I-95 Statewide Corridor Model in North Carolina: Unique Features and Challenges Presented to TRB Applications Conference May 9, 2013 Presented by Taruna.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
THURSTON REGION MULTIMODAL TRAVEL DEMAND FORECASTING MODEL IMPLEMENTATION IN EMME/2 - Presentation at the 15th International EMME/2 Users Group Conference.
Advertisements

SE Florida FSUTMS Users Group Meeting FDOT Systems Planning Office
Feedback Loops Guy Rousseau Atlanta Regional Commission.
Determining the Free-Flow Speeds in a Regional Travel Demand Model based on the Highway Capacity Manual Chao Wang Joseph Huegy Institute for Transportation.
Surveying and Modeling Long Distance Trips Stacey Bricka, TTI Erik Sabina, DRCOG Catherine Durso, University of Denver Julie Paasche, PTV NuStats Presented.
Analyzing the Effects of Tolls and Operating Costs on Statewide Travel Patterns Vishal Gossain Thomas A. Williams Joseph P. Savage Jr. Christopher E. Mwalwanda.
Intercity Person, Passenger Car and Truck Travel Patterns Daily Highway Volumes on State Highways and Interstates Ability to Evaluate Major Changes in.
Subarea Model Development – Integration of Travel Demand across Geographical, Temporal and Modeling Frameworks Naveen Juvva AECOM.
Speed and Stopping Distances
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. Improving the Treatment of Priced Roadways in Mode Choice.
A National County-Level Long Distance Travel Model Mike Chaney, AICP Tian Huang, PE, AICP, PTOE Binbin Chen, AICP 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning.
Interfacing Regional Model with Statewide Model to Improve Regional Commercial Vehicle Travel Forecasting Bing Mei, P.E. Joe Huegy, AICP Institute for.
Modeling University Student Trips Separately from the General Population In a Regional Travel Demand Model Presented to 15 th TRB National Transportation.
Using Aggregated Federal Data and Local Shipping Data to Model Freight Alabama Michael Anderson Civil Engineering The University of Alabama in Huntsville.
Comparison of Cell, GPS, and Bluetooth Derived External Data Results from the 2014 Tyler, Texas Study 15 th TRB National Transportation Planning Conference.
Milton-Madison Bi-State Travel Demand Model Rob Bostrom Planning Application Conference Houston, Texas May 19, 2009.
Presented to presented by Cambridge Systematics, Inc. Transportation leadership you can trust. An Integrated Travel Demand, Mesoscopic and Microscopic.
An Empirical Comparison of Microscopic and Mesoscopic Traffic Simulation Paradigms Ramachandran Balakrishna Daniel Morgan Qi Yang Caliper Corporation 14.
Talking Freight: Establishment Surveys State and Local Experience Johanna Zmud Mia Zmud Chris Simek.
Lynn Peterson Secretary of Transportation Combining Macro Scopic and Meso Scopic Models in Toll and Traffic Revenue Forecasting SR 167 Corridor Completion.
Some network flow problems in urban road networks Michael Zhang Civil and Environmental Engineering University of California Davis.
How to Put “Best Practice” into Traffic Assignment Practice Ken Cervenka Federal Transit Administration TRB National Transportation.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Daniel Beagan Cambridge Systematics, Inc. February.
Validating an Interregional Travel Model: A Case Study in California Nicholas J. Linesch Giovanni Circella Urban Land Use and Transportation Center Institute.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to FHWA “Talking Freight” Seminar Series presented by Lance Neumann Cambridge Systematics, Inc. August.
Overview Freight Modeling Overview Tianjia Tang, PE., Ph.D FHWA, Office of Freight Management and Operations Phone:
Dynamic Origin-Destination Trip Table Estimation for Transportation Planning Ramachandran Balakrishna Caliper Corporation 11 th TRB National Transportation.
Transportation leadership you can trust. presented to TRB 11 th Conference on Transportation Planning Applications presented by Dan Goldfarb, P.E. Cambridge.
Praveen Pasumarthy, P.E., PTOE, CDM Smith Chris Edmonston, AICP, FDOT Paul Fang, FDOT INNOVATIVE METHODOLOGY TO IDENTIFY CONGESTED ROADWAYS AND BOTTLENECKS.
Enhancement and Validation of a Managed-Lane Subarea Network Tolling Forecast Model May 19, 2005 Stephen Tuttle (RSG), Jeff Frkonja (Portland Metro), Jack.
Bharath Paladugu TRPC Clyde Scott Independent Consultant
A Dynamic Traffic Simulation Model on Planning Networks Qi Yang Caliper Corporation TRB Planning Application Conference Houston, May 20, 2009.
Jack is currently performing travel demand model forecasting for Florida’s Turnpike. Specifically he works on toll road project forecasting to produce.
Estimating Volumes for I-95 HOT Lanes in Virginia Prepared for: 2009 Planning Applications Conference Houston, TX May 18, 2009 Prepared by: Kenneth D.
INCORPORATING INCOME INTO TRAVEL DEMAND MODELING Brent Spence Bridge Case Study October 13, 2015.
1 Assessing Travel Demand for Exclusive Truck Facilities Matthew Roorda, University of Toronto Michael Hain, University of Toronto Glareh Amirjamshidi,
The Current State-of-the-Practice in Modeling Road Pricing Bruce D. Spear Federal Highway Administration.
Estimating Travel Patterns on I ‐ 95 with Automated Technology NCAMPO Conference - Asheville, NC May 3, 2012 Taruna Tayal (M/A/B) Brian Wert (M/A/B) Bill.
1 Forecasting Traffic for a Start-Up Toll Road 12 th TRB National Transportation Planning Application Conference May 18, 2009 David Schellinger, P.E. Vice.
1 Toll Modeling Analysis for the SR 520 Bridge Replacement and HOV Project 19 th Annual International EMME/2 Users’ Conference October 19-21, 2005 Presented.
Applications in Mobile Technology for Travel Data Collection 2012 Border to Border Transportation Conference South Padre Island, Texas November, 13, 2012.
Call us on Toll-Free. Call Us Now Toll Free.
Toll Free Toll Free.
Call us on Toll-Free Call Us Now Toll Free.
Results and Lessons-Learned from the 2016 Dallas-Ft
Evaluation of Hard Shoulder vs
Macro / Meso / Micro Framework on I-395 HOT Lane Conversion
Assessing Strengths and Limitations of a Statewide Tour Based Freight Model Using Scenario Analysis in Maryland By Colin Smith, RSG Sabya Mishra, University.
Nick Wood, P.E. Texas A&M Transportation Institute
APPLICATIONS OF STATEWIDE TRAVEL FORECASTING MODEL
DEVELOPMENT OF A FLEXIBLE ZONING SYSTEM
WIFI Data Collection and the Effectiveness of Various Survey Expansion Techniques- A Case Study on I-95 Corridor in Palm Beach County, FL Presented to.
Jim Henricksen, MnDOT Steve Ruegg, WSP
Modelling Sustainable Urban Transport
Recover Yahoo Mail Password Forgotten Password
Call On Toll-Free We Serve for 24*7 hours.
Thoughts on Florida LRTPs
Slugging in the I-395 Corridor
APTA High Speed Rail Policy Forum December 2, 2015
After Evans: Working on an Approximation of a Combined Equilibrium Model Based on Precision Assignment May, 2011 TRB Planning Applications Conference,
Source: NHI course on Travel Demand Forecasting, Ch. 8 (152054A)
Multi-modal Bi-criterion Highway Assignment for Toll Roads Jian Zhang Andres Rabinowicz Jonathan Brandon Caliper Corporation /9/2018.
Exercise (Field and Olewiler)
Jim Lam, Caliper Corporation Guoxiong Huang, SCAG Mark Bradley, BB&C
Chattanooga Transportation Data Collection Review
Design of Florida’s Turnpike’s State Integrated Land-Use Travel Demand Model Thomas Adler Resource Systems Group Youssef Dehghani Parsons Brinckerhoff,
Fraser River Crossing Pre- and Post- Study
  Advanced Tools to Assess Managed Toll Lane Operations Model Task Force Toll Subcommittee Meeting September 16, 2010.
Presentation transcript:

I-95 Statewide Corridor Model in North Carolina: Unique Features and Challenges Presented to TRB Applications Conference May 9, 2013 Presented by Taruna Tayal, Vanasse Hangen Brustlin, Inc. Bill Thomas, Michael Baker Engineering

I-95 Statewide Corridor Model in NC: Unique Features and Challenges Why are we here? Purpose of the model and Unique features Data Collection Toll diversion model Model Formulation and VoT Conclusions/Findings

I-95 Statewide Corridor Model in NC: Unique Features and Challenges Purpose of the Model and Unique Features Toll feasibility for I-95 Corridor in the state of North Carolina Understand travel patterns on I-95 in NC Length of the corridor modeled – 182 miles First study of this magnitude in US Based on trip distance, studied 3 trip patterns for 2-trip purposes: Separate diversion calculation application for long- distance and in-corridor trips External-ExternalPassenger Car External-InternalHeavy Vehicle Internal-Internal

I-95 Statewide Corridor Model in NC: Unique Features and Challenges Data Collection 7 8 # ALPR data collected at 10 locations Eight on I-95 One each on: o I-40, and o US-64 ALPR data collected and matched for two vehicle class Passenger Cars Trucks 48-hour tube class counts collected at each location Travel Time data for I-95 and US-301 corridor

I-95 Statewide Corridor Model in NC: Unique Features and Challenges Toll Model OD Matrices, Networks Skim Long Distance Network (toll/no-toll) Long Distance Diversion Split OD matrix (Long Distance) Assign Long Distance matrices (UE) Skim Corridor Network (toll/no-toll) Corridor Diversion Split OD matrix (Corridor) Assign corridor matrices (UE) Skim congested networks Check for convergence Summary Statistics Not converged Toll Diversion Highway Assignment Convergence Check & Feedback Data Prep and Initial Skimming

I-95 Statewide Corridor Model in NC: Unique Features and Challenges VoT and Model Formulation Truck driver VOT does not change as a function of distance. Non-CV VOT increases as distance increases. Intercity travel VOT is higher than local travel VOT for passenger travelers Different VOT for : E-E : PC and Trucks E –I intercity: PC and Trucks E –I local: PC I –I intercity: PC and Trucks I –I local: PC PurposePC ($/hr)Trucks ($/hr) EE$18.11$30.13 E-I - Intercity$15.72$30.13 E-I Local$11.23 I-I - Intercity$12.16$30.13 I-I Local$8.68 Toll Share = (1 / (1 + e U )) U= a*(Time toll – Time free ) + b*Cost + C Toll + C ETC + C Calib

I-95 Statewide Corridor Model in NC: Unique Features and Challenges Conclusions/Findings

I-95 Statewide Corridor Model in NC: Unique Features and Challenges Conclusions/Findings

I-95 Statewide Corridor Model in NC: Unique Features and Challenges CONTACT