1 3. PLANNING OF NATIONAL POWER SYSTEMS Asko Vuorinen.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Thermoflow, Inc. TOPS stands for Thermoflow’s Optimization System and is a general purpose optimizer for use with Thermoflow’s core programs. TOPS runs.
Advertisements

Tenth Annual Midwest Energy Conference March 7, 2007 How Best Satisfy Midwest Electric Load Growth? Thomas R. Casten Chairman Recycled Energy Development.
COMBINED HEAT & POWER J.R. Simplot Mountain Home, Idaho.
Energy Year 2013 Electricity Finnish Energy Industries.
National Renewable Energy Laboratory Innovation for Our Energy Future * NREL July 5, 2011 Tradeoffs and Synergies between CSP and PV at High Grid Penetration.
Status: Karsten Brinkmann PowerMex-CHP_CO2 bensheim engineers CHP – one Possibility to reduce CO 2 Karsten Brinkmann Promotion for CHP Berlin.
The Technical &Economical Impacts of the Upgraded Rehab Power Plant in Jordan Eng. Mamoun Shehadeh Operational Planning Department National Electric Power.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Proposed Aeroderivative Combustion Turbine Planning Assumptions Jeff King Northwest Power and Conservation.
Event Location Event Date and Location ADC WINTER FORUM | PAGE 2 Development Issues Energy Project Siting Considerations Tom Graves, Burns & McDonnell.
Avoided Costs of Generation
Estonian energy scenarios The first Balmorel model runs.
Page 1 May 08 Energy – Fossil Power Generation 700°C Steam Turbine for highest efficiency Energy – Fossil Power Generation 700°C Steam Turbine – Challenges.
Overview of Distributed Generation Applications June 16, 2003 Harrisburg, PA Joel Bluestein Energy and Environmental Analysis, Inc.
Impacts of wind power on energy balance of a hydro dominated power system EWEC 2006, Athens MSc Juha Kiviluoma, VTT PhD Hannele Holttinen, VTT.
OVERVIEW OF ISSUES DR AND AMI HELP SOLVE Dr. Eric Woychik Executive Consultant, Strategy Integration, LLC APSC Workshop on DR and AMI.
Sixth Northwest Conservation & Electric Power Plan Proposed Heavy-duty Combustion Turbine Planning Assumptions Jeff King Northwest Power and Conservation.
World Energy Outlook 2015 Deputy Director General Petteri Kuuva WEC Finland, 23 Nov
Energy Efficiency = changing current devices so they 1) do more useful work 2) not converting into low-quality(heat) 84% of all commercial energy used.
Generation Costs. Fuel InputProcess (Generating station) Electrical Energy output Cost of Electrical energy = Cost of fuel + processing cost.
Updated Energy Year 2011 Electricity Finnish Energy Industries
1. FUNDAMENTALS OF POWER PLANTS
1 2. FUNDAMENTALS OF EMISSION CONTROL Asko Vuorinen.
1 12. WORLD ELECTRICITY IN THE YEAR 2050 Asko Vuorinen.
1 8. OPERATING, REACTIVE AND BLACK START RESERVES Asko Vuorinen.
Jyväskylä’s energy use in 2012 ● The consumption of energy was 12 % lower than in 2010 ● Energy was mainly used in traffic and district heating ● The main.
1 4. PLANNING OF MUNICIPAL CHP SYSTEMS Asko Vuorinen.
1 11. PROFITABILITY EVALUATION OF NEW POWER PLANT ALTERNATIVES Asko Vuorinen.
1 9. BUSINESS STRATEGIES IN ELECTRICITY MARKETS Asko Vuorinen.
1 10. BUSINESS STRATEGIES IN ANCILLARY SERVICE MARKETS Asko Vuorinen.
Energy System Investment and Risk Management Unit 2: Energy Economics and Markets Connect Seminar, 3 rd March 2016, 18:30GMT.
7. FREQUENCY CONTROL AND REGULATING RESERVES
1 Biomass based Energy System for a Rural Area in Japan June 22-24, 2004 Toshihiko Nakata Tohoku University, Japan.
Electricity Basket Price & 2013 Power Policy Hammad Hashmi Advisor Technical (USAID) MWP.
Viability of Carbon Capture and Sequestration Retrofits for Existing Coal- fired Power Plants under an Emission Trading Scheme CEDM Annual Meeting May.
6. PLANNING OF POWER SYSTEM RESERVES
Argentine Power Market Fuel Oil Use & Opportunities for the Future Central Puerto S.A. Fuel Oil / Energy Buyer’s Conference Miami, September 2000.
Wood chip drying in connection with combined heat and power or solar energy in Finland Samuli Rinne Henrik Holmberg Tiina Järvinen Kaisa Kontu Sanna Syri.
Conceptual Design of 300 MW Modular Nuclear Plant Asko Vuorinen Ekoenergo Oy ASME Small and Medium Size Reactor Symposium Washington D.C. October 1st,
Unit-Specific Deployment based on Modified Generic Cost Presented at WMS December 15, 2003.
04/16/ Planning New Generation APPA Operations & Engineering Conference April 10, 2006 Jay Hudson, PE Manager, Environmental Management.
Energy Year 2016 Electricity
“Other” Cost Estimates
Towards a 100% Renewable Energy Supply “Renewables Working Together”
Dominik Franjo Dominković. , I. Bačeković, D. Sveinbjörnsson, A. S
Calculation of Payments for Renewable Energy Systems
What is POWERBALANCE?.
Kansas State University
5. PLANNING OF SMALL AND MICRO POWER SYSTEMS
Renewable vs. Non-Renewable
A SEMINAR ON HYBRID POWER SYSTEM
penetration of wind power
Energy Year 2017 Electricity
CSP Grid Value of Energy Storage and LCOE Implications 26 August 2013
Opportunities for the superwind concept in the region Fryslân
Biomass-fired combined heat and power for district heating
CCICED Enterprise Forum
Barry Ingold Senior Vice President, Generation.
Opportunities for Hydrogen-Based Energy Storage for Electric Utilities
Generation Expansion Daniel Kirschen
Energy Year 2017 Electricity
District heating in Finland 2017
Energy Usage in Agriculture
Energy Year 2018 Electricity
Energy Year 2018 Electricity
CCICED Enterprise Forum
Forecast of Nuclear Power Generation until 2100
Solar Energy Commercialization
Energy Usage in Agriculture
Wholesale Electricity Costs
Ciara O’Dwyer Damian Flynn ESRI/UCD conference 17/09/2019
Presentation transcript:

