What Became of Global, Mandatory, Fair Use (GMFU)? A Case Study in ‘Dysfunctional Pluralism.’ Lionel Bently (University of Cambridge)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
WIPO Information Session on Limitations and Exceptions Geneva, 3 and 4 November, 2008.
Advertisements

“European Copyright Reform” – BLACA/IPI Seminar 14th October 2009 The Three-Step Test – a Potentially Harmonising Formula? Jonathan Griffiths Senior Lecturer,
Fair Use in Copyright Fiorello Klein.
The New Israeli Copyright Act A Case-Study in Reverse Comparative Law.
Copyright in Saudi Arabia Royal Decree M/11 - Copyright protection to works first published in Saudi Arabia or whose author is a Saudi Arabian national.
University of Maastricht January 17, 2014 Phasing Out Copyright Prof. Martin Senftleben VU University Amsterdam Bird & Bird, The Hague.
Interface between patent and sui generis systems of protection of plant varieties The 1978 UPOV Act does not allow both systems to be applied to the same.
“Infopaq and the common standard of originality in Europe” Professor Lionel Bently, University of Cambridge Dr Justine Pila, University of Oxford Dr Nick.
Dr Estelle Derclaye, Associate Professor and Reader in Intellectual Property Law, University of Nottingham IPI/BLACA seminar, 21/10/2009.
The Future of Copyright Limitations Institute for Information Law University of Amsterdam Bernt Hugenholtz.
WIPO African Sub-Regional Workshop on Developing National Strategies and Polices: New Perspectives on Copyright Compulsory licencing – An idea whose time.
Review of EU Copyright Riga, 26 March 2015 The Three-Step Test Tragedy Prof. Dr. Martin Senftleben VU University Amsterdam Bird & Bird, The Hague.
Intellectual Property Department, Hong Kong SAR Government1 WIPO Regional Symposium 16 March 2004 Copyright Issues for Educational Institutions and Libraries.
Exception to rules on free trade Need to strike a balance between free trade and other values. Member can justify measures incompatible with WTO Agreements.
Seminar IP and Creative SMEs WIPO, May 26, 2010 IP reforms: a need for horizontal fair use? Prof. Dr. Martin Senftleben VU University Amsterdam Bird &
EBS Law Term 2013 Intellectual Property Law Copyright Law: Introduction Prof. Martin Senftleben VU University Amsterdam Bird & Bird, The Hague.
© Olav Torvund - NORWEGIAN RESEARCH CENTER FOR COMPUTERS AND LAW UNIVERSITY OF OSLO Intellectual property Overview of International Instruments.
WIPO Copyright Sector 1.  Fundamental or constitutional rights or public interest: freedom of speech, access to information, right for education, enjoyment.
Importance of Intellectual Property Central issue in multilateral trade relations –Need for organization to see that there are intellectual property procedures.
National Conference on Limitations and Exceptions to Copyright Law Sponsored by Ministry of Human Resources Development Department of Higher Education.
The Development of Copyright within the European Union By Harald von Hielmcrone Head of Research, State and University Library of Aarhus. Danish representative.
P2P file-sharing and collective management Séverine Dusollier University of Namur CRID.
Devils in the detail: term extension and temporary reproductions Anne Flahvin.
WIPO Regional Symposium on Copyright in Educational Institutions and Libraries in the Digital Era Hong Kong, March 15-16, 2004.
Copyright law and its Nexus with Education: A Critique Manasa Reddy Gummi.
Chinese Foreign Trade Law Jiaxiang Hu Professor of Law, School of Law, SJTU.
1 Wizards of OS 3 The Future of the Digital Commons Berlin - June 10 to 12, 2004 International Copyright in the Digital Era Geidy Lung WIPO Copyright Law.
Durban, South Africa January 29 to 31, 2013 Topic 17: Research and Regulatory Review Exception Regional Seminar for Certain African Countries on the Implementation.
© 2008 International Intellectual Property June 24, 2009 Class 8 Patents: Multilateral Agreements (WTO TRIPS); Global Problem of Patent Protection for.
