Deschutes County Planning Commission Redmond Urban Area Planning Commission May 25, 2006 Comprehensive Plan / UGB Amendment Work Session.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Planning Commission April 14, 2010
Advertisements

July 15, 2008 – GB Work Session Discussion of Mayor Thomas E. Swisstack’s Priority List Recommendations.
Welcome! Please have a seat and we’ll start shortly.
Land Conservation and Development Commission 3/12/15 Victor Chudowsky, City Counselor Brian T. Rankin, Long-range Planning Manager.
CITY OF TIGARD Respect and Care | Do the Right Thing | Get it Done City of Tigard Economic Opportunities Analysis May 10, 2011City Council Public Hearing.
City of Fitchburg, WISAA Design Group + Teska +Montgomery NORTH STONER PRAIRIE NEIGHBORHOOD PLAN Steering Committee Workshop: Plan Vision, Principles,
Presented by: ECONorthwest December 15, Agenda Introductions (10 minutes) Overview of the project (30 minutes) Presentation by ECONorthwest Role.
Neighborhood Preservation and Revitalization Division Board of County Commissioners March 10, Neighborhood Improvement Plan.
Candidate Briefing and Update. 45 minutes. Not a lot of time for most, for me IMPOSSIBLE ! ◦ Personal background ◦ Vision ◦ Development of a comprehensive.
King County Metro Long Range Public Transportation Plan Kirkland Transportation Commission_ April 10, 2015.
Community Development & Planning Grant Pre-Application Meeting April 17,
SITE. Parcel will go from Medium Density Residential to medium high Density Residential Low Density Residential Medium Density Residential Office/Business.
Compact for a Sustainable Ventura County A project of the Ventura County Civic Alliance and the Ventura Council of Governments.
Planning for Smart Growth in Rural New Hampshire SWRPC Southwest Region Planning Commission.
Mark-Up Draft 1 Frankfort City Comprehensive Plan Meeting, July 19, 2006.
Workshop on Sequim Urban Residential – I Zoning Responding to Non-Compliance and Invalidity Ruling of Western Washington Growth Management Hearing Board.
Implementing the Freeland Subarea Plan Zoning and Development Regulations Island County Planning & Community Development 2016 Comprehensive Plan Update.
EVALUATION AND APPRAISAL REPORT MAJOR COMMUNITY ISSUES RELATED TO COMPREHENSIVE PLAN Board of County Commissioners/ Local Planning Agency Joint Meeting.
Flintstone-Oldtown Planning Region Comprehensive Plan Kick-Off Meeting June 23, 2010 Insert pictures.
Evaluation and Appraisal Comprehensive Plan Amendments City Council Workshop December 9, 2014.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion March 20, 2012.
ZOM Newberry/122 nd St. PD. Applicant Request Applicant is requesting a rezoning from RE-1 (single-family residential) to PD (non-residential planned.
Application LU-MIN Small-Scale Future Land Use Map Amendment Twenty Fingers Property May 2007 PLDRB.
Miami-Dade County Department of Planning and Zoning - pg 1 Evaluation and Appraisal Report 2010.
Community Development Department GRAND HAVEN DEVELOPMENT OF REGIONAL IMPACT Planning & Land Development Regulation Board May 21, 2014.
Comprehensive Plan Update Kevin O’Neill Seattle Bicycle Advisory Board September 2, 2015.
City of Palm Coast EAR Public Input Process Update Prepared for the Palm Coast City Council By The FCRC Consensus Center November 24, 2009 Update Prepared.
Amherst County Comprehensive Plan (Update)
Pennsylvania Municipalities Planning Code - MPC State enabling legislation for all municipalities except Pittsburgh and Philadelphia Newly Elected Officials.
Eastside Activity Center Zoning Overlay District and Amended Land Development Regulations.
JUNE 27, 2013 ARB INFORMATIONAL UPDATE: ASSOCIATION OF BAY AREA GOVERNMENTS’/ METROPOLITAN TRANSPORTATION COMMISSION’S DRAFT SUSTAINABLE COMMUNITIES STRATEGY.
Land Needs Simulator: Overview and Recommended Assumptions Presented to: RPS Policy Committee Presented by: ECONorthwest January 9, 2007.
Amendments to Concurrency Management Regulations.
NOVEMBER 19, 2015 STUDY SESSION R IDGEFIELD J UNCTION S UBAREA P LAN DRAFT NOVEMBER 2015.
Growth Management Legislative Discussion June 19, 2012 Growth Management Legislative Discussion June 19, 2012.
Why Plan? Unprecedented pressure for growth and change To identify development and preservation areas over next 20 years To recommend types of land uses.
The Three Levels of Development Planning 1 Small Area Plan Zone / CDD DSP / DSUP.
Housing Element Update Workshop #2 January 28, 2009.
“ Grand Landings North” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing March 3, 2015.
EASTSIDE ACTIVITY CENTER MASTER PLAN PROPOSED COMPREHENSIVE PLAN AMENDMENT CPA Board of County Commissioners Hearing May 13, 2008.
agenda  General Plan Overview  Issues and Focus Areas Identification  Housing Element  Upcoming Events.
Planning Commission Study Session: Preferred Plan July 23, 2015.
Steve Horenstein CASE STUDIES OF COMPREHENSIVE PLAN PROCESSES AND RESULTS : Comprehensive planning as an economic development tool; Striking the right.
“State Road 100 MPC Lots” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing November 17, 2015.
DUVALL 2015 COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE and SURVEY RESULTS 9:00 – 10:30 AM Survey Results 30 minutes (Lara) Comprehensive Plan, Density and Capacity, and.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN UPDATE MEETING 4 – POPULATION & HOUSING ELEMENTS 1/30/2014.
Bottineau Rezoning Study University Neighborhood Network Mary Kaiser, Phil Kelley, Ashley Kobberdahl.
Infill Master Plan October 23, 2007 Infill Master Plan October 23, 2007 Board of County Commissioners Discussion Item.
Sixth Amendment to the Orange County / City of Winter Garden Joint Planning Area Agreement and Utilities Territorial Agreement April 17, 2007 Sixth Amendment.
2017 Comprehensive Plan Update
City of Pierce Welcome and Follow Up.
Growth Management Amendments Land Use & Transportation
Zoning Ordinance Update Study
“Palm Coast 145, LLC” Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning Planning and Land Development Regulation Board December 21, 2016.
LEE FARM ADDITION – GDP AMENDMENT
San Juan County 2036 Comprehensive Plan Update
ROSEBURG URBAN GROWTH BOUNDARY STUDY
Palm Coast 145, LLC Comprehensive Plan Amendment & Rezoning City Council Public Hearing September 5, 2017.
COMPREHENSIVE PLAN 2017 AMENDMENT PROCESS and DOCKET
Marriott-Slaterville, Utah March 2018
MPO School Transportation Working Group
ROOSEVELT CITY GENERAL PLAN 2010
PA LS Burnt Store Area Plan
Josephine County TSP Update
Planning Commission.
Joint City Council / Planning Commission
Joint City Council / Planning Commission Urban Growth Boundary Meeting
Southwest Urban Growth Area Boundary Planning Study
New Hanover Comprehensive Plan
VICTORIA CITY COUNCIL MEETING
Presentation transcript:

Deschutes County Planning Commission Redmond Urban Area Planning Commission May 25, 2006 Comprehensive Plan / UGB Amendment Work Session

 Slide 2 1.Purpose of the Meeting & Introductions 2.URA/UGB History 3.Proposed Timeline 4.Why a Joint Meeting? 5.Binder Table of Contents for June 8 Public Hearing 6.Roles – who does what? 7.Background in brief - urbanization study, UGB, Plan, etc. 8.Discussion 9.Contact Information Agenda

 Slide 3 Comprehensive Plan Update 1.Analyze housing & employment needs 2.Update public facilities plans a)Water, Sewer, Transportation, Parks 3.Establish Urban Reserve Area & Expand Urban Growth Boundary to accommodate projected growth (where to grow) 4.Update Comprehensive Plan (how to grow) 5.Implementation

 Slide year land supply 2.5,664 acres (113 acres/year) 3.Redmond Urbanization Study a)Based on Coordinated Population Forecast b)Buildable Lands Inventory c)Density assumptions Urban Reserve Area Timeline  Started 2003  Coordinated Population Forecast Adopted Sept  Urbanization Study Completed June 2005  Adopted Aug  Acknowledged Dec. 2005

 Slide 5 Urban Reserve Area

 Slide year land supply ( ) acres to accommodate growth over 20 years 3.Update UGB every 3-5 years, add land based on supply/ land absorption, revised growth projections & densities Urban Growth Boundary  Started Fall 2005  8 Work Sessions with City Council, Planning Commission  Public input at all work sessions  Neighborhood meetings, service club meetings

 Slide 7 1.Purpose of the Meeting & Introductions 2.URA/UGB History 3.Proposed Timeline 4.Why a Joint Meeting? 5.Binder Table of Contents for June 8 Public Hearing 6.Roles – who does what? 7.Background in brief - urbanization study, UGB, Plan, etc. 8.Discussion 9.Contact Information Agenda

 Slide 8 1.June 8: Joint Planning Commission Public Hearing; recommendations to Deschutes BOCC & City Council 2.July 11: Joint County Board, City Council Public Hearing; adoption 3.August/September: DLCD acknowledgement Proposed Timeline  Planning Commissions  City Council  Deschutes County, Board of County Commissioners  State of Oregon, Department of Land Conservation & Development

 Slide 9 1.Purpose of the Meeting & Introductions 2.URA/UGB History 3.Proposed Timeline 4.Why a Joint Meeting? 5.Binder Table of Contents for June 8 Public Hearing 6.Roles – who does what? 7.Background in brief - urbanization study, UGB, Plan, etc. 8.Discussion 9.Contact Information Agenda

 Slide 10 1.Expedite UGB expansion to accommodate growth 2.Convenience for public to participate in meetings (do not have to attend multiple meetings) 3.Commissioners benefit from joint discussion, questions, answers, etc. 4.Efficient use of resources (city & county staff, consultants, materials, space, etc.) Why a Joint Meeting?

 Slide 11 1.Purpose of the Meeting & Introductions 2.URA/UGB History 3.Proposed Timeline 4.Why a Joint Meeting? 5.Binder Table of Contents for June 8 Public Hearing 6.Roles – who does what? 7.Background in brief - urbanization study, UGB, Plan, etc. 8.Discussion 9.Contact information Agenda

 Slide 12 1.City of Redmond & Deschutes County notices of UGB Expansion UGB Expansion Findings 3.Proposed Comprehensive Plan Policy Amendments 4.Map of Proposed UGB Amendment 5.City of Redmond Urbanization Study 6.Public Facilities Memorandums Binder

 Slide 13 7.LUBA Decision Affirming Deschutes County’s Coordinated Population Figures 8.Letter from DLCD Acknowledging Urban Reserve 9.Joint Management Agreement (JMA) – Deschutes County – City of Redmond 10.Draft Urban Reserve Holding Zone 11.Visioning Redmond Plan 12.Schedule of Boundary Expansion 13.Draft Framework Plan Binder

 Slide 14 1.Purpose of the Meeting & Introductions 2.URA/UGB History 3.Proposed Timeline 4.Why a Joint Meeting? 5.Binder Table of Contents for June 8 Public Hearing 6.Roles – who does what? 7.Background in brief - urbanization study, UGB, Plan, etc. 8.Discussion & Contact information 9.Discussion Agenda

 Slide 15 Review & recommend approval of amendments to: 1.Urban Reserve Area map to reflect new UGB boundary 2.Comprehensive Plan policies & map to reflect new URA & UGB boundaries 3.TSP map to reflect new boundaries, and arterial & collector streets in urban unincorporated areas Roles – Deschutes County Planning Commission

 Slide 16 Review & recommend approval of amendments to: 4.Title 20: Redmond Urban Area Zoning Ordinance adopting UH-10 Zone and possibly EFU Zone 5.Findings document to support above amendments, and UGB legal description Roles – Deschutes County Planning Commission

 Slide 17 Review & recommend approval of: UGB Expansion Map & Findings, and legal description of UGB boundary Comprehensive Plan Map & Policy Amendments Redmond Development Code – UH-10 Zone Framework Plan Joint Management Agreement Roles – Urban Area Planning Commission

 Slide 18 1.Introductions 2.URA/UGB History 3.Proposed Timeline 4.Why a Joint Meeting? 5.Binder Table of Contents for June 8 Public Hearing 6.Roles – who does what? 7.Background in brief - urbanization study, UGB, Plan, etc. 8.Discussion 9.Contact information Agenda

 Slide 19 Background in Brief Met legal notice obligations & have provided all information on website Basis of UGB amendment & source documents Redmond Urbanization Study ( ) –Coordinated population forecast –Buildable Lands Inventory Summaries of UGB, Comprehensive Plan, Draft Framework Plan

 Slide 20 Background in Brief

 Slide 21 Background Buildable Lands Inventory 10,000 gross acres 2,000 acre UGB expansion is 20% of existing City

 Slide 22 Residential Building Permits 2005

 Slide 23 Land needed for housing 1,962 total residential acres needed Increase density from 5.1 to 7.5 units per acre avg.

 Slide 24 Background in Brief 20-Year Residential Demand Total 11,628 units Vacant Land in City4,699 units UGB Expansion6,929 units 1,516 acres needed in UGB to accommodate growth projections at 7.5 units per acre

 Slide 25 Demand for Commercial & Industrial Land 11,716 new employees 2003 – 2025 EPA: employees per acre

 Slide 26 Acres needed to accommodate new employees ,338 (gross) Acres available for commercial & industrial development 1,098 (1,317 gross acres) Need 100 acres for neighborhood commercial & tourist commercial Demand for Commercial & Industrial Land

 Slide 27 Provide employment uses / acres on west side to: –Create jobs / housing balance –Reduce automobile trips across town –Create a sense of community with a mix of uses in close proximity to one another –Create employment clusters / centers rather than only one large concentration on the east side Demand for Commercial & Industrial Land

 Slide Year UGB Expansion: 1,985 acres –Residential 1,516 –Commercial 100 –Park 280 –Public Facility 89 Proposed UGB expansion: 2,162 acres Background in Brief

 Slide 29 Established criteria with Planning Commission & City Council Created UGB expansion alternatives, revised, and selected preferred alternative Conducted 8 work sessions with City Council & Planning Commission, and neighborhood, service club & developer meetings Close cooperation with County & State staff, consultants and legal counsel UGB Expansion Process

 Slide ,000 +/- Acres 2.Transportation a)Create Arterial backbone (west side corridor) b)Disperse traffic 3.Sewer a)Complete west side interceptor b)Gravity flow 4.Schools / public facilities 5.Jobs / housing balance Criteria

 Slide 31 UGB Alternatives Evaluated 3 UGB Expansion Options Staff recommended Option 1 City Council, Planning Commission Direction: GO WEST! Option 1Option 2Option 3

 Slide 32 Revised Alternatives

 Slide 33 Preferred UGB 2,162 acres 2,094 acres w/o BPA Transportation Sewer Jobs / Housing Balance Schools

 Slide 34 Encourage efficient use of land inside City limits – infill development, vibrant downtown, target densities, etc. Create 2 map system - Comprehensive Plan Map & Zoning Map Encourage public facility planning & coordination between City & County Re-write Goal 14 Urbanization chapter to establish –Urban Holding Zone –Master Plan Requirements –Great Neighborhood Principles Comprehensive Plan Amendments

 Slide 35 Planning Framework Framework Plan Comprehensive Plan Neighborhood Plan Big Picture General Land Use, Transportation, Public Facilities & Open General Land Use, Transportation, Public Facilities & Open Space Systems General Plan Land Use Categories, Transportation Network, Public Facilities Plans, Open Spaces Specific Area Plan Detailed Land Uses, Streets, Bike Paths, Parks & Open Spaces, Public Facilities

 Slide 36 Opportunities & Constraints for urban expansion –Barriers –Topography –Adjoining land uses –Gateways –View corridors –Roads –BPA & COID easements for trails Draft Framework Plan

 Slide 37 1.General land uses 2.Road & trail connections, extensions 3.Neighborhood centers 4.Gateways 5.View corridors 6.Public input: Wednesday, May 31 Historic Redmond Church 11:00 – 1:00 p.m. 5:00 – 7:00 p.m. Draft Framework Plan

 Slide 38 1.Establish holding zones for future urban expansion 2.Zone (UH-10) maintains a minimum parcel size of 10 acres, allows agricultural uses & a single family dwelling 3.Zone change & master plan approval are required before urban development 4.Decision: UH-10 and/or Exclusive Farm Use (EFU) to serve as holding zone(s) Urban Holding Zone / EFU

 Slide 39 1.Introductions 2.URA/UGB History 3.Proposed Timeline 4.Why a Joint Meeting? 5.Binder Table of Contents for June 8 Public Hearing 6.Roles – who does what? 7.Background in brief - urbanization study, UGB, Plan, etc. 8.Discussion 9.Contact Information Agenda

 Slide 40 Discussion

 Slide 41 Wayne Sorensen, City of Redmond, Nick Lelack, City of Redmond, Peter Gutowski, Deschutes County, http// Contact Information

 Slide 42 Thank You!