Michael Cooke April 28, 2009 1 Diboson Production at the Tevatron DIS 2009, April 28 th, Madrid, Spain Michael Cooke (, ) on behalf of the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Observation of Z  at DØ Yurii Maravin (KSU). Where is Higgs? Artificial add-on to the standard model (is it even there?) There is a mounting tension.
Advertisements

Summary of Results and Projected Sensitivity The Lonesome Top Quark Aran Garcia-Bellido, University of Washington Single Top Quark Production By observing.
Recent Electroweak Results from the Tevatron Weak Interactions and Neutrinos Workshop Delphi, Greece, 6-11 June, 2005 Dhiman Chakraborty Northern Illinois.
Top Physics at the Tevatron Mike Arov (Louisiana Tech University) for D0 and CDF Collaborations 1.
LHC pp beam collision on March 13, 2011 Haijun Yang
WW  e ν 14 April 2007 APS April Meeting WW/WZ production in electron-neutrino plus dijet final state at CDFAPS April Meeting April 2007 Jacksonville,
6/15/2004Michael Kirby, Duke University1 Tevatron W/Z/  Results Part II Attack of the DiBosons 15th Topical Conference on Hadron Collider Physics Michael.
Diffractive W and Z Production at Tevatron Konstantin Goulianos The Rockefeller University and the CDF collaboration Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions.
Jake Anderson, on behalf of CMS Fermilab Semi-leptonic VW production at CMS.
Search for Anomalous tWb Couplings at D0, L. Li (Shanghai Jiao Tong University) SUSY 2012, August 16, Liang Li Shanghai Jiao Tong University Search.
University of Science & Technology of China (USTC) University of Science & Technology of China (USTC) W/Z+  ATLAS On behalf of ATLAS Collaboration.
Heavy charged gauge boson, W’, search at Hadron Colliders YuChul Yang (Kyungpook National University) (PPP9, NCU, Taiwan, June 04, 2011) June04, 2011,
1 g g s Richard E. Hughes The Ohio State University for The CDF and D0 Collaborations Low Mass SM Higgs Search at the Tevatron hunting....
W properties AT CDF J. E. Garcia INFN Pisa. Outline Corfu Summer Institute Corfu Summer Institute September 10 th 2 1.CDF detector 2.W cross section measurements.
Charged Higgs Results from Tevatron Sudeshna Banerjee Tata Institute of Fundamental Research Mumbai, India For CDF and DØ Collaborations Fermilab, Chicago.
Irakli Chakaberia Final Examination April 28, 2014.
1 CTEQ JLab Nikos Varelas SM HIGGS SEARCHES AT THE TEVATRON Nikos Varelas University of Illinois at Chicago
Alan L. Stone University of Illinois Chicago University of Illinois Chicago …on behalf of the CDF & DØ Collaborations Diboson Physics at the Tevatron.
Gideon Bella Tel Aviv University On behalf of the ATLAS collaboration ATL-PHYS-PUB ATL-PHYS-PUB Prospects of measuring ZZ and WZ polarization.
Higgs Properties Measurement based on HZZ*4l with ATLAS
KIRTI RANJANDIS, Madison, Wisconsin, April 28, Top Quark Production Cross- Section at the Tevatron Collider On behalf of DØ & CDF Collaboration KIRTI.
C. K. MackayEPS 2003 Electroweak Physics and the Top Quark Mass at the LHC Kate Mackay University of Bristol On behalf of the Atlas & CMS Collaborations.
Alex Melnitchouk DPF conference - May Search for Fermiophobic Higgs in the h   Channel DPF 2002, Williamsburg Alex Melnitchouk (Brown University)
Searches for the Standard Model Higgs at the Tevatron presented by Per Jonsson Imperial College London On behalf of the CDF and DØ Collaborations Moriond.
Electroweak and Related Physics at CDF Tim Nelson Fermilab on behalf of the CDF Collaboration DIS 2003 St. Petersburg April 2003.
Precision Measurements of W and Z Boson Production at the Tevatron Jonathan Hays Northwestern University On Behalf of the CDF and DØ Collaborations XIII.
Electroweak physics at the LHC with ATLAS APS April 2003 Meeting – Philadelphia, PA Arthur M. Moraes University of Sheffield, UK (on behalf of the ATLAS.
1 EPS2003, Aachen Nikos Varelas ELECTROWEAK & HIGGS PHYSICS AT DØ Nikos Varelas University of Illinois at Chicago for the DØ Collaboration
Associated production of weak bosons at LHC with the ATLAS detector
R. Brunelière Gauge Couplings at LEP2 1 Triple and Quartic Gauge Couplings at LEP 2 Renaud Brunelière LAPP - Université de Savoie on behalf of the four.
1 Recent results from TEVATRON Yuji Takeuchi (Tsukuba) for CDF and DZero collaborations 16 th YKIS Conference Progress in Particles Physics 2008 Feb. 18.
