PAVI 2011, Roma Outline 1.EDM 101 2.A word on eEDM 3.nEDM experiments 4.Principle of the SNS experiment 5.Berkeley involvement: Kerr effect, magnetometry.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Andreas Knecht1ZH Doktorandenseminar 2009, 4. – 5. Juni 2009 A Gravitational Spectrometer for Ultracold Neutrons Andreas Knecht Paul Scherrer Institut.
Advertisements

Atomic Parity Violation in Ytterbium, K. Tsigutkin, D. Dounas-Frazer, A. Family, and D. Budker
Ra-225: The Path to a Next Generation EDM Experiment
The electron EDM search in solid ferroelectric Eu 0.5 Ba 0.5 TiO 3 Alex Sushkov Steve EckelSteve Lamoreaux.
1 Test of fundamental symmetries Sumerian, 2600 B.C. (British Museum) With thanks to Antoine Weis from an atomic physics perspective Mike Tarbutt.
Searches for Permanent Electric Dipole Moments (EDM) of Atoms, Molecules, and the Neutron Dmitry Budker University of California, Berkeley Nuclear Science.
University of California, Berkeley Nuclear Science Division, LBNL
Another Route to CP Violation Beyond the SM – Particle Dipole Moments Dave Wark Imperial/RAL WIN05 Delphi June 10, 2005.
Philip Harris University of Sussex (for the EDM Collaboration) The Neutron EDM Experiments at the ILL.
Electric dipole moments : a search for new physics E.A. Hinds Manchester, 12 Feb 2004 Imperial College London.
The cryogenic neutron EDM experiment at ILL and the result of the room temperature experiment James Karamath University of Sussex.
Search for the Electron Electric Dipole Moment Val Prasad Yale University Experiment: D.DeMille, D. Kawall, R.Paolino, V. Prasad F. Bay, S. Bickman, P.Hamilton,
Lepton Moments 2014 Craigville 07/22/2014 P. Schmidt-Wellenburg PSI Searching for the electric dipole moment of the neutron.
1 Neutron Electric Dipole Moment Experiment Jen-Chieh Peng International Workshop on “High Energy Physics in the LHC Era” Valparaiso, Chile, December 11-15,
Nonlinear Magneto-Optical Rotation with Frequency-Modulated Light Derek Kimball Dmitry Budker Simon Rochester Valeriy Yashchuk Max Zolotorev and many others...
Experimental Atomic Physics Research in the Budker Group Tests of fundamental symmetries using atomic physics: Parity Time-reversal invariance Permutation.
Measurement of the electron’s electric dipole moment
Neutron Electric Dipole Moment 1.D. Beck (Intro) 2.S. Williamson (He3 Services construction and testing) 3.L. Yang (Light collection) with J. Blackburn,
Electric Dipole Moment of Neutron and Neutrinos
DHB, nEDM Collab. Mtg, 15/16 Apr 04 UIUC Test System (Beck, Chandler, Hertzog, Kammel, Newman, Peng, Sharp, Williamson, Yoder; Blackburn, Kenyon, Thorsland)
Search for an Atomic EDM with
Magnetic/Electric Fields for KEK-RCNP EDM Experiment K. Matsuta(Osaka), Y. Masuda(KEK), Y. Watanabe(KEK), S.C. Jeong(KEK), K. Hatanaka(RCNP), R. Matsumiya.
Ultrahigh precision observation of nuclear spin precession and application to EDM measurement T. Inoue, T. Furukawa, H. Hayashi, M. Tsuchiya, T. Nanao,
Future electron EDM measurements using YbF
P25 EDMEDM Seminar 4/27/05 #1 Martin Cooper, Los Alamos Co-spokesperson for the EDM Project for presentation to P-25 Seminar Los Alamos, New Mexico April.
Low-frequency nuclear spin maser and search for atomic EDM of 129 Xe A. Yoshimi RIKEN SPIN /10/11-16 Trieste, ITALY Collaborator : K. Asahi (Professor,
Normalization of the NPDGamma Experimental Data F. Simmons, C. Crawford University of Kentucky, for the NPDGamma collaboration Background: NPDγ Experiment.
Polarized Proton Solid Target for RI beam experiments M. Hatano University of Tokyo H. Sakai University of Tokyo T. Uesaka CNS, University of Tokyo S.
Beam Polarimetry Matthew Musgrave NPDGamma Collaboration Meeting Oak Ridge National Laboratory Oct. 15, 2010.
Applications of polarized neutrons V.R. Skoy Frank Laboratory of Neutron Physics, Joint Institute for Nuclear Research Dubna, Moscow Region, Russia.
A new measurement of the electron’s electric dipole moment using YbF molecules Mike Tarbutt Centre for Cold Matter, Imperial College London. International.
Molecular Deceleration Georgios Vasilakis. Outline  Why cold molecules are important  Cooling techniques  Molecular deceleration  Principle  Theory.
Measuring the Electron EDM Using Ytterbium Fluoride (YbF) Molecules
