Single Arm Trial of SmartQuit 2.0 ACT App for Smoking Cessation Jonathan Bricker, PhD Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Psychology.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center University of Washington Telephone-Delivered ACT for Adult Smoking Cessation: A Feasibility.

Advertisements

Supported by grants from: National Human Genome Research Institute (ELSI) HG/AG (The REVEAL Study); National Institute on Aging AG (The MIRAGE.

“Smart Quit” App Trial: Testing a New Path to Quitting Smoking Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center.

Using New Communication Technologies to Enhance Services at Smoking Quitlines Lorien Abroms, ScD. Dept. of Prevention & Community Health GW School of Public.

The Greater Cleveland Cancer Prevention Research Collaborating Center Sue Flocke, PhD Case Western Reserve University October 29, 2014 This presentation.

ABCs of Behavioral Support Jonathan Foulds PhD. Penn State – College of Medicine

Michael E. Levin, Jacqueline Pistorello, Steven C. Hayes, John Seeley, Crissa Levin, Kristy Dalrymple, Brandon Gaudiano & Jack Haeger USING ADJUNCTIVE.

C. Andres Bedoya, PhD Behavioral Medicine Service Department of Psychiatry Massachusetts General Hospital / Harvard Medical School Factors related to high-risk.

Web Based Programs for Smokeless Tobacco Cessation Herb Severson, Ph.D. Oregon Research Institute Eugene, Oregon.

1 Longitudinal Survey Engine (LSE): An Overview Philip L. Reed, PhD, MS Department of Epidemiology College of Human Medicine Michigan State University.

Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence January–February 2011.

Does Web-Based ACT Help Smokers with Depressive Symptoms to Quit? Helen A. Jones University of Washington Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center, Seattle.

First RCT of Web-Based Acceptance & Commitment Therapy For Smoking Cessation: 3 Month Processes & Outcomes Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Fred Hutchinson Cancer.

Project SEARCH Mercy Regional Medical Center Lorain, Ohio Varnum Award Video.

Help Save a Life: The Deeper Meaning of Smoking Cessation Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD & Kelly G. Wilson, PhD.

ISO 9001 Registered Clinical Trials Research Unit Mobile phone health interventions Dr Robyn Whittaker.

NCI’s Cancer Information Service Program Mary Anne Bright Office of Cancer Information Service, NCI June 25, 2007.

*Corresponding author: Lin Li, PhD

Quit For Life® Program Presented by Helen Farid 1.

Tobacco Education and the Oregon Tobacco Quit Line An Introduction for General Audiences.

Can undergoing an internet based ACT intervention change the impact of predictors thought to lead to Substance Use? Leonidou. G., Savvides. S., N. & Karekla.

Specific Aims  Modify a previously used ACASI (audio computer assisted structured interview) assessment tool, the Sexual Behavior Inventory (SBI), for.

Introduction Smoking and Social Networks Joseph R. Pruis, Student Research Collaborator, Rosemary A. Jadack, PhD, RN, Professor Department Of Nursing,

ACT Smartphone App for Quitting Smoking: Results from RCT Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Psychology.

Quitline Smoking Intervention: “TALK” Randomized Trial Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center University of Washington.

E of computer-tailored S moking C essation A dvice in P rimary car E A Randomised Controlled Trial ffectiveness Hazel Gilbert Department of Primary Care.

SMOKING in ADOLESCENTS with PSYCHIATRIC or ADDICTIVE DISORDERS.

1 Impact of Depression History on Tobacco Withdrawal and Relapse Among Female Smokers David W. Wetter, Ph.D. Department of Behavioral Science Funded by.

Relational Discord at Conclusion of Treatment Predicts Future Substance Use for Partnered Patients Wayne H. Denton, MD, PhD; Paul A. Nakonezny, PhD; Bryon.

Leveraging Technology The Quitline operates as a learning laboratory: testing new ideas, publishing results and attempting to guide the industry toward.

Factors associated with health care providers’ practice of smoking cessation interventions in public health facilities in Kiambu County, Kenya Dr Judy.

NRT & NRT+ Pilot Preliminary Results Gowri Shetty MS, MPH Gita Bewtra MPH.

Factors Predicting Stage of Adoption for Fecal Occult Blood Testing and Colonoscopy among Non-Adherent African Americans Hsiao-Lan Wang, PhD, RN, CMSRN,

Randomized Controlled Trial of a Web- and Internet-Based Diabetes Prevention Program Alive-PD Gladys Block, PhD, for NutritionQuest and Palo Alto Medical.

Designing an ACT Smartphone App: “Smart Quit” Case Study Jonathan B. Bricker, PhD Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Psychology.

UTILIZING TELEPHONE INTERVIEWERS AS COUNSELORS: LESSONS LEARNED FROM A SMOKING REDUCTION STUDY Bridget Gaglio, MPH 1, Tammy Smith, BS 2, Erica Ferro, MA.

