Western Bay Supporting People Programme Regional Monitoring Questionnaire

Background Local Requirements Response to provider national call for consistency Pool resources for collection only to date Local analysis informing local contract monitoring and commissioning First attempt to analyse at a regional level

Western Bay Supporting People Programme Introduction - The Process l these stages final analysis output  Stage 1: The Form (SNAP)  Questions –Need to review  Input and output formats. SNAP Is there a better format?  Stage 2: The Analysis  Not all information collected can be analysed e.g. not good at literal answers or input errors or omissions.  Not all providers returned yet.  Accuracy of data input (highlights). E.g. voids higher than 100% ??  Time frame at end of year returns needs review. Too tight to undertake detailed analysis.  Difficult to analyse unfamiliar data  Going Forward  What answers are we seeking? What worth collecting to analyse regionally?

Of the 167 returns: 58.1% (97) Projects/Services are registered with the CSSIW to Dom Care9758.1% 66.5% (111) Organisations are registered with the CSSIW as a Dom Care % 15% (25) have Registered Social Landlord status2615.6% 75.4% (126) are Registered Charities % Only 1 Organisation is a Limited Company 5 Organisations stated that they are a Registered Society with Exempt charity status via HMRC 1 Organisation stated that their status is Local Authority 4.2% (7) classed their Service Type as Floating Support less than 6 months74.2% 15.6% (26) classed their Service Type as Floating Support 6 to 24 months2615.6% 22.2% (37) classed their Service Type as Floating Support 24 months plus3722.2% 6.6% (11) classed their Service Type as Fixed Supported housing less than 6 months116.6% 7.2% (12) classed their Service Type as Fixed Supported housing 6 to 24 months127.2% 44.3% (74) classed their Service Type as Fixed Supported housing 24 months plus7444.3%

Western Bay Supporting People Programme

Regional Average Service Voids As A Percentage (Number of void weeks divided by the maximum potential occupancy x 100) Average %age Voids Number of Services 022 <5%22 >5%10 >10% 9 >20%+11

Who has accessed our services? Male = 1851 Females = 3461 Pregnant = 169 Gender not the same as at birth = 4 Married = 456 Civil Partnership = 233 Single = 3,214 Age Range Number

Families with children Females = 3461 Pregnant = 169 Given birth within 52 weeks = 207 Care of preschool child = 438 Care of School age child = 742 Single Parent = 548

Disability

Ethnicity

Religion

Sexuality Language