FpML Collateral Working Group Copyright © 2010 International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. OCTOBER 2010 – SLIDE 1 Karel Engelen, ISDA Lyteck.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
April 12, SLIDE 1 Copyright © 2011 International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. FpML Reporting WG FpML Representation for Public Price.
Advertisements

February 7, SLIDE 1 Copyright © 2011 International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. FpML Reporting WG FpML Reporting Working Group ® ISDA.
FpML Collateral Working Group Copyright © 2010 International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. OCTOBER 2010 – SLIDE Q1 Phase I Processes Margin.
Interactive Financial eXchange XML Usage in Financial Services Mark Tiggas President, Interactive Financial eXchange Open Applications.
AFACT eCOO WG interim meeting - Conference Call 1st March of 2011 Mahmood Zargar eCOO Experiences and Standards.
State of Indiana Business One Stop (BOS) Program Roadmap Updated June 6, 2013 RFI ATTACHMENT D.
Quality Label and Certification Processes Vienna Summit 11 April 2014 Karima Bourquard Director of Interoperability IHE-Europe.
ACSDA General Assembly Panel 2 – Collateral Management Brett Lancaster Thursday 24 March, 2011 v05.
FX Prime Brokerage: Risks and Challenges
DTCC Deriv/SERV ACSDA Leadership Forum Michael Velleca, Vice President, Deriv/Serv October 8, 2007.
1 April 2010 TX SET Timeline Project Conceptualization 11 weeks Market Requirements 12 weeks ERCOT Requirements 12 weeks Conceptual Design 6 weeks Detail.
W3C XML Query Language Working Group Mark Needleman Data Research Associates ZIG Current Awareness Session July 13, 2000.
Introduction to ebXML Mike Rawlins ebXML Requirements Team Project Leader.
Enterprise IT Decision Making
EbXML Overview Dick Raman CEO - TIE Holding NV Chairman CEN/ISSS eBES Vice Chair EEMA and HoD in UN/CEFACT Former ebXML Steering Group.
© L.A.C.E. Research Group, 2003 University of Cadiz Eudoxos Project Teaching Science with a Robotic Telescope EVALUATION OF THE EUDOXOS PROJECT The evaluation.
EHR Integration – Project Charter slide 1 Goals  Support specification of the already started service specification within HL7 RCRIM –going to ballot.
XML Developers 99—FpML: Initial Design Tradeoffs © 1999 Fragment Art & Research, Inc.—New York 1 Axel Fragment Art & Research, Inc.
CEN WS/BII2 1 Spreading interoperability in eProcurement processes across Europe Open Seminar Brussels December 6, 2012.
Session 21-2 Session 11 Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) & Commonline: Dispel the Myths.
Copyright © 2004 by The Web Services Interoperability Organization (WS-I). All Rights Reserved 1 Interoperability: Ensuring the Success of Web Services.
Mdnsext BoF Chairs: Tim Chown, Thomas Narten IETF85 Atlanta 6 th November, 2012.
State HIE Cooperative Agreement Program: Michigan’s Response Beth Nagel, HIT Coordinator Michigan Department of Community Health October 15,
+ OTC Derivative Clearing Summary Making Great Ideas Become Reality”
© 2013 IBM Corporation OSLC WG Transition **DRAFT** Plan 8 April 2013 Open Services for Lifecycle Collaboration Lifecycle integration inspired by the web.
Welcome to the February 2000 Accredited Standards Committee X12 General Session.
