CME-driven Shocks in White Light Observations Verónica Ontiveros National University of Mexico, MEXICO George Mason University,USA Angelos Vourlidas Naval.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Global Properties of Heliospheric Disturbances Observed by Interplanetary Scintillation M. Tokumaru, M. Kojima, K. Fujiki, and M. Yamashita (Solar-Terrestrial.
Advertisements

Heliospheric Propagation of ICMEs: The Drag-Based Model B. Vršnak 1, T. Žic 1, M. Dumbović 1, J. Čalogović 1, A. Veronig 2, M. Temmer 2, C. Moestl 2, T.
MHD modeling of coronal disturbances related to CME lift-off J. Pomoell 1, R. Vainio 1, S. Pohjolainen 2 1 Department of Physics, University of Helsinki.
Coronal Mass Ejections without photospheric/chromospheric signatures Session organizers: Alexei Pevtsov (NSO) and Vasyl Yurchyshyn (BBSO) Discussion leaders:
High Altitude Observatory (HAO) – National Center for Atmospheric Research (NCAR) The National Center for Atmospheric Research is operated by the University.
Non-Equilibrium Ionization Modeling of the Current Sheet in a Simulated Solar Eruption Chengcai Shen Co-authors: K. K. Reeves, J. C. Raymond, N. A. Murphy,
Strength of Coronal Mass Ejection- driven Shocks Near the Sun and Its Importance in Predicting Solar Energetic Particle Events Chenglong Shen 1, Yuming.
M. J. Reiner, 1 st STEREO Workshop, March, 2002, Paris.
Coronal Loop Oscillations and Flare Shock Waves H. S. Hudson (UCB/SSL) & A. Warmuth (Astrophysical Institute Potsdam) Coronal loop oscillations: introduction.
Flares and global waves, including seismic H. S. Hudson 1, C. A. Lindsey 2, J. Martinez-Oliveros 1 1 Space Sciences Laboratory, University of California,
E. Robbrecht – SIDC- Royal Observatory of Belgium 8 March 2007 The statistical importance of narrow CMEs Open questions to be addressed by SECCHI Eva Robbrecht,
Coronal IP Shocks Nat Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC Elmau CME Workshop, 2003 February 7 Plenary talk Sun Earth.
CME-driven Shocks in White Light Observations SOHO/LASCO C3 – CME May 5 th, 1999 CME-driven Shock We demonstrate that CME-driven shocks: (1) can be detected.
IGPP, March Coronal shock waves observed in images H.S. Hudson SSL/UCB.
Why does the temperature of the Sun’s atmosphere increase with height? Evidence strongly suggests that magnetic waves carry energy into the chromosphere.
Coronal Loop Oscillations and Flare Shock Waves H. S. Hudson (UCB/SSL) & A. Warmuth (Astrophysical Institute Potsdam) Coronal loop oscillations: (Fig.
Identifying Interplanetary Shock Parameters in Heliospheric MHD Simulation Results S. A. Ledvina 1, D. Odstrcil 2 and J. G. Luhmann 1 1.Space Sciences.
Coronal and Heliospheric Modeling of the May 12, 1997 MURI Event MURI Project Review, NASA/GSFC, MD, August 5-6, 2003 Dusan Odstrcil University of Colorado/CIRES.
Influence of Time-dependent Processes and Background Magnetic Field on Shock Properties N. Lugaz, I. Roussev and C. Downs Institute for Astronomy Igor.
High-Cadence EUV Imaging, Radio, and In-Situ Observations of Coronal Shocks and Energetic Particles: Implications for Particle Acceleration K. A. Kozarev.
Numerical simulations are used to explore the interaction between solar coronal mass ejections (CMEs) and the structured, ambient global solar wind flow.
Modeling Coronal Acceleration of Solar Energetic Protons K. A. Kozarev, R. M. Evans, N. A. Schwadron, M. A. Dayeh, M. Opher, K. E. Korreck NESSC Meeting,
Evolution of the 2012 July 12 CME from the Sun to the Earth: Data- Constrained Three-Dimensional MHD Simulations F. Shen 1, C. Shen 2, J. Zhang 3, P. Hess.
A Catalog of Halo Coronal Mass Ejections from SOHO N. Gopalswamy 1, S. Yashiro 2, G. Michalek 3, H. Xie 3, G. Stenborg 2, A. Vourlidas 4, R. A. Howard.
Relation between Type II Bursts and CMEs Inferred from STEREO Observations N. Gopalswamy, W. Thompson, J. Davila, M. Kaiser NASA Goddard Space Flight Center,
1 Determination of CME 3D Trajectories using COR Stereoscopy + Analysis of HI1 CME Tracks P. C. Liewer, E. M. DeJong, J. R. Hall, JPL/Caltech; N. Sheeley,
On the February 14-15, 2011 CME-CME interaction event and consequences for Space Weather Manuela Temmer(1), Astrid Veronig(1), Vanessa Peinhart(1), Bojan.
Arrival time of halo coronal mass ejections In the vicinity of the Earth G. Michalek, N. Gopalswamy, A. Lara, and P.K. Manoharan A&A 423, (2004)
Cynthia López-Portela and Xochitl Blanco-Cano Instituto de Geofísica, UNAM A brief introduction: Magnetic Clouds’ characteristics The study: Event types.
1 Acceleration and Deceleration of Flare/Coronal Mass Ejection Induced Shocks S.T. Wu 1, C.-C. Wu 2, Aihua Wang 1, and K. Liou 3 1 CSPAR, University of.
Extremely Fast Coronal Mass Ejection on 23 July Johns Hopkins University Applied Physics Laboratory, Laurel, Maryland,20723, USA 2 NOAA Space Weather.
Why Solar Electron Beams Stop Producing Type III Radio Emission Hamish Reid, Eduard Kontar SUPA School of Physics and Astronomy University of Glasgow,
1 SPD Meeting, July 8, 2013 Coronal Mass Ejection Plasma Heating by Alfvén Wave Dissipation Rebekah M. Evans 1,2, Merav Opher 3, and Bart van der Holst.
Validation of the SWMF Coupled Model for Solar Corona – Inner Heliosphere – CME With the Observations of the May 12, 1997 Event Ofer Cohen(1), Igor V.
A comparison of CME-associated atmospheric waves observed in coronal (Fe XII 195A) and chromospheric ( He I 10830A) lines Holly R. Gilbert, Thomas E. Holzer,
Lessons for STEREO - learned from Helios Presented at the STEREO/Solar B Workshop, Rainer Schwenn, MPS Lindau The Helios.
Forecast of Geomagnetic Storm based on CME and IP condition R.-S. Kim 1, K.-S. Cho 2, Y.-J. Moon 3, Yu Yi 1, K.-H. Kim 3 1 Chungnam National University.
34th Solar Physics Division Meeting, June 2003 Propagating Disturbances in the Lower Solar Corona Meredith J. Wills-Davey Southwest Research Institute.
Modeling particle acceleration at CME-driven shock and transport in the inner heliosphere, A case study SHINE 2004 Bozeman, June 28, 2004 Gang Li IGPP,
Fast Magnetosonic Waves and Global Coronal Seismology in the Extended Solar Corona Ryun Young Kwon, Jie Zhang, Maxim Kramar, Tongjiang Wang, Leon Ofman,
Modeling of CME-driven Shock propagation with ENLIL simulations using flux-rope and cone-model inputs Using observations from STEREO/SECCHI and SOHO/LASCO,
CASS/UCSD ILWS 2009 SMEI 3D reconstructions of density behind shocks B.V. Jackson, P.P. Hick, A. Buffington, M.M. Bisi, J.M. Clover, S. Hamilton Center.
The Suprathermal Tail Properties are not well understood; known contributors Heated solar wind Interstellar and inner source pickup ions Prior solar and.
SEP Event Onsets: Far Backside Solar Sources and the East-West Hemispheric Asymmetry S. W. Kahler AFRL Space Vehicles Directorate, Kirtland AFB, New Mexico,
A Numerical Study of the Breakout Model for Coronal Mass Ejection Initiation P. MacNeice, S.K. Antiochos, A. Phillips, D.S. Spicer, C.R. DeVore, and K.
Shock heating by Fast/Slow MHD waves along plasma loops
Heliospheric Simulations of the SHINE Campaign Events SHINE Workshop, Big Sky, MT, June 27 – July 2, 2004 Dusan Odstrcil 1,2 1 University of Colorado/CIRES,
Data-constrained Simulation of CME Initiation and Propagation Antonia Savcheva ESPM 2014 September 11, 2014 Collaborators: R. Evans, B. van der Holst,
Analysis of 3 and 8 April 2010 Coronal Mass Ejections and their Influence on the Earth Magnetic Field Marilena Mierla and SECCHI teams at ROB, USO and.
Shocks in the IPS Wageesh Mishra Eun-kyung Joo Shih-pin Chen.
Solar Origins of the October November 2003 Extreme Events N. Gopalswamy NASA/GSFC SHINE 2004 WG3 Thursday, June 1 Big Sky, Montana Photo.
How massive is a CME? The greater accuracy offered by STEREO Eoin Carley R.T. James McAteer, Peter T. Gallagher Astrophysics Research Group, TCD.
1 Pruning of Ensemble CME modeling using Interplanetary Scintillation and Heliospheric Imager Observations A. Taktakishvili, M. L. Mays, L. Rastaetter,
3D Morphology of CME-driven Shocks (work in progress) V. Ontiveros, A. Vourlidas, A. Thernisien.
Interplanetary proton and electron enhancements associated with radio-loud and radio-quiet CME-driven shocks P. Mäkelä 1,2, N. Gopalswamy 2, H. Xie 1,2,
Hybrid model of solar energetic particle acceleration and transport Hybrid model of solar energetic particle acceleration and transport Leon Kocharov,
An Introduction to Observing Coronal Mass Ejections
Driving 3D-MHD codes Using the UCSD Tomography
On the three-dimensional configuration of coronal mass ejections
ICME in the Solar Wind from STEL IPS Observations
Y. C.-M. Liu, M. Opher, O. Cohen P.C.Liewer and T.I.Gombosi
George C. Ho1, David Lario1, Robert B. Decker1, Mihir I. Desai2,
Particle Acceleration at Coronal Shocks: the Effect of Large-scale Streamer-like Magnetic Field Structures Fan Guo (Los Alamos National Lab), Xiangliang.
Solar Wind Transients and SEPs
Steven R. Spangler University of Iowa
Corona Mass Ejection (CME) Solar Energetic Particle Events
SMALL SEP EVENTS WITH METRIC TYPE II RADIO BURSTS
Direct Observations of the Magnetic Reconnection Site of an Eruption on 2003 November ,ApJ, 622,1251 J. Lin, Y.-K. Ko, L. Sui, J. C. Raymond, G.
Xi Luo1, Ming Zhang1, Hamid K. Rassoul1, and N.V. Pogorelov2
High-cadence Radio Observations of an EIT Wave
Presentation transcript:

CME-driven Shocks in White Light Observations Verónica Ontiveros National University of Mexico, MEXICO George Mason University,USA Angelos Vourlidas Naval Research Laboratory, USA Space Plasma Physics Sozopol, 2008 SOHO/LASCO C3 – CME May 5 th, 1999

CMEs are the primary mechanism driving IP shocks at 1 AU (~80%) Lindsay et al., 1994 IP shock involved in 75 % of Intense GS Why? How early are we able to detect and measure these perturbations? Dst -288 nT

SOLAR ENERGETIC PARTICLES EVENTS

The Goal SOHO/LASCO C3 – CME May 5 th, 1999 CME-driven Shock? To demonstrate that CME-driven shocks: (1) can be detected in white light coronagraph images. (2) can have some of their properties measured (i.e., shock strength). (3) their propagation direction can be deduced via simple modeling.

CME speed > alfven speed Necessary condition Not enough for WL images Alfven Speed 1-20 Rs MAS code (Riley, et al., 2006) 3D time-dependent MHD model SOHO/LASCO C3 – CME May 5 th, 1999 Where?

Why not? Robbrecht, 2008, ApJ submitted

How does a shock wave look like in a white light image? STREAMER DEFLECTION PILED UP MATERIAL ? Events between The overall morphology of the white light corona is simple. ALL FAST CMEs V>1500 km/s Events that will be good candidates to drive a shock. Our Data

Quantifying Ontiveros & Vourlidas, 2008, ApJ Submitted

Quantifying G1G2 G3 Image measurement Image measurement Image measurement ?

Quantifying

Results Kinetic Energy CC=0.7 Momentum CC=0.8 Speed high enough to create a shock, but not the best correlated parameter

Results WHERE IS EASIER TO OBSER THE SHOCK SIGNATURE? 15 degrees above or below the Solar Equator streamers make difficult the shock observation

Solar Corona Raytrace Simulated white light images for a bow-shock model observed through different lines of sight. (a) Along the Sun-Earth line (b) 10◦ west (c) 90 ◦ south (d) 45◦ west, 45◦south

Solar Corona Raytrace Comparison of Modeled Shock Orientation and CME Source Regions event shock nose source region S13W56 S18W N47W138 N43W S38W108 S26W134 < 30 deg Ontiveros & Vourlidas, 2008, ApJ Submitted

Summary and Conclusions 13/15 of these events exhibited a sharp but faint brightness enhancement ahead or at the flanks of the CME over a large area, which we interpret as the white light counterpart of the CME-driven shock. All halo CMEs (10 events) have at least one location with such a shock signature. This is consistent with a shock draping all around the CME driver. The clearest white light signatures were found 15 deg above or below the solar equator, irrespective of heliocentric distance.

We found only a weak dependence between the shock strength (γ) and the CME speed. We found stronger correlations between the density jump and the kinetic energy (cc=0.77) and between density jump and the momentum (cc=0.80). The observed density profiles are the result of line-of-sight integration through a thin shock and sheath and not with a step jump as the observed shocks from in-situ measurements. We also found that our modeled 3D shock direction is in very good agreement with the expected direction of the CME assuming radial propagation from the source region. Summary and Conclusions