ATM2003 / Students’ Programme „Structuring of co-ordination parameter at airports “ Franziska Meier Dresden University of Technology – Institute of Aviation.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Introduction to Transportation Systems. 2 PART I: CONTEXT, CONCEPTS AND CHARACTERIZATI ON.
Advertisements

Performance Review Commission, and performance management of the European ATM system Keith C. Williams, Chairman PRC.
Federal Aviation Administration 1 Collaborative Decision Making Module 2 Developing A Collaborative Framework.
Total Airport Management Systems
Airside Capacity Enhancement
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Saulo Da Silva
Line Balancing Problem A B C 4.1mins D 1.7mins E 2.7 mins F 3.3 mins G 2.6 mins 2.2 mins 3.4 mins.
Stockholm Arlanda and Bromma Airports and their future role Reykjavik Henrik Littorin Senior Analyst
European Commission Slot allocation at Community airports Infrastructures and Airports Unit Klaas Pel.
QUICKER THAN ROAD, CHEAPER THAN AIR, A PROMISING COOPERATION BETWEEN RAILWAYS AND AIRLINES WORD FROM KLAUS EBELING – Secretary general of European Intermodal.
Noise Problems and the Balanced Program Erik Nielsen Director, Head of Environmental Affairs Copenhagen Airports.
LMI Airline Responses to NAS Capacity Constraints Peter Kostiuk Logistics Management Institute National Airspace System Resource.
1 1 Capacity Measurements in Airport Sector: Drawbacks of Conventional Methods and Benchmarking Airports Using Declared Capacity Tolga Ülkü Presented in:
An Empirical Assessment of Aviation Charges in Germany Presented by Plamena Ivanova (HU) Marius Barbu (FHW) David Hörnle (FHW) GAP Workshop Berlin 10th.
1/36 How amazing! Do you know …… Which hotel is most expensive in the world ? The cheapest price is US $1,000 per night.
Location Models For Airline Hubs Behaving as M/D/C Queues By: Shuxing Cheng Yi-Chieh Han Emile White.
EUROCONTROL EXPERIMENTAL CENTRE from Passenger Perspective or… I n t e r m o d a l i t y from Passenger Perspective or… PhD Thesis EUROCONTROL Experimental.
ICRAT 2004 Airport Surface Operations Analysis Tarja Kettunen ISA Software International Conference on Research in Air Transportation Zilina, Slovakia,
Winter Operations GENEVA CASE AIRPORT OPERATIONS IN EXTREME WEATHER CONDITIONS (winter )
EUROCONTROL EXPERIMENTAL CENTRE1 AIRSPACE CONGESTION: Pre-Tactical Measures and Operational Events ICRAT Conference, Zilina November 22, 2004 Nabil BELOUARDY.
Economical factors in aviation Kpt. Ing. Michal BETKA Speaking Refresher for ATCs course
RAIL TRANSPORT SEMINAR: RAILWAY INFRASTRUCTURE – KEY TO ACHIEVE SUSTAINABLE TRANSPORT Operation on the Bulgarian railway market – current situation and.
Enav.it Channelling Finance and Innovation to Industry Steps towards the Air Traffic Management system modernisation.
ANS Operational Performance Framework as seen by the Airports ICAO Worldwide Symposium on Performance of the Air Navigation System, Montreal, 27 March.
ICAO-IATA Cross-Border ATFM Workshop
Aviation Sub-Sector Task Team Presentation to Potfolio Committee on Transport 2 March 2010.
Prague Integrated Transport (PID).  Prague - area 496 km 2 population 1.2 mil. distance of the city boundary from the centre is 10 km to the north, 18.
Por. Radim Rojíček. Big problem for all types of transport (not only for aviation) Aviation is responsible for 2% of manmade CO 2 Global temperature has.
Aviation Sector and Open Skies Chris Whittle IndII Wrap-up Conference 14 th June 2011.
Containing Aviation Emissions in the Short-term
Optimum Airspace Partitioning for Center/Sector Boundary Design Arash Yousefi George L. Donohue Research Sponsors: NASA ARC, FAA, Metron Aviation Inc.
1 An Integer Linear Programming model for Airline Use (in the context of CDM) Intro to Air Traffic Control Dr. Lance Sherry Ref: Exploiting the Opportunities.
14/01/20161 Air Traffic Management Panel Madrid May 2002 AVIATION OPERATIONAL MEASURES FOR FUEL AND EMISSIONS REDUCTION WORKSHOP HOW TO SAVE FUEL.
Terminal Airspace Traffic Complexity Fedja Netjasov University of Belgrade Faculty of Traffic and Transport Engineering Division of Airports and Air Traffic.
Port of Bellingham Briefing BELLINGHAM INTERNATIONAL AIRPORT MASTER PLAN BRIEFING April 2014.
RSPA/Volpe Center Arrival/Departure Capacity Tradeoff Optimization: a Case Study at the St. Louis Lambert International Airport (STL) Dr. Eugene P. Gilbo.
New Level 2 Concept JSAG SPR review – GVA September 2013 CONFIDENTIAL – NOT FOR DISTRIBUTION.
Challenges and Opportunities in Cyprus
Noise Problems and the Balanced Program
Jon Hadler and Dr. David Ison
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Saulo Da Silva
RVSM Implementation in Europe
Development of airport - important factors
CE 2303 Railways, Airports & Harbor Engineering
Report on two themes: Airport Management Weather & Environment by: Jan Terlouw (NLR) ATM 2003 Seminar, Budapest June 27, June 2003.
A Multi-Airport Dynamic Network Flow Model with Capacity Uncertainty
HOW TO SAVE FUEL BY LOSING TIME? Air Traffic Management Panel
The Role of Air Traffic Control in A CDM ENVIRONMENT
Airport Slot Coordination & its Role in the CDM Process
Aircraft Sequencing Problem Near Terminal Area
Gustavo Alonso & Arturo Benito
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
Work Package 3 Data Management
Airport Collaborative Decision Making (A-CDM) Saulo Da Silva
Airline Briefing: Lufthansa
Planning for a New Airport in Thessaloniki, Greece
Giancarlo Buono Nicosia, April 13th 2018
Continuous Climb Operations (CCO) Saulo Da Silva
World Statistics Day 20 October 2015
What is SESAR? SESAR is the European program for air traffic management infrastructure modernisation. SESAR aims at the development of the next generation.
Nikola Ivanov, Fedja Netjasov, Radosav Jovanovic
ANS Operational Performance Framework as seen by the Airports
Measures to Reduce Noise of Night Operations
AIXM and AIRM Analysis Results Summary.
How technology and data can bring needed improvements to air quality and the environment Dr Dave Williams 8th November 2018.
Collaborative Decision Making “Developing A Collaborative Framework”
Long term vision for Air Traffic Systems CARATS
Przemyslaw Borkowski Brussels
ROMATSA – SAFETY, EFFICIENCY AND ENVIRONMENTAL PERFORMANCE IN ATM
Presentation transcript:

ATM2003 / Students’ Programme „Structuring of co-ordination parameter at airports “ Franziska Meier Dresden University of Technology – Institute of Aviation TECHNISCHE UNIVERSITÄT DRESDEN

1 In Germany the airport co-ordinator keeps the slot requests by airlines and assigns the take off and landing rights (slots). He is the legal representative at the IATA Conference. In Germany the number of available planning slots is approved by the ministry of Transport. Analyses of the airport capacity and other major factors are the basis of the determination. slot demand > capacity of the airport then a slot distribution is necessary Legal constrainsCapacity of the airport The slot co-ordination process „The Slot“ = „set of parameters”

2 Major factors triggering set of parameters  Infrastructure constrains for example capacity of the runway system, terminal and apron  Economics goals effectiveness, maximum of profit, optimal use of existing capacities and resources  Political restrictions restrictions of air traffic without capacity bottlenecks e.g. cross-boarders traffic being quantitatively constrained  Noise restriction typically applied during the night time  Operational goals punctual traffic  Others for example ATC capacity, emission

3 calculated airport capacity “The structured slot”

3 Infrastructure constrains Political restrictions Others e.g. economic goals, ATC-capacity Noise restrictions Number of available Slots with respect to the individual applicable constrains calculated airport capacity “The structured slot” At the operational day the actual capacity > co-ordination capacity (untimely or delayed flights cause a peak) or the actual capacity < co-ordination capacity (weather conditions etc.) co-ordination capacity For example Airport DUS/Germany In 60 minutes could be co-ordinated: 38 Slots (06:00 – 20:59 LT) 35 Slots (21:00 – 21:59 LT) 25 Slots (22:00 – 22 :59 LT) In 10 minutes could be co-ordinated: 8 Slots (06:00 – 22:59 LT) Additional 2 Slots are available for general aviation

4 Structuring of co-ordination parameter - e.g. airport London-Heathrow [LHR] - 3 runways 4 terminals with a capacity of approximate 60 Mio. passenger/year  Determination of ARR/DEP – runway capacity in 60- and 10-min-parameters  TOTAL < DEP + ARR (functions of runway dependencies or operational schemes)  changing of parameters over the day Step 1 60-min-co-ordination parameter (ARR/DEP/TOT) of the airport LHR in SS02

5 implied by terminal, apron and overnight stops at LHR Step 2 Cross-check against capacities constrains 60-min-co-ordination parameter (ARR/DEP/TOT) of the airport LHR in SS02

6 Optimisation: use of parameter with different time interval :00 10:10 10:20 10:30 10:40 10:50 10:00 10:10 10:20 10:30 10:40 10:50 10:00 10:10 10:20 10:30 10:40 10:50 time panned slots Co-ordination parameters: 80 slots/60 min 50 slots/30 min 20 slots/10 min small time interval: 5 min/10 min/15 min medium time interval: 15 min/20 min/30 min large time interval: 60 min/120 min Step 3 Optimisation of these parameters will allow to:  favourably distribute the slots over the day  make it possible to serve short demand peaks and breaks with a balance over a long time interval After the cross-check the airport co-ordinator is allowed to assign a definite number of slots per time interval. Use of at least parameters with a small and a large time interval is necessary

7 Validation: use of the model „floating/rolling hour“ The model is based on the move of one hour at a definite time interval. Step 4  enables a detailed representation of the traffic peaks and breaks  problematic use, if the co-ordination parameters change during the day, for example at LHR airport, a process-simulation can be a solution The co-ordination parameter relates to static time intervals. But outside the static time interval it can generate extreme traffic peaks and breaks.

8 1. Co- ordination parameter of traffic peaks In traffic peaks increased co- ordination parameter, adapted to the demand  support the Hub- airport (more connections are possible)  high stress during peaks  inadequate use of the airport (capacities and resources) is possible Examples for different relevance of specific elements of co-ordination parameter AMS MUC description advantage disadvantage Example 60-min-co-ordination parameter (ARR/DEP/TOT) of the airport AMS in SS02

9 description advantage disadvantage 2. Hourly variable co-ordination parameter changed co- ordination parameter per static hour  adaptation to demand, capacity an traffic structure  risk of extreme traffic peak in peripheral hours Examples for different relevance of specific elements of co-ordination parameter Example CDG LHR MAN 60-min-co-ordination parameter (ARR/DEP/TOT) of the airport CDG in SS02

Example to create a new structure for a politically restricted airport Operational requirements:  capacity of infrastructure is sufficient  political handicap of maximum planned flights  static restrictions Optimised use of existing capacity:  adaptation on the demand  use of existing capacities and resources  increasing the airport attractiveness 10

New Structure:  use the contingent of flights, assignment of maximum planned flights per season or year  assignment of slots adheres of the demand through the airlines New Structure:  use the contingent of flights, assignment of maximum planned flights per season or year  assignment of slots adheres of the demand through the airlines Optimised use of existing capacity:  adaptation on the demand  use of existing capacities and resources  increasing the airport attractiveness Example to create a new structure for a politically restricted airport Operational requirements:  capacity of infrastructure is sufficient  political handicap of maximum planned flights  static restrictions Contingent of flights is used at airport AMS and Frankfurt/Main (FRA) and Brussels (BRU) for night flights.

11 Summary 1.Determination of ARR/DEP/TOT runway capacity 2.Cross-check against capacities constrains (terminal, apron, politically) 3.Optimisation: use of parameters with different time interval 4.Validation: use of the model “floating/rolling hour” Additional special co-ordination parameters (e.g. contingents of flights or co-ordination parameters of traffic peaks) can be used. Co-ordination capacity of the airport set of co-ordination parameters number of available slots (assignment through the airport co-ordinator) Legal constrainsCalculated capacityMajor factors

Thanks for your attention