Jets in top quark mass measurement Tobias Göttfert IMPRS colloquium 13 th June 2008.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Charged Particle Jet measurements with the ALICE Experiment in pp collisions at the LHC Sidharth Kumar Prasad Wayne State University, USA for the ALICE.
Advertisements

Jet and Jet Shapes in CMS
Dijet Transverse Thrust cross sections at DØ Veronica Sorin University of Buenos Aires.
DØ Run II jet algorithms E. Busato (LPNHE, Paris) TeV4LHC Workshop 12/1/2004 Outline:  Introduction  The Ideal Jet Algorithm  DØ Run II Cone Jet Algorithm.
1 Study of Top-Antitop Production with the ATLAS Detector at the LHC DPG Frühjahrstagung, A. Bangert, T. Barillari, S. Bethke, N. Ghodbane, T.
Top Turns Ten March 2 nd, Measurement of the Top Quark Mass The Low Bias Template Method using Lepton + jets events Kevin Black, Meenakshi Narain.
Jet Reconstruction Algorithms Eric Vazquez PHENIX- Journal Club.
Introduction to Single-Top Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) The measurement.
1 Hadronic In-Situ Calibration of the ATLAS Detector N. Davidson The University of Melbourne.
1 Andrea Bangert, ATLAS SCT Meeting, Monte Carlo Studies Of Top Quark Pair Production Andrea Bangert, Max Planck Institute of Physics, CSC T6.
Jet finding Algorithms at Tevatron B.Andrieu (LPNHE, Paris) On behalf of the collaboration Outline: Introduction The Ideal Jet Algorithm Cone Jet Algorithms:
Single-Top Cross Section Measurements at ATLAS Patrick Ryan (Michigan State University) Introduction to Single-Top The measurement.
Frederik Rühr, KIP Heidelberg ATLAS Jets: Measurements, Calibration and Studies Frederik Rühr, Kirchhoff-Institut für Physik, Heidelberg Universität Heidelberg.
A Comparison of Three-jet Events in p Collisions to Predictions from a NLO QCD Calculation Sally Seidel QCD’04 July 2004.
1 Top Quark Pair Production at Tevatron and LHC Andrea Bangert, Young Scientist Workshop, , Ringberg Castle.
Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments Introduction to Hadronic Final State Reconstruction in Collider Experiments.
Jet Reconstruction and Calibration in Athena US ATLAS Software Workshop BNL, 27/08/03 Ambreesh Gupta, for the JetRec Group University of Chicago Outline:
Measurement of Inclusive Jet cross section Miroslav Kop á l University of Oklahoma on behalf of the D Ø collaboration DIS 2004, Štrbské pleso, Slovakia.
 s determination at LEP Thorsten Wengler University of Manchester DIS’06, Tsukuba, Japan.
Jet Studies at CMS and ATLAS 1 Konstantinos Kousouris Fermilab Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions Wednesday, 18 March 2009 (on behalf of the CMS.
Simulation Calor 2002, March. 27, 2002M. Wielers, TRIUMF1 Performance of Jets and missing ET in ATLAS Monika Wielers TRIUMF, Vancouver on behalf.
1 A Preliminary Model Independent Study of the Reaction pp  qqWW  qq ℓ qq at CMS  Gianluca CERMINARA (SUMMER STUDENT)  MUON group.
Top-partner mass reconstruction by using jets Michihisa Takeuchi ( KEK,YITP ) In collaboration with Mihoko M. Nojiri (KEK), Naotoshi Okamura (KEK)
2004 Xmas MeetingSarah Allwood WW Scattering at ATLAS.
Studies of the jet fragmentation in p+p collisions in STAR Elena Bruna Yale University STAR Collaboration meeting, June
Stephen D. Ellis University of Washington Maria Laach September 2008 Lecture 3 : Calculating with QCD at Colliders - Jets in the Final State Quantum Chromodynamics,
1 Top Quark Pair Production at Tevatron and LHC Andrea Bangert, Herbstschule fuer Hochenergiephysik, Maria Laach, September 2007.
Optimization of parameters for jet finding algorithm for p+p collisions at E cm =200 GeV T. G. Dedovich & M.V. Tokarev JINR, Dubna  Motivations.
The D  Run II Cone jet algorithm: problems and suggested changes B.Andrieu (LPNHE, Paris) Outline:  Introduction  Algorithm description  Present and.
24 June Thoughts on Jet Corrections in Top Quark Decays Outline: 1. List of some issues regarding jets 2. Figures of merit 3. Eg: Underlying Event.
1 P. Loch U of Arizona July 22, 2011 Experimental aspects of jet reconstruction and jet physics at the LHC (Part II) What Are Jets? The experimentalist’s.
Lecture IV: Jet finding techniques and results Marco van Leeuwen Utrecht University Jyväskylä Summer School 2008.
OPTIMAL JET FINDER Ernest Jankowski University of Alberta in collaboration with D. Grigoriev F. Tkachov.
Study of the Subjet Multiplicity at CMS Manuk Zubin Mehta Prof. Manjit Kaur Panjab University Chandigarh 12/21/2015Inida CMS-Meeting.
Liu Minghui Nanjing MC study of W polarization and ttbar spin correlation Liu Minghui, Zhu Chengguang April 27, 2008.
Jet Physics at CDF Sally Seidel University of New Mexico APS’99 24 March 1999.
QCD Physics with ATLAS Mike Seymour University of Manchester/CERN PH-TH ATLAS seminar January 25 th / February 22 nd 2005.
Feasibility of Detecting Leptoquarks With the CDF Detector Althea Moorhead Mentor: Darin Acosta.
A Comparison Between Different Jet Algorithms for top mass Reconstruction Chris Tevlin University of Manchester (Supervisor - Mike Seymour) Atlas UK top.
DIS Conference, Madison WI, 28 th April 2005Jeff Standage, York University Theoretical Motivations DIS Cross Sections and pQCD The Breit Frame Physics.
March 2005Sarah Allwood WW Scattering at ATLAS Sarah Allwood University of Manchester IOP HEPP conference 2005, Dublin.
Jet Studies at CDF Anwar Ahmad Bhatti The Rockefeller University CDF Collaboration DIS03 St. Petersburg Russia April 24,2003 Inclusive Jet Cross Section.
Jet finding Algorithms at Tevatron B.Andrieu (LPNHE, Paris) On behalf of the collaboration Outline: Introduction The Ideal Jet Algorithm Cone Jet Algorithms:
Régis Lefèvre (LPC Clermont-Ferrand - France)ATLAS Physics Workshop - Lund - September 2001 In situ jet energy calibration General considerations The different.
1 UCSD Meeting Calibration of High Pt Hadronic W Haifeng Pi 10/16/2007 Outline Introduction High Pt Hadronic W in TTbar and Higgs events Reconstruction.
Eric COGNERAS LPC Clermont-Ferrand Prospects for Top pair resonance searches in ATLAS Workshop on Top Physics october 2007, Grenoble.
American Physical Society Meeting St. Louis, MO April th, 2008 Measuring the top mass at DØ using the Ideogram Method Amnon Harel
1 Stop pair production in photon-photon collision at ILC A.Bartl (Univ. of Vienna) W.Majerotto HEPHY (Vienna) K.Moenig DESY (Zeuthen) A.N.Skachkova, N.B.Skachkov.
Top Quark Pair Production Cross Section at Tevatron Viatcheslav Sharyy for CDF and D0 collaboration Rencontres de Moriond QCD and High Energy Interactions.
Erik Devetak Oxford University 18/09/2008
Measurement of the Top Quark Mass with the Matrix Element Method at D0
Performance of jets algorithms in ATLAS
on top mass measurement based on B had decay length
Venkat Kaushik, Jae Yu University of Texas at Arlington
H Y P A T I A HYbrid Pupil’s Analysis Tool for Interactions in Atlas
tt+jets simulation comparisons
semileptonic ttbar + jet events
Missing Energy and Tau-Lepton Reconstruction in ATLAS
Jessica Leonard Oct. 23, 2006 Physics 835
Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USA
Searches at LHC for Physics Beyond the Standard Model
Experimental Particle Physics PHYS6011 Putting it all together Lecture 4 28th April 2008 Fergus Wilson. RAL.
Jets Working Group WG focused so far on the following 2 physics studies: - intermediate mass Higgs searches - single top The 2 topics require the reconstruction.
SUSY SEARCHES WITH ATLAS
Inclusive Jet Production at the Tevatron
Experimental and theoretical Group Torino + Moscow
C.M.S.:.
Peter Loch University of Arizona Tucson, Arizona USA
Measurement of b-jet Shapes at CDF
Session 10 on Standard-Model Electroweak Physics
Presentation transcript:

Jets in top quark mass measurement Tobias Göttfert IMPRS colloquium 13 th June 2008

Max-Planck Institut für Physik What is a jet? According to Wikipedia, „jet“ has more than 60 meanings:  a stream of material  an aircraft propelled by a reaction engine that discharges a fast moving jet of fluid to generate thrust  an experimental nuclear fusion reactor (Joint European Torus)  the name of various bands  the name of various sports teams  the name of various movie and comic characters  a town in Alfalfa County, Oklahoma, USA  a cone of hadrons Jets for top mass measurement 2

Max-Planck Institut für Physik What is a jet?  Experimentalist: „A jet is a narrow aggregation of energy deposit in my calorimeter“  Theorist: „A jet is the colour-singlet final state of a parton after undergoing the non-perturbative QCD known as fragmentation and hadronisation“  Goal: reconstruct parton properties from observables of the jet Jets for top mass measurement 3

Max-Planck Institut für Physik Jet algorithms  provide a prescription to make jets that is feasible in both theory and experiment  reconstruct the observables of parton that made the jet Two big classes of algorithms: Jets for top mass measurement 4 Cone-type (successive) Clustering- type

Max-Planck Institut für Physik Cone-type jet algorithms  many variants around: „basic cone“, mid-point-iterating, SiSCone  well-established in hadron collider physics  basic principle: look at cones with fixed radius in η-φ-space: ΔR 2 = Δφ 2 +Δη 2 (φ : Azimuthal angle η : Pseudorapidity η = - ln tan (θ/2) ) Jets for top mass measurement 5 basic cone algorithm: 1. choose seed directions 2. calculate jet axis for every cone of fixed radius (e.g. 0.4) around the seed directions 3. if jet axis and seed direction are not equal, let jet axis become the new seed direction and go back to take all individual stable jets remaining basic cone algorithm: 1. choose seed directions 2. calculate jet axis for every cone of fixed radius (e.g. 0.4) around the seed directions 3. if jet axis and seed direction are not equal, let jet axis become the new seed direction and go back to take all individual stable jets remaining

Max-Planck Institut für Physik Standard cone how-to Jets for top mass measurement 6 all clusters of one event in the η-φ-plane

Max-Planck Institut für Physik Standard cone how-to Jets for top mass measurement 7 cone jets with R=0.4 cone jets with R=0.4

Max-Planck Institut für Physik Standard cone how-to Jets for top mass measurement 8 cone jets with R=0.4 + true partons from ttbar decay cone jets with R=0.4 + true partons from ttbar decay μ+ν b b b b light quarks

Max-Planck Institut für Physik Standard cone how-to Jets for top mass measurement 9 cone jets with R=0.7 cone jets with R=0.7 unwanted merging of two jets unwanted merging of two jets

Max-Planck Institut für Physik Cone-type jet algorithms Pros:  fast and easy to apply in experiment  well-known and tuned over years Cons:  not a one-to-one mapping, need to treat overlaps  not infrared-safe, not collinear-safe (can be overcome by a more complicated algorithm) Jets for top mass measurement 10