A New Search on the Neutron Electric Dipole Moment (nEDM) 2008 Fall Chinese Physical Society Meeting September 20, 2008 Jinan, China Haiyan Gao ( 高海燕 )
2007/11/02nEDM BOSTON1 Dressing Field Study Pinghan Chu University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign nEDM Collaboration Boston Dressed.
CP-Violation and Baryon Asymmetry in Universe Electric Dipole Moments of Fundamental Particles Yannis K. Semertzidis Brookhaven National Lab Colloquium.
DOE 2/11/05 #1 EDM R&D Progress Steve Lamoreaux, Los Alamos Co-spokesperson for the EDM Project for presentation to The Department of Energy Cost & Schedule.
CryoEDM – A Cryogenic Neutron-EDM Experiment Collaboration: Sussex University, RAL, ILL, Kure University, Oxford University Hans Kraus … but before: some.
Parity nonconservation in the 6s 2 1 S 0 – 6s5d 3 D 1 transition in Atomic Ytterbium: status of the Berkeley experiments K. Tsigutkin, J. Stalnaker, V.
Study of T 1 relaxation time A proposal to test T 1 using a dilution fridge and SQUID NMA at Royal Hollow University,London.
Collab_NSAC 4/2/03 #1 EDMEDM Martin Cooper, Los Alamos Co-spokesperson for the EDM Project for presentation to EDM Collaboration Meeting Los Alamos, NM.
Ramsey Spectroscopy: Search for e- Dipole Moment
Electric dipole moment searches E.A. Hinds Birmingham 11 th July 2011 Centre for Cold Matter Imperial College London.
EDMEDM LANL Review of EDM Cost and Schedule Jan Boissevain, P-25 February 11, 2005, Los Alamos National Laboratory EDM Reference Design Tour of the Reference.
Alex Sushkov Dima Budker Valeriy Yashchuk (UC Berkeley) Kerr Effect-based Measurement of the Electric Field.
EDMEDM C&S Review 2/11/05 #1 Martin Cooper, Los Alamos Co-spokesperson for the EDM Project for presentation to LANL Cost and Schedule Review Committee.
The cryogenic neutron EDM experiment at ILL Technical challenges and solutions James Karamath University of Sussex.
Kerr Effect-based Measurement of the Electric Field
EDMEDM EDM Collaboration Meeting 6-05 Jan Boissevain, P-25 June 20, 2005, Los Alamos National Laboratory EDM Reference Design.
Precision spectroscopy of trapped HfF + with a coherence time of 1 second Kevin Cossel JILA eEDM collaboration.
Electric Dipole Moment Searches in Nuclei, Atoms, and Molecules Dave Kawall - RIKEN BNL Research Center and UMass D S RBRC Symposium, BNL, June 19th, 2006.
The TRI  P programme at KVI Tests of the Standard Model at low energy Hans Wilschut KVI – Groningen Low energy tests e.g. Time reversal violation precision.
Mesure du moment électrique dipolaire du neutron Oscar Naviliat-Cuncic LPC-Caen et Université de Caen Basse-Normandie Journée de la division Champs et.
Assembly 12/14/06 #1 Assembly and Commissioning Paul Huffman.
Neutron and electron EDMs PPAP meeting, Birmingham, 18 th September 2012 Mike Tarbutt Centre for Cold Matter, Imperial College London.
Collab 6/20/05 #1 EDMEDM Martin Cooper, Los Alamos Co-spokesperson for the EDM Project for presentation to The EDM Collaboration Los Alamos, NM June 20,
Derek F. Jackson Kimball. Collaboration Dmitry Budker, Arne Wickenbrock, John Blanchard, Samer Afach, Nathan Leefer, Lykourgas Bougas, Dionysis Antypas.
Rydberg atoms part 1 Tobias Thiele.
1 m Tungsten Carbide Spectroscopy for electron EDM Measurement Jeongwon Lee June 23, 2011 Jinhai Chen, and Aaron E. Leanhardt Department of Physics, University.
Ultra-Cold Neutron Group in Kellogg Lab - Neutron Electric Dipole Moment (EDM) Experiment - Search for new CP violation - Neutron Decay - Precision measurements.
Yannis K. Semertzidis Brookhaven National Laboratory New opportunities at CERN CERN, 12 May 2009 Storage Ring EDM Experiments The storage ring method can.
 The electron electric dipole moment (eEDM) is aligned with the spin and interacts with the giant (~84 GV/cm) effective internal electric field of the.
– + + – Search for the μEDM using a compact storage ring A. Adelmann 1, K. Kirch 1, C.J.G. Onderwater 2, T. Schietinger 1, A. Streun 1 1 Paul Scherrer.
Electric Dipole Moments PPAP community meeting 2015
Alternate Gradient deceleration of large molecules
Neutron and electron electric dipole moments
Using ultracold neutrons to constrain the neutron electric dipole moment Tamas Budner.
Electric Dipole Moments: Searches at Storage Rings
Electric Dipole Moments: Searches at Storage Rings
electric dipole moments (EDM)
Presentation transcript:

PAVI 2011, Roma Outline 1.EDM A word on eEDM 3.nEDM experiments 4.Principle of the SNS experiment 5.Berkeley involvement: Kerr effect, magnetometry 6.No conclusion (yet) Presented for Douglas H Beck (UIUC) by Dmitry Budker (UC Berkeley)

Permanent EDM of a particle contradicts both P- and T-invariance PT d J T violation was not understood in the first EDM experiments!

No EDM in a state with a well defined rotational quantum number!

“Permanent” EDM of KRb “Given the measured B, the fit of the Stark shift (line in lower panel) gives a permanent electric dipole moment of 0.566(17) D.” K.-K. Ni, et al. Science 322 (2008) 231.

 Existence of particle EDM implies T reversal invariance violation  T reversal violation implies CP violation if CPT symmetry preserved  Std. model  immeasurably small EDM

 Simple extensions like 2 Higgs doublets, more gauge particles still preserve CP for real couplings multi-Higgs models can have explicit CP violation in L Higgs term  SUSY preserves CP in broken SUSY, complex couplings arise which naturally violate CP  Attractive in general to have underlying theory be CP invariant generate CP violation by spontaneous symmetry breaking

EDM causes spin to precess in an electric field E x y z

Universal Statistical Sensitivity Formula Electric fieldNumber of Particles Coherence Time Lifetime of Experimentalist

EDM of the Electron Heavy atoms and molecules amplify the EDM (d at / d e ~ Z 3 α 2 P.G.H. Sandars, Oxford, 1960s) Best limit (until 2011) |d e |<1.5· e·cm from E.D. Commins et al ( ), Tl New from Ed Hinds’ group:

Professor Eugene D. Commins

 In diamagnetic atoms, EDM dominated by nuclear contribution magnetic effects not so important, dominated by finite size effects (Schiff moment) Seattle 199 Hg experiment Sensitivity to motional fields reduced –  N <<  e –simpler apparatus –smallest EDM limit –R ~ 10 for 199 Hg ( 1 S 0 electron config’n) Griffith, et al. PRL 102 (2009)

 Particle Data Group says:

Neutron EDM: the time line ? Prof. N. F. Ramsey Retires

Prof. Norman F. Ramsey “What if we see an EDM?”

