Table 2.1.1: Number of Corneal Transplantation and Transplant Rate per million population (pmp), 1998-2007 Year1998199920002001200220032004200520062007.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Femtosecond Laser–Assisted Sutureless Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty
Advertisements

Therapeutic Penetrating Keratoplasty in Fungal Keratitis: Prospective Study Sonika Gupta Consultant Ophthalmology Max Eye Care New Delhi, India Author.
Sérgio Kwitko, Tiago Lansini, Andressa P Stolz, Diane R Marinho Authors have no financial interest in the subject matter of this poster.
CHAPTER 3 HEART AND LUNG TRANSPLANTATION Editors: Mr Mohamed Ezani Md. Taib Dato’ Dr David Chew Soon Ping Dr Ashari Yunus Expert Panel: Mr Mohamed Ezani.
Department of Ophthalmology, University Hospital Ayr, Scotland
CORNEAL SURGERY 1. Penetrating keratoplasty 2. Keratoprosthesis 3. Refractive surgery Radial keratotomy Photorefractive keratectomy (PRK) Laser in-situ.
DSAEK in Eyes With Severe Pre-operative Visual Acuity Loss. 1. Sightline Ophthalmic Associates, Pittsburgh, PA 2. Devers Eye Institute, Portland, OR 3.
Introduction To Corneal Transplantation
CHAPTER 2 CORNEAL TRANSPLANTATION
Hemi-Automated Lamellar Keratoplasty (HALK) Leonard Yuen, MD MPH MRCOphth Jodhbir Mehta, FRCS FRCOphth Li Lim, FRCOphth Donald Tan, FRCS FRCOphth SINGAPORE.
Table 4.1.1: Stock and Flow of Liver Transplantation, Year * ** New transplant patients Deaths
Dr. K.S.SIDDHARTHAN Aravind Eye Hospital Coimbatore
Somasheila I. Murthy, Prashant Garg, Pravin K. Vaddavalli
Table 5.1.1: Stock and Flow of Renal Transplantation, Year New transplant patients
1.PATIENTS’ CHARACTERISTICS Table 1.1: Age distributions.
Dept. of Ophthalmology, Friedrich-Alexander University Erlangen-Nuremberg, Erlangen, Germany. Outcome after big-bubble deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty.
CHAPTER 4 LIVER TRANSPLANTATION Editors: Dr Ganesalingam A/L Kanagasabai Expert panel: Dr Ganesalingam A/L Kanagasabai (Chairperson) Professor Dr Lee Way.
The Second Report of The National cataract Surgery Registry PATIENTS’ CHARACTERISTICS Table 1.1: Age Distributions.
Table 2.1.1: Number of Cornea Transplantation and Transplant Rate per million population (pmp), Year No.
Table 5.1.1: Stock and Flow of Renal Transplantation, Year New transplant patients
Table 2.1.1: New Transplant Rate per million population (pmp), Year New transplants
OCULAR HYPERTENSION AFTER PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY F Orucov, E Strassman, D Landau, J Frucht-Pery and A Solomon, Department of Ophthalmology, Hadassah-Hebrew.
Outcome of therapeutic keratoplasty in fungal keratitis Sonika Gupta, MS Assistant Professor, GMCH, Chandigarh, India Author has no financial interest.
INTACS – PKP Comparison X X 180°-0.75 TransplantIntacs.
"Management of Advanced Keratoconus with Deep Anterior Lamellar Keratoplasty (DALK).” Rohanah A., Thiageswary U. Department of Ophthalmology, Hospital.
Glaucoma and Penetrating Keratoplasty : Incidence, Risk Factors, and Outcomes Sonika Gupta Consultant Ophthalmology Max Eye Care New Delhi, India Author.
CHAPTER 1 BLOOD AND MARROW TRANSPLANTATION Editors: Dr Alan Teh Kee Hean Prof Dr Chan Lee Lee Expert Panel: Dr Alan Teh Kee Hean (co-chairperson) Prof.
Table 5.1.1: Stock and Flow of Renal Transplantation, Year New transplant patients
Indications for and Outcomes of Therapeutic Penetrating Keratoplasty Sonika Gupta Consultant Ophthalmology Max Eye Care New Delhi, India Author has no.
