Geostatistical History Matching Methodology using Block-DSS for Multi-Scale Consistent Models PHD PROGRAM IN PETROLUM ENGINEERING CATARINA MARQUES

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
KMS Technologies 1999 Discussion views - Monday Non-uniqueness is everywhere Seismic data is highly oversampled - less Non-seismic methods are generally.
Advertisements

1 -Classification: Internal Uncertainty in petroleum reservoirs.
Uncertainty in reservoirs
4 June 2014© Earthworks Environment & Resources Ltd. All rights reserved1 Reservoir Connectivity and Fluid Uncertainty Analysis using Fast Geostatistical.
2012 SEG/SPE/AAPG Summer Research Workshop
Multi-scale Planning and Scheduling Under Uncertain and Varying Demand Conditions in the Pharmaceutical Industry Hierarchically Structured Integrated Multi-scale.
A multi-scale, pattern-based approach to sequential simulation annual scrf meeting, may 2003 stanford university burc arpat ( coaching provided by jef.
1 (from Optimization of Advanced Well Type and Performance Louis J. Durlofsky Department of Petroleum Engineering, Stanford University.
Some problems of computational geophysics Yu.M. Laevsky, B.G. Mikhaylenko, G.V. Reshetova Institute of Computational Mathematics and Mathematical Geophysics.
A Workflow Approach to Designed Reservoir Study Presented by Zhou Lei Center for Computation and Technology Louisiana State University June 25, 2007.
I DENTIFICATION OF main flow structures for highly CHANNELED FLOW IN FRACTURED MEDIA by solving the inverse problem R. Le Goc (1)(2), J.-R. de Dreuzy (1)
CARPE DIEM 7 th (Final) meeting – Bologna Critical Assessment of available Radar Precipitation Estimation techniques and Development of Innovative approaches.
The Calibration Process
Combined Geological Modelling and Flow Simulation J. Florian Wellmann, Lynn Reid, Klaus Regenauer-Lieb and the Western Australian Geothermal Centre of.
Classification: Internal Status: Draft Using the EnKF for combined state and parameter estimation Geir Evensen.
Marginal Field Development Advances in 3D Geological Modeling: How it can help?
Sedimentology & Stratigraphy:
1 Hybrid methods for solving large-scale parameter estimation problems Carlos A. Quintero 1 Miguel Argáez 1 Hector Klie 2 Leticia Velázquez 1 Mary Wheeler.
Travel-time Tomography For High Contrast Media based on Sparse Data Yenting Lin Signal and Image Processing Institute Department of Electrical Engineering.
Advanced Resources International Demonstration of a Novel, Integrated, Multi-Scale Procedure for High-Resolution 3D Reservoir Characterization and Improved.
Schedule (years) Design Optimization Approach for FML Wing Structure Background The aerospace industry is gaining significant interest in the application.
16 th Annual Meeting Stanford Center for Reservoir Forecasting Stanford Center for Reservoir Forecasting.
Optimization in Engineering Design Georgia Institute of Technology Systems Realization Laboratory 101 Quasi-Newton Methods.
Remarks: 1.When Newton’s method is implemented has second order information while Gauss-Newton use only first order information. 2.The only differences.
Bed Contained Tectonic Fold-Related Fractures Flank of Teton Anticline Sawtooth Mnts. W. Montana Miss. Madison Ls.
Wytch Farm Field Development Project
Stochastic inverse modeling under realistic prior model constraints with multiple-point geostatistics Jef Caers Petroleum Engineering Department Stanford.
TEMPLATE DESIGN © A high-order accurate and monotonic advection scheme is used as a local interpolator to redistribute.
Model Fusion and its Use in Earth Sciences R. Romero, O. Ochoa, A. A. Velasco, and V. Kreinovich Joint Annual Meeting NSF Division of Human Resource Development.
Joel Ben-Awuah. Questions to Answer What do you understand about pseudo-well? When to apply pseudo-well? What are the uncertainties in reservoir modeling?
1 Tom Edgar’s Contribution to Model Reduction as an introduction to Global Sensitivity Analysis Procedure Accounting for Effect of Available Experimental.
Goal of Stochastic Hydrology Develop analytical tools to systematically deal with uncertainty and spatial variability in hydrologic systems Examples of.
Camera calibration from multiple view of a 2D object, using a global non linear minimization method Computer Engineering YOO GWI HYEON.
By: Amjad M. Omari 1.  Time is a competitive weapon. Even the best strategies, tactics, systems, and people will lose the battle if they arrive at the.
Earth models for early exploration stages PETROLEUM ENGINEERING ÂNGELA PEREIRA Introduction Frontier basins and unexplored.
Hybrid Bayesian Linearized Acoustic Inversion Methodology PhD in Petroleum Engineering Fernando Bordignon Introduction Seismic inversion.
Renewable energies | Eco-friendly production | Innovative transport | Eco-efficient processes | Sustainable resources Multi-fidelity meta-models for reservoir.
A Hybrid Optimization Approach for Automated Parameter Estimation Problems Carlos A. Quintero 1 Miguel Argáez 1, Hector Klie 2, Leticia Velázquez 1 and.
SEISMIC ATTRIBUTES FOR RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION
Role of Data Quality in GIS Decision Support Tools
Compressive Coded Aperture Video Reconstruction
Ioannis E. Venetis Department of Computer Engineering and Informatics
Goal We present a hybrid optimization approach for solving global optimization problems, in particular automated parameter estimation models. The hybrid.
Petroleum Engineering 631 — Petroleum Reservoir Description
Stanford Center for Reservoir Forecasting
Amit Suman and Tapan Mukerji
The Calibration Process
Automatic Picking of First Arrivals
Addy Satija and Jef Caers Department of Energy Resources Engineering
SCRF 26th Annual Meeting May
Jincong He, Louis Durlofsky, Pallav Sarma (Chevron ETC)
Jef Caers, Céline Scheidt and Pejman Tahmasebi
Pejman Tahmasebi, Thomas Hossler and Jef Caers
A Parallel BOA-PSO Hybrid Algorithm for History Matching
Iterative Optimization
Assessing uncertainties on production forecasting based on production Profile reconstruction from a few Dynamic simulations Gaétan Bardy – PhD Student.
A RESERVOIR MANAGEMENT REVOLUTION
PHD IN PETROLEUM ENGINEERING PEDRO PEREIRA Motivation
Finite Element Surface-Based Stereo 3D Reconstruction
Upscaling of 4D Seismic Data
Reservoir Simulation FEEDBACK INPUT Geologic Model Time
Brent Lowry & Jef Caers Stanford University, USA
PPT Design on 3D models Landysh Minligalieva Reservoir Engineer
Stanford Center for Reservoir Forecasting
Energy Resources Engineering Department Stanford University, CA, USA
Rohan Yadav and Charles Yuan (rohany) (chenhuiy)
Transformation Methods Penalty and Barrier methods
Yalchin Efendiev Texas A&M University
Multidisciplinary Optimization
Presentation transcript:

Geostatistical History Matching Methodology using Block-DSS for Multi-Scale Consistent Models PHD PROGRAM IN PETROLUM ENGINEERING CATARINA MARQUES Challenge During the last decades, the challenges of modelling subsurface Earth’s properties generated a remarkable development of reservoir modelling techniques that allow incorporating different sources of available information such as, historical production data, seismic reflection data and well-log data. However, all this information is traditionally used individually to model the reservoir at different stages during the geo-modelling workflow. Integrate all the available data faster and with accuracy in a unique workflow is still one big challenge. To optimize and speed-up a reservoir modelling conditioned to well- log data and historical production data, we developed and implemented a new geostatistical history matching algorithm. The optimization loop is performed at multiple reservoir scales allowing a faster convergence without losing accuracy. Supervisor: Amilcar Soares and Leonardo Azevedo PhD Program in Petroleum Engineering Methodology We introduce an iterative geostatistical history matching procedure able to generate geological models at diverse levels of detail. The multi-scale geostatistical history matching workflow integrates two history matching loops: 1) Traditional geostatistical history matching is performed at a coarse reservoir grid by iteratively perturbing it until a given misfit value between simulated and observed production data is achieved. 2) The best coarse grid model is refined using a block direct sequential simulation (Block-DSS) to downscale the matched coarse grid and improve the history matching with the assimilated course information, while propagating the uncertainty through the different scales. Workflow Results Further Work In the previous workflow we integrated well-log data and historical production data, but how to integrate all the available data in a unique workflow? Frequently the petrophysical properties models retrieved by seismic inversion are used as input for history matching procedures. But the perturbation of the model parameters during history matching, as they are not conditioned to seismic, may generate models that no longer match the observed seismic. Best Coarse Image Block-DSS Downscaling Combination of block simple kriging with DSS allows to incorporate information from two different scales: block data and point data. True Reservoir Model Reference Model (Porosity) Best Fine Iteration Best Coarse Iteration True Model (Permeability) Iteration 30 (Matched Porosity) Iteration 30 (Matched Permeability) Block DSS (Matched Porosity) Block DSS (Matched Permeability) With this work we proposed a novel methodology to integrate all available data - well-log, production data and seismic reflection data – coupling the objective of the two inverse problems into a single loop optimization. The proposed methodology aims to achieve one solution – petrophysical property models – which minimizes simultaneously the objective functions of both methods.