The XXII International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics in Santa Fe, New Mexico, June 13-19, 2006 The T2K 2KM Water Cherenkov Detector M.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
Advertisements

11-September-2005 C2CR2005, Prague 1 Super-Kamiokande Atmospheric Neutrino Results Kimihiro Okumura ICRR Univ. of Tokyo ( 11-September-2005.
Super-Kamiokande Introduction Contained events and upward muons Updated results Oscillation analysis with a 3D flux Multi-ring events  0 /  ratio 3 decay.
MINERvA Overview MINERvA is studying neutrino interactions in unprecedented detail on a variety of different nuclei Low Energy (LE) Beam Goals: – Study.
The JPARC Neutrino Project – a European Perspective Dave Wark University of Sussex/RAL DESY October 6, 2003.
Near Detector Working Group for ISS Neutrino Factory Scoping Study Meeting 24 January 2006 Paul Soler University of Glasgow/RAL.
Sinergia strategy meeting of Swiss neutrino groups Mark A. Rayner – Université de Genève 10 th July 2014, Bern Hyper-Kamiokande 1 – 2 km detector Hyper-Kamiokande.
Off-axis Simulations Peter Litchfield, Minnesota  What has been simulated?  Will the experiment work?  Can we choose a technology based on simulations?
Neutrino-CH 19 October 2006 Alain Blondel HARP and K2K 1. The K2K experiments 2. beam related uncertainties 3. HARP and results 4. K2K and results 5. conclusions.
Performance of a Water Cherenkov Detector for e Appearance Shoei NAKAYAMA (ICRR, University of Tokyo) November 18-19, 2005 International Workshop on a.
NuMI Offaxis Near Detector and Backgrounds Stanley Wojcicki Stanford University Cambridge Offaxis workshop January 12, 2004.
Alain Blondel Detectors UNO (400kton Water Cherenkov) Liquid Ar TPC (~100kton)
Background Understanding and Suppression in Very Long Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments with Water Cherenkov Detector Chiaki Yanagisawa Stony Brook.
T2K experiment at J-PARC Epiphany 2010D. Kiełczewska1 For T2K Collaboration Danuta Kiełczewska Warsaw University & Sołtan Institute for Nuclear Studies.
New results from K2K Makoto Yoshida (IPNS, KEK) for the K2K collaboration NuFACT02, July 4, 2002 London, UK.
Expected Sensitivity of the NO A  Disappearance Analysis Kirk Bays (Caltech) for the NO A Collaboration April 14, 2013 APS DPF Denver Kirk Bays, APS DPF.
Minnesota Simulations Dan Hennessy, Peter Litchfield, Leon Mualem  Improvements to the Minnesota analysis  Comparison with the Stanford analysis  Optimisation.
5/1/20110 SciBooNE and MiniBooNE Kendall Mahn TRIUMF For the SciBooNE and MiniBooNE collaborations A search for   disappearance with:
Recent results from the K2K experiment Yoshinari Hayato (KEK/IPNS) for the K2K collaboration Introduction Summary of the results in 2001 Overview of the.
Present status of oscillation studies by atmospheric neutrino experiments ν μ → ν τ 2 flavor oscillations 3 flavor analysis Non-standard explanations Search.
Resolving neutrino parameter degeneracy 3rd International Workshop on a Far Detector in Korea for the J-PARC Neutrino Beam Sep. 30 and Oct , Univ.
Status of the NO ν A Near Detector Prototype Timothy Kutnink Iowa State University For the NOvA Collaboration.
The Earth Matter Effect in the T2KK Experiment Ken-ichi Senda Grad. Univ. for Adv. Studies.
Apr. 4, KEK JHF-SK neutrino workshop 1 e appearance search Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK - IPNS)
Long Baseline Experiments at Fermilab Maury Goodman.
Dec. 13, 2001Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Neutrino and Anti-Neutrino Cross Sections and CP Phase Measurement Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK-IPNS) NuInt01,
The NOvA Experiment Ji Liu On behalf of the NOvA collaboration College of William and Mary APS April Meeting April 1, 2012.
Teppei Katori Indiana University Rencontres de Moriond EW 2008 La Thuile, Italia, Mar., 05, 08 Neutrino cross section measurements for long-baseline neutrino.
1 DISCOVERY OF ATMOSPHERIC MUON NEUTRINO OSCILLATIONS Prologue First Hint in Kamiokande Second Hint in Kamiokande Evidence found in Super-Kamiokande Nov-12.
Preliminary Results from the MINER A Experiment Deborah Harris Fermilab on behalf of the MINERvA Collaboration.
Counting Electrons to Measure the Neutrino Mass Hierarchy J. Brunner 17/04/2013 APC.
Yoshihisa OBAYASHI, Oct. Neutrino Oscillation Experiment between JHF – Super-Kamiokande Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (Kamioka Observatory, ICRR)
NuMI Off-Axis Experiment Alfons Weber University of Oxford & Rutherford Appleton Laboratory EPS2003, Aachen July 19, 2003.
Search for Electron Neutrino Appearance in MINOS Mhair Orchanian California Institute of Technology On behalf of the MINOS Collaboration DPF 2011 Meeting.
NuFact02, July 2002, London Takaaki Kajita, ICRR, U.Tokyo For the K2K collab. and JHF-Kamioka WG.
Road Map of Neutrino Physics in Japan Largely my personal view Don’t take too seriously K. Nakamura KEK NuFact04 July 30, 2004.
Neutrino Oscillations at Super-Kamiokande Soo-Bong Kim (Seoul National University)
Accelerator-based Long-Baseline Neutrino Oscillation Experiments Kam-Biu Luk University of California, Berkeley and Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory.
Low Z Detector Simulations
1 Status of the T2K long baseline neutrino oscillation experiment Atsuko K. Ichikawa (Kyoto univeristy) For the T2K Collaboration.
2 July 2002 S. Kahn BNL Homestake Long Baseline1 A Super-Neutrino Beam from BNL to Homestake Steve Kahn For the BNL-Homestake Collaboration Presented at.
Recent Results from Super-K Kate Scholberg, Duke University June 7, 2005 Delphi, Greece.
T2K Status Report. The Accelerator Complex a Beamline Performance 3 First T2K run completed January to June x protons accumulated.
CP phase and mass hierarchy Ken-ichi Senda Graduate University for Advanced Studies (SOKENDAI) &KEK This talk is based on K. Hagiwara, N. Okamura, KS PLB.
April 26, McGrew 1 Goals of the Near Detector Complex at T2K Clark McGrew Stony Brook University Road Map The Requirements The Technique.
1 A study to clarify important systematic errors A.K.Ichikawa, Kyoto univ. We have just started not to be in a time blind with construction works. Activity.
Search for active neutrino disappearance using neutral-current interactions in the MINOS long-baseline experiment 2008/07/31 Tomonori Kusano Tohoku University.
Cherenkov Tracking Calorimeters D. Casper University of California, Irvine.
1 Translation from Near to Far at K2K T.Kobayashi IPNS, KEK for K2K beam monitor group (K.Nishikawa, T.Hasegawa, T.Inagaki, T.Maruyama, T.Nakaya,....)
Measuring Neutrino Oscillations with the T2K Experiment Alfons Weber University of Oxford STFC/RAL Dec-2011.
Extrapolation Techniques  Four different techniques have been used to extrapolate near detector data to the far detector to predict the neutrino energy.
XLVth Rencontres de Moriond Status of the T2K experiment K. Matsuoka (Kyoto Univ.) for the T2K collaboration Contents Physics motivations (neutrino oscillation)
Hiroyuki Sekiya ICHEP2012 Jul 5 The Hyper-Kamiokande Experiment -Neutrino Physics Potentials- ICHEP2012 July Hiroyuki Sekiya ICRR,
Neutrino Interaction measurement in K2K experiment (1kton water Cherenkov detector) Jun Kameda(ICRR) for K2K collaboration RCCN international workshop.
Y.Ge, A.Meregaglia, A.Rubbia ETH Zürich ROOT Workshop 05, September Qscan: A QtROOT Based Software for Events Reconstruction in LAr TPC Detectors.
Observation Gamma rays from neutral current quasi-elastic in the T2K experiment Huang Kunxian for half of T2K collaboration Mar. 24, Univ.
 CC QE results from the NOvA prototype detector Jarek Nowak and Minerba Betancourt.
T2K Experiment Results & Prospects Alfons Weber University of Oxford & STFC/RAL For the T2K Collaboration.
Status of Super-Kamiokande, K2K and JHF ACFA LC Yuichi Oyama (KEK) for Super-Kamiokande collaboration, K2K collaboration and JHF collaboration.
Precision Measurement of Muon Neutrino Disappearance with T2K Alex Himmel Duke University for the The T2K Collaboration 37 th International Conference.
T2K Oscillation Strategies Kevin McFarland (University of Rochester) on behalf of the T2K Collaboration Neutrino Factories 2010 October 24 th 2010.
NNN 2011: The d Experiment Joshua Albert Duke University For the T2K Collaboration November 8, 2011.
Systematics Sanghoon Jeon.
Preliminary T2K beam simulation using the G4 2km detector
Physics with the ICARUS T1800 detector
Yoshihisa OBAYASHI (KEK - IPNS)
Naotoshi Okamura (YITP) NuFact05
Impact of neutrino interaction uncertainties in T2K
Davide Franco for the Borexino Collaboration Milano University & INFN
Conventional Neutrino Beam Experiment : JHF – Super-Kamiokande
Presentation transcript:

The XXII International Conference on Neutrino Physics and Astrophysics in Santa Fe, New Mexico, June 13-19, 2006 The T2K 2KM Water Cherenkov Detector M. Fechner (CEA-DAPNIA), N. Tanimoto (Duke University), for the T2K experiment 2KM working group T2K is a next generation long-baseline oscillation experiment that will start in 2009, using an intense µ  beam produced at J-PARC (Japan). The far detector is Super-Kamiokande (SK), the 50 kt water Cherenkov detector located 295 km from J-PARC ; the beam will be 2.5 ◦ off-axis to the detector, with a peak neutrino energy of 700 MeV. The goals of T2K are the precise measurement of ∆m² 23 and  23 from µ disappearance, and the search for e appearance, which would bring new information on  13 the last remaining unknown mixing angle. A 1kton water Cherenkov detector located 2 km away from the neutrino source has many advantages: ● Same target as SK ● Same algorithms / techniques for event reconstruction ● Same fluxes 2 km away from the the target there is about one interaction per accelerator spill and ~200,000 charged current interactions/100 tons/year. Signal events are oscillated e CC events. We select single-ring, e-like events, that pass extra e/    separation cuts. There are 3 types of background : Intrinsic beam e contamination (irreducible) Mis-identified NC   events Mis-identified   CC events Very similar distributions at SK and 2KM ! To show the effectivness of the 2KM we can do a Simple scaling without any corrections: Use just spherical attenuation and ratio of fiducial masses N sk = N 2km (M sk /M 2km )(L 2km /L SK ) 2 ( sk / 2km ) The systematics that remain are : - extrapolation/efficiency differences (~ 5%) - energy scale (2.1% at each detector) - fiducial volume (~4% total) Then, Using the 2KM we can predict what we will see at SK Assumed to be 1 Total systematic error is 8.0%. There is excellent agreement between SK and 2KM over a wide energy range! This is conservative we know how to reduce the total error to ~5%. 295km Super Kamiokande Tokyo Nagoy a Osak a Liquid Argon Water Cherenkov MRD  beam  beam The 2KM detector consists of three parts : Liquid Argon detector Water Cherenkov detector Muon range detector 2km detector site Unoscillated neutrino flux spectra at 280 m, 2 km and 295 km. The fluxes have been normalized to each other. SK (295km) 2km 280m SK (295km) 2km 280m  e E (GeV ) A detector located 2 km away from the T2K neutrino source will see the same neutrino flux spectrum as Super-Kamiokande and measure the background of electron neutrino appearance with the same nuclear target and the same detector technology as Super-Kamiokande. T2K Overview 2KM Water Cherenkov Detector 2KM WC Events Look Like SK Backgrounds for e Appearance Extrapolation From 2KM to SK SK (20” PMTs) 2km 8” PMTs The 2KM WC detector has been optimized to respond like SK. A full GEANT4 simulation was developed and tuned to K2K-1kton data. To match SK performance, a fine pixelisation with ~5600 8” PMT is needed A Simulated   in the 2KM(left) and SK(right) J-PARC = Japan Proton Accelerator Research Complex 2KM Flux is Almost the Same as SK Background BG: NC  0 Expected Signal Measuring e Appearance Electrons Signal: E (GeV ) J-Parc 5660 PMTs PMTs Most Serious BG The TOTAL BG error should be ~< 10%. To maximize potential we should control the extrapolation errors to <~ 5%. Signal+Background Total Background Background from  We should measure BG in beam before oscillations.