OAK RIDGE NORTH IMPACT FEES. Overview 1.Introduction 2.Schedule/Process 3.Land Use Assumption 4.Capital Improvement Plan Water Wastewater 5.Impact Fees.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PROPOSITION 218 IMPACTS ON UTILITY USER FEES Case Study City of Dixon Sewer Rate Repeal of 2007.
Advertisements

SANITARY SEWER ACCESS POLICY, 2007 AN OVERVIEW CITY OF TUSCALOOSA SANITARY SEWER ACCESS POLICY, 2007 AN OVERVIEW.
Middletown Water & Sewer Committee Recommendations for Future Financing of Improvements Water & Sewer Committee Members: Jennifer Falcinelli, Chairman.
“Nucor Road Industrial Corridor – Sanitary Sewer Project” Presented by: Justin Longstreth, P.E. Brian Hannon, P,E, Moore & Bruggink, Inc. October 14 th,
AIRPORT AREA INFRASTRUCTURE TIF DISTRICT: Public Hearing Presentation Oct 21, 2013.
Public Hearing FY 2011 Budget 1. City Council Goals FY 2011 Flood Recovery and Protection –Identify Funding and Sources for Flood –Restore Affordable.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
CAPITAL IMPROVEMENTS PLANNING FN 401 MPI Patrick Callahan, Municipal Consultant July 21, :00PM.
+ Proposed Lockwood Targeted Economic Development District 2015 Yellowstone County.
CITY OF MERIDIAN FY08 BUDGET HEARING Mayor – Tammy de Weerd Council President – Joe Borton Council Vice President – Charlie Rountree Council – Keith Bird.
Utility Extension Project
PUBLIC HEARING: Development (Impact) Fees - Land Use Assumptions & Infrastructure Improvement Plan Reports June 30, 2014.
Development (Impact) Fee Program Changes to Comply with State Law Mayor and Council Study Session June 3, 2014.
Municipal Tax Increment Financing
Beech Grove, Indiana TAX INCREMENT FINANCING Heather R. James, Ice Miller LLP April 18, 2013.
CITY OF MERIDIAN FY07 BUDGET HEARING Mayor – Tammy de Weerd Council President – Shaun Wardle Council Vice President – Joe Borton Council – Keith Bird Council.
Paying for Growth Rough Proportionality & Transportation Impact Fee Austin Neighborhoods Council June 24, 2015.
Presentation to CITY OF PALM COAST, FLORIDA WATER AND WASTEWATER RATE STUDY AND BOND FEASBILITY REPORT Prepared in Conjunction with the Issuance of Utility.
City of Houston Long Range Financial Management Task Force City Financial Overview Part I August 29,
Overview of System Development Charges Presented to the Ad Hoc Committee on Large Diameter Water Mains by Chris Cullinan, Acting CFO January 8, 2014.
Elk Grove Water District Water Rate Update and Connection Fees Habib Isaac – Principal April 10, 2013.
Annexation Issues in Eden A History of Annexation in Eden Since 1968 NC Annexation History Current Annexation Issues in Eden January 2010.
TENTATIVE BUDGET PRESENTATION CITY COUNCIL PUBLIC HEARING SEPTEMBER 8, 2010.
Implementing SB 1525: An Update Cheyenne Walsh Squire Sanders (US) LLP Government Finance Officers Association of Arizona Winter Conference Prescott, Arizona.
PROPOSED BUDGET PRESENTATION CITY COUNCIL WORKSHOP AUGUST 23, 2011.
