Testing antimatter gravity: the Aegis experiment at Cern Phd Student: Michele Sacerdoti Phd Workshop: 12-13/10/2015 Supervisors: Fabrizio Castelli, Marco.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Antimatter (e+, Ps, H-bar) physics Laboratory
Advertisements

Photodetachment microscopy in a magnetic field Christophe Blondel Laboratoire Aimé-Cotton, Centre national de la recherche scientifique, université Paris-
GRAVITY Chapter 3 Section 2.
Antimatter: Past, Present & Future Presentation By Paramita Barai In Course Phys 6410: Introductory Nuclear and Particle Physics Instructor: Dr. Xiaochun.
1 FK7003 Lecture 8 ● CP -violation ● T -violation ● CPT invariance.
Positronium Rydberg excitation in AEGIS Physics with many positrons International Fermi School July 2009 – Varenna, Italy The experimental work on.
Antihydrogen Spectroscopy David Christian Fermilab November 17, 2007.
Antimatter Matter-Antimatter Propulsion Theory. What Antimatter is Antimatter was predicted in 1929 (4) Antihydrogen produced in 1999 Antimatter is composed.
September 23, 2008 Erice Cem Güçlü İstanbul Technical University Physics Department Production of electron-positron pairs by nuclear dissociation.
The Production of Cold Antihydrogen w. A Brief History of Antimatter In 1928, Paul Dirac proposes antimatter with his work in relativistic quantum mechanics.
Determination of fundamental constants using laser cooled molecular ions.
Planet Earth Force Laws in Nature - Dynamics kinds - sources - strengths - ranges - mediators.
Equivalence principle, antigravity of antimatter and all that Savely G Karshenboim D.I. Mendeleev Institute for Metrology (St. Petersburg) and Max-Planck-Institut.
Forces and the Laws of Motion Changes in Motion Chapter 4:Section 1.
1 Antimatter 1Antimatter and the Universe 2Antimatter in the Laboratory 3Antimatter in Daily Life.
FLAR project S.L. Yakovenko JINR, Dubna,Russia. 2 Contents 1.FlAIR project 2.AD facility at CERN 3.Antyhydrogen and Positronium in-flight at FLAIR 4.LEPTA.
1 Antimatter - Rolf Landua Lecture Plan I.History of Antimatter II.Antimatter and the Universe III.Production and trapping of antiparticles IV.Precision.
Towards the production of an anti-hydrogen beam Simon Van Gorp1, Y.Enomoto1, N.Kuroda2, K.Michishio3, D.J.Murtagh1, S.Ulmer1,, H. Higaki, C.H.Kim2, Y.Nagata1,
Prepared By A.K.M. Moinul Haque Meaze Center for High Energy Physics Kyungpook National University Daegu Korea For the class of Respected.
Considerations on Rydberg transport for antihydrogen formation Daniel Comparat Laboratoire Aimé Cotton Orsay FRANCE.
Experiments with Stark-decelerated and trapped polar molecules Steven Hoekstra Molecular Physics Department ( Gerard Meijer) Fritz-Haber-Institutder Max-Planck-Gesellschaft.
Measuring the Gravitational Acceleration of Antimatter: The AEgIS Experiment Torkjell Huse (for Nicola Pasifico) – University of Oslo On behalf of the.
Toward a Stark Decelerator for atoms and molecules exited into a Rydberg state Anne Cournol, Nicolas Saquet, Jérôme Beugnon, Nicolas Vanhaecke, Pierre.
FLAIR meeting, GSI March Positron Ring for Antihydrogen Production A.Sidorin for LEPTA collaboration JINR, Dubna.
1/13/ Mar La Sapienza Marco Giammarchi Istituto Nazionale Fisica Nucleare - Milano Study of fundamental Laws with Antimatter at CERN Introduction.
Antihydrogen Trapping and Resonant Interactions, חגיגת הפיזיקה שדה בוקר אלי שריד Eli Sarid ALPHA Collaboration, CERN + NRCN, Israel Antihydrogen.
CERN: The ATRAP Experiment. Preview Overview of the ATRAP Experiment  History  Ongoing work  Goals Presentation of my jobs and projects.
Varenna - July 2009 Laser-driven Ps excitation in the Aegis antimatter experiment Marco G. Giammarchi and Fabrizio Castelli Dipartimento di Fisica dell’Universita’
January 6, 2011ICLATIP-3 Kathmandu University Nepal 1 Proposal for the realization of Santilli's comparative test on the gravity of electrons and positrons.
SEMINAR ON ANTIMATTER. INTRODUCTION Antimatter is real. Energy density of chemical reaction is 1×10  J/kg. nuclear fission is 8×10  J/kg. nuclear fusion.
Antihydrogen Workshop, June , CERN S.N.Gninenko Production of cold positronium S.N. Gninenko INR, Moscow.
Merritt Moore Physics 95, 2009 T R A P P E D ANTIPARTICLES.
New physics with intense positron beams Alfredo Dupasquier Frascati, 20 gennaio 2010.
Gemma Testera Consiglio di Sezione Luglio 2015 Stefan Meyer Institute CERN Czech Technical University ETH Zurich University of Genova University of Milano.
MASPLAS (MAterial and fundamental Science with Positrons and LASers)  Marco G. Giammarchi - Infn Milano  Rafael Ferragut - Politecnico di Milano (e Infn)
Proposed Laboratory Simulation of Galactic Positron In-Flight Annihilation in Atomic Hydrogen Benjamin Brown, Marquette University, Milwaukee, WI, USA.
Overview of low energy positron physics and applications
NUCLEAR FRAGMENTATION STUDIES WITH ANTIPROTON-NUCLEUS ANNIHILATIONS J. Kawada on behalf of the AE g IS collaboration. Albert Einstein Center for Fundamental.
Ялта Конференция Yalta-, Univ. of Tokyo, Ryo FUNAKOSHI Univ. of Tokyo Ryo FUNAKOSHI ATHENA collaboration ATHENA: a High Performance detector for.
Apparatus to Explore the Gravitational Interactions of antiatomS: the R&D programme CERN G. Bonomi (now at Brescia University), M. Doser, R. Landua, A.
Zeudi Mazzotta* On behalf of the AEgIS collaboration from Università degli studi di Milano Istituto Nazionale di Fisica Nucleare.
7/3/2016Milano Consiglio di Sezione AEGIS: a moirè deflectometer for antimatter Marco G. Giammarchi Istituto Nazionale Fisica Nucleare - Milano A E g I.
Towards anions laser cooling * Giovanni Cerchiari ( Elena Jordan Alban Kellerbauer Max-Planck-Insitut für Kernphysik (Saupfercheckweg.
Mossbauer spectroscopy
Physical and Applicative Overview Joey Goodknight Physics 129 October 21, 2010.
QUPLAS Marco G. Giammarchi Istituto Nazionale Fisica Nucleare – Milano
Raman Effect The Scattering of electromagnetic radiation by matter with a change of frequency.
MCP Analysis on ALpha Howard Chiao.
Alternate Gradient deceleration of large molecules
The AE g IS experiment at AD
Traps for antiprotons, electrons and positrons in the 5 T and 1 T magnetic fields G. Testera & Genoa group AEGIS main magnetic field (on axis) : from Alexei.
PHL424: 4 fundamental forces in nature
Overview Lecture 2 Trapping antiprotons Antihydrogen ATHENA and ATRAP
Cold Antimatter at CERN
By Ranjith Nambiar Roll no.41
Increasing Efficiency in the GRACE Line at CERN’s Antimatter Factory using Ardunio Interface Robby Finan.
Siara Fabbri University of Manchester
Marco G. Giammarchi* Istituto Nazionale Fisica Nucleare - Milano
Properties of antimatter studied at the CERN Antiproton Decelerator
Angela Gligorova on behalf of the AEgIS and Medipix collaborations
PHL424: 4 fundamental forces in nature
BEAMLINE MAGNETS FOR ALPHA-G
Russian Research Center “ Kurchatov Institute”
Subatomic Particles and Quantum Theory
ELENA Extra Low ENergy Antiproton Ring
Progress on Antimatter Interferometry
PHYSICS.
Summer Student Sessions
LEPTA project Measuring lifetime of positrons
Plans for future electron cooling needs PS BD/AC
Presentation transcript:

Testing antimatter gravity: the Aegis experiment at Cern Phd Student: Michele Sacerdoti Phd Workshop: 12-13/10/2015 Supervisors: Fabrizio Castelli, Marco Giammarchi

Index Theoretical aspects Aegis experiment Critical aspects Montecarlo simulations on various alternatives

3 All matter bodies at the same space-time point in a given matter gravitational field will undergo the same acceleration The weak equivalence principle (WEP) All antimatter bodies at the same space-time point in a given antimatter gravitational field will undergo the same acceleration CPT symmetric situation

All antimatter bodies at the same space-time point in a given antimatter gravitational field will undergo the same acceleration 4 All matter bodies at the same space-time point in a given matter gravitational field will undergo the same acceleration The weak equivalence principle (WEP) Will antimatter bodies at the same space-time point in a given matter gravitational field undergo the same acceleration?

Supergravity theories As pointed out by Scherk in 1979 besides the graviton with spin 2 and zero mass the gravitational interaction could be mediated by a Kaluza-Klein vector particle with spin 1 and a scalar particle with spin 0 with non zero mass The graviscalar is attractive while the gravivector is repulsive. It could happen that antimatter experiences a greater acceleration towards earth than matter or a smaller one. The effect of the two particles could be cancelled in matter experiments and appear in matter-antimatter experiments.

CERN Czech Technical University ETH Zurich University of Genova University of Padova University of Pavia University College London Politecnico di Milano Max-Planck Institute Heidelbert Institute of Nuclear Research of the Russian Academy of Science University of Bergen University of Brescia Heidelberg University University of Trento University of Paris Sud University of Oslo INFN sections of: Genova, Milano, Padova, Pavia, Trento AEgIS collaboration Stefan Meyer Institute University of Bern University of Lyon 1 6 University of Milano

The goal of Aegis Measure gravitational acceleration of Antihydrogen with a 1% precision with free fall and a classical Moiré deflectometer Antihydrogen is neutral, so electric fields should not hide the gravitational acceleration We need to create one antihydrogen atom per second to be able to have the result in a reasonable amount of time, around 1 month The atom must be very cold so that its thermal vibration doesn’t hide the gravitational acceleration (100 mK)

Classical Moirè deflectometer The beam is created through Stark acceleration with a non uniform electric field as antihydrogen is created in a Rydberg level with an electric dipole (100m/s) photon 70 μm L = 25 cm 30 μm 1 μm precision

Control of the antihydrogen quantum state Cold antihydrogen atoms (v antihydrogen ~ v antiproton ) Cross section goes with n 4 of Ps and is maximum when the orbital velocity of Ps is equal to its velocity Charge exchange with Positronium excited at Rydberg (high n) levels Aegis strategy to create antihydrogen For n=25 velocity of Ps orbital velocity Antiprotons from AD at Cern

Positronium atom orto-Ps Triplet state Mean lifetime 142ns 3  annihilation      para-Ps Singlet state Mean lifetime 0,125ns 2  annihilation  Energies = 511keV  Energies < 511keV Ps n-level energy Purely leptonic atom

The experimental apparatus Transfer line 4.46 T magnet 1 T magnet AD beam line Degraders 4.46 T catching traps 1 T manipulation traps Positron system Accumulator Trap 22 Na Ps chamber

e+ beam Antiprotons accumulated from CERN AD (Antiproton Decelerator) p-p- p-p- e+ Classical Moiré deflectometer accumulated from Na 22 source Detail of the apparatus 2 laser beams for Ps excitation

Positron pulse: 4,2kV The Positronium production A bunched positron beam is sent toward a porous «target» able to convert positrons into Positronium. Porous Silicon target cooled Positronium cloud Positronium is created in the material bulk A fraction of the Ps exiting the target is thermalized into the target pores Pores diameter ~ 10nm e+/Ps converter Nanochanneled Si Frontal view 4.2 kV e+

n=1 n=3 Continuum High n 6,05eV 205nm 0,75eV ~1680nm Strategy for Rydberg laser excitation 30% efficiency The laser apparatus has been studied and prepared in Milan Milan Aegis Group: “Efficient two-step Positronium laser excitation to Rydberg levels" in Nuclear Instruments and Methods in Physics Research Section B: Beam Interactions with Materials and Atoms 269, 1527 (2011).

Critical aspects Density and temperature of antiprotons (10 5 per bunch) Number, velocity and direction of Ps due to the limited solid angle (10 8 per bunch) Excitation efficiency of Ps by the lasers (30%) Effect of the 1T magnetic field on the trajectory of Ps towards the antiprotons As a result very limited number of generated antihydrogen atoms

Montecarlo Simulations I am working on montecarlo simulations to increase the experiment efficiency Until now the number of antihydrogen atoms is too small and needs to be increased (3 atoms per 200 s) Reflectors and electric focusing of Ps through Stark effect have been simulated (12 and 4 atoms per 200 s) The best result is obtained using a transmission target aligned to the antiprotons trajectory with Ps normal emission instead of a reflection one (1105 atoms per 200 s) The preparation of such a target is under investigation

Results of Montecarlo Simulations LayoutNumber of antih atoms in 200 s Proposal3 Ellipsoidal reflector12 Focusing through Stark effect4 Transmission target off-axis with normal emission112 Transmission target on-axis with normal emission1105

Ps and anti-hydrogen generation

ellipsoidal reflector focus in target center and antiproton cloud center trap electrodes radius 0.85 cm Ellipsoidal reflector

Focusing through Stark effect

Transmission target off-axis

Transmission target on-axis