R. Dean Schamberger Recent Results from the D Ø Experiment DIS 2009, Madrid April 2009.
RECENT RESULTS FROM THE TEVATRON AND LHC Suyong Choi Korea University.
Hiroshima Higgs Workshop 2006, Jan. 17 – 19, 2006 Higgs Searches at the Tevatron Kazuhiro Yamamoto (Osaka City University) for the CDF Collaboration 1.Tevatron.
Susan Burke DØ/University of Arizona DPF 2006 Measurement of the top pair production cross section at DØ using dilepton and lepton + track events Susan.
1 1/5/2007Beijing, Zhengguo Zhao Studies of Diboson Production and Triple Gauge Boson Couplings Zhengguo Zhao University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, USA 9.
1 Measurement of the Mass of the Top Quark in Dilepton Channels at DØ Jeff Temple University of Arizona for the DØ collaboration DPF 2006.
April 7, 2008 DIS UCL1 Tevatron results Heidi Schellman for the D0 and CDF Collaborations.
Multi boson production Paolo Mastrandrea PIC 2009 Kobe 8/31/ /2/2009.
LCWS06, Bangalore, March 2006, Marcel DemarteauSlide 1 Higgs Searches at DØ LCWS06, Bangalore, India March 9-13, 2006 Marcel Demarteau Fermilab For the.
1 Diboson production with CMS Vuko Brigljevic Rudjer Boskovic Institute, Zagreb on behalf of the CMS Collaboration Physics at LHC Cracow, July
La Thuile, March, 15 th, 2003 f Makoto Tomoto ( FNAL ) Prospects for Higgs Searches at DØ Makoto Tomoto Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory (For the.
Beate Heinemann University of Liverpool For the CDF collaboration EPS 2003, Aachen, Physics Beyond the Standard Model with Photonic Final.
Stano Tokar, slide 1 Top into Dileptons Stano Tokar Comenius University, Bratislava With a kind permissison of the CDF top group Dec 2004 RTN Workshop.
Latest Collider Results Aidan Robson University of Glasgow IOP HEPP/APP, 30 March 2010.
Searches for Resonances in dilepton final states Searches for Resonances in dilepton final states PANIC th -14 th November 2008, Eilat, ISRAEL A.
Studies of the Higgs Boson at the Tevatron Koji Sato On Behalf of CDF and D0 Collaborations 25th Rencontres de Blois Chateau Royal de Blois, May 29, 2013.
Search for Standard Model Higgs in ZH  l + l  bb channel at DØ Shaohua Fu Fermilab For the DØ Collaboration DPF 2006, Oct. 29 – Nov. 3 Honolulu, Hawaii.
Recent Electroweak Results from Tevatron Junjie Zhu State University of New Stony Brook For the CDF and DØ Collaborations ASPEN 2008 January 15,
Suyong Choi (SKKU) SUSY Standard Model Higgs Searches at DØ Suyong Choi SKKU, Korea for DØ Collaboration.
Eric COGNERAS LPC Clermont-Ferrand Prospects for Top pair resonance searches in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics october 2007, Grenoble.
A Search for Higgs Decaying to WW (*) at DØ presented by Amber Jenkins Imperial College London on behalf of the D  Collaboration Meeting of the Division.
Low Mass Standard Model Higgs Boson Searches at the Tevatron Andrew Mehta Physics at LHC, Split, Croatia, September 29th 2008 On behalf of the CDF and.
Study of Diboson Physics with the ATLAS Detector at LHC Hai-Jun Yang University of Michigan (for the ATLAS Collaboration) APS April Meeting St. Louis,
Measurement of the W + W - Production Cross Section and Search for Anomalous WW  and WWZ Couplings in pp Collisions at √s = 1.96 TeV Jennifer Pursley,
Searches for the Standard Model Higgs Boson at the Tevatron Gavin Hesketh Northeastern University On behalf of the CDF and D ⊘ Collaborations Hadron Collider.
1 Donatella Lucchesi July 22, 2010 Standard Model High Mass Higgs Searches at CDF Donatella Lucchesi For the CDF Collaboration University and INFN of Padova.
Search for high-mass ZZ resonances Aidan Robson University of Glasgow for the CDF Collaboration EPS, 21 July 2011.
Measurement of SM V+gamma by ATLAS
Search for a High Mass SM Higgs Boson at the Tevatron
Search for WHlnbb at the Tevatron DPF 2009
Deep Inelastic Scattering 2006
Investigation on Diboson Production
Double Gauge Boson Production at = 7, 8, and 13TeV
Electroweak Results from DØ
Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835
Strong Electroweak Symmetry Breaking from
Measurement of the Single Top Production Cross Section at CDF
Susan Burke, University of Arizona
Presentation transcript:

Michael Cooke April 28, Diboson Production at the Tevatron DIS 2009, April 28 th, Madrid, Spain Michael Cooke (, ) on behalf of the CDF and DØ Collaborations

Michael Cooke April 28, Diboson Physics Diboson processes have low cross sections – Provide natural series of goals for detector sensitivity – Probe fundamental details of the SM EW sector directly DØDØ DØDØ Direct window to SM Higgs decay – Higgs can decay directly into WW, ZZ, Zγ – Associated WH, ZH production

Michael Cooke April 28, Search for Anomalous Couplings SM includes two triple gauge-boson verticies – Contribute directly to Wγ, WW, WZ production Assuming EM gauge invariance and C and P conservation, the most general Lorentz invariant effective Lagrangian for triple gauge couplings is:...where V=γ or Z, g WWγ = −e, g WWZ = −e cot θ W, and g 1 γ = 1 ● In SM: g 1 V = κ V = 1, λ V = 0

Michael Cooke April 28, Search for Anomalous Couplings Equivalent triple-gauge boson vertex does not exist in SM for Zγγ/ZZγ – Can probe for this anomalous tree-level diagram in Zγ production – Most general Lagrangian has CP-odd and CP-even couplings...where F μν is the photon field, “~” denotes antisymmetry, □ = ∂ 2 /∂t 2 -   To preserve partial-wave unitarity and avoid divergent cross-sections, TGCs are introduced as form factors: ● Limits set in terms of A 0 ● Λ sets scale of new physics ● n = 2 for κ V, λ V, g 1 Z ● n = 3 for h 1 V, h 3 V ● n = 4 for h 2 V, h 4 V

Michael Cooke April 28, Creating Dibosons at Fermilab Tevatron produces pp collisions at √s = 1.96 TeV – CDF and DØ detectors measure the created particles ¯ ¯ p – p 36-on-36 particle bunches with 396 ns spacing 1.7 million collisions per second

Michael Cooke April 28, Tevatron Performance Tevatron has delivered 6.5 fb -1 of integrated luminosity to each experiment so far in RunII! – Record weekly int. lumi. (April 13 th –20 th ): 73.1 pb -1 – (RunI) int. luminosity: ~110 pb -1 – Results presented today correspond to 1.0–3.6 fb -1 Thank you, Accelerator Division! WW→ℓνℓν, WW+WZ→ℓνjj Zγ→ννγ ZZ→ℓℓνν,ℓℓℓℓ WZ→jjℓℓ,ℓνℓℓ WW→ℓνℓν Zγ→ννγ RunII: April, 2002 ‫→ April 2009 └ 2003 └ 2004 └ 2005└ 2006└ 2007└ 2008└ '

Michael Cooke April 28, The CDF and DØ Detectors Silicon vertex detector Wire drift chamber tracking Pb/Fe-scintillator calorimetry Muon chambers Silicon vertex detector Scintillating fiber tracking LAr-U compensating cal. Muon chambers

