Pay-As-You-Go Final 2012 Report. Agenda PAYG Refresher Pilot Goals & Overview Voice of the Customer Front Office Impacts Back Office Impacts Financial.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
SmartPOWER Critical Peak Pricing (CPP) June 3, 2008.
Advertisements

Achieving Price-Responsive Demand in New England Henry Yoshimura Director, Demand Resource Strategy ISO New England National Town Meeting on Demand Response.
BG&E’s PeakRewards SM Demand Response Program Successful Approaches for Engaging Customers August 20, 2014.
Time-of-Use and Critical Peak Pricing
1 The Potential For Implementing Demand Response Programs In Illinois Rick Voytas Manager, Corporate Analysis Ameren Services May 12, 2006.
Energy Efficiency and Demand Response: Separate Efforts or Two Ends of a Continuum? A Presentation to: Association of Edison Illuminating Companies Reno,
1 SMUD’s Small Business Summer Solutions Pilot: Behavioral response of small commercial customers to DR programs (with PCTs) Karen Herter, Ph.D. Associate.
TIME OF USE RATES AT THE UNITED ILLUMINATING COMPANY Presented at: Connecticut’s Energy Future December 2, 2004 James D. Lundrigan Pricing Manager The.
ANALYZING YOUR ELECTRIC BILL Bob Walker Met-Ed November 7, 2007.
2–1 1-1 Copyright © 2012 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved. McGraw-Hill/Irwin.
California Statewide Pricing Pilot Lessons Learned Roger Levy Demand Response Research Center NARUC Joint Meeting Committee on Energy.
1 SmartMeter™ Delivering Customer Benefits Jana Corey Director, Policy Planning Integrated Demand-side Management Pacific Gas and Electric Company.
1 SCE – Lessons Learned from Pricing Experiences July 31, 2014.
Overview of Residential Pricing/Advanced Metering Pilots Charles Goldman Lawrence Berkeley National Laboratory SMPPI Board Meeting August 3, 2005.
© Oklahoma State Department of Education. All rights reserved.1 Credit Cards: More Than Plastic Standard 8. 1 Credit Cards and Online Shopping.
Rate and Revenue Considerations When Starting an Energy Efficiency Program APPA’s National Conference June 13 th, 2009 Salt Lake City, Utah Mark Beauchamp,
1 New England Demand Response Resources: Present Observations and Future Challenges Henry Yoshimura Demand Resources Department ISO New England, Inc. Holyoke,
“Demand Response: Completing the Link Between Wholesale and Retail Pricing” Paul Crumrine Director, Regulatory Strategies & Services Institute for Regulatory.
Rate Design Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) Indiana Industrial Energy Consumers, Inc. (INDIEC) presented by Nick Phillips Brubaker &
Linking the Wholesale and Retail Markets through Dynamic Retail Pricing Presented by: Henry Yoshimura Manager, Demand Response ISO New England September.
CPUC Workshop on Best Practices & Lessons Learned in Time Variant Pricing TVP Load & Bill Impacts, Role of Technology & Operational Consideration Dr. Stephen.
Customer Preferences for Metering and Connectivity Metering Americas 2004 San Diego, CA March 24-26, 2004 Lynn Fryer Stein Primen.
Overview of DSM Cost Tests June 25, Background Parties developed demand side resource performance standards for post 1994 program cost recovery.
Idaho Power Company Demand Response & Dynamic Pricing Programs PNDRP December 5, 2008 Darlene Nemnich Pete Pengilly.
Copyright © 2015 McGraw-Hill Education. All rights reserved. No reproduction or distribution without the prior written consent of McGraw-Hill Education.
Benefits of Utilizing an Advance Pay Program ‘Not just a new way of billing, but a new way of living’
San Diego Gas & Electric February 24 th, 2016 Energy Matinee Pricing Tariff Proposal.
Pay-As-You-Go Final Report February Agenda Safety Moment PAYG Refresher Pilot Goals & Overview Voice of the Customer Front Office Impacts Back Office.
Pay-As-You-Go Update November Program Overview Paying advance for electricity Flexibility and Customer benefits Make as many payments as necessary.
Pay-As-You-Go Pilot Overview. Agenda Pay-as-you-go overview How the program works Pilot Overview Notifications and Payments 2.
Communicating Thermostats for Residential Time-of-Use Rates: They Do Make a Difference Presented at ACEEE Summer Study 2008.
1 City of Palo Alto Utilities Large Commercial Customer Pilot Demand Response Program Customer Meeting March 8, 2012.
Marketing Executives’ Conference Counterbalancing Rising Rates – Managing the Customer Impact Fred Stoffel Vice President, Marketing Xcel Energy October.
SOLAR*CONNECT COMMUNITY SM COMMUNITY SHARED SOLAR GARDENS Centrally-located solar PV arrays that provide electricity to participating subscribers.
Interim Survey Results August Survey Overview  Date of survey: July 18, 2012 – August 6, 2012  300 participants  52 completed  17.3% response.
Pay-As-You-Go - Draft Executive Product Development Meeting 3/29/2013.
Advanced Meter School August 18-20,2015 Time of Use and Load Profile Jeremiah Swann.
Smart Grid Tariff Changes
POSITIVE ENERGY TOGETHER ® Pay As You Go - Draft Executive Product Development Meeting 3/29/2013.
Inclusive Financing for Housing Energy Upgrades
Union Church Path to Net Zero Energy (10 Years of Progress)
Commercial Customer Demand Response Program Pilot
BURSAR & STUDENT ACCOUNTS
MEPAV 2010 CONFERENCE. AMI MANASSAS Gregg S. Paulson, P. E
Introducing Smart Energy Pricing Cheryl Hindes
Teacher instructions:
Narragansett Electric Rate Classes
Allegheny Power Residential Demand Response Program
Why have a (regular) checking account?
Credit Cards: More Than Plastic
International/National Transfer Orientation 2017
Understanding Credit Cards
Integrated Resource Planning and Load Flexibility Analysis
City of Lebanon, Missouri Electric Department
Budget Simulation : Finance Refresher
Student Accounting Summer Orientation 2018.
Load Response Products from Constellation NewEnergy
State Allocation Board Hearing Solar Energy and Energy Efficiency Project Options for California Schools Mark Johnson, Energy Solutions Manager - Schools.
Behavior Modification Report with Peak Reduction Component
Impact of Dynamic Pricing on AMR
Making Monthly Payments Easier with RENT ASSURANCE™ and
Mike Mumper & Brian Kick Good afternoon
Remote Service Switches Reconnect/Disconnect Meters
Fleet Electrification
Tom Clark Vice President, Customer Service & Service Area Development
Production Month Sun Hours K Monthly Kwh Tou Peak Value After Kwh
PG&E EV Fleet Program.
PG&E EV Fleet Program.
Smart Meter Update Oregon Public Utility Commission
Presentation transcript:

Pay-As-You-Go Final 2012 Report

Agenda PAYG Refresher Pilot Goals & Overview Voice of the Customer Front Office Impacts Back Office Impacts Financial Results Going Forward 2

Why Pay-As-You-Go? Customer Benefits Include: No deposit, late fees, or reconnect/disconnect fees. Give customers more control over their budget. Improved satisfaction through increased convenience, flexibility, and control. Ability to pay off past-due balances while keeping the lights on. Company Benefits Include: O&M savings. Bad debt recovery. Increased peak load reduction. Increased customer goodwill towards company.

Pilot Structure Recruitment via Call Center and Marketing Anyone except critical care or those who owe more than $500 Pay for electricity in advance of usage & opt out at any time Start with $25, then choose how much and how frequently to pay, using any OG&E method No deposit, late fees, or disconnect/reconnect fees No printed monthly statements Option to receive text, , or phone notifications Access to myUsage.com to edit notifications & view payments

Pilot Goals Customers – Satisfaction Operational Efficiency – Call Center – Back Office Load Impact – Demand Response

$ 0 $ $ $ Midnight Noon Midnight TOU Standard Rate Options

Program & Recruitment Overview Marketing & Official Enrollment: 3/5/12 Enrollment Complete: 6/12/12 Recruitment Goal: 720 Participants Actual Enrollment: 587 Pay-As-You-Go Pilot Enrollment RateGroupGoal Actual Enrollment Current Enrollment StandardBudget StandardConvenience TOUBudget TOUConvenience TOTAL: Actual enrollment numbers as of June 12th, Current enrollment numbers as of October 1 st, 2012.

Program Statistics Active customers utilizing MyUsage: 413 Average payment amount: $41.37 Debt Recovery: –Program started with $41, in debt recovery – Additional $3, debt created during program –$16, has been recovered – % reduction in debt recovery Notifications: –49,240 texts notifications to date – 4,293 outbound call notifications to date As of October 1, 2012

Front Office Impact Required headcount was higher than the control groups in the first three months but significantly decreased in months 4-7, indicating potential long-term savings. 9

Disconnect Activity Group Number of Customers Total Number Disconnected Percent Disconnected at Least Once Average Disconnects per Customer Average Number of Hours Disconnected per Customer Average Disconnect Duration Convenience – Participant % Convenience – Control % Budget Move In – Participant % Budget Move In – Control % Budget Installment Plan – Participant % Budget Installment Plan – Control % Customers on pilot had more total time disconnected than the control group. They also had more disconnects, but those disconnects were much shorter in duration. While a small part of the savings that budget customers realized were the result of having zero energy use during disconnects, 94% of the savings resulted from behavioral changes.

Load Impacts Group Baseline (energy) Reduction (energy) Percent Reduction Estimated Demand at time of System Peak (kW) Budget Move In % Budget Installment Plan % Estimated Total Energy for the Summer (kWh) Budget Move In 5, % Budget Installment Plan 5, % Group Baseline (energy) Reduction (energy) Percent Reduction Estimated Demand at time of System Peak (kW) Budget Move In % Budget Installment Plan % Estimated Total Energy for the Summer (kWh) Budget Move In 6,1291,14419% Budget Installment Plan 5, % Budget participants show significant on- peak energy savings. Budget TOU customers showed the largest reduction at system peak, lowering demand by 0.75 kW. Convenience customers’ usage suggested minor savings but the findings were not statistically significant.

Financial Overview Benefits to rate payers: – Avoided generation costs – Bad debt reduction Program started with $46,143 in debt recovery; $32,297 has been recovered (70%) – Paperless billing cost reduction – Peak demand reduction (0.5 KW per customer) – Call center labor costs Shareholder impacts: – The pilot does impact shareholders by reducing KWH sales until the next rate case – O&M cost reductions until the next rate case – Increased customer satisfaction & participation in other programs Cost drivers: Internal and External IT costs Marketing costs Benefit to cost ratio is 4.19 (TRC value)

13 Pilot participants were asked what one word they would use to describe prepaid electric service. Their answers are captured in the visual representation above. The larger the word, the more frequently it was mentioned. Customer Feedback

Next Steps An estimate for the resources needed to refine the Business Case to +/-25% of actual cost is being prepared 190 current customers are being kept on plan for the time being while options are being evaluated (as of December 2 nd, 2013)

Enrollment Recruitment GoalsCurrent Enrollment