Doc.: IEEE 802.15-06/0076r0 Submission Jan 2006 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio PlcSlide 1 Coexistence TAG Liaison Report Notice: This document has been.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /xxxxr0 Submission July 2006 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio PlcSlide 1 Discussion of Definitions in 0023r2 Notice: This document.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0004r0 Submission Jan 2006 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio PlcSlide 1 Coexistence issue in VoIP in the presence of
Doc.: IEEE /0024r0 Submission May 2006 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Discussion of Coexistence Scenarios Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0036r0 Submission Sept 2005 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio PlcSlide 1 Matthew Sherman’s Comments to P&P Notice: This document.
Coexistence Motions for LB84 Comment Resolution
LB84 General AdHoc Group Sept. Closing TGn Motions
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
March 2013 Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2013
IEEE White Space Radio Contribution Title
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Waveform Generator Source Code
Date: Authors: January 2005
March 2014 Election Results
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: July 2007 Month Year
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
3GPP liaison report May 2006 May 2006 Date: Authors:
November Opening Report
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
3GPP liaison report July 2006
[place presentation subject title text here]
(Presentation name) For (Name of group) (Presenter’s name,title)
TGp Motions Date: Authors: November 2005 Month Year
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: March 2006 Month Year
On Coexistence Mechanisms
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
TGp Closing Report Date: Authors: May 2007 Month Year
Decision on SG Formation
November Opening Report
On Coexistence Mechanisms
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
TGv Redline D0.07 Insert and Deletion
TGv Redline D0.06 Insert and Deletion
Experimental DTV Sensor
July 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: July 2012
TGu Closing Report Date: Authors: September 2005
IEEE WG Opening Report – July 2008
Joint Wireless Groups Architecture AdHoc
IEEE P Wireless RANs Date:
Spectrum Sensing Tiger Team
TGu-changes-from-d0-01-to-d0-02
Decision on SG Formation
September Opening Report
Joint Wireless Groups Architecture AdHoc
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
March 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2012
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
TGv Redline D0.10 Insert and Deletion
IEEE WG Opening Report – July 2007
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Redline of draft P802.11w D2.2 Date: Authors:
November Opening Report
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
March Opening Report Date: Authors: March 2011
Liaison Report From Date: Authors: Month Year
Draft P802.11s D1.03 WordConversion
Questions to the Contention-based Protocol (CBP) Study Group
January Opening Report
Motion to go to Letter Ballot
TGu-changes-from-d0-04-to-d0-05
TGu-changes-from-d0-03-to-d0-04
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
Discussion of Coexistence Scenarios
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
TGr Proposed Draft Revision Notice
TGp Motions Date: Authors: January 2006 Month Year
May 2012 Opening Report Date: Authors: May 2012
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0076r0 Submission Jan 2006 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio PlcSlide 1 Coexistence TAG Liaison Report Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at. Date: Authors:

doc.: IEEE /0076r0 Submission Jan 2006 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio PlcSlide 2 Abstract 15 day letter ballot for PAR/5C 4a interaction Issue with (Bluetooth) and

doc.: IEEE /0076r0 Submission Jan 2006 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio PlcSlide 3 PAR Description This Recommended Practice describes methods for assessing coexistence of wireless networks. The document defines recommended coexistence metrics and methods of computing these coexistence metrics. The focus of the document is on IEEE 802 wireless networks, though the methods developed here may be applicable in other places. Industry continues to develop new standards and specifications for wireless networks which operate in frequency bands shared with other wireless networks. In IEEE 802 alone there are multiple working groups that develop standards that operate in frequency bands shared by other wireless networks. The working groups in 802 that develop such standards include: , , , and The wireless networks to be considered in this project operate in a shared frequency band, however, that does not prevent the project from considering out-of-band interference. There is a need for recommended methods for evaluating how well these wireless networks coexist. The purpose of this project is to define recommended methods for objectively assessing the coexistence of these wireless networks.

doc.: IEEE /0076r0 Submission Jan 2006 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio PlcSlide 4 Reason for the Proposed Project The IEEE 802 executive committee has adopted a rule that new wireless standards for unlicensed wireless networks must assess the coexistence of the proposed standard with existing standards. If industry develops standards for wireless networks operating in shared frequency bands without having recommended methods for assessing how well these wireless networks coexist, that will have a negative impact on the industry. One of the benefits of this document is to provide standardized means to predict how well wireless networks will coexist. The prediction of coexistence will guide the standards development engineers to develop improved wireless standards. The stakeholders include, but are not limited to, wireless standards development organizations, such as IEEE 802.

doc.: IEEE /0076r0 Submission Jan 2006 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio PlcSlide 5 Interaction with a Good discussion See 15.4a report for details

doc.: IEEE /0076r0 Submission Jan 2006 Tom Siep, Cambridge Silicon Radio PlcSlide 6 Attributes of the Problem between Bluetooth / : –Needs a level of QoS to maintain a VoIP connection with an acceptable level of service –Uses a random, logarithmically increasing back-off in the presence of interference –May use all of the 2.4 GHz band –Generally may not be aware of – does not care, nor is effected by