2/06/00X-ZIG 26/04/2000 OIC XML SPECIAL INTEREST GROUP(XZIG) PROGRAM SPONSOR
Page 1 | Proprietary and Copyrighted Information NOCLAR Caroline Gardner, Task Force Chair IESBA Meeting New York April 13-15, 2015.
1 Agenda What is XML? XML Jargon Why XML? Why Now? Advantages Disadvantages of XML What is FIX? What is FIXML? What other standards are available? How.
Common Record Paving the Way for Electronic Standards in Higher Education Common Record – COD Common Record – CommonLine Common Record – ISIR Collaboration.
Data Interchange Focus Group Update for OBF SAG Venkates Swaminathan (Swami) November 17, 2003 OBF#84 Vancouver, B.C.
CERN openlab Phase 5 Preparation (Technical) Alberto Di Meglio CERN openlab CTO office.
GGF - © Birds of a Feather - Policy Architecture Working Group.
XML Interoperability & Convergence ISO XML Working Group (WG 10) XML on Wall Street November 20th, 2001 John Goeller.
CEN WS/BII Business interoperability interfaces for public procurement in Europe The path towards more efficient procurement in Europe through standards.
January 31, SLIDE 1 Copyright © 2011 International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. FpML Reporting WG FpML Reporting Working Group ® ISDA.
Brussels, January 16th, Overview and status of the project.
Open Container Initiative Certification Program
Implementation Review Team Meeting
CIM Modeling for E&U - (Short Version)
New transparency guidelines
An Introduction to the Standards
“Everyone can access”.
Payment and Settlement Systems in India - Recent Major Developments
TRANSFORMING OUR WORLD: THE 2030 AGENDA FOR SUSTAINABLE DEVELOPMENT
Regional preparatory process for Rio+20
44th Meeting of the Standing Committee Bonn, Germany, October 2015 Report on activities of the Strategic Plan Working Group Ines Verleye,
Blockchain initiatives
MedBiquitous Standards Implementation Workshop
Review of Professional Standards A National Conversation
Student Assignment Review Advisory Committee
Strategic & Operational Planning:
EDI and Evolution Jim Taylor, X12 Board Chair May 16, 2018.
Revision 1 to Document CWG-SFP-2/7-E 12 September 2017 Original: English Process and timetable for The elaboration of the ITU STRATEGIC and financial.
Information Interchange based on XML
IFX Forum Overview September 28, 2015 © Copyright IFX Forum, Inc
Exchange Network Past, Present, and Future
Session 11 Common Origination and Disbursement (COD) & Commonline: Dispel the Myths Session 21-
Service Oriented Architecture (SOA)
Interoperability and standards for statistical data exchange
Coordinate Operations Standard
Engagement on the Comprehensive Funding Agreement
DRIVER+ Overview EXTERNAL COOPERATION IN DRIVER+
FIX Membership Value Proposition for Industry Associations
Learning Management System (LMS) Alignment Meeting April 02, 2019
Agenda Purpose for Project Goals & Objectives Project Process & Status Common Themes Outcomes & Deliverables Next steps.
Scene setter European Commission DG Environment
Project leader: Richard Morton Lead Editor: Jalal Benhayoun
4th Meeting of the Expert Group on the Integration of Statistical and Geospatial Information (UN EG-ISGI) – Nov 2017 Summary of progress Martin Brady,
Alive and Well October 17, 2019 Westborough, MA Andrew Fitzpatrick.
Presentation transcript:

FpML Collateral Working Group Copyright © 2010 International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. OCTOBER 2010 – SLIDE 1 Karel Engelen, ISDA Lyteck Lynhiavu, ISDA Richard Barton, Algorithmics/Chair, FpML Collateral WG Scalable Collateral Management Using ISDA’s FpML Open Standard FpML - Financial products Markup Language

FpML Collateral Working Group Copyright © 2010 International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. OCTOBER 2010 – SLIDE 2 FpML makes your data portable What is FpML? An open electronic standard, based on XML, freely-licensed, sponsored by ISDA Provides a standard for communicating within & between firms about OTC derivatives Provides flexible representation of OTC transactions and business processes –including collateral management– enables automation and reduces costs

FpML Collateral Working Group Copyright © 2010 International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. OCTOBER 2010 – SLIDE 3 Proposal to use FpML as a universal data exchange format for collateral management – the standard is vendor-neutral – enables true interoperability Benefits of using FpML – Open standard defined by the OTC industry – Collective design FpML Collateral WG has been meeting weekly since January 60+ participants, 37 firms represented – Provides flexible framework for future requirements – Basis for company wide systems integration, process automation, and interoperability. FpML covers collateral and more

FpML Collateral Working Group Copyright © 2010 International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. OCTOBER 2010 – SLIDE 4 Open standard gives you choice Proprietary messaging format locks you and limits you to a particular vendor/application/service/network – You can’t communicate with partners that do not use the same service (limited network) – You haven’t solved your data translation problems internally FpML open standard gives you choice and control – Choice of vendors, services, partners (vendor and platform neutral) – Control over your data (audit, reporting, long term availability) – Streamlines business processes, increases automation – Enables interoperability with external systems without data conversion – Benefit from an evolving standard developed by peers – Extend the standard to meet your internal needs

FpML Collateral Working Group Copyright © 2010 International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. OCTOBER 2010 – SLIDE Q1 Phase I Processes Margin Call (completed) Substitution (completed) Interest (completed) Phase II (TBD) Portfolio Reconciliation Dispute Resolution Settlement (?) FpML 5.1 (First draft)FpML 5.1 REC Margin call development + reusable collateral building blocks Fed Commitment Letter March 1 Jan Feb March FpML 5.1 deliverables Kick-off Full set of collateral messages in FpML 5.1 Final version on schedule for December 2010 Draft available now for review & implementation Collaborative design, industry-driven Weekly meetings (since January) Open forum, transparent decisions (all communications, minutes available online) Full set of collateral messages in FpML 5.1 Final version on schedule for December 2010 Draft available now for review & implementation Collaborative design, industry-driven Weekly meetings (since January) Open forum, transparent decisions (all communications, minutes available online) April May JuneJuly Aug SeptOct Nov Dec Q2Q3Q4 1 st Working Draft Last CallTrial Recommendation RECOMMENDATION ISDA electronic messaging Nov 09 2 nd Working Draft Collateral Mgmt Roadmap April 15 Substitution Interest FpML Collateral Roadmap …

FpML Collateral Working Group Copyright © 2010 International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. OCTOBER 2010 – SLIDE 6 FpML Standards Process The ISDA electronic messaging document is a set of detailed business requirements that have gone through a standards process that includes extensive analysis, committee review and standard reviews to ensure it fits within the overall FpML structure and answers industry needs. Open Extensive analysis Broad industry input, real world scenarios Scrutiny Implementation (leverages 5 th Gen. framework) Group review  Testing Feedback  Refinements  Agreement Quality Technical reviews Public reviews (working drafts) New messages validated for industry use New industry requirements e.g., Collateral messaging

FpML Collateral Working Group Copyright © 2010 International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. OCTOBER 2010 – SLIDE 7 FpML vs ISO vs original data reqs Open forum (all s, minutes, decisions are publicly available online / the only open forum) Vendor neutral (only a vendor-neutral standard can enable true interoperability) Broad industry participation (60+ participants, 37 firms represented) Evolved from the ISDA requirements the messages evolved from the original requirements based on the input from the group to support greater scalability from the perspective of agreement types supported or the margining scenarios supported i.e. – support for segregated independent amounts, – gross vs net exposure treatment – full disclosure to expedite dispute identification – It also recognized where requirements had evolved i.e. dispute resolution piece and segregated independent amounts. Reusable components built upon FpML’s inherent building block design – The substitution messages could be designed in one session. The interest messages only took 2-3 sessions thanks to the work put into designing reusable components during the development of the Margin Call messages (6 months of weekly meetings) Benefits from FpML’s broad reach in the OTC derivatives space – Portfolio Reconciliation (already available in FpML 4.4) – CCP (LCH, CME, ICE actively participate in the development FpML, chair the FX WG, contribute proposals to BPWG, collateral WG, are on the FpML Standards Committee) – Collateral industry will need a standard that can reach across the collateral process (Collateral Margin Call + Subst. + Interest + Portfolio Rec + CCP) long term working towards a common business model with both FpML and ISO compliant syntax

FpML Collateral Working Group Copyright © 2010 International Swaps and Derivatives Association, Inc. OCTOBER 2010 – SLIDE 8 Collateral Industry Challenges and solution Margin Call Substitution Interest Port Rec Clearing FpML Inter- operability FpML data exchange standard provides existing functionality that spans across key collateral activities - an open, extensible, and rich framework that can be freely used as a common language internally and between trading partners - an inherent way to interconnect disparate processes together, enable interoperability and meet regulatory demands