Proposal: Ya. B. Zel'dovich, Sov. Phys. JETP, 9, 1389 (1959) First realizations: 1969, Dubna and Garching Problem with production -- tiny fraction in Maxwellian distribution (~ at T=30 K) Ultra-Cold Neutrons (UCN) The ILL UCN Source Materials used for UCN storage:

The ILL n-EDM Experiment Ramsey separated-field method N = 13,000; n~1/cm 3 Storage time:  = 130 s E = 4.5 kV/cm 199 Hg co-magnetometer Statistics-limited

UCN Source

Neutron EDM Experiment: Trapping Neutrons Superfluid helium n phonon n polarized neutron v = 440 m/s Incident neutrons have same energy and momentum as phonons in superfluid helium: they interact and stop

Neutron EDM Experiment: Neutron Precession Superfluid helium nnnnnn B0B0 B pulse

Neutron EDM Experiment: Precession Measurement Superfluid helium nnnnnn B0B0 3 He Add polarized 3 He atoms (nearly same magnetic moment as neutrons)

Neutron EDM Experiment: Precession Measurement Superfluid helium B0B0 n 3 He 3 He, n spins parallel: “no” interaction n 3 He

Neutron EDM Experiment: Precession Measurement Superfluid helium B0B0 n 3 He 3 He, n spins anti-parallel – large reaction probabilty → p + 3 H 3H3H p p and 3 H give off scintillation light

Superfluid helium nnnnnn B0B0 E0E0

 Polarize 9 Å (= 1 meV) neutrons in beam guide  Produce UCNs in place downscattering in He II, T ~ 0.5 K (UCN not in thermal equilibrium)  Two cells: E parallel, anti-parallel to B Measurement cell cutaway HV Ground Measurement Cells (7.6x10x40 cm 3 ) B E

Precession frequency by neutron capture –add polarized 3 He –  (n + 3 He) ~ 0,  (n + 3 He) ~ 2 Mb –p,T scintillate in He II –80 nm  400 nm in cell wall coating: deuterated fluor (dTPB) –light detected by PM tube at low temperature B E Scintillation signal (B/40)

Incident neutron fluence  cold ~ 3x10 8 n/s:  ~ 0.3 Å FWHM UCN density at beginning of measurement n UCN ~ 100 cm -3 Polarized 3 He densityn 3 ~ cm -3, n 3 /n 4 ~ 5x Cell volumex·y·z = 7.6·10·40 cm 3 = 3100 cm 3 Holding fieldB 0 ~ 10 mG x Electric fieldE 0 ~ 50 kV/cm x Precession frequenciesf n ~ 30 Hz, |f n – f 3 | ~ 3 Hz Operating temperatureT op = 0.45 K Refrigeration~ K Official sensitivity (300 live days)  d = 7.8x e·cm (90% CL)

nEDM Hall Ground Breaking (ORNL, 6 Feb. 09) “Shovel Ready” Spallation Neutron Source Oak Ridge National Laboratory

nEDM Hall July 09 (now complete) Spallation Neutron Source Oak Ridge National Laboratory

Apparatus Overview Dilution refrigerator mixing volume DR LHe volume (~300 liters) 3 He injection volume Central LHe volume (~1000 Liters) Re-entrant insert for neutron guide Measurement cell/electrode assembly

Sensitivity Estimates  d = 7.8x e·cm (90% CL) Source δ d n (e cm)Comments Linear v×E (geometric phase effect) < 2 x Uniformity of B 0 Quadratic v×E< 0.5 x E-field reversal to 1% Pseudomagnetic field effects< 1 x π /2 pulse, comparing two cells Gravitational offsets< 0.1 x With 1 nA leakage currents Leakage currents< 1 x < 1 nA Miscellaneous< 1 x alignments,  asym., etc. Expected statistical sensitivity –limited by neutron density in cell Systematic uncertainty estimates

 Experiment relies on several key pieces of physics stop neutrons in superfluid helium, trap in plastic cell measure precession frequency with capture reaction polarized 3 He also provides co-magnetometry, opportunity for spin-dressing  Progress on several technical challenges uniform magnetic (and electric) fields  including dressing, gradient coils handling polarized 3 He  source, relaxation, plumbing, spin-dressing many materials challenges  advanced stage of design with good materials Doug Beck’s Summary

Graduate student B.-K. Park Undergraduate Geoffrey Iwata Post-doc Brian B. Patton  Kerr monitor of HV field  Atomic magnetometer Berkeley involvement

Accurate E-reversal, stability and field-monitoring are essential! The E  v systematics: S. K. Lamoreaux, PRA 53(6), R3705, 1996 D. Budker, D. F. Kimball, and D. P. DeMille, “Atomic physics: Exploration in Problems and Solutions,” Oxford, 2003&2008 ~3 Hz  c ~L/v Motional magnetic field ~5·10 -8 Hz for both n and 3 He

E-field requirements Homogeneity over cell volume Stability over 500 s< 1 % Reversibility This reduces E-field-related systematics to < 5  Hz, i.e. one tenth of the EDM shift for d n = e  cm Electric field monitoring ~ 0.1% -1%

The Kerr Effect Uniaxial E-field-induced anisotropy:  n = n || -n  = KE 0 2 For input light polarized at 45 o to E, the induced ellipticity: Circular analyzer Achievable sensitivity:   rad Hz -1/2

Electric Field Measurement Kerr constant for LHe estimated from experimental data for He at 300K: K ≈ 1.7 · (cm/V) 2 Electric field: E 0 = 50 kV/cm Sample length: L = 10 cm Induced ellipticity:  ≈ rad A 1s measurement gives accuracy (  ≈ rad Hz -1/2 ):  E 0 /E 0 ≈ 5 · ? Kerr constant for superfluid He ?

Test set-up at Berkeley Cryostat (T  1.4 K) with optical access Graduate student A. Sushkov (Berkeley  Yale  Harvard) Electrode Assembly Laser Home-made cryogenic HV cable HV cable- connector Copper electrodes l=38 mm gap=6 mm Thin-wall st. steel tube

Results: LN 2 Kerr constant E = 60 kV/cm max Measurement: K = 4.2(1)· (cm/V) 2 Literature result: K = 4.0 · (cm/V) 2 K.Imai et. al., Proceedings of the 3rd Int. Conf. On Prop. and App. Of Diel. Mat., 1991 Japan)

LHe Kerr Constant Measurements Martin CooperA. Sushkov, Val Yashchuk, S. Lamoreaux Eric Williams

Results: LHe Kerr constant (T≈1.4 K) E = 50 kV/cm max Measurement: K = 2.45(13)· (cm/V) 2 Theoretical value: (1s, 2s, 2p levels) K = 2.0 · (cm/V) 2  Temperature dependence!

Fiberized Magnetometer for nEDM All-optical, alignment-based fiberized magnetometer: Large-core fibers (output) Magnetic field Polarization- maintaining fibers (input) Polarizing beamsplitter 1 cm Cs cell pump probe

Performance: cm-scale alekene-coated cell has T 1 = s: Driven oscillation indicates 2.4 nG field resolution with 12.5-Hz ENBW: Sensor also operates in self-oscillating mode with high sensitivity –Initial tests limited by ambient field noise Acoustic noise not observable at frequencies above 2 kHz, even when sensor in motion –Larmor frequency ~7 kHz in experiment.

Performance (in actual noisy

nEDM magnetometer people Chris Hovde SWS Mohammed Sheikh Undergraduate Brian Patton UCB

Advertisement: students/interns/postdocs/sabbatical faculty looking for visiting students/interns/postdocs/sabbatical faculty preferrably with funding will train!