TK Sundari Ravindran, Professor, Achutha Menon Centre for Health Science Studies, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Supporting continuous improvement in the replication process Getting to Grips with Replication Seminar 3: Monitoring, evaluation & continuous improvement.
Advertisements

 TAKING THE RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF INDIVIDUALS IN THE FORMAL POLITICAL ARENA AND APPLIES THEM ACROSS ALL SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS AND INSTITUTIONS.
Chapter 07: CHANS and Conflict Management. DISCUSSION TODAY Coupled Human and Natural Systems (CHANS) Conflict and INRM Co-management.
Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches
Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches Dr. William M. Bauer
Falls among older persons: A study in Thiruvananthapuram district of Kerala, India Dr Rekha M Ravindran & Dr V Raman Kutty, Achutha Menon Centre for Health.
Achutha Menon Centre for Health Science Studies Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology.
Scenario-building as a communication tool Skryhan Hanna Krasnoyarsk, February, 15 – February, 22, 2014.
Gender?. Refers to the economic, social, political and cultural attributes, constraints and opportunities associated with being male or female. The social.
SACIM: Health Equity Social Justice Committee. How you frame an issue The questions you ask Determines your analysis of the issue Determines how you prioritize.
Lecture 17 NATURAL RESOURCE PLANNING AND MANAGEMENT Dr. Aneel SALMAN Department of Management Sciences COMSATS Institute of Information Technology, Islamabad.
An introduction to intersectionality: relevance for researching health inequities Dr Anuj Kapilashrami Lecturer, Global Public Health Unit & Centre for.
Community Interventions for Health Kerala, India K R Thankappan MD,MPH For the CIH Team Kerala, India Professor and Head Achutha Menon Centre for Health.
Scottish Improvement Science Collaborating Centre Strengthening the evidence base for improvement science: lessons learned Dr Nicola Gray, Senior Lecturer,
Incorporating quantitative elements into socioeconomic narratives and scenarios Marc A. Levy Presentation to Institute of Medicine Webinar 27 June 2013.
1 Teaching Supplement.  What is Intersectionality?  Intersectionality and Components of the Research Process  Implications for Practice 2.
Communication Strategies: A Brief Overview. Roots of Development Communication  Began as development practice did – to ‘modernize’ non-western world.
Basic Improvement Methodology
LEADERSHIP & TEACHER DEVELOPMENT
PEP Annual Conference Policy and Research Forum
School Building Leader and School District Leader exam
Claiming and Realizing Right to Land: Can Development Organizations Address the Gender Disparities in Bangladesh? FERDOUS JAHAN, University of Dhaka, Bangladesh.
WP 5: Assessment of Transition Pathways to Regional Sustainability of Agriculture “to build on findings from WP3 to inform participatory identification.
On the CUSP of change: Effective scaling for social norms change programming for gender equality. Community for Understanding Scale Up (CUSP)
The Advocacy Initiative 4th Knowledge Exchange Forum
Addressing Social Determinants of Health and Development
Presenter: Terry O’Connell
Chapter 7 Occupational Science: The Study of Occupation
Touching base: Concepts and approaches to health equity research
Measuring Social Inclusion
The learning disability landscape in Scotland
Module 2 The SDG Agenda: No-one left behind
Introductory discussion
QIC-AG Logic Model Template
GIZ Professional Forum on ‘The Political Economy of Health and Social Protection’ 2011 Making development co-operation work better by using political.
UNICEF Social Protection Training Course
Some Thoughts about Models in Organisational Efficiency and Agility
Qualitative methods in health equity research
Spreading story use.
Track D Social and Political Research, Law, Policy and Human Rights
The NICE Citizens Council and the role of social value judgements
INTRODUCTION TO….
Advancing Race Equity and Inclusion Annie E. Casey Foundation
THEORY IN EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH
© LOUIS COHEN, LAWRENCE MANION AND KEITH MORRISON
UNICEF Social Protection Training Course
asking critical questions
Intercultural Communication: Globalization and Social Justice
Intersecting social inequalities in health: An introduction
Chapter 1 – Sociology: A Unique Way to View the World
Module 7 Key concepts Part 2: EVALUATING COMPLEX DEVELOPMENT PROGRAMS
CHOOSING A RESEARCH PROJECT
Assessment: Measuring the Impact of our Programs on Students
On the CUSP of change: Effective scaling for social norms change programming for gender equality. Community for Understanding Scale Up (CUSP)
ENGENDERING TAKING THE RIGHTS AND RESPONSIBILITIES OF INDIVIDUALS IN THE FORMAL POLITICAL ARENA AND APPLIES THEM ACROSS ALL SOCIAL RELATIONSHIPS AND INSTITUTIONS.
Session 2: The SDG Agenda: No-one left behind
Advancing the Human Condition
Quantitative and Qualitative Approaches Dr. William M. Bauer
Foundations for Young Adult Success: A Developmental Framework
Thomas Schwandt University of Illinois, USA
Presentation to Institute of Medicine Webinar
European Partnership for Supervisory Organisations in Health Services and Social Care (EPSO), Sofia, 12th October 2018 How does regulation impact on.
Sociology: A Unique Way to View the World
Dr Hayley MacGregor, 13 Dec 2011
Our Journey: a tool to support reflection and wellbeing
NEED FOR GENDER SENSITIZATION
Informatics 121 Software Design I
SUSTAINABLE MICRO-FINANCE for WOMEN’S EMPOWERMENT
What is Moving Forward Together
The Strategic Focus of the Department for Women, Children and Persons with Disabilities 11 AUGUST 2009 V Y Nxasana.
Presentation transcript:

TK Sundari Ravindran, Professor, Achutha Menon Centre for Health Science Studies, Sree Chitra Tirunal Institute for Medical Sciences and Technology, Trivandrum Researching health inequities

OUTLINE Why research health inequities? The current state of research in health inequities – some reflections Some thoughts on how to move forward and what it entails

WHY RESEARCH HEALTH INEQUITIES? “If you don’t ask, you don’t know And if you don’t know, you cannot act” (Kreiger, 1992) Urgent need to problematize the routinely described differences in health status across social groups as well as the complete absence of information about other social groups. The resounding silence about health inequities in India’s health policies and programmes; the focus on “poor”,, “women”, “tribal” etc. rather than on inequities

THE CURRENT STATE OF RESEARCH ON HEALTH INEQUITIES -1 Focus on measuring and describing ; mainly quantitative. Important first step. But need for recognition of limitations. Caution to be exercised to prevent this from becoming “Blame- the-victim” research, and to not locate the key factors producing a health disparity within the individual, neglecting underlying structural and historical factors that are responsible

THE CURRENT STATE OF RESEARCH ON HEALTH INEQUITIES -2 Results should not be interpreted in terms of “how to bring “those” people up-to-speed so that they do not pull down state/national averages?” – i.e. “Deficit-oriented” health equity research. Reliance predominantly on large scale data -limits what can be researched and what cannot. (e.g. “class” reduced to income levels) Fails to guide action for changing the status-quo and may convey a sense of inevitability

THE CURRENT STATE OF RESEARCH ON HEALTH INEQUITIES -3 No explicit philosophical approach; interpretations influenced by one’s own implicit biases. While multi-level factors are acknowledged, focus is most often on individual level factors and not on larger structural factors. Consequently, micro-macro linkages are not explored. That which does not lend itself to measurement e.g. alienation, power dynamics – seldom studied. “WHY” questions not addressed for the most part. We have limited understanding on the pathways and mechanisms through which health inequities are created and sustained (discrimination, prejudice, stigma, humiliation, social exclusion).

THE CURRENT STATE OF RESEARCH ON HEALTH INEQUITIES -4 The dynamic and context specific nature of health inequities not often visible in the research. Focus on “down stream” determinants of health in intervention research, perhaps because these are amenable to be studied through experimental and quasi-experimental designs – perpetuating the myth that health inequities may be effectively addressed without challenging the status-quo. TRYING TO MAKE OMLETTES WITHOUT BREAKING EGGS? Most importantly – intersections of multiple axes of disadvantages or oppression – ignored for the most part.

WHERE TO FROM HERE? “Health inequities” occupies a multidimensional space and does not lend itself to simplistic approaches. Described as the result of inequalities in the distribution of “power, money and resources”. Need to develop approaches that can capture the pathways through which this happens.

WHERE TO FROM HERE? -2 Adopt an “intersectionality” approach View from lived experiences and lay knowledge needs to be given its due place, as do participatory and bottom-up approaches to knowledge construction. Key to understanding the relationship between individual agency and structural forces. Need to move beyond narrowly defined interventions research and “start to articulate explicit alternative future scenarios in which greater health equity could be achieved” (Scott-Samuel 2015)

Need of the hour: transformational research for social change Approaches that begin to unpack the social forces driving inequities and their everyday manifestations Methodological innovations drawing on multiple disciplines Purposeful research’ of a transformational nature – in terms of how and for what and with whom we do research.