Max-Planck Institut für Physik Clustering-type jet algorithms  known as Durham or k T algorithm  originally developed for lepton collider experiments, extended to hadron physics  extremely flexible and steerable  basic principle: look at relative transverse momenta of objects as criterion to successively merge them (inspired by „reversing“ showering models)  results in „fuzzy“ jets (no cone shape) Jets for top mass measurement 11

Max-Planck Institut für Physik Example k T algorithm The k T (exclusive mode): 1. take a list of protojets and define distances: d i = p Ti 2 d ij = min(p Ti 2, p Tj 2 ) ΔR 2 (ΔR 2 = Δφ 2 +Δη 2 ) 2. find d min, the smallest of all d i, d ij 3. if it’s a d i, declare protojet as “beam jet”, if it’s a d ij, merge the two jets i and j according to p μ ij = p μ i + p μ j (E recombination scheme) 4. iterate until d min >d cut The k T (exclusive mode): 1. take a list of protojets and define distances: d i = p Ti 2 d ij = min(p Ti 2, p Tj 2 ) ΔR 2 (ΔR 2 = Δφ 2 +Δη 2 ) 2. find d min, the smallest of all d i, d ij 3. if it’s a d i, declare protojet as “beam jet”, if it’s a d ij, merge the two jets i and j according to p μ ij = p μ i + p μ j (E recombination scheme) 4. iterate until d min >d cut Jets for top mass measurement 12

Max-Planck Institut für Physik k T how-to Jets for top mass measurement 13 all clusters of one event in the η-φ-plane

Max-Planck Institut für Physik k T how-to Jets for top mass measurement 14 k T exclusive running k T exclusive running

Max-Planck Institut für Physik k T how-to Jets for top mass measurement 15 jets for k T exclusive with d cut =(30GeV) 2 jets for k T exclusive with d cut =(30GeV) 2 μ+ν b b b b light quarks

Max-Planck Institut für Physik Clustering-type jet algorithms  Pros: well-defined in both theory and experiment, one-to-one mapping of input objects inherently infrared- and collinear-safe gives you more information about the event than just the four- momenta of resulting jets  extract information from the merging scales d min  Cons: how to treat hadron remnants in hadron collisions? computationally expensive for large multiplicities of calorimeter clusters (can be overcome by smart bookkeeping)  k T has different sources of systematic errors than cone algorithms Jets for top mass measurement 16

Max-Planck Institut für Physik Top mass reconstruction signature in the ttbar lepton+jets channel: Jets for top mass measurement 17 1 high energetic lepton missing transverse energy 2 light jets simple method of reconstructing the top mass on the hadronic side: combine those three jets whose p T sum is maximal b-jet

Max-Planck Institut für Physik Top mass reconstruction Jets for top mass measurement 18 tri-jet mass of all selected top candidates for lepton+jets signal and various sources of background tri-jet mass of all selected top candidates for lepton+jets signal and various sources of background combinatoric background combinatoric background physics background physics background

Max-Planck Institut für Physik d Merge analysis  d min behaves like an event shape: the smallest relative p T when there are a certain number of jets left in the event  see whether signal and background behave differently  possibility to improve S/B with a cut Jets for top mass measurement 19 cut at d min = (20GeV) 2 cut at d min = (20GeV) 2 d min for 4 jets left signal backg

Max-Planck Institut für Physik Conclusions  defining jets is complicated due to non-perturbative QCD effects (hadronisation, UE) and also experimental effects (pile-up)  Two major types of jet algorithms around: Cone-type and clustering-type (k T )  They suffer from different sources of systematics  combined analyses could improve on error  k T contains more information than just the four- momenta of jets  this could be used to separate signal from background or distinguish e.g. 4jet from 5jet events Jets for top mass measurement 20

Max-Planck Institut für Physik Acknowledgments Thanks to:  Sven Menke  Stefan Kluth  arXiv:hep-ph/ v2  arXiv:hep-ph/ v Jets for top mass measurement 21