© A. Kur IP in Transition – Proposals for Amendment of TRIPS Annette Kur, MPI Munich.
UNCTAD/CD-TFT 1 Basic Features of the Multilateral Systems of Patents and Regulatory Test Data Development Dimensions of Intellectual Property Rights Hanoi.
© Olav Torvund - NORWEGIAN RESEARCH CENTER FOR COMPUTERS AND LAW UNIVERSITY OF OSLO Intellectual property Overview of International Instruments.
A: Copy –Rights – Artistic, Literary work, Computer software Etc. B: Related Rights – Performers, Phonogram Producers, Broadcasters etc. C: Industrial.
Copyright Limitations and Exceptions in International Treaties and Beyond: Developing Countries and Access to Knowledge Geidy Lung, WIPO Copyright Law.
American University Washington, 10 June 2014 Marrakesh Treaty – Ceiling or Window to Open Sky? Prof. Dr. Martin Senftleben VU University Amsterdam Bird.
Agreement on TRIPS TRIPS Agreement  When the WTO was established, it led to 18 specific agreements to which all members need to adhere. Members necessarily.
Press clipping and other information services: Legal analysis and perspectives By Loreto Corredoira y Alfonso Professor Universidad Complutense de Madrid.
Reform(aliz)ing Copyright BCLT, April 18-19, 2013 Three Steps Towards Formalities Prof. Martin Senftleben VU University Amsterdam Bird & Bird, The Hague.
Copyright protection for tests (Panel session: ”Copyright: how can we balance the needs of authors, publishers, users, researchers and clients”) by Dr.
Copyright and the Freedom of Accessing Information in the Cyberspace András Szinger András Szinger copyright expert ARTISJUS, Hungary.
Collective Management: The Role of RROs and IFRRO Presenter name and job title Date Venue, country.
COMPULSORY LICENSING UNDER THE INDIAN COPYRIGHT ACT T.G.Agitha.
PATENTS, INTEGRATED CIRCUITS, AND INDUSTRIAL DESIGNS Presented By: Navdeep World Trade Organization.
Abner Pérez, MA. Young Scholar’s Workshop, September 2015 University of Music and Performing Arts, Vienna Compulsory licensing in the recording industry:
AU Washington, PIJIP 12 September 2012 Fair Use and Fair Dealing: A European Perspective Prof. Dr. Martin Senftleben VU University Amsterdam Bird & Bird,
Intellectual Property and Public Policy: Application of Flexibilities in the International IP and Trade system --Limitation and Exceptions for Education.
International Intellectual Property Prof. Manheim Spring, 2007 Exclusive Rights & Exceptions Copyright © 2007.
WORKSHOP ON COPYRIGHT – COLLECTIVE MANAGEMENT INT MARKT IND/EXP organized in co-operation with the Ministry of Culture of the former Yugoslav Republic.
Copyright Protection Copyright Protection aims at: Providing incentives for creativity by granting authors a number of exclusive rights Providing incentives.
Copyright Vs Patent Software authors lost their rights Benjamin Henrion Knowright2008 Krakow, 19 September 2008.
Overview of presentation
Exception to rules on free trade
Collective Management of press clippings in Spain
Prof. Dr. Martin Senftleben VU University Amsterdam
Legal aspects of copying audiovisual work onto portable media devices
IP Protection under the WTO
Prof. Martin Senftleben Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam
INTRODUCTION INTO PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW OF THE EUROPEAN UNION
Sub-Regional Meeting for ASEAN Countries on the Marrakesh Treaty and the Production and Exchange of Accessible Books by the World Intellectual Property.
ECOWAS/ENDA/QUNO Dialogue SALY(DAKAR) Senegal May
Vasiliki Samartzi, Queen Mary, University of London
Copyright law 101 Nicole Finkbeiner
Documentaries, UPF, 19 April 2018
INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY RIGHTS (IPR) IN FP7
Christoph Spennemann, Legal Expert
ACCESS TO PROTECTED WORKS: LIMITS OF PERMITTED USE
International Copyright Legal Framework
EBS Law Term 2016 Intellectual Property Law Fields and Principles
EUROPEAN UNION CITIZENSHIP
Comparative L&Es in Copyright Singapore, 22 July Copyright L&Es Treaty
Presentation transcript:

What Became of Global, Mandatory, Fair Use (GMFU)? A Case Study in ‘Dysfunctional Pluralism.’ Lionel Bently (University of Cambridge)

What is GMFU? Berne Convention, Art 10(1 ) Article 10 Certain Free Uses of Works: (1) It shall be permissible to make quotations from a work which has already been lawfully made available to the public, provided that their making is compatible with fair practice, and their extent does not exceed that justified by the purpose, including quotations from newspaper articles and periodicals in the form of press summaries.

Why Art 10 is GMFU (i) Global (181 MS) (ii) Mandatory “It shall be permissible…” (iii) Fair Proportionality/Fair Practice Made Available/Attribution (iv) Use: Meaning of Quotation Not Limited by Purpose Ordinary use – broad.

2. What Became of GMFU? Glocalisation/‘Dysfunctional Pluralism’? Members added conditions eg (i) purpose (“criticism or review” - UK) (ii) short (France) (iii) without modification (Painer, [AG]) (iv) incorporation into another work (Spain) (v) comment/referencing back (Painer, [AG]) (vi) remuneration (Spain)

3. Discursive and Institutional Facilitation of Dysfunctional Pluralism 1. Presented as “optional” not mandatory: eg EU ISD 2. Assumed subject to 3-step test 3. Dominance of textual/print conception 4. Absence of Enforcement mechanism and/or nation state with interest to enforce

How? (1) ‘Optional’ Cf. Art 5(3)(d) of Info Soc Directive (MS “may provide”) Ficsor/von Lewinski: does not fit well with nature of Berne (minimum standards, connecting factors) For Berne works. Cf. neighbouring rights

Better View: ‘Mandatory’ Language: “it shall be permissible” Commentators: Ricketson & Ginsburg; Hugenholtz & Goldstein; Grosse Ruse-Khan & Kur; Xalabarder; Senftleben Travaux: the UK proposed at the meeting of Government experts to make option, and the proposal was rejected (1965)

How? (2) The Obsession with the Three Step Test TRIPs, Art 13 ‘’ Members shall confine limitations or exceptions to exclusive rights to certain special cases which do not conflict with a normal exploitation of the work and do not unreasonably prejudice the legitimate interests of the right holder’’ BUT TRIPs, Article 9(1) ‘’Members shall comply with Articles 1 through 21 of the Berne Convention (1971) and the Appendix thereto. ‘’ TRIPs, Art 2(2) ‘’ Nothing in Parts I to IV of this Agreement shall derogate from existing obligations that Members may have to each other under the Paris Convention, the Berne Convention, the Rome Convention and the Treaty on Intellectual Property in Respect of Integrated Circuits.’’

How? (3) The Dominance of Textual/Print Thinking Import assumptions from typical quotation in literary sphere But ordinary meaning in context – Berne applicable to music, art and film too Here ordinary use of term quotation covers: use of whole; transformative uses; uses without explicit critical commentary.

Ordinary Use in Art History

Commentaries Michael Fried calls Déjeuner “perhaps the most notorious instance of quotation from the Old Masters in Manet’s oeuvre.” (150) Fried explains “the three foregrounded figures in Manet’s painting are a direct quotation from Marcantonio Raimondi’s engraving.” Beatrice Farwell, answering her question “Why did he [Manet] need Raphael” explains that in doing so Manet was invoking the ideal, and that it “is this and not ‘weakness of imagination’ that lay behind Manet’s quotations of the old masters.“ Likewise, CUNY Professor of Art History, Carol Armstrong, calls it “perhaps the most concentrated exercise in eclectic quotation since The Old Musician of 1860.”

How? (4) Institutional Context No enforcement mechanism until WTO. Who would bring action to complain about national law?

4. Conclusion: Restoring GMFU 1.Time is right to reverse ‘dysfunctional pluralism.’ 2.Need for more ‘breathing space.’ 3.Towards a global conception of ‘fairness’ 4.GMFU not as broad as US fair use