CS182 Leon Barrett with slides inspired by Eva Mok and Joe Makin April 25, 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
CSCTR Session 8 Dana Retová. group at UC Berkeley & Uni of Hawaii Nancy Chang Benjamin Bergen Jerome Feldman, … General assumption Semantic relations.
Advertisements

Embodied Compositional Semantics Ellen Dodge
Term 2 Week 3 Semantics.
The Neural Basis of Thought and Language Final Review Session.
CIS 630 Slides for March Schedule We missed two classes. I will try to make up in April Spring break– Week of March 8 Your presentations I would.
CS 182 Sections slides created by: Eva Mok modified by jgm April 26, 2006.
CS 182 Sections Eva Mok April 21, 2004.
1 Kakia Chatsiou Department of Language and Linguistics University of Essex XLE Tutorial & Demo LG517. Introduction to LFG Introduction.
Lecture 1 Introduction: Linguistic Theory and Theories
Phrases and Sentences: Grammar
PS: Introduction to Psycholinguistics Winter Term 2005/06 Instructor: Daniel Wiechmann Office hours: Mon 2-3 pm Phone:
Introduction to Embodied Construction Grammar March 4, 2003 Ben Bergen
Embodiment & Compositionality Two fundamental, but unreconciled, aspects of human language: embodiment and compositionality Embodiment – the realization.
SYNTAX.
SYNTAX 1 NOV 9, 2015 – DAY 31 Brain & Language LING NSCI Fall 2015.
September 26, : Grammars and Lexicons Lori Levin.
Chapter 3 Language Acquisition: A Linguistic Treatment Jang, HaYoung Biointelligence Laborotary Seoul National University.
Lec. 10.  In this section we explain which constituents of a sentence are minimally required, and why. We first provide an informal discussion and then.
Parsing with Context Free Grammars. Slide 1 Outline Why should you care? Parsing Top-Down Parsing Bottom-Up Parsing Bottom-Up Space (an example) Top -
The Neural Basis of Thought and Language Final Review Session.
The Neural Basis of Thought and Language Final Review Session.
slides derived from those of Eva Mok and Joe Makin March 21, 2007
CS 182 Leon Barrett Thanks to Eva Mok and Joe Makin Q:What did the Hollywood film director say after he finished making a movie about myelin? A:“That’s.
The Neural Basis of Thought and Language Week 14.
CS 182 Sections Leon Barrett with slides inspired by Eva Mok and Joe Makin April 18, 2007.
PHL 251 ACADEMIC PROFESSOR/TUTORIALRANK For more course Tutorials
The Neural Basis of Thought and Language Week 14.
A Compositional Constructional Analysis of ‘Hitting’ Verb Argument Realization Patterns and Their Meanings Ellen K. Dodge International Computer Science.
The Neural Basis of Thought and Language Week 12 Metaphor and Automatic Reasoning, plus Grammars.
CS 182 Sections slide credit to Eva Mok and Joe Makin Updated by Leon Barrett April 25, 2007.
Natural Language Processing Vasile Rus
Warm-Up- Books and calcs
The Car Caddy Caeden W. 7 PA.
Pronoun Usage.
Supporting your child with literacy in Reception
CS 182 Sections 101 & 102 Leon Barrett Jan 17, 2007
Cognitive Language Processing for Rosie
Without it, life would be boring…
CS 182 Sections 101 & 102 Leon Barrett Jan 25, 2008
CHAPTER 14: Binomial Distributions*
Psych156A/Ling150: Psychology of Language Learning
Middle Childhood: Cognitive Development
I’ll help to clean up the
Some of what you need to know…
Lexical Development II: Word spurt
Organizing Meetings.
slides derived from those of Eva Mok and Joe Makin March 21, 2007
with acknowledgments to Eva Mok and Joe Makin
Welcome.
“No one writes an account of history without some bias.”
ENG 380 Education for Service/tutorialrank.com
Pets Unit 1 Week 3 Vocabulary.
HUDM4122 Probability and Statistical Inference
CSC 594 Topics in AI – Applied Natural Language Processing
Cognitive Language Comprehension in Rosie
A Few Things to Think About
TODAY ELA notebook Open to the next blank page and title it ACTIVE VOICE A writing utensil Turn in your coloring sheet to the tray!
WARM UP: PLEASE READ & DO THESE THINGS!
Morning Warm- Up. Nothing stays the same
Developing Materials for STANAG Listening Exams. Selected aspects.
Understand the Written Communication rubric
Macbeth Day 2.

6Y Wednesday Writing an A+ Answer
Function Notation.
Multiplication with Base 10 Pieces
I can extend written methods to multiplication of U.t x U
1. What animal 2. Male or Female ? 4. Male or Female? Why? Why?
Support with the spelling and grammar test
Present Continuous + Present Simple
Presentation transcript:

CS182 Leon Barrett with slides inspired by Eva Mok and Joe Makin April 25, 2008

Announcements a9 out, due Thursday BBS articles are assigned for the final paper!

Schedule Last Week –Metaphor understanding using KARMA –Grammars and parsing This Week –Construction Grammar, ECG –Grammar Learning Next Week –ECG Learning

Questions What are constructions? How does ECG use constructions? Why is learning language hard? What is the poverty of the stimulus? What is Gold's Theorem?

Embodied constructions construction H ARRY form : /hEriy/ meaning : Harry construction C AFE form : /k h aefej/ meaning : Cafe Harry CAFE cafe ECG Notation FormMeaning Constructions have form and meaning poles that are subject to type constraints.