Barbara Silver, MA, CTTS, Carol Ripley-Moffitt, MDiv, CTTS, Jillian E. Harris, BASW, Mark Gwynne, MD, Adam Goldstein, MD, MPH Nicotine Dependence Program.

Feasibility of a text messaging intervention to promote symptom management and medication adherence for patients prescribed oral anti-cancer agents S.

1 Effects on smoking cessation of a national strategy to maximise NRT usage: the UK experience Robert West University College London WCTOH July 2006 Washington.

Full Circle: A Holistic Cessation Intervention Serving American Indians in Oklahoma Sally Carter, MSW, Oklahoma State Department of Health; Cynthia Tainpeah,

E-cigarettes for lung cancer patients

Utilization of a Telephone Quitline by Smokeless Tobacco Users Lowell C. Dale, MD Associate Professor of Medicine College of Medicine, Mayo Clinic Medical.

Dawn Owen PhD Student Centre for Evidence Based Early Intervention

River Bend CUSD Strategic Plan Update 2016

Trends in electronic cigarette use in England

Michael E. Levin, Jacqueline Pistorello,

Michael E. Levin, Utah State University

Jonathan Foulds, Jessica M. Yingst, Susan Veldheer, Shari Hrabovsky,

University College London

Using Observation to Enhance Supervision CIMH Symposium Supervisor Track Oakland, California April 27, 2012.

NCI’s Cancer Information Service Program

Smoking Cessation through the Use of The Transtheoretical Model: A Case Study By: David Shepard DPT 844.

A Growth Curve Analysis Participant Baseline Characteristics

QuitlineNC Funding.

Nicotine replacement therapy

River Bend CUSD Strategic Plan Update 2016

ABCs of Behavioral Support

S1316 analysis details Garnet Anderson Katie Arnold

Personalized prevention: mobile application for smokers

Pritaporn Kingkaew, B.Pharm, MSc (Health Economics), PhD candidate

OCTAE presents: Up-to-Date with DATE

JAMA Pediatrics Journal Club Slides: Effect of Attendance of the Child in Childhood Obesity Treatment Boutelle KN, Rhee KE, Liang J, et al. Effect of attendance.

Showcasing the Cancer Information Service – National Cancer Institute

Predictors of Breastfeeding: Data from Northeast Tennessee

The Vermont Young Adult Survey: Methods and Some Initial Findings

Patient-Refined Messaging for a Mailed Colorectal Cancer Screening Program: Pilot Findings from the PROMPT Study Jamie Thompson, MPH Kaiser Permanente.

INTRODUCTION & STUDY AIMS

Helping younger smokers quit:

Empowering with PrEP (E-PrEP): a peer-based online social network intervention to facilitate PrEP adoption among young Black/Latinx men who like men in.

Presentation transcript:

Single Arm Trial of SmartQuit 2.0 ACT App for Smoking Cessation Jonathan Bricker, PhD Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Psychology Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA Public Health Sciences, Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Psychology Department, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington, USA

©2016 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Disclosures Neither I nor any of my research team has any financial relationships to SmartQuit or are receiving any compensation for this presentation. Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center licenses SmartQuit technologies to 2Morrow.

©2016 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Grant Funding Sources: $14 Million Dollars National Cancer Institute R01-CA (PI: Bricker) R01-CA (PI: Bricker) R01-CA (PI: Bricker) National Institute on Drug Abuse R01-DA (PI: Bricker) R21-DA (PI: Bricker) Lee Hartwell Innovation Fund (PI: Bricker) Snoqualmie Tribe (PI: Bricker) Fred Hutch Cancer Research Center Pilot Funding (PI: Bricker) Life Sciences Discovery Fund (Site PI: Bricker; PI: Masterson)

Core Collaborators & Partners Terry Bush, PhD Alere, Seattle Feng Cheng, PhD Tsinghua University, Beijing Rutger Engels, PhD Trimbos, Netherlands Jaimee Heffner, PhD Fred Hutch, Seattle Julie Kientz, PhD University of Washington, Seattle Jennifer McClure, PhD Group Health, Seattle Robert Whelan, PhD University College, Ireland 2 Morrow Inc. Mobile Health Programming & Sales, Seattle Blink UX Web Design, Seattle Collaborative Data Services Data ops, Fred Hutch Harvard University Health Communications Boston Moby, Web Programming Design & Programming, Seattle Nutrition Assessment Shared Resource Data ops, Fred Hutch ©2016 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

XXXXXXXXXXXX XXXXXXXXXXX ©2016 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

Cigarette Smoking: Most Preventable Cause of Death Worldwide © Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center5 6 million deaths/year

©2016 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

Quit Smoking Apps Availability: 500+ available in English (Bricker 2014) Reach: 3.2 million US downloads in the two-year period (XYO.NET, 2014), and estimated now 2 million annually Effectiveness: None had been tested in RCT…until SmartQuit 1.0 trial