AlphaCor TM : A Novel Approach to Minimize Late Post-operative Complications V. Ngakeng MD, M. Price PhD. MBA, F. Price MD.
Deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty in children World Cornea Congress April 2010 Boston, MA Asim Ali, MD, FRCSC University of Toronto Hospital for Sick.
Table 6.1.1: Stock and Flow, Year New transplant Deaths* Lost.
Clinical outcome of DALK in Keratoconus – A one year follow up
E-Poster Price Vision Group & Cornea Research Foundation of America Descemet - Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty :Survival Outcomes in Eyes with Pre-
Table 3.1.1: Stock and Flow of Heart Transplantation, Year New transplant patients Deaths
Table 1.1.1: Stock and Flow of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Year New transplant patients Deaths
Jodhbir S Mehta, Donald Tan The Authors have a financial Interest in the Endoglide patent/royalty.
Etiological and decision making factors for repeat DSAEK or PK in cases of failed Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty First and Presenting.
DSEK for the treatment of endothelial disease in India -Initial Experience in 80 eyes- Authors have no financial interest Dr Ashish Nagpal MD, FRCS Dr.
Table 4.1.1: Stock and Flow of Liver Transplantation, Year * ** New transplant patients Deaths.
Table 3.1.1: Stock and Flow of Heart Transplantation, Year New transplant patients Deaths
Yonca Aydin Akova MD, Leyla Erkanli Asena MD
Table 1.1.1: Stock and Flow of Blood and Marrow Transplantation, Year New transplant patients Deaths
Management of corneal perforations and deep ulcers with patch grafts Dariusz Dobrowolski¹, Edward Wylęgała¹ ׳ ², Dorota Tarnawska¹, Dominika Janiszewska¹.
Anita Panda Rakhi Kusumesh Murugesan Vanathi Tushar Agarwal S Khokhar Cornea and Refractive Surgery Services Dr Rajendra Prasad Centre for Ophthalmic Sciences.
Varsha Rathi DO, P K Vaddavalli MS, S Murthy MS, V S Sangwan, MS
Outcomes of Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty in patients with a Pre-Existing Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lens S. Elderkin1A, E. Tu1A,
Corneal Endothelium Single layer of cells on the inner surface.
Trauma z Surgical treatment of extremely complicated forms of glaucoma
Outcomes and Complications of DSEK in Eyes with Tube shunts or ACIOLs
World Cornea Congress VI April 7-9, 2010
Table 3.1.1a: Stock and Flow of Heart Transplantation,
Study of Death to Preservation Time and
Dr. Sandeep Arora FRCS Dr Ashish Nagpal FRCS
Endothelial keratoplasty in failed grafts
Early Experience with Descemet’s Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Combined with Phacoemulsification: Clinical and Refractive Outcome University.
H Nayak, A Patel, S Gudsoorkar, V Kumar University Hospital Wales
Hong A, Boehlke CS, Afshari NA, Kim T Duke University Medical Center
PATIENTS’ CHARACTERISTICS Table 1.1: Age distributions
Traumatic Wound Dehiscence After Corneal Keratoplasty
Table 1.1.1: Stock and Flow of Blood and Marrow Transplantation,
Role of HSV Infection in the Histopathology of Failed DSAEK
BACTERIAL AND FUNGAL ENDOPHTHALMITIS AFTER PENETRATING KERATOPLASTY
Table 6.1.1: Stock and Flow, *based on year of death Year
Anand K Shah MD1 Neda Shamie MD1 Paul Phillips MD1 Mark A Terry MD1,2*
The S. Fyodorov EYE MICROSURGERY STATE INSTITUTION, Moscow, Russia,
Japanese Red Cross Society
Authors have no financial interest.
Table 6.1.1: Stock and Flow, Year
Presentation transcript:

Table 2.1.1: Number of Corneal Transplantation and Transplant Rate per million population (pmp), Year No. of new transplants New transplant rate pmp Table 2.1.2: Types of Corneal Transplant, Year1998 (N=119) 1999 (N=122) 2000 (N=126) 2001 (N=221) 2002 (N=203) No.% % % % % Penetrating Keratoplasty Lamellar Keratoplasty Patch Graft for Corneal Patch Graft for Sclera Cornea Scleral Keratopalsty No data Year2003 (N=165)2004 (N=184)2005 (N=192)2006 (N=177)2007 (N=189)TOTAL (N=1698) No.% % % % % % Penetrating Keratoplasty Lamellar Keratoplasty Patch Graft for Corneal Patch Graft for Sclera Cornea Scleral Keratopalsty No data

Table 2.2.1: Gender distribution, Year1998 (N=119) 1999 (N=122) 2000 (N=126) 2001 (N=221) 2002 (N=203) 2003 (N=165) 2004 (N=184) 2005 (N=192) 2006 (N=177) 2007 (N=189) TOTAL (N=1698) GenderNo.% % % % % % % % % % % Male Female Table 2.2.2: Ethnic distribution, Year1998 (N=119) 1999 (N=122) 2000 (N=126) 2001 (N=221) 2002 (N=203) 2003 (N=165) 2004 (N=184) 2005 (N=192) 2006 (N=177) 2007 (N=189) TOTAL (N=1698) Ethnic group No.% % % % % % % % % % % Malay Chinese Indian Bumiputra Sabah Bumiputra Sarawak Others No Data

Table 2.2.3: Age distribution of corneal transplant recipient patients, Year1998 (N=119) 1999 (N=122) 2000 (N=126) 2001 (N=221) 2002 (N=203) 2003 (N=165) 2004 (N=184) 2005 (N=192) 2006 (N=177) 2007 (N=189) TOTAL (N=1698) Age group (years) No.% % % % % % % % % % % >= Mean SD Median Minimum 4 months52 months5 months1 2 months 3 Maximum

Table 2.2.4: Primary diagnosis, Year 1998 (N=119) 1999 (N=122) 2000 (N=126) 2001 (N=221) 2002 (N=203) 2003 (N=165) 2004 (N=184) 2005 (N=192) 2006 (N=177) 2007 (N=189) TOTAL (N=1698) Primary Diagnosis No.% % % % % % % % % % % Keratoconus Corneal scar Microbial keratitis Microbial keratitis+Corne a perforation Corneal perforation (non microbial) Pseudophakic Bullous keratopathy Other (non psedophakic) bullous keratopathy Failed previous graft Corneal dystrophy Congenital opacity Others No data *1650 patients have 1 primary diagnosis, 168 have 2 primary diagnoses, 11 patients had 3 diagnoses, and 1 patient had 4 diagnoses

Table 2.2.5: Indications of Corneal Transplant, Indication of transplant2004 (N=184) 2005 (N=192) 2006 (N=177) 2007 (N=189) TOTAL (N=742) %No.% % % % Optical Tectonic Therapeutic Tectonic + Therapeutic Optical + Tectonic Optical + Tectonic + Therapeutic Optical + Therapeutic Optical + Others Others No data Table : No of Previous Grafts in Grafted Eye, Graft Number2004 * (N=138) 2005 (N=192) 2006 (N=177) 2007 (N=189) Total (N=696) No.% % % % % * In the year 2004 there were a total of 184 corneal transplants performed but complete data set was only received for 138 patients.

Table : Ocular Co-morbidity, (N=138) 2005 (N=192) 2006 (N=177) 2007 (N=189) Total (N=696) Ocular co-morbidityNo.% % % % % Any ocular co-morbidity (a to d below) a) Superficial corneal vascularisation b) Deep corneal vascularisation c) History of glaucoma d) Current ocular inflammation *Patient might have multiple ocular co-morbidities. Table : Pre-operative Vision,

Table : Source of Donor Cornea Tissue, * (N=138) 2005 (N=192) 2006 (N=177) 2007 (N=189) Total (N=696) Source of donorNo.% % % % % Local USA Sri Lanka Others No data If Local, ethnic group: Malay Chinese Indian Others No data * In the year 2004 there were a total of 184 corneal transplants performed but complete data set was only received for 138 patients. Figure : Source of Donor Corneal Tissue,

Table : Donor Age Distribution, (N=138) 2005 (N=192) 2006 (N=174) 2007 (N=189) Total (N=696) Age, yearsNo.% % % % ≥ Mean SD Median Minimum Maximum Table : Preservation Media, (N=138) 2005 (N=192) 2006 (N=177) 2007 (N=189) Total (N=696) Preservation mediaNo.% % % % % Optisol GS MK Medium Moist Chamber Others*001* No data *Others : Eusol-C

Figure : Preservation Media, Table : Cause of Death in Corneal Donors, (N=138) 2005 (N=192) 2006 (N=177) 2007 (N=189) Total (N=696) Cause of death No.% % % % % Cardiac / Circulatory System Cerebrovascular System Malignancy Trauma / Accident Respiratory System Others No data

Table : Types of Surgeries, (N=138) 2005 (N=192) 2006 (N=177) 2007 (N=189) Total (N=696) Type of surgeryNo.% % % % % Penetrating Keratoplasty Lamellar Keratoplasty Patch graft for corneal Patch graft for scleral Cornea Scleral Lamellar Keratoplasty * In the year 2004 there were a total of 184 corneal transplants performed but complete data set was only received for 138 patients (N=138) 2005 (N=192) 2006 (N=177) 2007 (N=189) Total (N=696) Combined surgeries No.% % % % % No. of patients with corneal transplant surgery combined with another surgical procedure (a) Glaucoma surgery (b) Cataract Extraction (c ) IOL (d) Cataract extraction and IOL (e) Retinal Surgery + Internal Tamponade (f) Anterior vitrectomy (g) Others *Patients may have more than one combined surgery. Table : Types of Combined Surgeries,

2004 (N=138) 2005 (N=192) 2006 (N=177) 2007 (N=189) Total (N=696) Graft size, mmNo.% % % % % No data Mean SD Median Minimum Maximum Table : Recipient Cornea Trephine Size,

Table : Difference in Trephined Sizes of Recipient and Donor Corneas, (N=138) 2005 (N=192) 2006 (N=177) 2007 (N=189) Total (N=696) Difference in Graft size, mmNo.% % % % % Same size Not available Table : Suture Technique, (N=138) 2005 (N=192) 2006 (N=177) 2007 (N=189) Total (N=696) Suture TechniqueNo.% % % % % Interrupted only Continuous only Combined No data

Table 2.4.1: Stock and Flow - Graft status (whole database)

Figure : Graft Survival, Table : Graft Survival, * Interval (months)No.% successSE Outcome data were not submitted for 192 corneal transplant patients in year , while outcome data at 1 year for 172 corneal transplant patients with notification in year 2007 is still on going

Figure : Graft Survival by Optical and Non-optical Indication, Table : Graft Survival by Optical and Non-optical Indication, OpticalNon-Optical Interval (months)No.% successSENo.% successSE Outcome data were not submitted for 192 corneal transplant patients in year , while outcome data at 1 year for 172 corneal transplant patients with notification in year 2007 is still on going

Figure Graft Success by Gender, Table Graft Success by Gender, MaleFemale Interval (months)No.% successSENo.% successSE Outcome data were not submitted for 192 corneal transplant patients in year , while outcome data at 1 year for 172 corneal transplant patients with notification in year 2007 is still on going.

Table Graft Survival by Age, Interval (months)No.% successSENo.% successSE ≥40 Interval (months)No.% successSENo.% successSE Outcome data were not submitted for 192 corneal transplant patients in year , while outcome data at 1 year for 172 corneal transplant patients with notification in year 2007 is still on going. Figure Graft Survival by Age,

Table : Causes of Graft Failure Total (N=94) No.% Graft Failure9425 Cause of Failure Primary graft failure or Primary Endothelial decompensation1617 Recurrence of primary disease66 Late Endothelial decompensation1920 Glaucoma1314 Infection1819 Graft rejection2223 Others2527 No data89 *Each Patient may have more than one cause of graft failure. 56 patients have 1 cause 28 patients have 2 causes 1 patient has 3 causes 1 patient has 4 causes

Table : Availability of Data on Post Corneal Transplant Unaided Vision Unaided Vision (N =742) No.% Data available Lost to follow up No data Table Unaided Visual Outcome After Cornea Transplant Surgery Reason for graft Optical (228) Non-optical (98) n%n% Vision better Vision same Vision worse Not known* * Either pre op vision and/or post op vision is not available Figure Unaided Visual Outcome After Corneal Transplant Surgery

Table Unaided Vision for Optical and Non Optical Cases Optical Non Optical VisionGraft Survival (192) Graft Failure (36) Graft Survival (58) Graft Failure (40) n%n%n%n% 6/18 or Better /24 – 6/ Less than 6/ Data not available Figure Cumulative Probability for Unaided Vision in Grafts

Table 2.5.1: Post Transplant Complications One year outcome (N=275) 2 nd year outcome (N=72) 3 rd year outcome (N=26) 4 th year outcome (N=5) Total (N=378) No.% % % % % Any complications Complication Epithelial Problem Wound Dehiscence Suture infiltration / abscess Endophthalmitis Microbial keratitis Vascularisation Post-keratoplasty glaucoma Graft Rejection No data * Each patient may have more than one complication Table 2.5.2: Post Transplant Graft Rejection Types One year outcome (N=275) 2 nd year outcome (N=72) 3 rd year outcome (N=26) 4 th year outcome (N=5) Total (N = 378) No.% % % % % Graft Rejection Types Epithelial Stromal Endothelial No data * Each patient may have more than one type of rejection