1 3. PLANNING OF NATIONAL POWER SYSTEMS Asko Vuorinen

2 System conditions SiteSouth-Europe Site temperature+30 o C Site elevation200 m Peak load of power system MW

3 Historical prices of fuels

4 Future prices of fuels by regression analysis

5 Levelised prices of fuels Calculated by discounting future prices to first year of operation (2011): ∑ (f(i)/(1-r/100) i ) Fl = ∑ (e(i)/(1-r/100) i ) whereFl = levelised price f(i) = fuel price in year i e(i) = energy generation in year i r = discount rate (=8 %)

6 Levelised prices of fuels, (eur/MWh lhv) 2013 levelisedprice Liquid biofuel (lbf)38,843,4 Light fuel oil (lfo)36,747,4 Heavy fuel oil (hfo)24,431,8 Natural gas*24,4+231,3+2 Coal Nuclear2,42, * Natural gas has variable and fixed (2) components

7 Cost estimates of power plants Power plant options Capital costs Operation and maintenance costs Fuel costs Tariff formulas

8 Alternative power plants Oil-fired plants Gas-fired plants Other plants

9 Oil-fired power plants Plant Concept DE-160 hfo* 10 x 16 MW diesel engines DE-160 lfo** 20 x 8 MW diesel engines ADGT-160 lfo 4 x 40 MW gas turbines Ind.GT-110 lfo 1 x 110 MW gas turbine DE-160 lbf*** 10 x 16 MW diesel engines *hfo = heavy fuel oil **lfo = light fuel oil ***lbf= liquid bio fuel (palm oil/rape seed oil)

