Adding Flame to Kindling: Transforming Campus Culture

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Aligning and Integrating General Education and the Majors at a Large Public Research University Anthony Ciccone William Keith Jeffrey Merrick University.
Advertisements

Steps to an Integrated Assessment System: Merging Culture and Process Cara Gardner Assessment Coordinator Bay Path College American Association of Colleges.
What is LEAP? Roundtable Discussions October 19 & 20.
Working with Rubrics: Using the Oral Communication, Writing, and Critical Thinking Rubrics VALUE Rubrics Ashley Finley, Ph.D Senior Director of Assessment.
The Role of Faculty During the Self-Study Process Ensuring Success at Cedar Crest LaMont Rouse Executive Director of Assessment, Accreditation & Compliance.
Assessment Consultant to THECB’s Undergraduate Education Advisory Committee (UEAC): Danita McAnally, Chief of Planning and Advancement.
University of Minnesota Duluth Design and Implementation of a Comprehensive Campus Assessment System Jackie.
Undergraduate Co-Curricular Competencies. Bernie Savarese Director, Orientation and First Year Experience Enrollment Services Jennifer Belisle Assistant.
1 Learning and Educational Outcomes: Assessing Resiliency in Life and Career Learning and Educational Outcomes: Assessing Resiliency in Life and Career.
SLOAC Committee Flex Day Working Session Date: Time: 12:45 – 2:15.
Pierce College CSUN-Pierce Paths Project Outcomes Report 2013.
Thomas College Name Major Expected date of graduation address
Closing the Loop: The Assessment Process from Outcomes to Academic Excellence, Budgetary Competence and Community Engagement.
Closing the Loop: The Assessment Process from Outcomes to Academic Excellence, Budgetary Competence and Community Engagement January 2012.
 Pressures  Considerations  Charge  Progress & Thinking So Far  Feedback.
Assessment of Student Learning North American Colleges and Teachers of Agriculture Cia Verschelden June 17, 2009.
Liberal Education and America’s Promise: Changing the Conversation about Student Success and Institutional Accountability SHEEO—Denver, CO August 2009.
SACS-CASI Southern Association of Colleges and Schools Council on Accreditation and School Improvement FAMU DRS – QAR Quality Assurance Review April 27-28,
SUBMITTED TO THE HIGHER LEARNING COMMISSION OF THE NORTH CENTRAL ASSOCIATION OF COLLEGES AND SCHOOLS MAY 2010 Progress Report on Outcomes Assessment.
Susan A. Ambrose Senior Vice Provost, Undergraduate Education & Experiential Learning Professor of Education & History NEASC Annual Meeting & Conference.
Planning 101 Overview of integrated planning at SCC
MT ENGAGE Student Learning Outcomes and Assessment April 27, 2015.
AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment Key findings from a survey among 325 chief academic officers or designated representatives at AAC&U.
HLC Criterion Three Primer: Teaching and Learning: Quality, Resources, and Support Thursday, September 24, :40 – 11:40 a.m. Event Center.
Annual Program Assessment With a Five- Year Peer Review John Henik Associate Vice President, Academic Affairs Dave Horsfield
8/23/ th ACS National Meeting, Boston, MA POGIL as a model for general education in chemistry Scott E. Van Bramer Widener University.
What is Global Citizenship?
AQIP Categories Category One: Helping Students Learn focuses on the design, deployment, and effectiveness of teaching-learning processes (and on the processes.
Agenda About Middlebury Middlebury’s Mission Assessment Challenges.
Designing and Assessing Civic Engagement Activities for 300 Level Learning Communities Maggie Commins November 28th, 2016.
Report from Curriculum Committee 4/3/2017
PDP Presentation Trinity Washington University
Beyond the “A” Word Assessment that Empowers Faculty to
Academic Affairs Update Monday, April 17, 2017
Assessment-driven Core Reform
General Education Review
CTE Academy: Engaging Faculty in a Culture of Continuous Improvement
Higher Learning Commission Accreditation Update – January 2016
Student Learning Outcomes Alignment through Academic and Student Affairs Partnerships NASPA Assessment & Persistence Conference June 25, 2015 Susan Platt,
ASSESSMENT OF THE GEN ED PROGRAM –
Closing the Loop: The Assessment Process from Outcomes to Academic Excellence, Budgetary Competence and Community Engagement January 2012.
Mary Moser Learning Commons Librarian
SHEEO Higher Education Policy Conference | August 8–10, 2012 State Agency Workshop Session Learning Outcomes Assessment Development of Statewide Plan.
Student Learning Outcomes Assessment
Institutional Learning Outcomes Assessment
Continuing to Advance the Culture of Assessment in Massachusetts
The Pain and Promise of CRITICAL CORE Implementation
Purposeful Pathways: Designing Relevant and Transparent HIPs
QM and Accreditation—Sounds Boring but It’s BASIC
Bring the GWP to Your School
Engaging Online Students in Global Learning
Student Learning Outcome Assessment Plan
Comprehensive Assessment Plan
AAC&U Members on Trends in Learning Outcomes Assessment
HLC Update: Progress and Preparation for the Visit
Randy Beach, South Representative Marie Boyd, Chaffey College
Dr. James W. Dottin Department Chair Business Administration
Learning Outcomes All CITE programs will include critical reflection. Use problem-solving strategies to resolve real-world issues Communicate effectively.
Presented by: Skyline College SLOAC Committee Fall 2007
Juliana S Lancaster Georgia Gwinnett College
We VALUE HIPs Utilizing VALUE Rubrics and HIP QA Tools in Course Revitalization Presented by Melynda Conner, TBR OSS HIP Specialist 2019.
HART RESEARCH A S O T E C I AAC&U Members On Trends In Learning Outcomes, General Education, and Assessment Key findings from online survey among 433 Chief.
GERT Force March 14, 2019.
Dan Kline, GenEd Director
Student Learning Outcomes at CSUDH
Assessment of the UCA Core Annual Brief (AY ‘18-19) Diversity
Student Interpretation of Learning Outcomes
Minnesota State University, Mankato THE MODERN UNIVERSITY Legislative Day 2003.
Share.Shape.Unite. Building our SSU Sonoma State University Academic Senate May 17, 2018 University Budget Office.
Closing the Loop: The Assessment Process from Outcomes to Academic Excellence, Budgetary Competence and Community Engagement January 2012.
Presentation transcript:

Adding Flame to Kindling: Transforming Campus Culture HLC Annual Meeting - April 17, 2016

Our Story Compliance shared community values Institutional learning outcomes transformative learning environment

SCSU Snapshot Regional comprehensive university Part of Minnesota State Colleges and Universities system Enrollment: 15,400 Employees: 1450

HLC Quality Initiative (2012) Adopt institutional learning outcomes that will characterize the SCSU experience for all students; Put in place a robust system of assessment and continuous improvement.

Quality Initiative Outcomes Adopt institutional learning outcomes that will characterize the SCSU experience for all students Develop and put in place an institutional-level assessment plan for the institutional outcomes Complete university-wide assessment of at least one institutional learning outcome by spring semester 2016 Demonstrate the alignment between program or unit outcomes and those of the institution

Process and Structure Process - consultative, iterative, engaging Representative governance structure Tri-chair model Representatives from across campus

Process and Structure Oversight committee 4 sub-committees: Internal Outcomes External Outcomes Communication Assessment

National Conversations Value Rubrics (AAC&U) LEAP Vision for Learning (AAC&U) Curriculum Mapping Degree Qualifications Profile 2.0 (Lumina/NILOA) Employer surveys Multi State Collaborative/MN VALUE Project (SHEEO/AAC&U) Re-Imagining the First Year (AASCU)

When students graduate with an SCSU education, they will: Think Creatively and Critically Seek and Apply Knowledge Communicate Effectively Integrate Existing and Evolving Technologies Engage as a Member of a Diverse and Multicultural World Act with Personal Integrity and Civic Responsibility

SCSU Student Perspectives Enrolled Spring 2015 Not Enrolled Spring 2015 Mean Difference Engage as a global citizen in a multicultural world 3.9 3.4 0.5 Seek and apply knowledge to solve problems 5.1 4.4 0.7 Adapt and integrate technology 5.0 4.3 Communicate effectively 5.5 4.8 Act with personal integrity and civic responsibility 5.6 4.9 Think creatively and critically 0.6

Governance Structure Oversight Committee Dimension Committees Year 1 – Planning Year 2 – Dimension of the Year Year 3 – Closing the Loop!

Our Husky Compact Roll-out Year Planning Implementation Closing the Loop 2015-16 Communicate Effectively 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

Our Husky Compact Roll-out Year Planning Implementation Closing the Loop 2015-16 Engage as a Member of a Diverse and Multicultural World Communicate Effectively 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

Our Husky Compact Roll-out Year Planning Implementation Closing the Loop 2015-16 Engage as a Member of a Diverse and Multicultural World Communicate Effectively Think Creatively and Critically 2016-17 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

Our Husky Compact Roll-out Year Planning Implementation Closing the Loop 2015-16 Engage as a Member of a Diverse and Multicultural World Communicate Effectively Think Creatively and Critically 2016-17 Dimension 4 2017-18 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

Our Husky Compact Roll-out Year Planning Implementation Closing the Loop 2015-16 Engage as a Member of a Diverse and Multicultural World Communicate Effectively Think Creatively and Critically 2016-17 Dimension 4 2017-18 Dimension 5 2018-19 2019-20 2020-21

Our Husky Compact Roll-out Year Planning Implementation Closing the Loop 2015-16 Engage as a Member of a Diverse and Multicultural World Communicate Effectively Think Creatively and Critically 2016-17 Dimension 4 2017-18 Dimension 5 2018-19 Dimension 6 2019-20 2020-21

Our Husky Compact Roll-out Year Planning Implementation Closing the Loop 2015-16 Engage as a Member of a Diverse and Multicultural World Communicate Effectively Think Creatively and Critically 2016-17 Dimension 4 2017-18 Dimension 5 2018-19 Dimension 6 2019-20 2020-21

Our Husky Compact Roll-out Year Planning Implementation Closing the Loop 2015-16 Engage as a Member of a Diverse and Multicultural World Communicate Effectively Think Creatively and Critically 2016-17 Dimension 4 2017-18 Dimension 5 2018-19 Dimension 6 2019-20 2020-21

Alignment Defined What do we mean? How programs already deliver on Our Husky Compact Orient program outcomes to the OHC dimensions (in a disciplinarily appropriate way) How students will be exposed to the OHC dimensions Use of assessment to inform ongoing alignment and improvement

Process of Alignment 70% of programs had learning outcomes All courses had learning outcomes Backwards design model not possible Process created in order to facilitate program discussions Co-curricular alignment

OHC Spider Web

OHC Alignment Map Blank=No connection; L=Low; M=Medium; H=High Program Outcomes Communicate Effectively Think Creatively, Critically Engage as a Member of a Diverse, Multicultural World Seek and Apply Knowledge Act with Personal Integrity and Civic Responsibility Integrate Existing and Evolving Technologies Blank=No connection; L=Low; M=Medium; H=High

Assessment Strategy Multi State Collaborative sampling strategy Student artifacts from multiple disciplines and experiences First-year and senior-level courses AAC&U VALUE Rubrics Written Communication Oral Communication

Future Implementation Broad integration of Our Husky Compact Planning and Implementation for Think Creatively and Critically Planning for Engage as a Member of a Diverse and Multicultural World Continue alignment Completion of HLC Quality Initiative Report

Challenges Communication Perfect is the enemy of progress Concerns regarding evaluation, usefulness Financial Integration of co-curricular activities

http://stcloudstate.edu/ourhuskycompact John Eggers: jmeggers@stcloudstate.edu Lisa Foss: lhfoss@stcloudstate.edu Kristian Twombly: kmtwombly@stcloudstate.edu