Questions What are constructions? How does ECG use constructions? Why is learning language hard? What is the poverty of the stimulus? What is Gold's Theorem?

A schema hierarchy of objects (Nomi) schema Referent subcase of Entity roles category distribution boundedness number gender accessibility resolved-ref schema Referent subcase of Entity roles category distribution boundedness number gender accessibility resolved-ref schema Object subcase of Entity schema Object subcase of Entity schema Entity schema Place schema Physical-Object subcase of Object, Place schema Physical-Object subcase of Object, Place schema Animate subcase of Physical-Object roles animacy constraints animacy ← true schema Animate subcase of Physical-Object roles animacy constraints animacy ← true schema Human subcase of Animate roles sex schema Human subcase of Animate roles sex schema Nomi subcase of Human sex ← female schema Nomi subcase of Human sex ← female schema Manipulable-Object subcase of Physical-Object schema Manipulable-Object subcase of Physical-Object schema Toy subcase of Manipulable-Object schema Toy subcase of Manipulable-Object schema Ball subcase of Toy schema Ball subcase of Toy slot filler schema Cup subcase of Manipulable-Object schema Cup subcase of Manipulable-Object

The schemas we just defined Entity Place Object Physical- Object Referent Animat e Manipulable- Object HumanToy Nom i MotherFatherBook Cup Bal l Block Food DollBed Cak e Juice

A schema hierarchy of actions (Nomi) schema DirectedAction subcase of Action roles patient : Entity schema DirectedAction subcase of Action roles patient : Entity schema Action roles agent : Entity schema Action roles agent : Entity schema Move subcase of Action roles mover : Entity direction : Place schema Move subcase of Action roles mover : Entity direction : Place schema CauseMove subcase of DirectedAction, Move roles causer : Human mover : Physical-Object motion : Move constraints motion.mover ↔ mover motion.agent ↔ causer motion.direction ↔ direction agent ↔ causer patient ↔ mover schema CauseMove subcase of DirectedAction, Move roles causer : Human mover : Physical-Object motion : Move constraints motion.mover ↔ mover motion.agent ↔ causer motion.direction ↔ direction agent ↔ causer patient ↔ mover identification constraint type constraint

The schemas we just defined Action Directed Action Cause-Move Move JointMoveTransfer

Constructions, finally (Nomi) construction Ref-Expr form : Schematic-Form meaning : Referent construction Ref-Expr form : Schematic-Form meaning : Referent construction Nomi-Cn level 0 subcase of Ref-Expr form : Word self.f.orth ← "Nomi" meaning evokes Nomi as n self.m.category ↔ n self.m.resolved-ref ↔ n construction Nomi-Cn level 0 subcase of Ref-Expr form : Word self.f.orth ← "Nomi" meaning evokes Nomi as n self.m.category ↔ n self.m.resolved-ref ↔ n local name fancy way of saying that the category of the referent is Nomi construction Cup-Cn level 0 subcase of Ref-Expr form : Word self.f.orth ← “cup" meaning evokes Cup as n self.m.category ↔ n self.m.resolved-ref ↔ n construction Cup-Cn level 0 subcase of Ref-Expr form : Word self.f.orth ← “cup" meaning evokes Cup as n self.m.category ↔ n self.m.resolved-ref ↔ n

Constructions, finally (Nomi) construction Cause-Motion-Verb subcase of Motion-Verb meaning : CauseMove construction Cause-Motion-Verb subcase of Motion-Verb meaning : CauseMove construction Motion-Verb meaning : Move construction Motion-Verb meaning : Move construction Get-Cn level 0 subcase of Cause-Motion-Verb form : Word self.f.orth ← "get" construction Get-Cn level 0 subcase of Cause-Motion-Verb form : Word self.f.orth ← "get" lexical constructio n

Constructions, finally (Nomi) construction Transitive-Cn level 2 constructional constituents agt : Ref-Expr v : Cause-Motion-Verb obj : Ref-Expr form agt.f before v.f v.f before obj.f meaning v.m.agent ↔ agt.m.resolved-ref v.m.patient ↔ obj.m.resolved-ref construction Transitive-Cn level 2 constructional constituents agt : Ref-Expr v : Cause-Motion-Verb obj : Ref-Expr form agt.f before v.f v.f before obj.f meaning v.m.agent ↔ agt.m.resolved-ref v.m.patient ↔ obj.m.resolved-ref smaller constructions that it takes ordering constraints on the constituents

Questions What are constructions? How does ECG use constructions? Why is learning language hard? What is the poverty of the stimulus? What is Gold's Theorem?

Difficulty of learning language What makes learning language difficult? –How many sentences do children hear? –How often are those sentences even correct? –Even when they're correct, how often are they complete? –How often are children corrected when saying something wrong? –How many possible languages are there?

Larger context War! –Is language innate? –Covered in book

Questions What are constructions? How does ECG use constructions? Why is learning language hard? What is the poverty of the stimulus? What is Gold's Theorem?

Poverty and Opulence Poverty of the stimulus –Coined to suggest how little information children have to learn from Opulence of the substrate –Opulence = “richness” –Coined in response to suggest how much background information children have

Questions What are constructions? How does ECG use constructions? Why is learning language hard? What is the poverty of the stimulus? What is Gold's Theorem?

Gold's Theorem Suppose that you have an infinite number of languages –language = “set of legal sentences” Suppose that for every language Ln, there is a bigger language Ln+1 –makes every sentence, and then some There's some language Linfinity –contains all the sentences in all other languages You can arrange data so that no one ever learns Linfinity – on.GoldsTheorem.pdf