10 Oil-fired power plants, Performance Plant Net efficiencyCO2-emission (%)(g/kWh) DE-160 hfo 43 %654 DE-160 lfo 41 %644 ADGT-160 lfo 36 %712 Ind.GT-110 lfo 31 %860 DE-160 lbf 41 %

11 Oil-fired power plants, Capital costs Plant InvestmentCapital costs €/kW€/kWa DE-160 hfo 99193,6 DE-160 lfo 75671,5 DE-160 lbf 98092,6 ADGT-160 lfo 85780,9 Ind.GT-110 lfo 63560,

12 Oil-fired power plants, Fixed O&M costs (FOM) Plant PersonnelOtherTotal €/kWa€/kWa€/kWa DE-160 hfo ,4 DE-160 lfo DE-160 lbf ADGT-160 lfo Ind.GT-110 lfo

13 Oil-fired power plants, Variable O&M costs (VOM) Plant Maintenance Materials Waste** Total €/MWh* €/MWh €/MWh €/MWh DE-160 hfo DE-160 lfo DE-160 lbf ADGT-160 lfo Ind.GT-110 lfo *Includes start-up costs lfo plant run 2 h/startup (gas turbines conume 5 eq.hours/start-up) ** includes CO 2 costs (23 eur/ton CO 2 )

14 Oil-fired power plants, Tariff formulas Plant Fixed VariableGen. costs costscostsat 500 h/a €/kWa€/MWh€/MWh DE-160 hfo DE-160 lfo DE-160 lbf ADGT-160 lfo Ind.GT-110 lfo

15 Gas-fired power plants, Concepts PlantConcept GTCC-500 gas300 MW GT+ 200 MW ST GTCC-330 gas 2 x 110 MW GT ST DF-160 gas 10 x 16 MW dual-fuel engines GE-160 gas20 x 8 MW gas engines ADGT-160 gas 4 x 40 MW gas turbines Ind.GT-110 gas 1 x 110 MW gas turbine CHP-160 gas 20 x 8 MW gas engines or 110 GT and 50 MW ST

16 Gas-fired power plants, Performance Plant Net efficiencyCO2-emission (%) (g/kWh) GTCC-500 gas58 % 350 GTCC-330 gas 49 % 414 DF-160 gas 43 % 474 GE-160 gas42 % 482 ADGT-160 gas 38 % 529 Ind.GT-110 gas 31 % 646 CHP-160 gas* 42 %(86%) * Combined heat and power (CHP) plant has 86 % total efficiency

17 Gas-fired power plants, Capital costs Plant InvestmentCapital costs (€/kW)(€/MWh) GTCC-500 gas ,4 GTCC-330 gas DF-160 gas GE-160 gas ADGT-160 gas Ind.GT-110 gas CHP-160 gas

18 Gas-fired power plants, Fixed O&M costs (FOM) Plant PersonnelOther Total (€/kW)(€/kW) (€/kW) GTCC-500 gas GTCC-330 gas DF-160 gas GE-160 gas ADGT-160 gas Ind.GT-110 gas CHP-160 gas

19 Gas-fired power plants, Variable O&M costs (VOM) Plant Maintenance Materials Waste* Total €/MWh€/MWh €/MWh €/MWh GTCC-500 gas GTCC-330 gas DF-160 gas GE-160 gas ADGT-160 gas Ind.GT-110 gas CHP-160 gas * Includes CO 2 -costs at price 23 €/t CO 2

20 Gas-fired power plants, Tariff formulas Plant FixedVariable Gen.costs costscosts at 2000 h/a €/kWa€/MWh€/MWh GTCC-500 gas GTCC-330 gas DF-160 gas GE-160 gas ADGT-160 gas Ind.GT-110 gas CHP-160 gas

21 Other power plants PlantConcept Nuclear MW (Evolutionary PWR) Coal-500Superctritical steam plant Biomass MW wood chip fired plant Wind x 5 MW wind park