Michael Cooke April 28, Zγ→ννγ Only ISR diagram contributes to Zγ→ννγ at tree level – SM NLO σ Zγ = 39 ± 4 fb; selection: ● Missing E T > 70 GeV ● Central calorimeter γ candidate with E T > 90 GeV – Use EM shower pointing to confirm vertex & estimate backgrounds ● Veto on: Jet or 2 nd EM object with E T > 15 GeV; muons; iso. tracks OBSERVATION (5.1σ): σ Zγ = 32 ± 9 (stat+syst) ± 2 (lumi) fb PRL 101, (2008) arXiv [ ] Submitted to PRL 3.6 fb -1 [ E T γ > 90 GeV ]

Michael Cooke April 28, Zγ→ννγ: ATCGs Photon E T spectrum used to examine anomalous TGCs – No distinction between CP-even/odd couplings (h 1,2 V vs h 3,4 V ) – Combined with DØ Zγ→ℓℓγ [PLB 653, 378 (2007); 1.1 fb -1 ] arXiv [ ] Submitted to PRL 3.6 fb -1 |h 30 γ | < 0.033|h 40 γ | < |h 30 Z | < 0.033|h 40 Z | < Tightest limits from hadronic collider! – 3  improvement vs Zγ→ℓℓγ – All but h 30 γ improve upon LEP2

Michael Cooke April 28, WW→ℓνℓν Individual channel cuts optimized for σ WW measurement – SM NLO σ WW = 12.4 ± 0.7 pb: ● Lepton p T > 25, 15 GeV ● E T > 45 (ee), 20 (eμ), 35 (μμ) GeV ● Maximum p T WW cut suppresses Z and tt TGC limits based on lepton p T : arXiv [ ] Submitted to PRL 1.0 fb -1 arXiv [ ] Submitted to PRL 1.0 fb -1 / σ WW = 11.5 ± 2.1 (stat+syst) ± 0.7 (lumi) pb Most precise at hadronic collider when submitted Apr. 3 rd ! Λ = 2 TeV LEP: < Δκ γ < 0.83, < λ < 0.19, < Δg 1 Z < 0.30 EQUAL: < Δκ γ = Δκ Z < 0.35, < λ γ = λ Z < 0.19 ¯

Michael Cooke April 28, WW→ℓνℓν Matrix element based likelihood ratio analysis – SM NLO σ WW = 12.4 ± 0.7 pb: ● Event kinematics are used to assign a probability based on LO ME cross section calculation for the WW, ZZ, Wγ and W+jet processes Preliminiary 3.6 fb -1 Preliminiary 3.6 fb -1 σ WW = 12.1 ± 0.9 (stat) (syst) pb Public note made available on April 20 th, currently most precise measurement at hadronic collider! - 1.4

Michael Cooke April 28, WW+WZ→ℓνjj Multivariate discriminant separates WW/WZ from W+j – SM NLO σ WW+WZ = 16.1 ± 0.9 pb; selection: ● e/μ p T > 20 GeV; Missing E T > 20 GeV ● 2+ jets with p T > 30, 20 GeV ● Transverse W mass > 35 GeV – Random Forest discriminates S from B ● Average over many decision trees Fit to RF output determines signal – RF fit p-value = 5.4  (4.4σ) arXiv [ ] Accepted by PRL 1.1 fb -1 σ WW+WZ = 20.2 ± 2.5 (stat) ± 3.6 (syst) ± 1.2 (lumi) pb First EVIDENCE in this channel at hadronic collider!

Michael Cooke April 28, WW+WZ→ℓνjj: ATCGs Dijet mass spectrum used to examine anomalous TGCs – Smallest allowed range of values at 95% C.L. from Tevatron Preliminary 1.1 fb -1 LEP Compatible, Λ = 2 TeV < Δg 1 Z < < Δκ Z < < λ Z < 0.11 Equal Couplings, Λ = 2 TeV < Δκ γ = Δκ Z < < λ γ = λ Z < 0.11 WpTWpT ZpTZpT ● LEP Constraints conserve SU(2) L  U(1) Y symmetry ● Specifically, λ γ = λ Z and Δκ Z = Δg 1 Z – Δκ γ tan θ W

Michael Cooke April 28, WZ→jjℓℓ Three bins in Z boson p T used to study σ WZ and ATGCs – [ ] GeV: Control bin ● Dominated by high p T Drell-Yan, used to test modeling – [ ] GeV: Medium and [210+] GeV: High ● Used to perform m jj fits to set limits on σ WZ and ATGCs Preliminary 1.9 fb -1 Medium p T Bin High p T Bin Λ = 1.5 TeV: < Δg 1 Z < < Δκ Z < < λ Z < 0.18 Λ = 2.0 TeV: < Δg 1 Z < < Δκ Z < < λ Z < % C.L. σ WZ Limits: Medium Bin: 234 fb High Bin: 135 fb

Michael Cooke April 28, WZ→ℓνℓℓ: ATGCs Z boson p T spectrum used to set 95% C.L. limits on anomalous TGCs – Extends PRL 98, (2007), using 25 observed events Preliminary 1.9 fb -1 Λ = 1.5 TeV: < Δg 1 Z < < Δκ Z < < λ Z < 0.15 Λ = 2.0 TeV: < Δg 1 Z < < Δκ Z < < λ Z < 0.14

Michael Cooke April 28, ZZ→ℓℓνν Getting a good handle on Missing E T is critical! – SM NLO σ ZZ = 1.4 ± 0.1 pb; selection: ● Select ee/μμ events with lepton p T > 15 GeV ● Veto extra EM clus. (5 GeV), muons, iso. tracks, > 2 jets (10 GeV) – Create “corrected E T ” discriminant ● Minimize effect of mismeasured jets/μ – Expect 7.4 ZZ, 26.5±0.5 bkgd; 43 data LLR p-value = 4.2  -3 (2.6σ): σ ZZ = 2.01 ± 0.93 (stat) ± 0.29 (syst) pb Phys. Rev. D 78, (2008) 2.7 fb -1 / / /

Michael Cooke April 28, ZZ→ℓℓℓℓ Analysis focused on optimization of lepton selection – SM NLO σ ZZ = 1.4 ± 0.1 pb; selection: ● Study eeee, eeμμ, μμμμ channels, with tighter cuts on lepton p T, lepton isolation and dilepton mass than previous DØ analysis – 4e/4μ require p T > 30, 25, 15, 15 GeV (eeμμ 25, 15); all > 15 GeV before – Dilepton mass pairs > 70, 50 GeV vs. > 30, 30 GeV in previous analysis Comparison to previous 1 fb -1 analysis (no data overlap): – 1 fb -1 : expect 1.71 ± 0.15 ZZ, 0.13 ± 0.03 bkgd; observed 1 event – 1.7 fb -1 : expect 1.89 ± 0.08 ZZ, 0.14 ± 0.03 bkgd; observed 3 events Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, (2008) 1.7 fb -1

Michael Cooke April 28, ZZ Combination 1.7 fb -1 ZZ→ℓℓℓℓ observations: p-value 4.3  (5.3σ) – σ ZZ = (stat) ± 0.13 (syst) pb Three analyses combined into final σ ZZ measurement: – Non-overlapping 1.0 fb -1 and 1.7 fb -1 ZZ→ℓℓℓℓ ● 1.0 fb -1 : Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, (2008) – Complimentary 2.7 fb -1 ZZ→ℓℓνν ● Phys. Rev. D 78, (2008) – Combined p-value = 6.2  (5.7σ) σ ZZ = 1.60 ± 0.63 (stat) (syst) pb First OBSERVATION of ZZ at hadronic collider! – CDF: (stat+syst) pb (4.4 σ) [PRL 100, (2008)] Phys. Rev. Lett. 101, (2008) 2.7 fb

Michael Cooke April 28, Summary Diboson production results are in agreement with SM – Cross section measurements remain consistent with SM – No evidence of anomalous triple gauge-boson couplings Recently, the Tevatron has provided: – EVIDENCE for WW+WZ→ℓνjj (4.4σ) – OBSERVATION of Zγ→ννγ (5.1σ) – OBSERVATION of ZZ production (5.7σ) – MOST PRECISE WW→ℓνℓν cross section at hadronic collider ●...twice in April! – MOST STRINGENT LIMITS on h 30 Z, h 40 γ, h 40 Z – INCREASINGLY STRINGENT LIMITS on κ V, λ V, g 1 Z from hadronic collisions