1 Sammenligning av lineære og ulineære metoder for robust Anti-slug regulering Slug (liquid) buildup Two-phase pipe flow (liquid and vapor) Sigurd Skogestad.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Model-based PID tuning methods Two degree of freedom controllers
Advertisements

Chapter 9 PID Tuning Methods.
Tuning of PID controllers
Introductory Control Theory I400/B659: Intelligent robotics Kris Hauser.
PROCESS SYSTEMS ENGINEERING GROUP
Objectives Control Terminology Types of controllers –Differences Controls in the real world –Problems –Response time vs. stability.
PROCESS SYSTEMS ENGINEERING GROUP Førsteamanuensis Tore Haug-Warberg Professor Heinz Preisig Professor Sigurd Skogestad Førsteamanuensis Nadi Skjøndal-Bar.
Specialization project 2012 Temperature control of an unstable chemical reactor By Ola Sæterli Hjetland Supervisors: Sigurd Skogestad, Krister Forsman.
280 SYSTEM IDENTIFICATION The System Identification Problem is to estimate a model of a system based on input-output data. Basic Configuration continuous.
Enhanced Single-Loop Control Strategies
Controller Tuning: A Motivational Example
Stabilization of Desired Flow Regimes in Pipelines
1 Basic Control Theory and Its Application in AMB Systems Zongli Lin University of Virginia.
1 Operation of heat pump cycles Jørgen Bauck Jensen & Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Technology.
PID Tuning and Controllability Sigurd Skogestad NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
1 © Alexis Kwasinski, 2011 DC micro-grids comprise cascade distributed power architectures – converters act as interfaces Point-of-load converters present.
MODEL REFERENCE ADAPTIVE CONTROL
1 Feedback: The simple and best solution. Applications to self-optimizing control and stabilization of new operating regimes Sigurd Skogestad Department.
First African Control Conference, Cape Town, 04 December 2003
Book Adaptive control -astrom and witten mark
PSE and PROCESS CONTROL
DYNAMIC BEHAVIOR AND STABILITY OF CLOSED-LOOP CONTROL SYSTEMS
Alternative form with detuning factor F
Department of Chemical Engineering,
Simple rules for PID tuning Sigurd Skogestad NTNU, Trondheim, Norway.
Controller Design (to determine controller settings for P, PI or PID controllers) Based on Transient Response Criteria Chapter 12.
Public PhD defence Control Solutions for Multiphase Flow Linear and nonlinear approaches to anti-slug control PhD candidate: Esmaeil Jahanshahi Supervisors:
1 1 Subsea process systems engineering Integrated and new processes for separation (vapor pressure and dewpoint control) and water handling, with emphasis.
Page 1 Lecture 12 AO Control Theory Claire Max with many thanks to Don Gavel and Don Wiberg UC Santa Cruz February 14, 2013.
Feedback Linearization Presented by : Shubham Bhat (ECES-817)
1 Anti-slug control on a small-scale two-phase loop Heidi Sivertsen and Sigurd Skogestad Departement of Chemical Engineering, Norwegian University of Science.
1 Feedback: The simple and best solution. Applications to self-optimizing control and stabilization of new operating regimes Sigurd Skogestad Department.
Abstract An important issue in control structure selection is plant ”stabilization”. The paper presents a way to select measurement combinations c as controlled.
1 Decentralized control Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Tecnology (NTNU) Trondheim, Norway.
Lecture 22: Frequency Response Analysis (Pt II) 1.Conclusion of Bode plot construction 2.Relative stability 3.System identification example ME 431, Lecture.
1 1 Vinicius de Oliveira | an intelligent adaptive anti-slug control system for production maximization Vinicius de Oliveira Control and Automation Engineering.
Anti-Slug Control Experiments Using Nonlinear Observers
Control limitations for unstable plants
1 Feedback: The simple and best solution. Applications to self-optimizing control and stabilization of new operating regimes Sigurd Skogestad Department.
1 Feedback: The simple and best solution. Applications to self-optimizing control and stabilization of new operating regimes Sigurd Skogestad Department.
1 Feedback Applications to self-optimizing control and stabilization of new operating regimes Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian.
Stabilizing control and controllability:
1 Lu LIU and Jie HUANG Department of Mechanics & Automation Engineering The Chinese University of Hong Kong 9 December, Systems Workshop on Autonomous.
1 Effect of Input Rate Limitation on Controllability Presented at AIChE Annual Meeting in Austin, Texas November 7 th, 2002 Espen Storkaas & Sigurd Skogestad.
1 Feedback: Still the simplest and best solution Sigurd Skogestad Department of Chemical Engineering Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU)
1 PID Feedback Controllers PID 反馈控制器 Dai Lian-kui Shen Guo-jiang Institute of Industrial Control, Zhejiang University.
1 1 Sigurd Skogestad | Closed-loop model identification and PID/PI tuning for robust anti-slug control Closed-loop model identification and PID/PI tuning.
EEN-E1040 Measurement and Control of Energy Systems Control I: Control, processes, PID controllers and PID tuning Nov 3rd 2016 If not marked otherwise,
Model SIMC-tunings Tight control Smooth control Level control
Presentation at NI Day April 2010 Lillestrøm, Norway
Comparison of nonlinear model-based controllers and gain-scheduled Internal Model Control based on identified model Esmaeil Jahanshahi and Sigurd Skogestad.
The thematic content of the series:
Feedback: The simple and best solution
Stabilization of Desired Flow Regimes in Pipelines
Controller Tuning: A Motivational Example
Auto-tuning of PID controllers
Changing between Active Constraint Regions for Optimal Operation: Classical Advanced Control versus Model Predictive Control Adriana Reyes-Lúa, Cristina.
Active Control of Gas Lift Wells Simulation and Experimental Series
Feedback: The simple and best solution
Enhanced Single-Loop Control Strategies
Christoph J. Backi and Sigurd Skogestad
Decentralized control
Presented at AIChE Annual Meeting in Indianapolis, USA
Espen Storkaas and Sigurd Skogestad Dep. of Chemical Engineering
Simplified First Principle Model for Severe
Presented at AIChE Annual Meeting in Indianapolis, USA
Hafez Sarkawi (D1) Control System Theory Lab
Henrik Manum, student, NTNU
Performance and Robustness of the Smith Predictor Controller
Espen Storkaas and Sigurd Skogestad
Presentation transcript:

1 Sammenligning av lineære og ulineære metoder for robust Anti-slug regulering Slug (liquid) buildup Two-phase pipe flow (liquid and vapor) Sigurd Skogestad og Essmaeil Jahanshahi Institutt for kjemisk prosessteknologi, NTNU SERVOMØTET, OKTOBER 2013

2 Slug cycle (stable limit cycle) Experiments performed by the Multiphase Laboratory, NTNU

3 Experimental mini-loop (2003) Ingvald Bårdsen, Espen Storkaas, Heidi Sivertsen

4 p1p1 p2p2 z Experimental mini-loop Valve opening (z) = 100% SLUGGING

5 p1p1 p2p2 z Experimental mini-loop Valve opening (z) = 25% SLUGGING

6 p1p1 p2p2 z Experimental mini-loop Valve opening (z) = 15% NO SLUG

7 p1p1 p2p2 z Experimental mini-loop: Bifurcation diagram Valve opening z % No slug Slugging

8 How to avoid slugging?

9 p1p1 p2p2 z Avoid slugging: 1. Close valve (but increases pressure) Valve opening z % No slugging when valve is closed Design change

10 Avoid slugging: 2. Design change to avoid slugging p1p1 p2p2 z Design change

11 Minimize effect of slugging: 3. Build large slug-catcher Most common strategy in practice p1p1 p2p2 z Design change

12 Avoid slugging: 4. ”Active” feedback control PT PC ref Simple PI-controller p1p1 z

13 Anti slug control: Mini-loop experiments Controller ONController OFF p 1 [bar] z [%]

14 Anti slug control: Full-scale offshore experiments at Hod-Vallhall field (Havre,1999)

15 Avoid slugging: 5. ”Active” feedback control with topside measurement? PC ref Control is difficult (Inverse reponse = Unstable zero dynamics) p2p2 z

16 Summary anti slug control (2008)* Stabilization of desired non-slug flow regime = $$$$! Stabilization using downhole pressure simple Stabilization using topside measurements difficult Control can make a difference! “Only” problem: Not sufficiently robust *Thanks to: Espen Storkaas + Heidi Sivertsen + Håkon Dahl-Olsen + Ingvald Bårdsen

: Esmaeil Jahanshahi, PhD-work supported by Siemens New Experimental mini-rig 3m

18 1 st step: Developed new simple 4-state model*. State equations (mass conservations law): θ h L2L2 hchc w mix,out x 1, P 1,V G1, ρ G1, H L1 x 3, P 2,V G2, ρ G2, H LT P0P0 Choke valve with opening Z x4x4 h>h c w G,lp =0 w L,lp L3L3 w L,in w G,in w x2x2 L1L1 *Based on Storkaas model

19 New 4-state model. Comparison with experiments: Top pressure Subsea pressure Experiment

20 Linear Control Solutions

21 Experiment Solution 1: H ∞ control based on linearizing new model Experiment, mixed-sensitivity design

22 Experimental linear model (new approach) Fourth-order mechanistic model: Hankel Singular Values: Model reduction: 4 parameters need to be estimated Closed-loop step-response with P-control

23 Solution 2: IMC based on identified model IMC design Block diagram for Internal Model Control system IMC for unstable systems: y u e r + _ Plant Model: IMC controller:

24 Experiment Solution 2: IMC based on identified model Experiment

25 Experiment Solution 3: «Robustified» IMC using H ∞ loop shaping

26 Comparing linear controllers (subsea pressure) *Controllers tuned at 30% valve opening *

27 Fundamental limitation – top pressure Z = 20%Z = 40% M s,min Measuring topside pressure we can stabilize the system only in a limited range Unstable (RHP) zero dynamics of top pressure

28 Nonlinear Control Solutions

29 PT Nonlinear observer K State variables uc uc uc uc PtPt Solution 1: observer & state feedback

30 High-Gain Observer

31 State Feedback K c : linear optimal gain calculated by solving Riccati equation K i : small integral gain (e.g. K i = 10 −3 )

32 High-gain observer – top pressure measurement: topside pressure valve opening: 20 % Experiment

33 High-gain observer – subsea pressure measurement: subsea pressure valve opening: 20 % Experiment Not working ??!

34 Chain of Integrators Fast nonlinear observer using subsea pressure: Not Working??! Fast nonlinear observer (High-gain) acts like a differentiator Pipeline-riser system is a chain of integrator Measuring top pressure and estimating subsea pressure is differentiating Measuring subsea pressure and estimating top pressure is integrating

35 Anti-slug control with top-pressure is possible using fast nonlinear observers The operating range of top pressure is still less than subsea pressure Surprisingly, nonlinear observer is not working with subsea pressure, but a (simpler) linear observer works very fine. Subsea pressureTop Pressure Nonlinear ObserverNot Working !?Working* Linear ObserverWorkingNot Working PI ControlWorkingNot Working Max. Valve60%20% Nonlinear observer and state feedback Summary *but only for small valve openings

36 Solution 2: feedback linearization PT Nonlinear controller uc uc P rt Jahanshahi, Skogestad and Grøtli, NOLCOS, 2013

37 Solution 2: feedback linearization Cascade system

38 Output-linearizing controller Stabilizing controller for riser subsystem System in normal form: Linearizing controller: Control signal to valve: dynamics bounded : riser-base pressure : top pressure

39 Experiment Gain: CV: riser-base pressure (y 1 ), Z=60%

40 Solution 3: Adaptive PI Tuning Static gain: Linear valve: PI Tuning: slope = gain is small for large valve openings

41 Experiment Solution 3: Adaptive PI Tuning Experiment Large valve opening: - Large controller gain - Large integral time

42 Solution 4: Gain-Scheduling IMC Three identified model from step tests: Z=20%: Z=30%: Z=40%: Three IMC controllers:

43 Solution 4: Gain-Scheduling IMC Experiment Experiment

44 Comparison of Nonlinear Controllers Gain-scheduling IMC is the most robust solution Adaptive PI controller is the second-best Controllability remarks: –Fundamental limitation control: gain of the system goes to zero for fully open valve –Additional limitation top-side pressure: Inverse response (non-minimum-phase)

45 Conclusions A new simplified model verified by OLGA simulations and experiments Best: Anti-slug control using a subsea valve close to riser-base New robust controllers have been developed Main point: Increase controller gain for large valve openings Acknowledgements Financial support from SIEMENS Master students: Elisabeth Hyllestad, Anette Helgesen, Knut Åge Meland, Mats Lieungh, Henrik Hansen, Terese Syre, Mahnaz Esmaeilpour and Anne Sofie Nilsen.