22 Other power plants Performance PlantEfficiencyCO2-emission (%)(g/kWh) Nuclear %- Coal %858 Biomass %- Wind-150--

23 Other power plants Capital costs PlantInvestmentCapitalcosts (€/kW)(€/kWa) Nuclear Coal Biomass Wind

24 Other power plants Fixed O&M costs (FOM) Plant PersonelOtherTotal costscostscosts €/kWa€/kWa€/kWa Nuclear Coal Biomass Wind

25 Other power plants Variable O&M costs (VOM) PlantMaintenanceMaterials WasteTotal €/MWh€/MWh €/MWh €/MWh Nuclear Coal *24.7 Biomass Wind * includes CO2 costs

26 Other power plants Tariff formulas Plant FixedVariable Gen. costs costscosts at 7000 h/a €/kWa€/MWh €/MWh Nuclear Coal Biomass Wind * CHP-160 gas * At 3000 h/a

27 Generation costs

28 Break even costs Full power hours (t) when the alternative power plants have the same generation costs VC 1 x t + FC 1 = VC 2 x t + FC 2 Then t = (FC 2 -FC 1 )/(VC 1 -VC 2 )

29 Break even costs 1)<149 h/a Ind. GT cheapest (LFO) 2)>149 h/a diesel engine is cheaper than GT 3)>820 h/a gas engine is cheaper than DE 4)>1530 h/a GTCC-500 is cheaper than GE 5)>2740 coal plant is cheaper than GTCC 6)>3770 h/a nuclear plant cheaper than coal 7)between h/a CHP plant is cheaper than others If nuclear and coal plants are not accepted 4)GTCC plant is cheapest h/a Renewable plants 1)< 1125 h/a LBF diesel plant 2)> 1125 h/a biomass plant and wind plants

30 Minimizing of the total costs Fill the load duration curves using the least cost alternatives

31 Case 1) All options available

32 Case 2) No nuclear Note: coal replaces nuclear

33 Case 3) no nuclear, no coal Note: GTCC plant replaces nuclear and coal

34 Case 4) Renewable Wind in the base and LBF-diesel in the peak load

35 Total system costs and CO 2 - emissions AlternativeCost Emissions €/MWhg/kWh ) All options ) No nuclear ) No nuclear/coal ) Renewable86.9 0

36 Pofitablity of alternatives In the new electricity markets the price of electricity equals the variable costs of marginal plant (MC) Profits = Revenues - Costs where Revenues = ∑ (MC(t) x E(t)) MC(t) = marginal costs at hour (t) E(t) = energy generation during hour (t)

37 Maximization of profits Fill the load duration curve so that the highest variable cost plant is operating in the peak and intermediate load and the lowest variable cost plant in the base load

38 Case 5) Nuclear in base load and LBF diesel plant in peak load

39 Case 6) Nuclear in base load and Gas engine plant in peak load

40 Case 7) Wind in base load and LBF diesel plant in peak load

41 Case 8) Wind in base load and Gas engine plant in peak load

42 Pofitablity of alternative case systems CaseProfitsElectricity M€/aprice ) All options € 2) No nuclear ) No nucler/coal ) Renewable ) Nuclear/LBF diesel ) Nuclear/Natural gas ) Wind/LBF diesel ) Wind/Natural gas

43 Recommendations 1) Maximize the use CHP-plants because they have the lowest generation costs in the base and intermediate load 2) Fill the base load then with wind and nuclear plants up to 6000 h/a 3) Use gas fired plants in the intermediate load 4) Use LFO and LBF plants in the peak load

44 Recommendations, continued 5) Select actual power plants only after studying the need of o ancillary services o reserve power requirements The largest plant has largest need for ancillary services and reserves

45 Recommendations, continued 6) The peak and intermediate load plants should o be able to start-up in min o be able to participate in Automatic Generation Control (AGC) o have high ramp rate

46 Recommendations, continued 7) Build the power plants near the consumption centers to avoid transmission losses and need of reactive reserves

47 Summary Power system can be optimised to give minimum costs or maximum profits The boundary conditions may be target to reduce CO2-emissions Optimal system has low variable cost plants in base load and flexible plants in the peak load

48 For details see reference text book ”Planning of Optimal Power Systems” Author: Asko Vuorinen Publisher: Ekoenergo Oy Printed: 2008 in Finland Further details and internet orders see: