Leading the pervasive adoption of grid computing for research and industry © 2005 Global Grid Forum The information contained herein is subject to change.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
© 2007 Open Grid Forum JSDL-WG Session OGF27 – General Session 10:30-12:00, 14 October 2009 Banff, Canada.
Advertisements

© 2006 Open Grid Forum Joint Session on Information Modeling for Computing Resources OGF 20 - Manchester, 7 May 2007.
© 2007 Open Grid Forum JSDL-WG Session OGF21 – Activity schema session 17 October 2007 Seattle, U.S.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum OGSA Next Steps Discussion Providing Value Beyond the Specifications.
© 2008 Open Grid Forum Resource Selection Services OGF22 – Boston, Feb
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Network Services Interface OGF29: Working Group Meeting Guy Roberts, 19 th Jun 2010.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum JSDL Optional Elements OGF 24 Singapore.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Joint Session on Information Modeling for Computing Resources (OGSA Modeling Activities) OGF 21 - Seattle, 16 October 2007.
© 2006, 2007 Open Grid Forum Michel Drescher, FujitsuOGF-20, Manchester, UK Andreas Savva, FujitsuOGF-21, Seattle, US (update) Extending JSDL 1.0 with.
OGSA-WG Session #4 Usecase Document Overview Platform Service Next Step Discussion GGF10 Berlin March. 11, :30pm Audimax.
1 ©2013 Open Grid Forum OGF Working Group Sessions Security Area – FEDSEC Jens Jensen, OGF Security Area.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum DCI Federation Protocol BoF Alexander Papaspyrou, TU Dortmund University Open Grid Forum March 15-18, 2010, Munich, Germany.
© 2005 Global Grid Forum The information contained herein is subject to change without notice Leading the pervasive adoption of grid computing for research.
© 2007 Open Grid Forum Data Grid Management Systems: Standard API - community development Arun Jagatheesan, San Diego Supercomputer Center & iRODS.org.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Service Level Terms Andrew Grimshaw.
Peter Ziu Northrop Grumman ACS-WG Grid Provisioning Appliance Concept GGF13, March 14, 2005 (Revised 8/4/2005)
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Network Services Interface OGF 32, Salt Lake City Guy Roberts, Inder Monga, Tomohiro Kudoh 16 th July 2011.
© 2007 Open Grid Forum JSDL-WG Session OGF22 – General Session (11:15-12:45) 25 February 2008 Boston, U.S.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum FEDSEC-CG Andrew Grimshaw and Jens Jensen.
© 2015 Open Grid Forum ETSI CSC activities Wolfgang Ziegler Area Director Applications, OGF Fraunhofer Institute SCAI Open Grid Forum 44, May 21-22, 2015.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum GridRPC Working Group 15 th Meeting GGF22, Cambridge, MA, USA, Feb
OGSA-RSS Face-to-Face Meeting Sunnyvale, CA, US Aug 15-16, 2005.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Network Services Interface CS Errata Guy Roberts, Chin Guok, Tomohiro Kudoh 29 Sept 2015.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum OGSA-WG: EGA Reference Model GGF18 Sept. 12, 4-5:30pm, #159A-B.
Leading the pervasive adoption of grid computing for research and industry © 2005 Global Grid Forum The information contained herein is subject to change.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Grid High-Performance Networking Research Group (GHPN-RG) Dimitra Simeonidou
© 2005 Global Grid Forum The information contained herein is subject to change without notice Leading the pervasive adoption of grid computing for research.
Peter Ziu Northrop Grumman ACS-WG Grid Provisioning Appliance Concept GGF13, March 14, 2005
© 2007 Open Grid Forum OGF Management Area Meeting OGF20 7 May, am-12:30pm Manchester, UK.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum Grid Resource Allocation Agreement Protocol GRAAP-WG working session 1 Thursday, 5 March, 2009 Catania, Sicily.
© 2007 Open Grid Forum OGF20 Levels of the Grid Workflow Interoperability OGSA-WG F2F meeting Adrian Toth University of Miskolc NIIF 11 th May, 2007.
Leading the pervasive adoption of grid computing for research and industry © 2005 Global Grid Forum The information contained herein is subject to change.
© 2006 Open Grid Forum 1 Application Contents Service (ACS) ACS-WG#1 Monday, September 11 10:30 am - 12:00 am (158A-B) ACS-WG#2 Wednesday, September 13.
© 2008 Open Grid Forum Production Grid Infrastructure WG State Model Discussions PGI Team.
Leading the pervasive adoption of grid computing for research and industry © 2005 Global Grid Forum The information contained herein is subject to change.
OGSA Data Architecture WG Data Transfer Session Allen Luniewski, IBM Dave Berry, NESC.
Leading the pervasive adoption of grid computing for research and industry © 2005 Global Grid Forum The information contained herein is subject to change.
OGSA-WG Session #2 Program Execution Services GGF10 Berlin March. 10, :30-5pm Senate Hall.
© 2007 Open Grid Forum JSDL-WG Session OGF26 – General Session 11:00-12:30, 28 May 2009 Chapel Hill, NC.
Network Services Interface
Mark Morgan February, 2006 (GGF16 in Athens)
SLIDES TITLE Your name Session Name, OGSA-WG #nn
GGF Intellectual Property Policy
Welcome and Introduction
OGSA EMS Session OGF19 OGSA-WG session #3 30 January, :30pm
RISGE-RG use case template
Hiro Kishimoto, OGSA-WG co-chair GGF16 in Athens February 17, 2006
OGSA Session #1 Execution Management Services
OGSA Data Architecture WG Data Transfer Discussion
OGSA-WG EMS Architecture
GridRPC Working Group 13th Meeting
Grid Resource Allocation Agreement Protocol
Service Virtualization via a Network Appliance….
OGF session PMA, Florence, 31 Jan 2017.
OGSA-WG Session #2 Program Execution Services
WS-Agreement Working Session
Sessions 1 & 3: Published Document Session Summary
Grid Scheduling Architecture – Research Group
Hiro Kishimoto, OGSA-WG co-chair GGF16 in Athens February 13, 2006
Network Services Interface
OGSA-Workflow OGSA-WG.
Naming service BoF #2 & report session
Information Model, JSDL and XQuery: A proposed solution
WS Naming OGF 19 - Friday Center, NC.
Activity Delegation Kick Off
Network Services Interface Working Group
OGSA-RSS-WG EPS Discussion.
Introduction to OGF Standards
Proposed JSDL Extension: Parameter Sweeps
OGF 40 Grand BES/JSDL Andrew Grimshaw Genesis II/XSEDE
Presentation transcript:

Leading the pervasive adoption of grid computing for research and industry © 2005 Global Grid Forum The information contained herein is subject to change without notice OGSA EMS GGF15, October, 2005 in Boston

GGF Intellectual Property Policy All statements related to the activities of the GGF and addressed to the GGF are subject to all provisions of Section 17 of GFD-C.1, which grants to the GGF and its participants certain licenses and rights in such statements. Such statements include verbal statements in GGF meetings, as well as written and electronic communications made at any time or place, which are addressed to any GGF working group or portion thereof, Where the GFSG knows of rights, or claimed rights, the GGF secretariat shall attempt to obtain from the claimant of such rights, a written assurance that upon approval by the GFSG of the relevant GGF document(s), any party will be able to obtain the right to implement, use and distribute the technology or works when implementing, using or distributing technology based upon the specific specification(s) under openly specified, reasonable, non-discriminatory terms. The working group or research group proposing the use of the technology with respect to which the proprietary rights are claimed may assist the GGF secretariat in this effort. The results of this procedure shall not affect advancement of document, except that the GFSG may defer approval where a delay may facilitate the obtaining of such assurances. The results will, however, be recorded by the GGF Secretariat, and made available. The GFSG may also direct that a summary of the results be included in any GFD published containing the specification.

Agenda Background on EMS −Basic model −WG’s working BES RSS ACS CDDLM −Issues punted so far Configuration, deployment, provisioning −Andrew’s thoughts −Stuart’s thoughts What to tackle next?

OGSA-EMS Background Basic problem: provision, execute and manage services (including legacy applications) in a grid −Some use cases start up a cache service on-demand, utility computing start up and manage a set of legacy applications Want to be able to “instantiate” a service and have the grid figure it out, and provide management interfaces throughout the lifetime of the service

EMS addresses issues such as: Where can a service execute? What are the locations it can execute because of resource restrictions such as memory, CPU and binary type, available libraries, and available licenses? Given the above, what policy restrictions are in place that may further limit the candidate set of execution locations? Where should the service execute? Once it is known where the service can execute, the question is where should it execute? This may involve different selection algorithms that optimize different objective functions or are trying to enforce different policies or service level agreements. Prepare the service to execute. Just because a service can execute somewhere does not necessarily mean it can execute there without some setup. Setup could include deployment and configuration of binaries, libraries, staging data, or other operations to prepare the local execution environment to execute the service. Get the service executing. Once everything is ready, actually start the service and register it in the appropriate places. Manage (monitor, restart, move, etc.). Once the service is started in must be managed and monitored. What if it fails? Or fails to meet its service agreements. Should it be restarted in another location? What about state? Should the state be “checkpointed” periodically to ensure restartability? Is the service participating in some sort of fault-detection and recovery scheme?

EMS Services fall into three sets Resources that model processing, storage, executables, resource management, and provisioning Job management and monitoring services; and Resource selection services that collectively decide where to execute a service.