First Randomized Trial of Adult Quit Smoking App: SmartQuit 1.0 Trial

©2016 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

SmartQuit Features Name core values inspiring quitting Set a quit date Learn ACT skills to manage urges Encourage medications, including patch, gum, & Chantix

©2016 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center SmartQuit 1.0 Trial CONSORT Diagram Screened: 738 Eligible: 400 Consented: 340 Confirmed by phone: 205 Randomized: 196 Smart Quit: 98Quit Guide: day Follow-up: day Follow-up: 84

©2016 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Engagement Quit GuideSmartQuitp-value Number of times opened app

©2016 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 70-Day Follow-up (30-day quit rate) Quit GuideSmartQuitOR (95% CI) 8%13%2.7 (0.8, 10.3)

©2016 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center 70-Day Follow-up (30-day quit) Baseline Subgroups Baseline Subgroup Quit GuideSmartQuitOR (95% CI) At Least Pack-A-Day6%11%1.8 (0.1, 53.3) Avoidant of Cravings8%15%2.9 (0.6, 20.7)

©2016 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center What’s Popular vs. What’s Helpful Content Source Feature# users OR (p) USCGPViewed quit plan overview (.03) USCGPViewed progress in calendar (.17) USCGPOpened sharing page (.23) USCGPViewed progress in chart (.44) ACTTracked acceptance (.03) Most Popular Content Source Feature# users OR (p) ACTTracked ACT skills practice (.01) USCGPViewed quit plan overview (.03) ACTTracked acceptance (.03) ACTViewed Staying Motivated video (.06) ACTViewed Handling Urges video (.06) Most Helpful (Heffner et al., AJDAB, 2015)

©2016 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Single Arm Trial of a Quit Smoking App: SmartQuit 2.0 Trial

Aim 1: Re-Design Structured program with a certificate of completion focused on features most predictive of quitting: urge tracking and key ACT. Aim 2: Satisfaction And descriptively compare 2.0 with 1.0. Aim 3: Cessation And descriptively compare 2.0 with 1.0. Aim 4: Completion Does completion predict cessation? ©2016 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Aims

©2016 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center SmartQuit 2.0

©2016 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center SmartQuit 2.0 Trial CONSORT Diagram Screened: 443 Eligible: 347 Consented: 221 Confirmed by Smart Quit: day Follow-up: day Follow-up: 84

©2016 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Baseline Demographics: SmartQuit 2.0 vs. 1.0 Demographic 2.0 (N=99) 1.0 (N=96) Age, mean (SD) 38 (8.9)41 (12.0) Female88%53% Caucasian97%85% Married40%37% Working70%58% HS or less25%14% Nicotine Dependence (FTND)5.5 (2.1)4.9 (2.5) Smokes at least ½ pack32%28% Smoked 10+ Years81%72% Live with partner who smokes25%24%

©2016 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Satisfaction: SmartQuit 2.0 vs. 1.0 Satisfaction Indicator Satisfied Overall84%59% Recommend to Friend73%52% Useful for Quitting74%53%

©2016 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Cessation & Reduction: 2.0 vs Day Follow-up Day Quit Rate11% Reduced Smoking75%32%

©2016 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Cessation in 2.0: All vs. Completers SmartQuit Day Quit Rate All Participants11% Program Completers (24% of All)28%

SmartQuit 2.0 Completion Predicts Cessation Completion Measure Quit Outcome Full Completion of the Program: 24% of AllOR % CI1.13, p-value0.032 Depth of Completion Number of Quit Plan ViewsOR % CI0.92, 4.34 p-value Each ACT Module CompletedOR % CI1.01, 1.60 p-value Each Urge Passed Tracked OR % CI1.00, 1.03 p-value Number of Anytime Coaching usesOR % CI0.87, 1.09 p-value (Zeng et al., in review) ©2016 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center

Fully Powered Randomized Trial of a Quit Smoking App: SmartQuit 3.0 Randomized Trial Fully Powered Randomized Trial of a Quit Smoking App: SmartQuit 3.0 Randomized Trial

©2016 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center SmartQuit 3.0 Trial $3.1 Million US Dollars, Funded by National Cancer Institute Year 1: Design & develop SmartQuit 3.0 by synthesizing trial and user research from SmartQuit 2.0. Years 2-4: -Conduct trial of 1622 nationally-recruited adult smokers -Randomize to SmartQuit or NCI’s Quit Guide -3, 6, & 12 Month Follow-up Year 5: Analyze, publish, and disseminate results

©2016 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center SmartQuit 3.0 Design User Testing

©2016 Fred Hutchinson Cancer Research Center Summary SmartQuit 2.0 advances smoking cessation app technology through a structured program with research-driven features that predict quit rates. In the challenging higher female & less educated sample with longer smoking history, SmartQuit 2.0 had: 1. High user satisfaction 2. Modest quit rates 3. High reduction in smoking Program completion may be key to boosting quit rates.

Thank you Dr. Jonathan Bricker