Index 4/5 ESC Region 11. 2 Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness emphasizes the role of elementary and middle schools in preparing.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
AIE Annual Conference| September 24, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson,
Advertisements

August 8, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon Housson, Director Overview of.
Accountabil ity System Student Achievement Index I Student Progress Index 2 Closing Performanc e Gaps Index 3 Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 Overview.
1 Accountability System Overview of the Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
Accountability preview Major Mindshift Out with the Old – In with the New TEPSA - May 2013 (Part 2) Ervin Knezek John Fessenden
State Accountability Overview 2014 Strozeski – best guess.
APAC Meeting | January 22, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of Performance.
Accountability Update Ty Duncan Coordinator of Accountability and Compliance, ESC
2013 ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Linda Jolly Region 18 ESC.
PSP Summer Institute| July 29 – August 2, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Shannon.
Index 4 Description: Postsecondary Readiness Index 4 is : the Post-secondary Readiness index, which is used to show the readiness of students on campus.
2014 Accountability Commissioner’s Decisions – April 4, 2014.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver Accountability Development What do we know? What do we want to know? March 4, 2014.
2013 State Accountability System Allen ISD. State Accountability under TAKS program:  Four Ratings: Exemplary, Recognized, Academically Acceptable, Academically.
Kim Gilson Senior Consultant Data and Accountability Region 10 ESC
2015 Accountability Commissioner’s Final Decisions KIM GILSON SENIOR CONSULTANT, DATA AND ACCOUNTABILITY REGION 10 ESC
Accountability Update Professional Service Provider Update and Network Meeting April 1,
Data Revolution: Instruction and Index 4 Region 4 ESC.
State Accountability Overview 1 Performance Index Framework: For 2013 and beyond, an accountability framework of four Performance Indexes includes a broad.
2013 Texas Accountability System. Features of the System No single indicator can lower a rating Focuses on overall campus/district performance rather.
2014 Accountability System 2014 Accountability System Jana Schreiner Senior Consultant Accountability State Assessment
The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global workplace, ready for personal.
2015 Goals and Targets for State Accountability Date: 10/01/2014 Presenter: Carla Stevens Assistant Superintendent, Research and Accountability.
2014 Accountability System 2014 Accountability System Overview Kim Gilson Senior Consultant Data and Accountability
Index Accountability 2014 Created by Accountability and Compliance staff of Region 17 Education Service Center.
Kelly Baehren Waller ISD Administrative Workshop July 28, 2015.
2013 Accountability Ratings for NISD September 9, 2013.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
TASSP Spring 2014 Tori Mitchell, ESC 17 Specialist Ty Duncan, ESC 17 Coordinator Overview of 2014 Accountability
2013 Accountability System Design Assessment & Accountability, Plano ISD.
1 Accountability System Overview of the PROPOSED Accountability Rating System for Texas Public Schools and Districts.
1 August 8, 2014 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Overview of 2014 Accountability.
2015 Texas Accountability System Overview and Updates August 13, 2015.
1.Welcome (10 minutes) 2.Federal Focus School Update (20 minutes) 3.Upcoming Sessions (30 Minutes) 4.Break (15 minutes) 5.Accountability Update (75 minutes)
Accountability Update District Testing Coordinator Advisory Committee Meeting March 20,
What are the STAAR Performance Standards? Copyright 2013 by Region 7 Education Service Center. All rights reserved.
Accountability 2014!! Tori Mitchell, ESC 17 Shauna Lane, ESC 17 Ty.
Overview of 2015 Accountability SUMMER 2015 MICKI WESLEY, DIRECTOR OF ACCOUNTABILITY & COMPLIANCE CINDY TEICHMAN, COORDINATOR OF INSTRUCTIONAL SUPPORT.
March 7, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Accountability Policy Advisory Committee.
2015 Texas Accountability System La Porte Independent School District August 5, 2015.
LOMA PARK ACCOUNTABILITY PARENT PRESENTATION September 24, 2015.
TETN Session #18319 | November 14, 2013 | 1:00-3:00 p.m. Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
Texas Academic Performance Report (TAPR) Lockhart Independent School District December
Kingsville ISD Annual Report Public Hearing.
Northwest ISD January 11, 2016 The best and most sought-after school district where every student is future ready: ready for college, ready for the global.
Texas Assessment Conference| February 16, 2016 Shannon Housson, Director, Division of Performance Reporting Department of Assessment and Accountability.
June 5, 2014 Accountability Update. Accountability Updates 110% for At-Risk, Criterion #4 Accountability Manual Updates.
Charter School Summit| June 16, 2014 Diane J. Hernandez | Texas Education Agency Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting.
HISD Becoming #GreatAllOver 1 Accountability Rating System Commissioner’s Final Rules 2014.
Charter School Summit| June 30, 2015 Christopher Lucas| Texas Education Agency Department of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting.
July 11, 2013 Texas Education Agency | Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Performance Reporting Michael Murphy State and Federal Accountability.
2016 Accountability Texas Education Agency | Department of Assessment and Accountability | Division of Performance Reporting February 25, 2016.
TETN Videoconference #36664| April 21, 2016 Texas Education Agency | Assessment and Accountability Performance Reporting Overview of 2016 Accountability.
Accountability 2016 Shauna Lane, Educational Specialist
Overview of 2016 Accountability
Accountability Overview 2016
Data Review and Discussion David Holland
State Academic Accountability: A View to the Future
A-F Rating and State Accountability System
TETN Videoconference #386|April 5, 2018
Accountability Update
Campus Comparison Groups and Distinction Designations
Texas State Accountability
A-F Accountability and Special Education
State and Federal Accountability Overview
Spencer County Public Schools
2019 Accountability Updates
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
Presentation transcript:

Index 4/5 ESC Region 11

2 Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness emphasizes the role of elementary and middle schools in preparing students for the rigors of high school and earning a high school diploma that provides the foundation necessary for success in college, the workforce, job training programs, or the military. Construction: For non-AEA districts and campuses, Index 4 is based on four components with one exception: when data are missing for any of the three non- STAAR components, it is based solely on the STAAR component. Index 4 ComponentsWeight 1. STAAR at Postsecondary Readiness Standard25% 2. Graduation Rate (or Dropout Rate)25% 3. Graduation Diploma Plan25% 4. Postsecondary Component: College and Career Readiness25%

3 Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness 2015 & ∙ All Components ∙ Districts: 57 (based on all four components)* ∙ High Schools/K–12: 57 (based on all four components)* ∙ Elementary/Middle School: n/a STAAR Only: ∙ District: 13 ∙ Elementary: 12 ∙ Middle School: 13 ∙ High School/K–12: 21 Based on four components: STAAR Final Level II, Graduation Rate (or Dropout Rate), Graduation Diploma Plan, and College-Ready Graduates. If any of the four components are not available, districts and campuses are evaluated on the STAAR component only. ∙ All Components ∙ Districts: 60 (based on all four components)* ∙ High Schools/K–12: 60 (based on all four components)* ∙ Elementary/Middle School: n/a No change No change STAAR Score: STAAR Percent Met Final Level ll on two or more STAAR subject-area tests for All Students and racial/ethnic student groups Students tested on one subject area only must meet the final Level II performance standard for that subject area. Similarly, students tested on only two subject areas must meet the final Level II performance standard for both subject areas. No change

4 Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness 2015 & 2016 continued Graduation Score: Combined performance across graduation/dropout rates for: o Grade 9–12 Four-Year Graduation Rate for ten student groups; or o Grade 9–12 Five-Year Graduation Rate for ten student groups, whichever contributes the most points to the index Ten Student Groups: All Students and each racial/ethnic group (seven groups), Students with Disabilities, and ELLs No change Graduation Plan: RHSP/DAP Graduates based on Four-Year Longitudinal Cohort: All Students and racial/ethnic groups Graduation Plan: Two diploma-plan rates will be calculated: 1.calculation that excludes FHSP students 2.calculation that includes FHSP students The one that gives the most points will be used. College-Ready Graduates: High school graduates from the 2012–13 school year who met the college-ready criteria on the TAKS exit-level test, or the SAT test, or the ACT test in both ELA and mathematics. Postsecondary Component: Annual graduates who demonstrate postsecondary readiness in any one of three ways: o Meeting the college-ready criteria on the TSI assessment, SAT test, or ACT test in both ELA and mathematics o Earning credit for two advanced course/dual credit courses o Enrolling in a coherent sequence of two or more career and technical education (CTE) courses as part of a four-year plan of study.

5 Index 4: Postsecondary Readiness 2015 & 2016 continued Weighting: Combine with equal weight (25%) the results of four components if all four are available: o STAAR Final Level ll o Graduation Rate o Graduation Plan o College-Ready Graduates No change o Graduation Plan Calculation o Postsecondary Readiness Indicator Substitute assessments for STAAR EOC tests are includedNo Change

6 Distinction Designations For 2016, distinction designations are awarded in the following areas: ▪Academic Achievement in English Language Arts/Reading (campus only) ▪Academic Achievement in Mathematics (campus only) ▪Academic Achievement in Science (campus only) ▪Academic Achievement in Social Studies (campus only) ▪Top 25 Percent: Student Progress (campus only) ▪Top 25 Percent: Closing Performance Gaps (campus only) ▪Postsecondary Readiness (district and campus)

7 Distinction Designations Districts and Campuses Postsecondary Readiness Distinction designation criteria for campuses: ▪Elementary and middle schools must have at least 50 percent of indicators in the top quartile of similar schools in their campus comparison group. ▪High schools and K-12 campuses must have at least 33 percent of the indicators in the top quartile. Same as 2015, rigorous criteria are applied to school districts in order to attain a Postsecondary Readiness Distinction Designation: ▪Districts must have at least 70 percent of its campus-level indicators in the top quartile.