Typical Pattern Provisioning Deployment Configuration Information Services Service Container Persistent State Handle Service Accounting Services Execution Planning Services Candidate Set Generator (Work - Resource mapping) Job Manager Reservation

EMS: Collaborative Work Example Provisioning Deployment Configuration App. Contents Service Information Services Service Container Data Container Accounting Services Execution Planning Services Candidate Set Generator (Work -Resource mapping) Job Manager Reservation RSS BES CDDLM ACS information EMS JSDL GRAAP

Other issues punted Accounting/auditing, logging “Provisioning” – getting ready to run High availability/fault-tolerance hooks/services Disk/storage/caches, etc. Reservations/agreements

Andrew’s thoughts on “provisioning” My definition of “provisioning an application” is more like “installing” −Doing what is necessary to prepare the application for execution in a hosting environment (e.g., Unix OS, Windows,.Net, JVM, whatever) −This may mean “installing” binaries, libraries, databases, configuration files, mucking with registries, etc. −It does not extend to specific input file staging – to me that is a separate, but important issue described by JSDL −Whether an application can be “provisioned” on (in?) a hosting environment will depend on many factors, e.g., binary availability, licensing, other installed software, etc. −As an EMS guy – let me describe what I want functionally from the provisioning “system”

What I’d like to have An namable abstract “application” −/applications/biochemistry/sequence/BLAST “Application” knows about its requirements in terms of resources, licenses, etc. −Application can export this information to information services in some form – e.g., metadata, resource properties, whatever −There is a well-known algorithm for determining “compatibility” between applications and containers Application knows how to “install” itself on a variety of container types −I expect these containers to be represented as BES containers −The application can give me an estimate on how long it will take to install itself on a specific container −Application may know the containers on which it is already installed

What I want Assume an “application” type −Application { long install_time_estimate(BES_container); Result_type install(BES_container); Service_group already_installed(); } Also assume that applications push all the needed info to info services, and that the target container has been decided BES_container fred; Application BLAST; If (BLAST.install_time_estimate(fred)< threshold) If (BLAST.install(fred)==INSTALL_OK) {..} else {…}

“Stuart’s” thoughts or “What Andrew really wants ” From: OGSA Glossary of Terms, GFD44 −Provisioning: The activity of specifying, reserving, allocating and deploying the set of resources required to accomplish a task −Deployment: The process of installing components and related contents (e.g. programs and data) on a set of resources to meet the requirements of the job to which they have been allocated. Deployment may be followed by resource configuration. CDDLM specs are done; reference implementations in progress, close to be done Start from CDDLM, specify what else needs to be supported and go from there

EMS addresses issues such as: Where can a service execute? What are the locations it can execute because of resource restrictions such as memory, CPU and binary type, available libraries, and available licenses? Given the above, what policy restrictions are in place that may further limit the candidate set of execution locations? Where should the service execute? Once it is known where the service can execute, the question is where should it execute? This may involve different selection algorithms that optimize different objective functions or are trying to enforce different policies or service level agreements. Prepare the service to execute. Just because a service can execute somewhere does not necessarily mean it can execute there without some setup. Setup could include deployment and configuration of binaries, libraries, staging data, or other operations to prepare the local execution environment to execute the service. Get the service executing. Once everything is ready, actually start the service and register it in the appropriate places. Manage (monitor, restart, move, etc.). Once the service is started in must be managed and monitored. What if it fails? Or fails to meet its service agreements. Should it be restarted in another location? What about state? Should the state be “checkpointed” periodically to ensure restartability? Is the service participating in some sort of fault-detection and recovery scheme?

CDDLM is about …what it name says: Configuration Description Deployment, and Lifecycle Management It is not about: −Scheduling, candidate set generation, discovery, repository, accounting, containers, reservations, agreements, naming….. etc.

The CDDLM High Level Architecture From CDDLM Foundation Spec CDDLM Deployment API CDDLM Component model (a wrapper around the service) Deployed service describe deploy Configuration Description Language (CDL)

Interaction of CDDLM and Other Management Components 1.Job Submission 4. Resource Request 7. Allocated Resource 2. Deployment Request 3. Rtrn resource requirements, & CDDLM job ID Job Management Resource Allocation (Candidate Set Gen.) CDDLM Local Resource Management Wrapper (Container) Resources CDDLM I/F 6. Allocated Resource 5. Resource Brokering 8. Designate resources 11. Return status 9. Transfer files and Initiate Local Program 10. Return machine job ID

Direct Repository Use Provisioning Deployment Configuration Information Services Service Container Accounting Services Execution Planning Services Candidate Set Generator (Work -Resource mapping) Job Manager Reservation Application Repository Application Archive ACSACS

Using Data Services to Access Repository Provisioning Deployment Configuration Information Services Service Container Accounting Services Execution Planning Services Candidate Set Generator (Work -Resource mapping) Job Manager Reservation Application Repository Application Archive ACSACS Data Services (GridFTP, …) ARI

Splitting Content from Execution Provisioning Deployment Configuration Information Services Service Container Accounting Services Execution Planning Services Candidate Set Generator (Work -Resource mapping) Job Manager Reservation Application Repository Application Archive ACSACS ARI

What to tackle next?