1 NYS Grades 4-8 Teacher Growth Scores: From MGP to HEDI Ratings and Scores 2015-16 August 2016 Disclaimer If there are any discrepancies.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 New York State Education Department Interpreting and Using Your New York State-Provided Growth Scores August 2012.
Advertisements

A quick review of z-scores and how to understand them August 26, 2011
3.3 Measures of Position Measures of location in comparison to the mean. - standard scores - percentiles - deciles - quartiles.
New York State’s Teacher and Principal Evaluation System VOLUME I: NYSED APPR PLAN SUBMISSION “TIPS”
LCSD APPR Introduction: NYS Teaching Standards and the Framework for Teaching Rubric Welcome! Please be seated in the color-coded area (marked off by colored.
The Normal Curve. Probability Distribution Imagine that you rolled a pair of dice. What is the probability of 5-1? To answer such questions, we need to.
1. Statistics 2. Frequency Table 3. Graphical Representations  Bar Chart, Pie Chart, and Histogram 4. Median and Quartiles 5. Box Plots 6. Interquartile.
Unit 3 Section 3-4.
Week 7: Means, SDs & z-scores problem sheet (answers)
New York State District-wide Growth Goal Setting Process: Student Learning Objectives Webinar 1: December 2011.
1 New York State Education Department Using Growth Measures for Educator Evaluation August 2012.
Student Learning Objectives SLOs TST BOCES January 6, 2012.
Using VAM Data to Determine Points (50 % of the Total) toward Unified Single Rating Draft Procedures 11/21/2012 DRAFT DOCUMENT.
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation 2011–12 July 2012 PRESENTATION as of 7/9/12.
The APPR Process And BOCES. Sections 3012-c and 3020 of Education Law (as amended)  Annual Professional Performance Review (APPR) based on:  Student.
New York State Scores 2011—2012 School Year. Growth Ratings and Score Ranges Growth RatingDescriptionGrowth Score Range (2011–12) Highly EffectiveWell.
Western Suffolk BOCES Boot Camp Emma Klimek Eastern Suffolk BOCES 2012.
 z – Score  Percentiles  Quartiles  A standardized value  A number of standard deviations a given value, x, is above or below the mean  z = (score.
A tour of fundamental statistics introducing Basic Statistics.
© 2007 Board of Regents of the University of Wisconsin System, on behalf of the WIDA Consortium WIDA Focus on Growth H Gary Cook, Ph.D. WIDA.
Measures of Variability Percentile Rank. Comparison of averages is not enough. Consider a class with the following marks 80%, 80%, 80%, 90%, 20%, 70%,
Student Learning Objectives SLOs April 3, NY State’s Regulations governing teacher evaluation call for a “State-determined District-wide growth.
3 common measures of dispersion or variability Range Range Variance Variance Standard Deviation Standard Deviation.
IE(DS)1 Many of the measures that are of interest in psychology are distributed in the following manner: 1) the majority of scores are near the mean 2)
CHAPTER SEVEN ESTIMATION. 7.1 A Point Estimate: A point estimate of some population parameter is a single value of a statistic (parameter space). For.
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation 2011–12 July 2012 PRESENTATION as of 7/9/12.
APPR: Ready or Not Joan Townley & Andy Greene October 20 and 21, 2011.
Teacher Scores from the State
Preparing to Analyse Data C.Adithan Department of Pharmacology JIPMER Pondicherry
Advanced Math Topics Chapter 3 Review Please round all answers to the nearest hundredth and make an answer column, just like the test tomorrow!
© 2012, Community Training and Assistance Center *Please see caveat © 2012, Teaching Learning Solutions Student Learning Objectives OCM.
Understanding How Evaluations are Calculated Professional Practices, Measures of Student Learning/ Outcomes- Calculating Scores & Translating SLOs/SOOs.
EngageNY.org State-Calculated Growth Measures Overview July 2013 Tracy Rowlands & Deb Duffy.
1 New York State Growth Model for Educator Evaluation June 2012 PRESENTATION as of 6/14/12.
EngageNY.org State-Calculated Growth Measures Overview July 2013 Deb Duffy.
NYS Grades 9-12 School Growth Scores: From MGP and GRE to HEDI Ratings and Scores August 2016 Disclaimer If there are any discrepancies between.
Lecture #3 Tuesday, August 30, 2016 Textbook: Sections 2.4 through 2.6
Evaluation of Teachers & Principals (APPR)
SLOs for Group/Team, School, BOCES Results
Rounding Decimals.
VAM Primer.
Percent of Applicants and Enrollees by Range of Grade Point Averages, 2016 GPA Scores
Student Learning Objectives!
Estimation Procedures
Introduction to Statistics for the Social Sciences SBS200 - Lecture Section 001, Spring 2017 Room 150 Harvill Building 9:00 - 9:50 Mondays, Wednesdays.
DESCRIBING A POPULATION
The normal distribution
APPR Overview 3012c Draft Revision March 2012
Understanding How Evaluations are Calculated
New York State Education Department Using Growth Measures for Educator Evaluation August 2012.
Data Tables Packet #19.
Measuring Variation – The Five-Number Summary
Valley Central School District
NEWARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT APPR OVERVIEW
NEWARK CENTRAL SCHOOL DISTRICT APPR/EVALUATION OVERVIEW
Percent of Applicants and Enrollees by Range of Grade Point Averages, 2017 GPA Scores
Rounded Off Values Upper and Lower Bounds.
Percent of Applicants and Enrollees by Range of Grade Point Averages, 2018 GPA Scores
Central Square School District and CSTA
Homework: pg. 119 #3,4; pg. 122 #6-8 3.) A. Judy’s bone density score is about one and a half standard deviations below the average score for all women.
Rounding and estimating: Upper and Lower Bounds
Data Analysis Questions
pencil, red pen, highlighter, notebook, graphing calculator
Roadmap November 2011 Revised March 2012
A student learning objective is an academic goal for a teacher’s students that is set at the start of a course. It represents the most important learning.
Unit 2: Descriptive Statistics
Unit 2: Descriptive Statistics
Scatterplots and Two-Way Tables
Jeanne M. Burns, Ph.D. Louisiana Board of Regents May 22, 2013
Jeanne M. Burns, Ph.D. Louisiana Board of Regents May 22, 2013
Presentation transcript:

1 NYS Grades 4-8 Teacher Growth Scores: From MGP to HEDI Ratings and Scores August 2016 Disclaimer If there are any discrepancies between the language in these materials and the Statute, Regulations, or APPR Guidance, the Statute, Regulations, or APPR Guidance prevail.

2 2 How is MGP Classified into 3012-c Growth Rating for Teachers of Grades 4-8 in ? MGP Confidence Range Lower Limit > Mean (Lower Limit > 51) Lower Limit > Mean (Lower Limit > 51) Any Upper Limit < Mean (Upper Limit < 51) Upper Limit < Mean (Upper Limit < 51) Upper Limit (<.75 SD below mean) (Upper Limit < 43) Upper Limit (<.75 SD below mean) (Upper Limit < 43) Growth Rating Yes No Yes No Notes: SD = Standard Deviation Values are rounded to the nearest whole number. Highly Effective Well above state average for similar students (18-20 points) Highly Effective Well above state average for similar students (18-20 points) Effective Equal to state average for similar students (9-17 points) Effective Equal to state average for similar students (9-17 points) Developing Below average for similar students (3-8 points) Developing Below average for similar students (3-8 points) Ineffective Well below average for similar students (0-2 points) Ineffective Well below average for similar students (0-2 points) MGP ≥ 1.5 SD above mean (MGPs of 67 or higher) MGP ≥ 1.5 SD above mean (MGPs of 67 or higher) MGP > 1 SD below mean and MGP < 1.5 SD above mean (MGPs of 41 thru 66) MGP > 1 SD below mean and MGP < 1.5 SD above mean (MGPs of 41 thru 66) MGP > 1.5 SD below mean and MGP ≤ 1 SD below mean (MGPs of 35 thru 40) MGP > 1.5 SD below mean and MGP ≤ 1 SD below mean (MGPs of 35 thru 40) MGP ≤ 1.5 SD below mean (MGPs of 34 or lower) MGP ≤ 1.5 SD below mean (MGPs of 34 or lower)

3 3 How are 3012-c Growth Score Points * for Teachers Assigned in ? Point value of 3 includes teachers with MGPs in the Ineffective category but confidence ranges of 43 or above Point value of 9 includes teachers with MGPs in the Developing category but confidence ranges above state average Point value of 17 includes teachers with MGPs in the Highly Effective category but confidence ranges below state average HEDI Points * Min MGPMax MGP Highly Effective Well above state average for similar students (18-20 points) Highly Effective Well above state average for similar students (18-20 points) Ineffective Well below average for similar students (0-2 points) Ineffective Well below average for similar students (0-2 points) Effective Equal to state average for similar students (9-17 points) Effective Equal to state average for similar students (9-17 points) Developing Below average for similar students (3-8 points) Developing Below average for similar students (3-8 points) * Based on the arguments presented in the NYC arbitration proceeding held on May 30 and 31, 2013 and pursuant to his authority in Education Law §3012-c(2)(a), the Commissioner imposed new proportional scoring ranges for use in NYC for the , , and school years. Please see the following link for a description of these scoring ranges: appr-plan pdf. appr-plan pdf

4 4 How is MGP Classified into 3012-d Growth Rating for Teachers of Grades 4-8 in ? MGP Confidence Range Lower Limit > Mean (Lower Limit > 51) Lower Limit > Mean (Lower Limit > 51) Any Upper Limit < Mean (Upper Limit < 51) Upper Limit < Mean (Upper Limit < 51) Upper Limit (<.75 SD below mean) (Upper Limit < 43) Upper Limit (<.75 SD below mean) (Upper Limit < 43) Growth Rating Yes No Yes No Notes: SD = Standard Deviation Values are rounded to the nearest whole number. Highly Effective Well above state average for similar students (18-20 points) Highly Effective Well above state average for similar students (18-20 points) Effective Equal to state average for similar students (15-17 points) Effective Equal to state average for similar students (15-17 points) Developing Below average for similar students (13-14 points) Developing Below average for similar students (13-14 points) Ineffective Well below average for similar students (0-12 points) Ineffective Well below average for similar students (0-12 points) MGP ≥ 1.5 SD above mean (MGPs of 67 or higher) MGP ≥ 1.5 SD above mean (MGPs of 67 or higher) MGP > 1 SD below mean and MGP < 1.5 SD above mean (MGPs of 41 thru 66) MGP > 1 SD below mean and MGP < 1.5 SD above mean (MGPs of 41 thru 66) MGP > 1.5 SD below mean and MGP ≤ 1 SD below mean (MGPs of 35 thru 40) MGP > 1.5 SD below mean and MGP ≤ 1 SD below mean (MGPs of 35 thru 40) MGP ≤ 1.5 SD below mean (MGPs of 34 or lower) MGP ≤ 1.5 SD below mean (MGPs of 34 or lower)

5 5 How are 3012-d Growth Score Points * for Teachers Assigned in ? Point value of 13 includes teachers with MGPs in the Ineffective category but confidence ranges of 43 or above Point value of 15 includes teachers with MGPs in the Developing category but confidence ranges above state average Point value of 17 includes teachers with MGPs in the Highly Effective category but confidence ranges below state average HEDI Points * Min MGPMax MGP Highly Effective Well above state average for similar students (18-20 points) Highly Effective Well above state average for similar students (18-20 points) Ineffective Well below average for similar students (0-12 points) Ineffective Well below average for similar students (0-12 points) Effective Equal to state average for similar students (15-17 points) Effective Equal to state average for similar students (15-17 points) Developing Below average for similar students (13-14 points) Developing Below average for similar students (13-14 points)