Marelize Gorgens The World Bank An M&E strategy Monitoring & Evaluation strategy Master & Execute Money and Energy is a waste of M&E that we do not M&E.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Results-Based Management (RBM) and the UNDAF Results Matrix.
Advertisements

Capacity Building Global Support Program Enhance the institutional capacity necessary to support professionals in implementing tiger conservation over.
Prepared by BSP/PMR Results-Based Programming, Management and Monitoring Presentation to Geneva Group - Paris Hans d’Orville Director, Bureau of Strategic.
Ray C. Rist The World Bank Washington, D.C.
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
Prepared by: Marelize Gorgens-Albino, The World Bank Global AIDS M&E Team (GAMET) 1 12 Components of a Functional National HIV M&E System A short introduction.
Return On Investment Integrated Monitoring and Evaluation Framework.
Project Cycle Management (PCM)
Results-Based Management: Logical Framework Approach
CASE STUDIES IN PROJECT MANAGEMENT
CONCEPT PAPER RESULT BASED PLANNING. RESULT-ORIENTED PLANNING Overall Objective/ Goal Specific Objective/ Purposes Expected Result/ Output Activities.
1 Module 4: Designing Performance Indicators for Environmental Compliance and Enforcement Programs.
This project is funded by the EUAnd implemented by a consortium led by MWH Logical Framework and Indicators.
A Sourcebook for Monitoring and Evaluating Agricultural and Rural Development Measuring Results in less-than-ideal Conditions Global Donor Platform for.
Results-Based Management
Evaluation in the GEF and Training Module on Terminal Evaluations
1 RBM Background Development aid is often provided on a point to point basis with no consistency with countries priorities. Development efforts are often.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
M&E Basics Miguel Aragon Lopez, MD, MPH. UNAIDS M&E Senior Adviser 12 th May 2009.
University of Palestine Dept. of Urban Planning Introduction to Planning ( EAGD 3304 ) M.A. Architect: Tayseer Mushtaha
Monitoring & Evaluation: The concepts and meaning Day 9 Session 1.
University of Palestine Dept. of Urban Planning Introduction to Planning ( EAGD 3304 ) M.A. Architect: Tayseer Mushtaha Mob.:
Monitoring and Evaluation of GeSCI’s Activities GeSCI Team Meeting 5-6 Dec 2007.
Model Name Transition Project Learning Network Workshop 3 IYF Transition Project.
Mainstreaming Responses to Climatic Variability & Change While Improving Results-Based Management The Fifth GEF Biennial International Waters Conference.
Western Cape Water Sector Plan Mr R Dyantyi MEC for Local Government & Housing (DLG&H) May 2007.
M&E in the GEF Carlo Carugi Senior Evaluation Officer Expanded Constituency Workshop Dakar, Senegal - July 2011.
4/5 June 2009Challenges of the CMEF & Ongoing Evaluation 1 Common monitoring and evaluation framework Jela Tvrdonova, 2010.
Task NumberHarmonise, develop & implement capacity building Performance Indicators CB-07-01c Harmonise efforts by Tasks, in particular those related with.
The Access Initiative and the Partnership for Principle 10 World Resources Institute Nathalie Eddy.
The Logic Model An Outcomes-Based Program Model. What is a Logic Model? “a systematic and visual way to present and share your understanding of the relationships.
Project Management Learning Program 23 Mar – 3 Aprl 2009, Mekong Institute, Khon Kaen, Thailand Managing for Development Results Results-Oriented Monitoring.
1 UNEP/IETC EST Initiative Proposed Cooperation Framework 4 December 2003 Otsu, Japan.
Consultant Advance Research Team. Outline UNDERSTANDING M&E DATA NEEDS PEOPLE, PARTNERSHIP AND PLANNING 1.Organizational structures with HIV M&E functions.
Principles for Strategic Plan Development
M&E TRAINING MODULES Different tools for different applications.
Application of Human Rights Principles in Results Based Management Muhammad Usman Akram, Evaluation Advisor Adapted from RBM training held for UNDP BRC.
S3.1 session day 5 2 Programme management download resources from Approved by the Advisory Group: Programme management Programme and project.
Developing a Monitoring & Evaluation Plan MEASURE Evaluation.
WORKSHOP ON PROJECT CYCLE MANAGEMENT (PCM) Bruxelles 22 – 24 May 2013 Workshop supported by TAIEX.
Supporting community action on AIDS in developing countries ‘Evaluating HIV and AIDS-related advocacy’ Skills Building Session International.
CAN EFFECTIVE PERFORMANCE MANAGEMENT SYSTEM ALONE HELPS IMPROVE SERVICE DELIVERY? Institute of Municipal Finance Officers & Related Professions Cherèl.
Building an ENI CBC project
Logic Models How to Integrate Data Collection into your Everyday Work.
Monitoring and Evaluating Rural Advisory Services
Template Contents of the Low Carbon Development Strategy (LCDS)
Module 2 Basic Concepts.
M&E Basics Miguel Aragon Lopez, MD, MPH
Managing for Results Capacity in Higher Education Institutions
Performance Management -Uttam Acharya
Performance Management -Uttam Acharya
THE CONCEPTUAL FRAMEWORK
Session 1 – Study Objectives
PURPOSE AND SCOPE OF PROJECT MONITORING AND EVALUATION M&E.
Monitoring and Evaluation Systems for NARS Organisations in Papua New Guinea Day 2. Session 6. Developing indicators.
Strategic Planning for Learning Organizations
Multi-Sectoral Nutrition Action Planning Training Module
Claire NAUWELAERS, independent policy expert
Joint session with IHP+ introduction
April 2011.
Building Knowledge about ESD Indicators
CATHCA National Conference 2018
WHAT is evaluation and WHY is it important?
SuperBIO: Evaluation Els Van de Velde
Technical and Advisory Meeting
OGB Partner Advocacy Workshop 18th & 19th March 2010
Project intervention logic
Integrating Gender into Rural Development M&E in Projects and Programs
How is an M & E framework derived from the logframe?
M & E Plans and Frameworks
Presentation transcript:

Marelize Gorgens The World Bank

An M&E strategy Monitoring & Evaluation strategy Master & Execute Money and Energy is a waste of M&E that we do not M&E

What did you learn last week?

 Measurable change in a state or condition as a result of a programmatic intervention  Derive from a cause-and- effect relationship  Three levels of results:  impact;  outcome;  output.

Visible transformation In a group In an organization In a society In a country Two major elements Cause and effect relationship between an action and the results achieved. “If-then” logic. Change Causality

Impact Outcomes Outputs Changes in the lives of people Institutional Change: values, laws – associated with institutional performance, new institutions Behavioural change: new attitudes, practices Operational Change: products and services – knowledge, skills

ImpactBenefits to or achievements by the target group Outcome Change in behaviour of or use of new capacities by target group; changes in systems Output New capacities (knowledge, skills and equipment) ActivitySpecific actions taken InputHuman & financial resources

ImpactBenefits to or achievements by the target group What they achieve OutcomeChange in behaviour of or use of new capacities by target group; changes in systems What they do OutputNew capacities (knowledge, skills and equipment) What we achieve ActivitySpecific actions takenWhat we do InputHuman & financial resourcesWhat we invest

Causal logic – the results chain GOAL: Protecting the environment and improving urban infrastructure GOAL: Protecting the environment and improving urban infrastructure OUTCOME: Ground water and surface water are protected from pollution OUTCOME: Ground water and surface water are protected from pollution OUTPUT 3: Waste water treatment facilities are constructed OUTPUT 3: Waste water treatment facilities are constructed OUTPUT 1: Watershed protection plans exist OUTPUT 1: Watershed protection plans exist OUTPUT 2: Municipalities are connected to sewerage networks OUTPUT 2: Municipalities are connected to sewerage networks

Causal logic – the results chain Impact Outcome Output Activities Inputs Activities Inputs Activities Inputs Activities Inputs

Result Combined Project Results (outputs) lead to Programme Results at the outcome level

Combined Programme Results lead to Strategic Results at the impact level Result

Strategic Result Programme Result Result if then

Inputs Activities Outputs Outcomes Impact National Level Indicators immediate 6months – 1 year After implementation immediate5 years or more2 to 5 years Project / Department Level Indicators

 How do you move from a results framework to programme improvement?  What would such a monitoring and evaluation system look like?  How do you ensure that the monitoring and evaluation system is and remains sustainable?

Understand current situation Design results Design detailed work plan and allocate resources Implement programmes to achieve results Assess implementation status Understand status of M&E system Design M&E system Design M&E work plan Measure results Use data to assess achievement of results

 National and sectoral M&E systems are new  The profession & discipline of M&E is new  The concept of harmonizing M&E systems is new  Institutions operationalising M&E systems are new

◦ One common definition - agreed to by everyone - of what needs to be in a national multisectoral M&E system and when is such a system functional (so that we all know and agree when the national M&E system is successful) ◦ One assessment tool with which to assess the status of the M&E system (so that we know which parts are weak, and how to support them) ◦ One national costed M&E work plan to which government and all partners contribute (so that we all work together to make the weak parts of the system strong)

 Why components? ◦ Systems approach ◦ System is a group of interconnected and interrelated components to form a whole (Senge, 1990) ◦ Therefore, for M&E system, need components  Why 12 components? ◦ Developed from operational experience ◦ Initially for HIV sector, but expanded to other sectors

 Why relevant and important for you? ◦ New ‘gold standard’ for M&E systems ◦ Create a common language ◦ Endorsed by a global reference group for M&E ◦ Agreed to by all development partners ◦ Results-based approach to M&E: an objective for each component ◦ Although developed for HIV M&E systems, the principles are applicable for all sectors

 12 components can be grouped into 3 types: ◦ People, partnerships and planning ◦ Data collection, capturing and verification ◦ Using information to improve results

 Create enabling environment for M&E  What is it about? ◦ People (component 1) ◦ who are skilled (component 2) ◦ working together (component 3) ◦ to plan (component 4) ◦ operationalise and cost (component 5), and ◦ motivate for an M&E system to become and remain fully functional (component 6)

 The M&E plan defines which data need to be captured to monitor and evaluate the national response  The components in this ring helps to collect, capture and verify all the types of data that are needed as part of a national M&E system

 Raison d’etre for M&E systems  M&E systems are there to use the results to assess ◦ Implementation status ◦ Progress with outcomes ◦ Progress with achievement of goals  M&E systems help us know ◦ Whether we have implemented what we said we would (monitoring) ◦ Whether we have achieved our goals (evaluation)

Understand current situation Design results Design detailed work plan and allocate resources Implement programmes to achieve results Assess implementation status Understand status of M&E system Design M&E system Design M&E work plan Measure results Use data to assess achievement of results

12 Component Familiarisation Exercise

 Divide into small groups of 5 persons each  Complete the skills building exercise assigned to your group (only one of the five skills building exercises)  Some groups will be selected to provide feedback  Suggested answers to all five skills building exercises is available in the Answer Book

 Is the basis for conducting M&E system status assessments  Used to develop joint M&E reports after joint missions  Enables partners to agree on who will support which part of the M&E system  Could be used to develop indicators for the M&E system itself (the M&E of the M&E system)

 Used to develop job descriptions of national M&E unit staff  Could be the organising framework for the national M&E framework and joint work plan  Forms a backdrop against which to organise capacity building efforts for M&E  Provides a checklist of what kind of information needs to be captured in the national database How can / has the 12 components been used?