Hernando County’s Utilities Infrastructure Opportunity through the American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009 (the Federal Stimulus Package)
SUMMARY OF FY2016 PROPOSED BUDGET July 21,
Christopher M. Quinn, MACC, CPA, CFE, CGFO, CGMA Finance Director Tuesday, May 3 rd, 2016.
1 New Territory Municipal Utility Districts Strategic Partnership Agreement Discussions With the City of Sugar Land.
Kevin Burnett Presented by CITY OF TULARE, CALIFORNIA.
City of Fernley, Nevada – 164 th Ave. NE, Suite 300, Redmond, WA April 18, 2007 Rate Study Findings Water and Sewer Utility Rates.
What are they and how are they calculated? May 2015.
Operating Efficiencies Costs to operate and maintain the water and sewer system have not varied significantly during the first 5 years of operation.
Orange County Government Adoption Public Hearing May 10, 2016 Board of County Commissioners School Impact Fee Update.
REVENUE OVERVIEW FY2016 PROPOSED BUDGET July 28,
CP-TXT Amendment to the Capital Improvements Element (Annual Update) September 25, 2007.
BUDGET PROCESS & REVENUE & EXPENSE INFORMATION For FISCAL YEAR 2011.
Proposed Draft Financial Plan April 10, 2017
City of Lockport, Illinois
RURAL POTABLE WATER INFRASTRUCTURE WATERLINE AND TRUCKFILLS
Water & Wastewater Capacity Charge Work Shop
City of Delavan 2017 Budget.
City of Madras System Development Charges
SEWER SERVICE FEE RATE STRUCTURE ALTERNATIVE
2017 Fee Calculation Methodology – A Case Study
Park Enhancement District Presentation
Final Rate Study Findings
City of Sisters, OR 2017 Water & Sewer Rate Study
Sewer User Rate Increase PUBLIC HEARING
City of Petersburg Water and Sewer Rates April 26, 2011
Development Charge Public Meeting October 23, 2017
City of Richmond, California FY Draft Budget
System Development Fees
Proposed Certificates of Obligation Issue
Water & Sewer Rate Study Presented by: Chris Gonzalez, Project Manager
FINAL 2018 Budget December 14, 2017 City Council Meeting 12/14/2017
MUNICIPAL UTILITIES DEPARTMENT July 26, 2005
Proposed 2018 Budget Truth In Taxation Hearing December 5, 2017
Proposed Certificates of Obligation Issue
Presentation and Discussion of the Draft Transportation Land Use Assumptions and Infrastructure Improvement Plan Report (Impact Fee Report) Town Council.
CP-TXT Amendment to the Capital Improvements Element & Public School Facilities Element (Annual Update) October 2008.
2019 TRUTH IN TAXATION HEARING
Northeast Marshall Neighborhood Improvement Authority
Funding the Town’s Transportation Infrastructure Improvement Plan (IIP) – An Initial Discussion of Impact Fees Town Council Meeting March 1, 2017.
City of Sunrise Wastewater Reuse Program
City of Smithville Tax Rate Public Hearing and Budget Workshop #2
2018 Water/Wastewater Rate Study and Financial Forecast
City of Santa Paula Water and Sewer Rate Study Results Public Workshop
Updating the Transportation Impact Fee – The Proposed Calendar and Public Input Process Town Council Meeting March 15, 2017.
Dakota County Board of Commissioners Meeting September 24, 2019
Presentation transcript:

OAK RIDGE NORTH IMPACT FEES

Overview 1.Introduction 2.Schedule/Process 3.Land Use Assumption 4.Capital Improvement Plan Water Wastewater 5.Impact Fees TIRZ Area Residential Area 6.Next Steps/Actions 7.Q&A

One Company. Unlimited Potential. Introduction

Introduction: Common Terms You Will Encounter 1.Land Use Assumptions (LUA) 2.Capital Improvement Plan (CIP) 3.Impact Fee 4.Service Unit or ESFC 5.Tax Increment Reinvestment Zone (TIRZ) 6.Tap Fee 7.Chapter 395 (Texas Local Government Code) 8.General Funds 9.Maintenance Funds 10.Bond Funds 11.Certificates of Obligation (C.O.) 12.Debt Service

Introduction – Purpose: Impact Fee Identify land use Identify/fund necessary water/sewer infrastructure Review CIP every 5 years based on 10-year outlook Minimize impact on existing users Assess new development in-lieu of existing users

Introduction – Service Unit “Service Unit” refers to an Equivalent Single Family Connection (ESFC) that consumes the amount of water requiring a standard 5/8” meter. For a development requiring a larger meter, a service unit equivalent is established based on its capacity compared to the 5/8” meter.

Schedule/Process 1.Identify Need – Impact Fee Update 2.City Council creates “Capital Improvement Advisory Committee” 3.City Council commissions engineer to perform an Impact Fee/CIP Study 4.City Council publishes notice of public hearing on “LUA & CIP” (30 day notification required) 5.Present results of Draft Impact Fee & CIP Study/Report to Advisory Committee 6.Advisory Committee offers comments/questions at least 7 days prior to public hearing 7.Public offers comments at the Public Hearing on LUA & CIP 8.Engineers revise Impact Fee & CIP Study/Report and present final report to City Council 9.City Council publishes notice for Public Hearing on proposed Impact Fees (30 day notification required) 10.Public offers comments at the Public Hearing on Impact Fees 11.City Council considers ordinance setting Impact Fees and implementation date 12.Impact Fees go into effect (12 months after adoption)

One Company. Unlimited Potential. Capital Improvement Plan

CIP – Water/Sewer System Projects

One Company. Unlimited Potential. Water Projects

Water Line Upsizing Along IH-45: From Paula Ln. to Pine Manor Dr.

ORN Commerce Park Waterline South From Hanna Road to 350 ft East of UPRR Track

I-45 Waterline Extension Phase II From Robinson Road to Wood Ridge Plaza

Water Well No. 4 East of Hanna Road & North of Robinson Road

ORN Commerce Park Waterline North From Hanna Road to 600 ft East of UPRR

Water Plant No. 2 East of Hanna Road & North of Robinson Road

Proposed Water Projects ProjectCost Impact Fee Study (1/2)$22,500 Waterline Upsizing$493,000 ORN Commerce Park Waterline Extension (South)$150,000 I-45 Waterline Extension (Phase 2)$214,000 Water Well No. 4$1,852,000 ORN Commerce Park Waterline Extension (North)$250,000 Water Plant No. 2 (GST, HT, BP, Piping, GenSet, Fence, Sitework, MCC) $2,271,000 Total Cost: $5,252,500

One Company. Unlimited Potential. Wastewater Projects

Gravity Sewer Trunkline Upsize

Robinson Road Lift Station Force Main From Maplewood to Lift Station

Robinson Road Lift Station

Proposed Wastewater Projects ProjectCost Impact Fee Study (1/2)$22,500 Wastewater Treatment Plant Capacity Purchase$3,000,000 Gravity Sewer Trunkline Upsize$950,000 Robinson Road Lift Station$1,000,000 Robinson Road Force Main$545,000 Total Cost: $5,517,500

One Company. Unlimited Potential. Impact Fees

Tap Fees vs. Impact Fees Tap fees are service fees for connecting private property to public water or wastewater facilities. This revenue covers the costs related to labor, parts, and materials. Impact fees are charged to new developments to offset the costs associated with an increased demand for water and wastewater services. This revenue helps to fund the expansion of water and sewer infrastructure to accommodate growth.

Maximum Recoverable Costs for Water Projects * Water projects serving the TIRZ *

Maximum Recoverable Costs for Wastewater Projects * Wastewater projects serving the TIRZ *

Maximum Impact Fees for TIRZ Water Projects

Maximum Impact Fees for TIRZ Wastewater Projects

Summary: Maximum Impact Fees Combined – TIRZ

Impact Fee – Area Affected Area 1 – City (Residential Area), ETJ (Outside of TIRZ): No Impact Fee Area 2 – TIRZ: Proposed Impact Fee

One Company. Unlimited Potential. Next Steps

Adopt IF Ordinance Implement IF Ordinance (12 months after adoption) City Council calls Public Hearing on Proposed IFs Receive comments City Council considers IF Ordinance Public Hearing on LUA/CIP Receive comments Revise IF/CIP Report

One Company. Unlimited Potential. Q & A

Contact Info Ed Shackleford, PE Matt Breazeale, PE Jeffrey Bishop, EIT Joe Sherwin, PE, CFM Director of Public Works Vicky Rudy, PCED City Manager Christopher L. Nichols City Attorney