Results: Characteristics of the study participants according to specialty.

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

1 SECOND AUSTRALIAN NATIONAL BLOOD PRESSURE STUDY (ANBP-2) Enalapril/ACEI vs. HCTZ, n = 6,083 Randomized, open-label (blinded endpoint review) All CV events.

Advertisements

Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence March-April 2007.

Journal Club Alcohol and Health: Current Evidence March-April 2006.

Evaluation of an E-Recruitment Portal Graphs of Responses to “Can’t Rate”, “Ratings”, and “Images”

1 EPI235: Epi Methods in HSR May 3, 2007 L10 Outcomes and Effectiveness Research 4: HMO/Network (Dr. Schneeweiss) Methodologic issues in benchmarking physician.

Assessment Data Brigham Young University Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering W. Spencer Guthrie March 20, 2008 Brigham Young University.

Your Personal Mission Statement  What defines who you are?  What is the primary purpose of your life?  What MUST you accomplish to be a success?  Write.

Modular 15 Ch 10.1 to 10.2 Part I. Ch 10.1 The Language of Hypothesis Testing Objective A : Set up a Hypothesis Testing Objective B : Type I or Type II.

6 / 5 / RENAL DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED INTO 3 GROUPS BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (GFR) ALLHAT.

EUropean Best Information through Regional Outcomes in Diabetes Risk Adjusted Diabetes Indicators Fabrizio Carinci Technical Coordinator The BIRO Academy.

Evidence-Based Medicine 3 More Knowledge and Skills for Critical Reading Karen E. Schetzina, MD, MPH.

Joe Selby, MD MPH EBRI December 15, 2011 What Might Patient (Employee)- Centered Research Look Like?

Study Designs Afshin Ostovar Bushehr University of Medical Sciences Bushehr, /4/20151.

POTH 612A Quantitative Analysis Dr. Nancy Mayo. © Nancy E. Mayo A Framework for Asking Questions Population Exposure (Level 1) Comparison Level 2 OutcomeTimePECOT.

Table 1. Cluster 1 Patients Attaining Treatment Levels % Patients Attaining Treatment Levels 24 Weeks64 Weeks E/S + N † E/S † N†N† E/S + N † E/S † Cluster.

1 Journal Club Alcohol, Other Drugs, and Health: Current Evidence March–April 2012.

April 6 Logistic Regression –Estimating probability based on logistic model –Testing differences among multiple groups –Assumptions for model.

Mrs. Watcharasa Pitug ID The Association between Waist Circumference and Renal Insufficiency among Hypertensive Patients 20/10/58 1.

 decimals/cc-7th-fracs-to-decimals/v/converting-fractions-to-decimals-example.

T. Brzostek 1, L. Przewoźniak 1, P.Brzyski 1, M. Kózka 1, K.Gajda 1, M.Cisek 1, L. Aiken 2, W. Sermeus 3 1.Jagiellonian University Medical College, Krakow,

Introduction to Survival Analysis Utah State University January 28, 2008 Bill Welbourn.

April 4 Logistic Regression –Lee Chapter 9 –Cody and Smith 9:F.

1 Applied biostatistics Francisco Javier Barón López Dpto. Medicina Preventiva Universidad de Málaga – España

Association between Systolic Blood Pressure and Congestive Heart Failure Complication among Hypertensive and Diabetic Hypertensive Patients Mrs. Sutheera.

Outcome of chemotherapy in synovial sarcoma (sys) patients (pts): review of 15 clinical trials from EORTCc involving advanced sys compared to other Soft.

Solomon Tesfaye et al N Engl J Med 2005;352: Comparison of Baseline Data in 1819 Patients According to Whether There Was an Assessment for Neuropathy.

Research Techniques Made Simple: Multivariable Analysis Marlies Wakkee Loes Hollestein Tamar Nijsten Department of Dermatology, Erasmus University Medical.

Information network on rare cancers Work Package 4 Information on epidemiology of rare cancers Riccardo Capocaccia and Sandra Mallone Cancer Epidemiology.

RITA-3 ESC 4 th September 2005 The impact of underlying risk and gender on the benefit of early intervention in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndrome.

What is randomization and how does it solve the causality problem? 2.3.

Measuring Associations Between Exposure and Outcomes Chapter 3, Szklo and Nieto.

Chapter 1: CKD in the General Population 2015 A NNUAL D ATA R EPORT V OLUME 1: C HRONIC K IDNEY D ISEASE.

ALLHAT 6/5/ CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (3 GROUPS by GFR)

EVALUATING u After retrieving the literature, you have to evaluate or critically appraise the evidence for its validity and applicability to your patient.

6/5/ CARDIOVASCULAR DISEASE OUTCOMES IN HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS STRATIFIED BY BASELINE GLOMERULAR FILTRATION RATE (4 GROUPS by GFR) ALLHAT.

Scott E. Hadland MD MPH John R. Knight MD Sarah H. Copelas BA Sion K. Harris PhD.

Pulmonary-Allergy Drugs Advisory Committee May 1, 2007 OutlineOutline History of development programHistory of development program –Dr. Carol Bosken Introduction.

Date of download: 6/23/2016 Copyright © The American College of Cardiology. All rights reserved. From: Outcomes Associated With Microalbuminuria: Effect.

Case Control study. An investigation that compares a group of people with a disease to a group of people without the disease. Used to identify and assess.

The Canadian KTpush project 41 FPs in practice 1-year mixed methods study PUSH and PULL components PUSH: 4,548 rated alerts PULL: 1,767 rated searches.

How Can High School Counseling Shape Students’ Postsecondary Attendance? Exploring the Relationship between High School Counseling and Students’ Subsequent.

Table 4 Risk factors for acquisition of vancomycin-resistant enterococcal (VRE) colonization after transplantation for 120 liver transplant recipients.

Identifying patients with atrial fibrillation and "truly low" thromboembolic risk who are poorly characterized by CHA2DS2-VASc: Superior performance of.

Darrell H. S. Tan1, Jayoti Rana1, Shawn Fowler2, Trevor A

Copyright © 2010 American Medical Association. All rights reserved.

A Quality improvement initiative

Online Supplemental Material

From: Wells Rule and d-Dimer Testing to Rule Out Pulmonary EmbolismA Systematic Review and Individual-Patient Data Meta-analysis Ann Intern Med. 2016;165(4):

Amanda D. Castel, MD, MPH Assistant Research Professor

From: Effect of the Medicare Part D Coverage Gap on Medication Use Among Patients With Hypertension and Hyperlipidemia Ann Intern Med. 2012;156(11):

CHOICE: Relative risk of death on peritoneal dialysis vs hemodialysis

PAD Patients vs Post-ACS Patients:

11/20/2018 Study Types.

Linear Regression.

Baseline characteristics of HPS participants by prior diabetes

Assessing the Risk for Stroke in Patients With Atrial Fibrillation

RJ Jacobs AS Meyerhoff Capitol Outcomes Research, Inc.

Jun M, et al. Lancet 2010 Epub May 10

Selmer R, et al. Br J Clin Pharmacol 2009;67:355-62

Physician Adoption of Adolescent Tdap Recommendations

EAST GRADE course 2019 Introduction to Meta-Analysis

Baseline Characteristics of the Study Participants

Baseline Characteristics of Elderly Participants in the Cardiovascular Health Study,According to Quintiles of Cystatin C Michael G.Shlipak et al N Engl.

JAMA Ophthalmology Journal Club Slides: Timing of Intervention in Congenital Nasolacrimal Duct Obstruction Sathiamoorthi S, Frank RD, Mohney BG. Spontaneous.

Assessing the impact of different imputation methods on serial measures of renal function: The Strong Heart Study N.-M. Shara, J.-G. Umans, W. Wang,

Pooled risk with 95% CI of ACM (A) and CVD risk (B) for the highest vs

Risk differences for incident stroke, coronary heart disease (CHD), and cardiovascular mortality (per 1000 person-years) by clinical risk factor in the.

Outcomes Group Number of events Total person-years aIRR (95%CI)

Dean T. Eurich, PhD, Cheryl A. Sadowski, PharmD, Scot H

Subgroup analysis of associations between daily tea consumption and risk of ischaemic heart disease (IHD) according to potential baseline risk factors.

Presentation transcript:

Results: Characteristics of the study participants according to specialty

Percentage of the physicians who are aware of risk estimation tools that agree with the statements regarding CVD risk assessment according to user category

Reasons for never or rarely estimating patients’ CVD risk

Comparison of the sub-group of physicians who use risk estimation in practice

BS.E.WaldSig.Exp (B)95% C.I. for EXP (B) LowerUpper Step 1 a Sex Use of smartphone Years since graduation Practice setting Specialty Constant Logistic regression of factors affecting outcome (’non-user’ vs ‘user’)