RACT 2 – Source Testing and Monitoring Requirements Air Quality Technical Advisory Committee August 4, 2016 Harrisburg, PA Tom Wolf, GovernorPatrick McDonnell,

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Proposed Rulemaking to Implement Provisions of the Federal Clean Air Interstate Rule Environmental Quality Board Meeting Harrisburg, PA February 20,
Advertisements

General Monitoring Requirements and Options
Harmonization of Part 60 and Part 75 CEM Requirements Robert Vollaro
Harmonization of Parts 60 and 75
EPA Proposed Mandatory Greenhouse Gas Reporting Rule.
MEETING YOUR MERCURY MONITORING REQUIREMENTS 2007 ARIPPA Conference Presented By: AVOGADRO Environmental Corporation.
Florida Department of Environmental Protection Mercury from Electric Utilities: Monitoring and Emission Reductions Greg DeAngelo & Tiffany Miesel Florida.
Tuesday Oct. 7, 2014 Implementation of Permit Exemption Criteria Category No. 38 Tom Corbett, Governor Dana Aunkst, Acting Secretary.
A History and Status of CEMS Applications in USEPA Regulations Dale Evarts US EPA December 16, 2002 Better Air Quality in Asian Cities 2002
© Copyright, Yorke Engineering, LLC 2008 SCAQMD Rule Compliance Steps and Strategies Judy Yorke and Bipul K. Saraf Yorke Engineering, LLC
Thomas K. Fidler Deputy Secretary for Waste, Air and Radiation Management Department of Environmental Protection Commonwealth of Pennsylvania Proposed.
Pennsylvania Draft Regulations for the Control of Mercury From Coal-fired Electric Generating Units Allegheny Section- AWMA Air Quality Issues Workshop.
Massachusetts’ Power Plant Mercury Regulations Sharon Weber Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection WESTAR Fall Business Meeting - September.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Washington July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Nevada May 2013.
Indiana New Source Review Reform Plantwide Applicability Limitations (PALs) IDEM/Office of Air Quality September 7, 2004.
| Philadelphia | Atlanta | Houston | Washington DC Boiler MACT Compliance Plans: Failure to Develop Plans Is Planning to Fail Susie Bowden|
Blue Skies Delaware; Clean Air for Life DNREC Air Quality Management Air Permitting Seminar Natural Minor Permitting.
Proposed Rulemaking 25 Pa. Code Chapter 121. General Provisions Chapter 127 Subchapter E. New Source Review John Slade, Chief Division of Permits Bureau.
PA Department of Environmental Protection Continuous Source Monitoring Manual (Manual, Revision 8)
Emission Update Verifiable Cost Task Force August 21, 2008.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Connecticut July 2013.
Massachusetts’ 4-Pollutant Power Plant Regulations Sharon Weber Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection Air Innovations Conference - August.
Title V Operating Permits: A Compliance and Enforcement Tool Candace Carraway US Environmental Protection Agency Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards.
Massachusetts Multi-pollutant Power Plant Regulations Sharon Weber Massachusetts Department of Environmental Protection EPA Utility MACT Working Group.
Hardware Analyser vs Software Analyser
Virtual Analyser What is it Have you ever faced an analyser failure that requires a plant shut down to repair & wished that there.
1 NSR Rule Review and Guidance 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121. General Provisions Chapter 127 Subchapter E. New Source Review The Allegheny Mountain Section.
1 Consideration of Final Rulemaking Clean Air Interstate Rule Environmental Quality Board Meeting Harrisburg, PA December 18, 2007 Joyce E. Epps Director,
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review North Dakota July 2013.
Public Workshop Proposed RACT/BARCT Determination for Stationary Spark-Ignited Internal Combustion Engines August 29, 2000 California Environmental Protection.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review New Hampshire July 2013.
1 Emission and Air Quality Trends Review Idaho July 2013.
Final Omitted Rulemakings Repeals: Employer Trip Reduction; Portable Fuel Container Requirements; and St. Joe Resources Company Emission Limits Environmental.
Main flexibility tools for the adoption of high emission standards for LCPs set in the new Industrial Emissions Directive Gerard Lipinski Coordinator of.
Proposed Rulemaking: Additional RACT Requirements for Major Sources of NO x and VOCs (25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 129) Environmental Quality Board November.
January 13, 2009 Tampa, Florida.  Add pollutants: PM2.5, CPM, NH3, TBAC  Expand summer season data requirements to the entire state  Lower hazardous.
Additional RACT Requirements for Major Sources of NO x and VOCs: Final Rule (25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 129) RACT Overview and Implementation Presentation.
Final Rulemaking: 25 Pa. Code Chapters 121 and 139 Measurement and Reporting of Condensable Particulate Matter Emissions Environmental Quality Board Meeting.
Petition to Adopt Regulations to Restrict Idling of Diesel-Powered Vehicles Environmental Quality Board Harrisburg, Pennsylvania January 17, 2006.
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Complying with Periodic Emissions Monitoring Requirements
Final Rulemaking Nonattainment Source Review 25 Pa. Code, Chapter 121
Consideration of Final Rulemaking
What is the Boiler NESHAP?
Clean Air Act (CAA) Purpose
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Air Permitting General Permit Updates
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Examples of 1-Hour NO2 and SO2 Modeling William O’Sullivan Director, Division of Air Quality NJDEP April 28, 2011.
Enforcing the NAAQS Case Study Sean Taylor
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Western Regional Haze Planning and
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Emission and Air Quality Trends Review
Presentation transcript:

RACT 2 – Source Testing and Monitoring Requirements Air Quality Technical Advisory Committee August 4, 2016 Harrisburg, PA Tom Wolf, GovernorPatrick McDonnell, Acting Secretary 1

On April 23, 2016, the Environmental Quality Board (EQB) promulgated additional reasonably available control technology (RACT 2) requirements for major stationary sources of nitrogen oxides (NOx) and volatile organic compounds (VOCs). An owner or operator must demonstrate compliance with the RACT 2 regulation by January 1, An owner or operator of air contamination sources with continuous emission monitoring systems (CEMS) must use them to demonstrate compliance. Background 2

Existing emission and data availability standards remain in place. An owner or operator of an air contamination source without CEMS must conduct source testing to demonstrate compliance. Background 3

For an air contamination source with CEMS, compliance will be demonstrated with a 30 operating day rolling average emission rate (except municipal waste combustors that will comply using a daily average). An operating day is defined as a 24-hour period beginning at 12:00 midnight during which the source operates at any time and produces emissions. It includes emissions that were generated during startups, shutdowns, or malfunctions. 30 Operating Day Rolling Average Emission Rate 4

Hourly data validation will be conducted as per the data reduction criteria contained in Revision No. 8 of the Department’s Continuous Source Monitoring Manual (Manual). Data substitution is required for invalid hours in which monitoring is required. Data availability criteria will apply for hours in which monitoring is required. 30 Operating Day Rolling Average Emission Rate 5

The 30 operating day rolling average emission rate will be calculated as follows: A.Sum the total pounds of pollutant emitted from the combustion unit for the current operating day and the previous 29 operating days. B.Sum the total heat input to the combustion unit in million Btu (MBtu) for the current operating day and the previous 29 operating days. C.Divide A (above) by B (above) to determine the emissions rate (lbs/MBtu). 30 Operating Day Rolling Average Emission Rate 6

An owner or operator of an air contamination source with CEMS will submit a monitoring plan (MP) in the Department’s CEM Data Processing System (CEMDPS). Each major source category requires slightly different content to be included in the MP. Monitoring Plan 7

For a combustion unit or process heater, include the following in the MP: – A new emission result and CEMS for hourly mass emissions (lbs), hourly heat input (MBtu), and hourly (lbs/MBtu). – A new emission result and CEMS for allowable hourly emission rate (lbs/MBtu) for those that have a variable emission standard. – Each CEMS should be associated with the appropriate analyzer(s). Monitoring Plan 8

For a combustion turbine, include the following in the MP: – A new emission result and CEMS for hourly concentration emissions 15% O2). – A new emission result and CEMS for allowable hourly emission rate 15% O2) and hourly heat input (MBtu) for those that have a variable emission standard. – Each CEMS should be associated with the appropriate analyzer(s). Monitoring Plan 9

For a Portland cement kiln, include the following in the MP: – A new emission result and CEMS for hourly mass emissions (lbs), hourly clinker production (tons), and hourly (lbs/ton-clinker). – Each CEMS should be associated with the appropriate analyzer(s). Monitoring Plan 10

For a municipal waste combustor, only submit a monitoring plan if a new daily average NOx emission standard must be added. Monitoring Plan 11

An owner or operator of an air contamination source with CEMS will submit a certification test protocol and certification test report in the CEMDPS once the MP has been approved. A data acquisition and accuracy check must be successfully completed. Sample hours of emissions data (under various scenarios) will be required. An acceptable sample report must be submitted in the CEMDPS for any new emission results. Performance Testing and Certification 12

Upon Department certification, the owner or operator of an air contamination source with CEMS will submit hourly emissions data to the Department. Data will be required starting with the first quarter of Quarterly Emission Reports 13

For a combustion unit or process heater, submit hourly mass emissions (lbs) and hourly heat input (MBtu). The owner or operator will also submit the allowable hourly emission rate (lbs/MBtu) for sources that have a variable emission standard. – Department software will calculate a 30 operating day rolling average emission rate (lbs/MBtu) for each operating day. The software will also calculate the allowable for sources that have a variable emission standard. Quarterly Emission Reports 14

For a combustion turbine, submit the hourly concentration 15% O2). The owner or operator will also submit the allowable hourly concentration 15% O2) and hourly heat input (MBtu) for sources that have a variable emission standard. – Department software will calculate a 30 operating day rolling average emission rate (lbs/MBtu) for each operating day. The software will also calculate the allowable for sources that have a variable emission standard. Quarterly Emission Reports 15

For a Portland cement kiln, submit hourly mass emissions (lbs) and hourly clinker production (tons). – Department software will calculate a 30 operating day rolling average emission rate (lbs/ton-clinker) for each operating day. For municipal waste combustors, submit average hourly concentration emissions 7% O2). Quarterly Emission Reports 16

The emission limit shall be determined on a total heat input fuel weighted basis using the equation in RACT 2. A fuel representing < 1% of the unit’s annual fuel consumption on a heat input basis is excluded when determining the emission limit. The owner or operator of the unit must demonstrate that this exclusion applies over a 12-calendar month period, rolling by 1-month. – For example, the exclusion would exist for the month of July if the fuel met this criteria from August of the preceding year to July of the current year. Units Firing Multiple Fuels 17

Corroborating information should be included in the cover letter of the quarterly emissions report if the exclusion is utilized. The owner or operator of a unit may petition the Department to include a fuel representing < 1% of the unit’s annual fuel consumption on a heat input basis in the emission limit. Units Firing Multiple Fuels 18

You may use the CEMDPS to demonstrate compliance on a facility-wide basis if the following criteria are met: – All underlying emission results, CEMS, and analyzers conform to the requirements of the Manual. – The Department may approve the use of analyzers that have been “certified” under an applicable Federal program. Additional testing may be required. Those not meeting the above must submit a quarterly compliance report to the applicable DEP Regional Office to demonstrate compliance. Emissions Averaging Plans 19

All demonstrations of compliance on a system-wide basis should be submitted as a quarterly compliance report to the applicable DEP Regional Office. If more than one DEP Region is involved, a copy of the report must be submitted to each. Emissions Averaging Plans 20

Monitoring and testing must be conducted in accordance with a Department approved emissions source test that meets the requirements of Chapter 139, Subchapter A (relating to sampling and testing methods and procedures). Source testing must be conducted one time in each 5-year calendar period. Source Testing Requirements 21

The owner or operator of a unit may reference a previously approved test protocol (i.e. no new protocol needed) if the following conditions are met: – They agree to meet all conditions of acceptance of the protocol. – Nothing has changed since Department approval was granted (i.e. same relevant testing requirements, same process operating conditions, same testing subcontractor, etc.). Source Testing Requirements 22

Division of Source Testing and Monitoring Program Contact Charles J. Zadakis, Program Manager Department of Environmental Protection Harrisburg, PA Telephone: (717)