Date of download: 9/19/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparative Analysis of Different Configuration Domestic Refrigerators: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2015;137(6): doi: / Model domestic refrigerators: (a) Empty model refrigerator (BMF), (b) loaded model refrigerator (TMF), and (c) loaded model refrigerator (SMF) Figure Legend:

Date of download: 9/19/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparative Analysis of Different Configuration Domestic Refrigerators: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2015;137(6): doi: / Comparison between experimental [20] and predicted temperature at 0.5 m height Figure Legend:

Date of download: 9/19/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparative Analysis of Different Configuration Domestic Refrigerators: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2015;137(6): doi: / Comparison between experimental [40] and predicted velocity (U y ) at 0.5 m height Figure Legend:

Date of download: 9/19/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparative Analysis of Different Configuration Domestic Refrigerators: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2015;137(6): doi: / Predicted temperature in empty cabinets of model refrigerators: (a) TMF, (b) BMF, and (c) SMF Figure Legend:

Date of download: 9/19/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparative Analysis of Different Configuration Domestic Refrigerators: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2015;137(6): doi: / Predicted cooling effectiveness in empty cabinets of model refrigerators: (a) TMF, (b) BMF, and (c) SMF Figure Legend:

Date of download: 9/19/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparative Analysis of Different Configuration Domestic Refrigerators: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2015;137(6): doi: / Predicted cooling effectiveness in empty cabinets of model refrigerator with simulated opening: (a) BMF, (b) TMF, and (c) SMF Figure Legend:

Date of download: 9/19/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparative Analysis of Different Configuration Domestic Refrigerators: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2015;137(6): doi: / Transient response averaged over different compartment of the model refrigerator. (a) Average compartment temperature and (b) average compartment cooling effectiveness. Figure Legend:

Date of download: 9/19/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparative Analysis of Different Configuration Domestic Refrigerators: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2015;137(6): doi: / Predicted cooling effectiveness of loaded model refrigerator: (a) TMF, (b) BMF, and (c) SMF Figure Legend:

Date of download: 9/19/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparative Analysis of Different Configuration Domestic Refrigerators: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2015;137(6): doi: / Predicted cooling effectiveness of the load (chicken) in model refrigerator: (a) BMF, (b) TMF, and (c) SMF Figure Legend:

Date of download: 9/19/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparative Analysis of Different Configuration Domestic Refrigerators: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2015;137(6): doi: / Predicted cooling load in model empty refrigerator: (a) freezer compactment, (b) fresh food compactment, and (c) total cooling load Figure Legend:

Date of download: 9/19/2016 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved. From: Comparative Analysis of Different Configuration Domestic Refrigerators: A Computational Fluid Dynamics Approach J. Energy Resour. Technol. 2015;137(6): doi: / Predicted cooling load in model refrigerator with chicken load: (a) freezer compactment, (b) fresh food compactment, and (c) total cooling load Figure Legend: