Status of DCH Mechanical Structure 13 Dec 2011. S. Lauciani2 Summary Proposal for a mechanical structure of DCH Stringing strategy and analysis of deformations.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
FE analysis with shell and axisymmetric elements E. Tarallo, G. Mastinu POLITECNICO DI MILANO, Dipartimento di Meccanica.
Advertisements

Mechanical Analysis of Dipole with Partial Keystone Cable for the SIS300 A finite element analysis has been performed to optimize the stresses in the dipole.
4-Chapter Allowable stresses. contents Introduction 2.6.1(p8) Compression element, Axial or bending2.6.1(p8) Compression element, Axial or bending Axial.
Chapter 3 – Stress and Deformation Analysis (ref MCHT 213!!)
EMA 405 Coordinate Systems. Introduction There are many coordinate systems in ANSYS Global and Local: used to locate geometry items (nodes, keypoints,
The Effect of T-Stiffener Web and Flange Tilt on Frame Stress Evaluated using Finite Element Analysis by Dean Pasquerella MASTER OF ENGINEERING Major Subject:
Torsion: Shear Stress & Twist ( )
STRUCTURAL MECHANICS: CE203
Tracker Solenoid Module Design Update Steve VirostekStephanie Yang Mike GreenWing Lau Lawrence Berkeley National LabOxford Physics MICE Collaboration Meeting.
Home Work #4 Due Date: 18 Mar, 2010 (Turn in your assignment at the mail box of S581 outside the ME general office) The solutions must be written on A4.
DesignXplorer Parameter Manager Workshop 9. DesignXplorer Parameter Manager Workshop Supplement August 26, 2005 Inventory # WS9-2 Workshop 9 – Goals.
Contact Stress (3.19) MAE 316 – Strength of Mechanical Components
Can Bottom Snap-through
Angular Motion, General Notes
1 Tutorial 5-1: Part Sketch / Geometric Constraints.
Structural option for the Jinping neutrino central detector Contributor : Yuanqing Wang, Zongyi Wang Speaker : Zongyi Wang Department of civil engineering,
Example: Radially Polarized Tube. Introduction This is a 2D static axisymmetric piezoelectric benchmark problem A radially polarized piezoelectric tube.
A Study of the Effect of Imperfections on Buckling Capability in Thin Cylindrical Shells Under Axial Loading Lauren Kougias.
Cooling Pipes: Force Analysis Thermal forces Disc deflections Manufacturing tolerance forces Glue joint analysis Friction forces.
PROBLEMS ON TORSION.
1 Mechanical calculations of the CDC end-plates KEK H. Yamaoka July 8 th, '09 KEK H. Yamaoka.
COMBINED LOADING.  Analyze the stress developed in thin-walled pressure vessels  Review the stress analysis developed in previous chapters regarding.
14FEB2005/KWCAE2-UsersGroup Astro-E2 X-Ray Telescopes XRT Setup & Structure Performance Characteristics –Effective Area –Angular Resolution –Optical Axes.
Inner Triplet Review April 2007 Inner Triplet Supports Sonia Bartolomé Jiménez (TS/IC)
☻ ☻ ☻ ☻ 2.0 Bending of Beams sx 2.1 Revision – Bending Moments
AUGUST 3, 2010 BRYCE AUSTELL UNIVERSITY OF ILLINOIS FERMILAB SIST INTERN ADVISOR: RYUJI YAMADA Muon-to-Electron Conversion Experiment (Mu2e) Detector Solenoid.
Conclusions on Transverse Shearing Stress Calculations Maximum Value at Neutral Axis – IF CROSS- SECTION IS NOT NARROWER ELSEWHERE –Depends on Shape of.
1 Calorimeter 4-May-2009 Added Slides Data from MAS GCALOR with phojet min-bias events in ATLAS detector.
16 T dipole in common coil configuration: mechanical design
Design ideas for a cos(2q) magnet
Buckling in aircraft structures
STRAW TRACKER SYSTEM CAD STATUS :
GOVERNMENT ENGINEERING COLLEGE, BHAVNAGAR TOPIC : INTRODUCTION TO PRESSURE VESSELS Prepared By :- 1.Aal Akash Ansari Aarif.
Date of download: 10/21/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Present status of the flux return yoke design
Date of download: 10/22/2017 Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Development of a low material endplate for LP1 and ILD
Pure Bending.
16 T Cosq DIPOLE Mechanical Analysis
FEA Analysis of the LHCB Velo RF foil
JLAB MEETING FDR – April 23-24th 2013
EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils (DRAFT)
SiD Solenoid Status and Plans
EuroCirCol: 16T dipole based on common coils
3 Torsion.
the MDP High Field Dipole Demonstrator
ENE 325 Electromagnetic Fields and Waves
STUDIES TOWARDS TARGET-HORN INTEGRATION Institute of Applied Mechanics
INTRODUCTION TO PRESSURE VESSELS
BDA30303 Solid Mechanics II.
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
3 Torsion.
Integration and IR Hall
ENE 325 Electromagnetic Fields and Waves
326MAE (Stress and Dynamic Analysis) 340MAE (Extended Stress and Dynamic Analysis)
Structure I Course Code: ARCH 208 Dr. Aeid A. Abdulrazeg
Tutorial in Mechanical Properties
MQXF coil cross-section status
( BDA ) CHAPTER V THICK CYLINDER
Distributed Forces: Centroids and Centers of Gravity
Distributed Forces: Centroids and Centers of Gravity
Final Design CGEM Workshop HIEP, 14/03/2017 M. Melchiorri - INFN FE.
3 Torsion.
TORSION CO 2 : ABILITY TO ANALYZE TORQUE-LOADED MEMBER EVALUATE THE VALUES AND DISTRIBUTION OF BENDING AND SHEAR STRESSES IN BEAM SECTION By: ROSHAZITA.
Poisson’s Ratio For a slender bar subjected to axial loading:
Feasibility of Recuperation of Magnets in Decommissioned Storage Rings
Cross-section of the 150 mm aperture case
Tutorial.
S. Bettoni on behalf of the whole team
Presentation transcript:

Status of DCH Mechanical Structure 13 Dec 2011

S. Lauciani2 Summary Proposal for a mechanical structure of DCH Stringing strategy and analysis of deformations Buckling analysis on DCH

13 Dec 2011 S. Lauciani3 Proposal of a mechanical structure: General layout External load bearing structure Thin inner cylinder Endplates fixed only on outer rim Homogeneus distribution of material in axial and angular direction Two halves shell is a preferred solution with respect to a single cylindrical one. It is less expensive, uses less radial space and it is easier to build. Inner rim is free to move in axial direction

13 Dec 2011 S. Lauciani4 Endplate: materials and geometry Ex = 130 GPa n xy = 0.3 Gxy = 4.5 GPa Ey = 4.6 GPa n xz = 0.3 Gxz = 4.5 GPa Ez = 4.6 GPa n zy = 0.25Gzy = 4.5 GPa CF properties* Ply#Lamina TypeThickness(mm)Angle (deg) 1Graphite/Epoxy Graphite/Epoxy Graphite/Epoxy Graphite/Epoxy Ply#Lamina TypeThickness(mm)Angle (deg) 1Graphite/Epoxy Graphite/Epoxy Graphite/Epoxy Graphite/Epoxy x10 x Ply#Lamina TypeThickness(mm)Angle (deg) 1Graphite/Epoxy Graphite/Epoxy Graphite/Epoxy Graphite/Epoxy x EndplatesInner stiffening ring Outer stiffening ring To consider the holes effect, material properties are downgraded by a factor of 0.7 *Taken from datasheets, may vary %

13 Dec 2011 S. Lauciani5 Wires: Materials and load Wire typeMatr (mm)N° WiresSag. (mm) FieldAluminium SenseMolybdenum (AU coated) GuardAluminium Minor changes in wire layout, inner and outer diameter have not an important effect on results Considering a maximum wire’s length of 2700mm and endplate curvature the nominal load is N Endplate curvature and thickness have a great influence on deformations

13 Dec 2011 S. Lauciani6 FEM model for stringing process Initial Load (N) Force Force Force Force Force Force Force Force Force Force Force Force Force Force Force Force Force Force Force Force Endplate is divided in 20 circular areas. Total load is applied in 20 steps For every step displacements are calculated Every load is decreased according to material, length and deformation of every wire

13 Dec 2011 S. Lauciani7 Final displacement Initial Load (N)Final Load (N) Force Force Force Force Force Force Force Force Force Force Force Force Force Force Force Force Force Force Force Force Max displacement: 0.31mm Total nominal load: N Total real load: N

13 Dec 2011 S. Lauciani8 Stringing: Final sagitta For a fixed displacement sense wires have a greater sagitta than field wires. Molybdenum is more rigid (E_mo=320 e3 Mpa E_al=68.9 e3 Mpa) On the first layer act all the stringing process, so the difference is greater The first layers “feel” all the stringing process, so the difference in sagitta is larger Max. Sagitta difference : 0.026mm Nominal sagitta This plot takes into account a further displacement due to the cylindrical shell deformation, about 0.07mm

Buckling: Shell material Ply#Lamina TypeThickness(mm)Angle (deg) 1Graphite/Epoxy Graphite/Epoxy Graphite/Epoxy Graphite/Epoxy Honeycomb60 6Graphite/Epoxy Graphite/Epoxy Graphite/Epoxy Graphite/Epoxy Dec 2011 S. Lauciani9 Cylindrical shell. Thickness 8mm Ex = 130 GPa n xy = 0.3 Gxy = 4.5 GPa Ey = 4.6 GPa n xz = 0.3 Gxz = 4.5 GPa Ez = 4.6 GPa n zy = 0.25Gzy = 4.5 GPa Ex = 138 MPa n xy = 0.02 Gxy = 1 MPa Ey = 3 MPa n xz = 0.02 Gxz = 45 MPa Ez = 3 Mpa n zy = 0.02Gzy = 24 MPa Honeycomb properties CF properties 1mm CF 6mm HC 1mm CF

13 Dec 2011 S. Lauciani10 N°Buckling Load (N) E E E E E E E E+06 Buckling occurs only on endplates. Using HC allow to avoid instability problem on cylindrical shell and to use less material First instability load: N 20 times higher than wire load Buckling: Analysis

Conclusions and plans Inner load bearing cylinder is not needed DCH can be strung without overtensioning wires CF laminates are optimized to reduce displacement The numbers used for the DCH inner radius, length and thickness of all elements are close to final, but we will check for updates. These updates are expected not to cause important changes on the conclusions Realize some test due to uncertainty on material properties Understand effect of feed-through holes with tests Understand how DCH is supported 13 Dec 2011 S. Lauciani11