A randomized study of tenofovir containing HAART compared to lamivudine containing HAART in antiretroviral naïve HIV/HBV coinfected patients in Thailand:

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Hepatitis B & Hepatitis C in HIV
Advertisements

HBV and HIV HIV and HBV VG Naidoo Gastroenterology.
Lessons from a decade of collaboration in Thailand Sharon R Lewin Professor and Head, Department of Infectious Diseases Alfred Hospital and Monash University.
BORDERNETwork Training on HIV and HBV Co-Infections Dr. med. Wolfgang Güthoff / Alexander Leffers, M.A.
Hepatitis web study H EPATITIS W EB S TUDY Therapeutic Agents Used to Treat Hepatitis B Presentation Prepared by: Nina Kim, MD and David Spach, MD Last.
PEPFAR Hepatitis B co-infection and Response to Antiretroviral Therapy among HIV-infected Patients in Tanzania Oral abstract # MOAB0101 C. Hawkins, B.
Slide #1 CL Thio, MD. Presented at RWCA Clinical Update, August Optimizing Hepatitis B Virus Treatment in HIV-Infected Individuals Chloe L. Thio,
Persisting long term benefit of genotypic guided treatment in HIV infected patients failing HAART and Importance of Protease Inhibitor plasma levels. Viradapt.
Yves BENHAMOU. Management of Patients with HIV/HBV Co-infection Yves Benhamou Hepatology Department Groupe Hospitalier Pitié Salpétrière Paris, France.
HBV related complications in HIV positive patients during HAART therapy Irina Magdalena Dumitru*, E. Dumitru*, S. Rugina*, Roxana Carmen Cernat**, Simona.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Pathogenesis of HIV-hepatitis B co-infection Sharon R Lewin, FRACP, PhD Infectious Diseases Unit, Alfred Hospital Department of Medicine, Monash University.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Discussion HBV Flare AWACC Pathogenesis of HBV CLDx Hepatic damage  predominantly immune mediated - cytotoxic T cells HBV specific peptides presented.
Strategies for Management of Antiretroviral Therapy Study Wafaa El-Sadr and James Neaton for the SMART Study Team.
Switch to RAL-containing regimen  Canadian Study  CHEER  Montreal Study  EASIER  SWITCHMRK  SPIRAL  Switch ER.
HAART Initiation Within 2 Weeks of Seroconversion Associated With Virologic and Immunologic Benefits Slideset on: Hecht FM, Wang L, Collier A, et al. A.
POWER 3 Study Confirms Safety and Efficacy of Darunavir/Ritonavir in Treatment-Experienced Patients Slideset on: Molina JM, Cohen C, Katlama C, et al.
Entecavir Superior to Lamivudine for Treatment of Nucleoside-Naive, HBeAg- Negative Patients Slideset on: Lai CL, Shouval D, Lok AS, et al. Entecavir versus.
ACTG 5142: First-line Antiretroviral Therapy With Efavirenz Plus NRTIs Has Greater Antiretroviral Activity Than Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus NRTIs Slideset.
Jung Min Lee, Sang Hoon Ahn, Hyon Suk Kim, Hana Park, Hye Young Chang, Do Young Kim, Seong Gyu Hwang, Kyu Sung Rim, Chae Yoon Chon, Kwang-Hyub Han, and.
NRTI-sparing  SPARTAN  PROGRESS  RADAR  NEAT001/ANRS 143  A  VEMAN  MODERN.
Adefovir Suppresses HBV DNA Levels in Lamivudine-Resistant HIV/HBV Patients Slideset on: Benhamou Y, Thibault V, Vig P, et al. Safety and efficacy of adefovir.
Hepatitis B virus infection in renal transplant recipients
Telbivudine Versus Lamivudine in Chinese Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B: Results at 1 Year of a Randomized, Double-Blind Trial HEPATOLOGY 2008;47:
Early Hepatitis B Virus DNA Reduction in Hepatitis B e Antigen–Positive Patients with Chronic Hepatitis B : A Randomized International Study of Entecavir.
Rilpivirine-TDF-FTC versus Efavirenz-TDF-FTC STaR Trial
Treatment-Naïve Adults
Design Randomisation 1 : 1 Double-blind W8 W12
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
In The Name of God.
Dolutegravir plus Rilpivirine as Maintenance Dual Therapy SWORD-1 and SWORD- 2: Design
ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + 3TC ATLAS-M Study.
Higher rate of antiretroviral therapy reinitiation among HIV-HBV coinfected patients in the episodic arm of the SMART study Dore G.1, Soriano V.2, Neuhaus.
ARV-trial.com Switch to LPV/r + RAL KITE Study 1.
Etravirine versus Protease Inhibitor in ARV-Experienced TMC 125-C227
Switch from EFV plus ABC-3TC to EFV-TDF-FTC ROCKET-1 Trial
Once Daily Etravirine versus Efavirenz in Treatment-Naive SENSE Trial
LPV-RTV versus LPV-RTV + ZDV-3TC in Treatment-Naïve MONARK Trial
How to optimize the management of my HBeAg negative patients?
Hepatitis Primary Care: Clinics in Office Practice
Phase 3 Treatment Naïve HIV Coinfection
Natural history of hepatitis B
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Clinicaloptions.com/hepatitis Using Virologic and Serologic Tests in the Management of Hepatitis B Diagnose chronic HBV infection When in slideshow mode,
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Comparison of INSTI vs EFV
Comparison of EFV vs MVC
Comparison of PI vs PI ATV vs ATV/r BMS 089
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: Management of chronic hepatitis B
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of NRTI combinations
Comparison of NRTI combinations
NRTI-sparing SPARTAN PROGRESS RADAR NEAT001/ANRS 143 A VEMAN
Sequencing cohorts Open-label Design W8 W12 ≥ 18 years
Presentation transcript:

A randomized study of tenofovir containing HAART compared to lamivudine containing HAART in antiretroviral naïve HIV/HBV coinfected patients in Thailand: 48 week findings Matthews GV, Avihingsanon A, Lewin SR, Amin J, Rerknitmitr R, Petcharat P, Marks P, Sasadeusz J, Cooper DA, Bowden S, Locarnini S, Ruxrungtham K, Dore GJ

Background Prevalence of HBV in HIV populations ~ 5 -10% HIV/HBV coinfected individuals have high rates of progression to significant liver disease Lamivudine monotherapy for HBV results in high rates of drug resistance Evidence for optimal therapy of HBV in HIV coinfected individuals is based predominantly on observational data

Study design N=36 Primary objective AZT / LAM / EFV AZT / TDF / EFV To compare the safety and efficacy of tenofovir (TDF) to lamivudine (LAM) and to combination TDF/LAM in treating HBV in ARV- naive patients with HIV/HBV co-infection over 48 weeks AZT / LAM / EFV Gp 1 VK N=36 AZT / TDF / EFV Gp 2 VK LAM / TDF / EFV Gp 3 VK Week 12 Week 48

Study endpoints Primary endpoint HBV DNA time-weighted change over 48 weeks (DAVG) Secondary endpoints HBV DNA suppression HBeAg/HBsAg seroconversion HBV resistance Hepatic flare events ALT normalisation Change in HIV-RNA and CD4+ /CD8+ counts Histological improvement/reduction in ccc-HBV-DNA

Study set-up Australia-Thai collaboration HBV virology Subject recruitment through HIV-NAT, Bangkok, Thailand Study management NCHECR, Australia HBV virology performed at VIDRL, Australia HBV virology Bayer Versant bDNA assay (2,000 – 108 copies/ml) Roche Taqman assay (LLD 200 c/ml)

Study eligibility Inclusion criteria Exclusion criteria HIV positive and ARV naive HBsAg positive for > 6 months HBV DNA > 105 copies/ml No prior exposure to anti-HBV agents (excl IFN) Exclusion criteria HCV-RNA positive or Anti-HAV IgM positive Acute hepatitis (serum ALT > 1000 U/L) Active opportunistic infection Pregnancy or lactation Concurrent malignancy Decompensated or Child’s C cirrhosis AFP > 3X ULN

Baseline characteristics

Baseline characteristics : HBV * Clinical or histological

Median HBV reduction 48 weeks DAVG analysis 4.07 log 4.51 log 4.73 log p=0.700 This graph demonstrates the median HBV reduction over the 48 weeks in the 3 arms and visually you acns ee there is little difference between the groups. This is confirmed by the DAVG analysis which wwasth primary endpoint, demonstarting no significant difference in the values between groups although it was highest in the combination group.

HBV DNA suppression at 48 w On treatment

HBV resistance M204V/L180M HBV DNA reduction (log10 c/ml) No PCR M204I BL wk 4 wk 8 wk 12 wk 24 wk 36 wk 48 -1 M204V/L180M -2 No PCR HBV DNA reduction (log10 c/ml) -3 M204I -4 WT -5 -6

CD4 change P=0.048 P=0.072

HIV RNA suppression ITT

Hepatic flare Incidence 25% sAg loss Anti-HBE Anti-HBE sAg loss Reasons for hepatic flare in patients with HIV HBV who initiate HAART may be multifactoiral, and include drug toxicity, flare in HBV disease and immune reconstitution disease. In our patients hepatic falre was followed by seroconversion to anti-HBE in 2 and to anti-HBe followed by anti-HBs in two.

Serological response Group 1 LAM Group 2 TDF Group 3 LAM/TDF Total HBeAg loss* 3 (33%) 1 (17%) 3 (43%) 7 (32%) Anti-HBe Seroconversion* 1 (11%) 6 (27%) HBsAg loss 1 (8%) 1 (9%) 3 (8%) * Of 22 HBeAg positive at BL p=1.00

Conclusions Combination TDF/LAM not demonstrated as superior to monotherapy in this study Proportion of patients with HBV DNA > 3 log c/ml at week 48 significantly greater in LAM monotherapy arm 2 cases of LAM resistance both in GP 1 Good HIV control was achieved and maintained in the majority Both seroconversion and hepatic flare common after HBV-active HAART in this population

Acknowledgements HIV-NAT Thai Red Cross AIDS Research Centre, Bangkok, Thailand Anchalee Avihingsanon Kiat Ruxrungtham R Rerknitmitr P Petcharat Peeraporn Kaewon National Centre in HIV Epidemiology and Clinical Research Greg Dore David Cooper Pip Marks Janaki Amin Victorian Infectious Diseases Reference Laboratory, Melbourne, Australia Stephen Locarnini Scott Bowden Anna Ayres Peter Revill The Alfred Hospital, Melbourne Sharon Lewin Joe Sasadeusz Jenny Hoy