Peer Observation & Review of Teaching (P.O.R.T.) By (presenter) for (identity of group) (date and venue)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Stage One: Registrant Mentor, (N.M.C., 2006).
Advertisements

PQF Induction: Small group delivery or 1-1 session.
5th International CDIO Conference Singapore, June , The Role of Peers in the Assessment of Students’ CDIO Skills Ivan D’haese Johan D’heer.
Evaluating Teaching and Learning Linda Carey Centre for Educational Development Queen’s University Belfast 1.
Workplace-based Assessment. Overview Types of assessment Assessment for learning Assessment of learning Purpose of WBA Benefits of WBA Miller’s Pyramid.
Peer observation, feedback and reflection for online practice Mark H. Jones, Faculty of Science & eSTEeM.
Introducing the New College Scheme Seevic Performance Appraisal.
1 Peer Review of Teaching K.P. Kwan & J. Jones, EDU etkpkwan etjjones x 6287 x6320 EDU Seminar 7 May 1999 (Friday)
Stage One: Registrant, (N.M.C., 2006). Student Handout. (May, 2008).
How to teach in everyday clinical practice The Reverend Dr David Taylor Senior Tutor And Deputy Director School of Medical Education University of Liverpool.
Session Five: Evaluating learning and teaching in the classroom Short Course in Learning and Teaching in the Classroom Janet Holmshaw and Jeff Sapiro Middlesex.
Stage 1 : Preparation for Observation Within effective Peer-to-Peer observation, preparation is vital - to help clarify the learning goals for the process.
Mentor Workshop: Assessing Learners Facilitated by a Practice Education Facilitator.
ASSESSMENT OF CORE SKILLS/ GENERAL EDUCATION OUTCOMES Angelina Hill, PhD Associate Director, Office of Academic Assessment.
South Western School District Differentiated Supervision Plan DRAFT 2010.
The Griffith PRO- Teaching Project A Process for Peer Review and Observation of Teaching.
What Ofsted does to reach a judgement about teaching and what can be learned from this by academies?
Peer Review: Promoting a quality culture Associate Professor Gordon Suddaby & Associate Professor Mark Brown Massey University New Zealand Contact details:
Facilitating Learning in Professional Experience: Mentoring for Success Module 1 - An Introduction.
Presenter Shereen Khan August 17 th,  A school based activity that engages teachers in meaningful, non-judgmental and on-going instructional dialogue.
 I can examine the benefits of peer observation.  I can demonstrate understanding of the PGES protocols for the peer observation process.
Warilla Public School Journey of Literacy Development with Primary Students.
Mentoring and Teaching Pat Rogers, Associate Vice President: Teaching and Learning Wilfrid Laurier University Annual Academic Administrators Workshop Balsillie.
Class Observer & Feedback Training Cass Breen & Marco Macchitella.
Analysis of Research and Impact on Practice, Action Planning Monday December 13th.
Copyright © Springer Publishing Company, LLC. All Rights Reserved. BECOMING A SCHOLAR IN NURSING EDUCATION – Chapter 16 –
Queen’s Teaching Awards QUB Teaching Awards Aims of the Briefing Session To raise awareness of the Queen’s Teaching Awards Scheme To encourage colleagues.
Peer Observation of Teaching (POT) Ian Solomonides.
‘How flipping difficult can it be?’ - an update
‘Time to TaLK’ Finham Park School.
Subject specialist teaching
“PRACTICE BASED ASSESSMENTS” An update for 2017/18
SCHOOL BASED SELF – EVALUATION
LEARNING FOCUSED RELATIONSHIPS
Socrative – Join room “Lessontoolbox”
Queen’s Teaching Awards 2017
UCL Peer Dialogue Scheme
Support for English, maths and ESOL Module 5 Integrating English, maths and ICT into apprenticeship programmes.
How is your teaching recognized and rewarded in CBS? Dec 12, 2016
Arranging your experiential placements
NQT Mentor and Tutor Seminar
Instructional Coaching Samir Omara RELO-NileTESOL Trainer s. m
ASSESSMENT OF STUDENT LEARNING
Introduction to Coaching Skills for Senior School Leaders
Pauline Walker Headteacher
ADSHE South West Regional Meeting Professional Peer Supervision - Ground Rules and Approaches Taken from ADSHE Professional Tutor Handbook Led by Kelly.
Peer Observation & Review of Teaching (P.O.R.T.)
Aurora Briefing for participants 2018 to 2019
Ed 11: Beginning Field Experience
Extreme Mentoring 16th July 2018
Arranging your experiential placements
VASSP Ten Top Tips ~ Difficult Conversations with staff
Victorian Association of State Secondary Principals
School’s Cool Makes a Difference!
Reflection & Discussion
Practice of Teaching Part 1
Information and Guidelines booklets
Practice of Teaching Part 1
Learning Intentions We are learning to (W.A.L.T.):
Course Evaluation Ad-Hoc Committee Recommendations
Understanding Standards: Nominee Training Event
TEACHNG AWARDS 2019 BRIEFING SESSION
TEACHNG AWARDS 2018 BRIEFING SESSION
Implementation data will continue to be collected
Ongoing Reporting Guiding Principle 5
Catherine Beswick University of Nottingham April 2019
Maximising your progress on your professional placements
Mentor training.
New Professional Standards for Lecturers – SO WHAT?
Arranging your experiential placements
Presentation transcript:

Peer Observation & Review of Teaching (P.O.R.T.) By (presenter) for (identity of group) (date and venue)

The aim of today is to answer the following questions …  What can be observed and reviewed?  What procedure can we use?  How do we give appropriate feedback? ACU PORT Program - Introductory Session2

P.O.R.T. aims to …  be a scholarly process;  to engender group and individual reflection on teaching;  provide genuine peer-to-peer dialogue;  emphasize development and collective responsibility;  be supportive;  avoid issues of duality (good/bad, praising/fault- finding);  allow for team reflection but also individual confidentiality;  be light on paperwork; and  enable the dissemination of good practice. ACU PORT Program - Introductory Session 3

4

CharacteristicEvaluation modelReview Model Developmental model Who does it & to whom? Senior staff observe other staff Ed Designers/expert teachers observe practitioners Teachers observe each other Purpose Performance, probation, promotion etc Competency & assessment Engagement in discussion about teaching; reflection OutcomeReport/judgement Report/action plan; pass/fail Analysis, discussion, reflection Status of evidence AuthorityExpert diagnosis Peer shared perception Relationship of observer to observed Power Expertise/ mentor & mentee Equality/mutuality Confidentiality Between manager, observer and observed Between observer and the observed, examiner Between observer & observed; with PORT colleagues Judgement Pass/fail, score, quality assessment, worthy/unworthy How to improve; pass/fail Non-judgemental, constructive feedback Risks Alienation, lack of co- operation, opposition No shared ownership, lack of impact Complacency, conservatism, unfocused 5

The Scope of Peer Observation & Review of Teaching  Learning Outcomes  Choice of materials and readings  Learning tasks and formats  Classroom performance  Development and marking of assessment  Clinical, laboratory or field work  Counseling of students  Supervision of graduate students  On-line delivery  Contributions to the scholarly discourse on learning and teaching  (See appendix 2 in the Manual) ACU PORT Program - Introductory Session6

Operating Models … ACU PORT Program - Introductory Session7

Sample Procedure … 1.Development/Introductory Session (1 hour) - today! 2.Pre-observation meeting (30 mins) – observer(s) and observed meet to discuss what is being observed and the use of pro forma 3.Observation (1 hour) – pro forma can be used, or open responses could be given – need to agree beforehand 4.Post-meeting (30 mins) – as soon as possible (but within 1 or 2 days), observer(s) and observed meet to discuss feedback ACU PORT Program - Introductory Session8

Sample Procedure (cont.)… 5.Individual action plan (30 mins) – based on meeting observed completes brief action plan, focusing on 1 or 2 areas (optional) 6.Team discussion/debrief session at end of semester (1 hour) – after all observations members meet to reflect, highlight good practice and discuss any action necessary. 7.Reports – PORT coordinator compiles short report to Faculty Board highlighting good practice and areas for team development or action and your names. ACU PORT Program - Introductory Session9

 Think back to some time when you had to give or you received some difficult feedback. This may have been about conduct, performance, attitude etc. Try and think of a time when this process went particularly badly, when as a give or receiver of feedback the situation was uncomfortable, or one of the parties was upset, disheartened or even aggressive.  Think back to some other time when you had to give or you received some difficult feedback, but when this process went particularly well ; when as a giver or receiver of feedback the situation was resolved in a good natured or constructive way. Giving and Receiving Feedback … ACU PORT Program - Introductory Session10

When feedback goes wrong! ACU PORT Program - Introductory Session11

Feedback Session*  As soon as possible  Allow the observee to speak first  Allow the observee to raise problems & solutions first  Behaviour not the person  Be specific  Focus on good practice & areas for development  Focus on no more than 5 areas, with no more than 2 as ‘key’ * There is also advice on feedback in your PORT manuals ACU PORT Program - Introductory Session12

Dangers When Giving Feedback …  Lack of formalisation – fades under pressures of workload.  Lack of feedback – no individual or group benefit.  Lack of coordination – no insights shared, practice disseminated, death by inertia.  Lack of support – sabotage, no collegiality.  Lack of scope – focuses only on classroom performance.  Lack of purpose – becomes perfunctory. ACU PORT Program - Introductory Session13

What now? 1.Decide which team method you will adopt? 2.Discuss within your teams “what” you want observed? 3.Set dates and times. 4.Any other issues? ACU PORT Program - Introductory Session 14

ACU PORT Program - Introductory Session15 Any finalquestions?