M. Seidel (PSI), E. Jensen (CERN), R. Gehring (KIT), Th. Parker (ESS), J. Stadlmann, P. Spiller (GSI) EuCARD² is co-funded by the partners and the European Commission under Capacities 7th Framework Programme, Grant Agreement The Accelerator Energy Efficiency program of EuCARD 2

EnEfficient Accelerator Efficiency – Outline 1)Political picture of energy efficiency – Desire: sustainable energy: but insufficient storage; numerical examples of amounts of energy – Consequences for accelerator facilities – Work package EnEfficient within the EuCARD 2 program 2)Power flow in an accelerator – Major consumers in typical accelerator facilities – Conversion to secondary radiation: highest potential 3)Examples of technical developments towards higher efficiency – Heat recovery – Efficient magnets – Efficient RF generation, s.c. cavities – Energy management abstract concrete

EnEfficient The Energy problem Climate change and worldwide scarcity of resources cause critical reflections on the use of fossil energy carriers; nuclear power has other problems and is disputed … Energy cost will rise over medium timescales (at least not decrease)  Improving efficiency is a strategy in many countries, this also affects accelerator projects  new accelerator projects and existing facilities must consider efficiency and sustainability

EnEfficient Energy: Order of Magnitude Examples generationconsumptionstorage 1d cyclist „Tour de France“ (4h x 300W): 1.2 kWh 1 run of cloth washing machine: 0.8…1 kWh Car battery (60 Ah): 0.72 kWh 1d Wind Power Station (avg): 12 MWh 1d SwissLightSource 2.4 GeV,0.4 A: 82 MWh ITER superconducting coil: 12.5 MWh 1d nucl. Pow. Plant Leibstadt (CH): 30 GWh 1d CLIC Linear 14 GWh all German storage hydropower: 40 GWh CLIC, 580 MW SLS, 3.5 MW ITER hydro storage car battery nucl. plant 1.3 GW cyclist, 300 W wind-power, 3 MW peak

EnEfficient Energy: Order of Magnitude Examples generationconsumptionstorage 1d cyclist „Tour de France“ (4h x 300W): 1.2 kWh 1 run of cloth washing machine: 0.8…1 kWh Car battery (60 Ah): 0.72 kWh 1d Wind Power Station (avg): 12 MWh 1d SwissLightSource 2.4 GeV,0.4 A: 82 MWh ITER superconducting coil: 12.5 MWh 1d nucl. Pow. Plant Leibstadt (CH): 30 GWh 1d CLIC Linear 14 GWh all German storage hydropower: 40 GWh 1d Earth/Moon System E-loss: 77 TWh 1d electrical consumpt. mankind: 53 TWh World storage hydropower: O(1 TWh ) 1d sunshine absorbed on Earth: 3,000,000 TWh 1d total mankind (inc.fuels): 360 TWh 1.) Accelerators are in the range where they are relevant for society and public discussion 2.) Desired turn to renewables is an enormous task; storage is the problem, not production 3.) Fluctuations of energy availability, depending on time and weather, will be large!

EnEfficient Task 1: Energy recovery from cooling circuits, Th. Parker, A. Lundmark (ESS) Task 2: Higher electronic efficiency RF power generation, E. Jensen (CERN) Task 3: Short term energy storage systems, R. Gehring (KIT) Task 4: Virtual power plant, J. Stadlmann (GSI) Task 5: Beam transfer channels with low power consumption, P. Spiller (GSI) Networking Activity “EnEfficient”, EuCARD 2 links to all workshops on EuCARD: „European Coordination for Accelerator Research”, co-funded by European Commission, 2013…2017 EnEfficient: WP3, networking activity to stimulate developments, support accelerator projects, thesis studies etc. Work Package Leader: M. Seidel (PSI)

EnEfficient Power flow in Accelerators Electrical Grid Accelerator Radio Frequency Magnets Vacuum etc. Auxiliary systems cryogenics conv. cooling, AC etc. Instruments e.g. particle detectors conversion to secondary radiation (beam collisions, targets, undulators …) direct beam application: p-therapy isotope production secondary radiation exotic particles, e.g. Higgs, B-mesons synchrotron radiation neutrons muons figure of merit: secondary particles, X-rays on sample per KWh beam finally all converted to waste heat !

EnEfficient IPAC 2015 Ring Cyclotron 590 MeV loss  Power transfer through 4 amplifier chains 4 resonators 50 MHz SINQ spallation source Example: PSI Facility, 10 MW 2.2 mA /1.3 MW Proton therapy centre [250 MeV sc. cyclotron] dimensions: 120 x 220 m 2 Muon production targets 50 MHz resonator

EnEfficient Electricval grid ca. 10 MW RF Systems 4.1 MW Magnets  2.6 MW Magnets  2.6 MW aux.Systems Instruments  3.3 MW aux.Systems Instruments  3.3 MW Beam on targets 1.3 MW Beam on targets 1.3 MW heat  to river, to air neutrons muons cryogenics Example: PSI Facility, 10 MW n: per beamline: s 10eV ≈ 20µW  + : per beamline 5·10 8 s 30MeV/c ≈ 300µW

EnEfficient Conversion efficiency grid to secondary radiation Conversion to secondary radiation/particles is often required  has great potential for the overall efficiency, for example: Synchrotron Radiation emittance!; optimized undulators; FEL: coherent radiation; energy recovery Colliders low-beta insertion; crab cavities etc. Neutron Sources target; moderators, neutron guides etc. Muon Sources target; capture optics; µ-cooling PSI-HIPA: muonsPSI-HIPA: neutronsSLS: SRSwissFEL: SR linear collider, high energy:

EnEfficient Example: improved conversion efficiency Spallation Target [M. Wohlmuther, PSI] Measuregain Zr cladding instead steel12% more compact rod bundle5% Pb reflector10% inverted entrance window10% total gain factor1.42 colour code: neutron density on same scale (MCNPX) old new beam

EnEfficient Accelerator Efficiency – Outline 1)Political picture of energy efficiency – Desire: sustainable energy: but insufficient storage; numerical examples of amounts of energy – Consequences for accelerator facilities – Work package EnEfficient within the Eucard-2 program 2)Power flow in an accelerator – Major consumers in typical accelerator facilities – Conversion to secondary radiation: highest potential 3)Examples of technical developments towards higher efficiency – Heat recovery – Efficient magnets – Efficient RF generation, s.c. cavities – Energy management

EnEfficient Participants (Experts) from DESY, ALBA, SOLEIL, ESS, MAX-4, PSI, DAFNE, ISIS (institutes) e-ON, Kraftringen, Lund municipality (industry, local authorities) Lab survey on consumption and heat recovery Heat recovery works for many facilities; high temperatures beneficial; local heat distribution system required Greenhouses/food production present interesting application (non-linear scaling) New facilities MAX-4 and ESS foresee heat recovery on large scale talks: Heat Recovery Workshop, Lund, March 2014 [Th. Parker, E.Lindström, ESS]

EnEfficient Lab Survey: Energy Consumption & Heat [Master Thesis, J. Torberntsson, ESS] 10 in operation 2 under Construction Energy consumption Cooling methods Energy related costs

EnEfficient Use of Waste Heat produce work  electrical power? convert heat to higher T level for heating purposes use heat directly at available temperature 1 [electrical power] 0.95 [mechanical power] 0.3…0.4 [heat] Quality of power

EnEfficient IPAC 2015 Weight (average) in grams Days A. Kiessling However: strong scaling with T for food production, i.e. fish!

EnEfficient Efficient RF Generation and Beam Acceleration The more energy is converted – the less you have reject into environment! RF generation efficiency is key for many accelerator applications, especially high intensity machines Topics at Cockcroft workshop: klystron development multi beam IOT (ESS) magnetrons high Q s.c. cavities Workshop EnEfficient RF sources: E2V: magnetron THALES: multi- beam klystron CPI: multi- beam IOT THALES: TETRODE SIEMENS: solid state amplifier

EnEfficient Inductive Output Tubes – considered for ESS [M. Jensen EnEfficient RF sources, 2014] P in P out Klystron/MBK IOT MB-IOT back-off for feedback Operating Power Level +6 dB  sat  65-68%  ESS ~ 45% High gain Low Gain Long-pulse excursions possible Short-pulse excursions possible IOT’s don’t saturate. Built-in headroom for feedback.  70% Courtesy of CPI  Klystrons: Back-off for feedback, cost: 30%  IOTs: Operate close to max efficiency

EnEfficient ‘’Classical” bunching New bunching with core oscillations (COM)  RF =78.0% Useful RF phase Normalised velocity RF period, rad  RF =89.6% Normalised velocity RF period, rad Electrons velocities distributions prior entering the output cavity Bunch phase 0 0 22 22 Output cavity

EnEfficient Superconducting cavities for CW operation Related references: A. Grasselino et al., “Nitrogen and argon doping of niobium for superconducting radio frequency cavities: a pathway to highly efficient accelerating structures”, Supercond. Sci. Technol., vol. 26 No S. Posen and A. Liepe, “RF Test results of the first NB2SN Cavities coated at Cornell”, Proceedings of SRF2013, Paris France Voltage, dissipated power and cryogenic efficiency: promising example: FNAL results

EnEfficient Low power accelerator magnets Workshop on Special Compact and Low Consumption Magnet Design, November 2014, CERN; indico.cern.ch/event/321880/ in prep: Ph. Gardlowski, master thesis, systematic comparison of beam transport TypeProCon Permanent magnets No power required, reliable, compact Tunability difficult, large aperture magnets limited, radiation damage Optimized electro-magnet Low power, less cooling (+vibrations) Larger size, cost Pulsed magnet Low average power, less cooling, high fields Complexity of magnet and circuit, field errors Superconducting magnet No ohmic losses, higher fields Cost, complexity, cryo installation High saturation materials Lower power, compactness and weight Cost, gain is limited

EnEfficient NdFeB magnets with B r = 1.37 T 4 permanent magnet blocks gradient = 15.0…60.4 T/m, stroke = mm Pole gap = 27.2 mm Field quality = ±0.1% over 23 mm Permanent Magnet Quad Design for CLIC [B. Shepard, STFC Daresbury] Stroke = 0 … 64 mm Tunable high-gradient permanent magnet quadrupoles, B.J.A. Shepherd et al 2014 JINST 9 T11006

Pulsed Quadrupole Magnet [P. Spiller et al, GSI] Prototype Quadrupole Gradient80 T/m Length0.65 m Pulse length 90  s (beam 1  s) Peak current400 kA (35 kA) Peak voltage17 kV (5 kV) kV65 kJ (5.6 kJ) Inductivity535 nH Capacitor 450  F Forces200 kN Engineering model of the prototype quadrupole magnet incl. support See U. Bell et al: IPAC15: WEPMA021 low average power; energy recovery in capacitive storage possible for periodic operation; high field complexity added by pulsing circuit; field precision potentially challenging

EnEfficient E management: impact of solar/wind energy (taken from internet) Renewables cause strong variations Impact on accelerators? Energy management, but how? Germany

EnEfficient Energy management example: CLIC Study on standby modes Andrea Latina, CERN CLIC project predicts large power for 3TeV case: 580 MW idea: Prepare standby modes for high consumption times during day; relatively fast luminosity recovery from standby (challenging) Model calculation includes standby power, start-up times result of model with 2 standbys during day:

EnEfficient Energy Storage for Accelerators LIQuid HYdrogen & SMES storage systems needed for: pulsed RF systems cycling synchrotrons pulsed magnets uninterrupted power strategic energy management development by KIT for general purpose: hybrid SMES/LH2 [M. Sander, R. Gehring, KIT] large power MW capacity to  70 GWh SMES to  10 GJ synergy with existing cryogenics

EnEfficient Summary With scarcity of resources and in presence of global climate change, Energy Efficiency becomes important for accelerator projects; Eucard-2 offers a networking activity dedicated to this topic. Physics concept to generate radiation for users has large potential for efficiency (SR, exotic particles, µ, n etc.); advancements should be better communicated as efficiency improvements Many technical efforts are undertaken with heat recovery, RF systems, cavities, magnets, energy management 3 rd Workshop on Sustainable Energy for large Accelerator RI‘s took place last week at DESY: Planned: – proton driver efficiency (Feb 16), – Energy management (2016) EuCARD 2 /EnEfficient – stay tuned: Thank you for your attention!