State Tenure Law Changes and the Dearborn Teacher Evaluation Program Presented to the Dearborn Public Schools Board of Education: By Chris Sipperley and.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Discuss the charge of the Michigan Council for Educator Effectiveness (MCEE) Summarize the MCEE Interim Report Provide an Overview of the Pilot.

Advertisements

1.  Why and How Did We Get Here? o A New Instructional Model And Evaluation System o Timelines And Milestones o Our Work (Admin and Faculty, DET, DEAC,

Teacher Evaluation & Developing Goals Glenn Maleyko, Executive Director, Ph.D Haigh Elementary September 8, 2014.

David Guyette, Laura Six, Rose Drake and Paige Kinnaird

PSESD Teacher Principal Evaluation Project Regional Implementation Grants October 25, pm.

MICHIGAN’S EDUCATOR EVALUATION RULES, REGULATIONS, RIGHTS....OH MY... WHAT EVERY NEW TEACHER NEEDS TO KNOW! RULES, REGULATIONS, RIGHTS....OH MY... WHAT.

 Reading School Committee January 23,

Ramapo Teachers’ Association APPR Contractual Changes.

Guidance Evaluation SY12/13 Governing Board Presentation September 13, 2012.

TEACHER EVALUATIONS. REVIEW OF POLICY Classroom teaching must be observed using one of the four piloted observation tools: Charlotte Danielson’s.

Teacher and Administrator Evaluation Update Before The Board of Education By Ms. Christine Sipperley, Mr. Brian Whiston, and Dr. Glenn Maleyko. February.

October 12, College- and Career-Ready Expectations for All Students 2. State-Developed Differentiated Recognition, Accountability, and Support.

Division of School Effectiveness Office of Instructional Practices and Evaluations.

Union and District Relations: Positive Collaboration and Team Work Chris Sipperley, DFT President Glenn Maleyko, Executive Director, Ph.D Stout Middle.

April –February 2014 – Advisory Council (SCAC) convenes –April 2014 – NYSED School Counselor Summit –June 2014 – Summit recommendations to BOR.

Human Resources: Teacher Evaluation Presentation at U of M Dearborn May 30, 2013 BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Executive Director Staff and Student Services May.

TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING November 1 st, 2012 General Admin Meeting BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources John McKelvey– Teachscape November.

Michigan Tenure Law Update By Glenn Maleyko Director of Human Resources Dearborn Public Schools August 25th, 2011 General Administrators meeting.

Dearborn Teacher Evaluation Program By Chris Sipperley, Glenn Maleyko, and the evaluation committee November 14th, 2011.

TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING November 1 st, 2012 General Admin Meeting BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources John McKelvey– Teachscape November.

NEW TEACHER PRINCIPAL EVALUATION. RACE TO THE TOP AND ESSB 5895  The principles guiding the change  Quality teaching and leading is critically important.

Politics Everywhere Courageous Journey Presentation by: Glenn Maleyko, Ph.D February 4, 2014.

Factoring Growth Models Into Administrator and Teacher Performance Evaluations -- a presentation for -- Henderson, Mercer, and Warren Counties Regional.

Teacher and Principal Evaluations and Discipline Under Chapter 103.

Extraordinary Learning for All Goal 1: Ensure that each Madison student achieves annual academic growth Madison Gifted Committee

Teacher Evaluation System Administrator Training June 5 & 6, 2012.

Educator Effectiveness Evaluation MERA Fall 2013 Conference November 25-26, 2013 Frankenmuth, Michigan.

Teacher Evaluation Training Gen Admin Meeting December 1st, 2011 By Dr. Glenn Maleyko.

TPEP Teacher & Principal Evaluation System Prepared from resources from WEA & AWSP & ESD 112.

What you need to know about changes in state requirements for Teval plans.

Proposed Dearborn Teacher and Administrator Layoff, Recall and Placement Policies Dearborn Board of Education Meeting, May 13, 2013 By: Brian Whiston,

BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Board of Directors October 27,

Dearborn Administrator Evaluation Program Dearborn Board of Education Meeting, November 26, 2012 By Andy Denison, ADSA President and Glenn Maleyko, Director.

Overview of Proposed Educator Evaluation Regulations August 1, 2012.

BISD Update Teacher & Principal Evaluation Update Teacher Evaluation Committee November 29,

Teaching and Learning Courageous Journey Presentation by: Glenn Maleyko, Ph.D December 9, 2013.

TEACHER EVALUATION TRAINING June 19, 2012 Administrative Retreat BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human Resources June 19, 2012 Administrative Retreat.

New Hanover County Schools Board of Education Presentation November 19, 2013.

Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education September 2010.

Dearborn Administrator Evaluation Program The General Administrators Meeting: By Andy Denison, Glenn Maleyko, and the evaluation committee September 13.

UPDATE ON EDUCATOR EVALUATIONS IN MICHIGAN Directors and Representatives of Teacher Education Programs April 22, 2016.

Educator Evaluation Mary K. Bradley, Associate Director for School Operations Mark J. Weinberg, Director of Academic Performance & Accountability The Center.

MICHIGAN’S EDUCATOR EVALUATION RULES, REGULATIONS, RIGHTS....OH MY... WHAT EVERY NEW TEACHER NEEDS TO KNOW! RULES, REGULATIONS, RIGHTS....OH MY... WHAT.

APPR Annual Professional Performance Review Legislation: 3012-d Board of Education Work Session November 9, 2015.

TEACHER EVALUATION Presentation Before New Teaching Faculty May 8th and 9th, 2012 New Teacher PD at Dearborn High BY GLENN MALEYKO, Ph.D Director of Human.

Teacher Licensure PI-34 Wisconsin’s New Process. New License Stages  Initial Educator 5 year, non-renewable  Professional Educator 5 year renewable.

 Mark D. Reckase.  Student achievement is a result of the interaction of the student and the educational environment including each teacher.  Teachers.

District State of the Schools. AIM I: Unity-Bringing together students, parents, staff, and community 1.Increase the number of website hits by 50%, increase.

Evaluation of Teachers & Principals (APPR)

Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.

Introduction to the Marzano Teacher Evaluation Model for USD 259

Evaluations (TPGES) All Certified staff are held accountable to job specific domains and standards. SB 1 Changes The Process Starts with the PGP. Bourbon.

Licensed Educator Professional Growth and Evaluation Process

Rockingham County Public Schools Teacher Evaluation Process

Teacher Evaluation Work Group November 15, 2012

Value-Added Evaluation & Tenure Law

Teacher Evaluation Process Training

Glenn Maleyko, Superintendent, Ph.D

The General Administrators: September 12, 2013

Human Resources Presentation at AP Leadership Meeting

APPR Overview 3012c Draft Revision March 2012

TEACHER EVALUATION Updates

Valley Central School District

Overview of Implementation and Local Decisions

Teacher Evaluation Process Training

McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM

Dearborn Employee Evaluation Update

The best way to predict the future is to create it.

Pike County Schools Certified Evaluation Annual Training

McREL TEACHER EVALUATION SYSTEM

Presentation transcript:

State Tenure Law Changes and the Dearborn Teacher Evaluation Program Presented to the Dearborn Public Schools Board of Education: By Chris Sipperley and Glenn Maleyko, November 28th, 2011

Thank you to the following individuals/groups for their support  The Board of Education  Mr. Whiston, Superintendent  Chris Kenniburg  Joanne Oliver  Teacher Evaluation Committee

Teacher Evaluation Committee Rose Bruno Mark Palise Jill Chochol Shannon Peterson Andrew DenisonLinda Salamey Fatme Faraj Robert Seeterlin Hassane JaafarGail Shenkman Julia MaconochieChris Sipperley Glenn MaleykoMarc Zigterman

Legislative Changes  Rating scale on teacher evaluation must include 4 categories, ineffective, minimally effective, effective, and highly effective  Changes tenure to 5 years unless a probationary teacher receives highly effective on 3 annual evaluations, then it is 4 years for probation  Tenure only granted after receiving effective or highly effective rating 3 years in a row.

Legislative Changes  Evaluation must include student growth data by %, %, %.  Governor Committee on Student Growth and Assessment. -Convened on October 31st, Recommendations are due by April 2012.

Legislative Changes - Individualized Development Plan (IDP) goals developed for all 1st year probationary teachers or any teacher rated minimally effective or ineffective on most recent evaluation

Three Plans in the Dearborn Evaluation Tool  Teachers in Dearborn participate in the evaluation process by entering one of three plans.  Plan I for probationary teachers  Plan II for effective or highly effective tenured teachers  Plan III for ineffective or minimally effective tenured teachers).

Plan III  3 Phases  Awareness  Assistance (3 reporting stages recommended)  Disciplinary The recommended timeline is 30 calendar days between each phase and report

Observations  Performance evaluations must include classroom observations. MCL  The observer must review  1. Lesson Plans  2. State Curriculum Used  3. Pupil Engagement

Overall Changes  Attendance will be reported on the evaluation template for informational purposes.  Student Growth Must be a significant Part of the Evaluation  We have created a revised standards of effective teaching rubric to comply with the four ratings; highly effective, effective, minimally effective, and ineffective.

Training for Administrators/Teachers  General Administrator meetings.  Principal Forum Meetings  Other training sessions  Growth Data Training  Looking at the potential for training from Danielson’s group

State Waiver Applied for on November 1st, 2011

HR Website an-resources/hr-evaluation-tools