Transnational Working & Reporting Procedures What project promoters cannot ignore about INTERREG IVB NWE project monitoring.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Introduction of participants / project ideas (PI) Presentation: What makes a good partnership? Presentation: Which projects is NWE looking for? Speed dating.
Advertisements

Green Partnerships Local Partnerships for Greener Cities and Regions Project overview Kick-off meeting Crete, 9-10 April 2013.
The INTERREG IVB NWE Programme: an overview. NWE Eligible Area Ireland UK Belgium Luxembourg Switzerland* Parts of France Germany Netherlands.
S3 Project aim The main goal, thus expected result, of the S3 project would be to strengthen tools used for Structural Fund policies (SF), through the.
Financing possibilities for implementation of the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region: different solutions INTERACT Point Turku 14 October.
How to make a Progress Report Activity Reporting Lead partner and partner seminar Voss, Norway June 2008 Maxi Nachtigall.
2 nd Steering Committee Meeting October 2008, Athens and Aegina.
Activity Reporting Lead Partner and Partner Seminar 16 June 2009 – Laukaa, Finland Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
Project Implementation Monika Balode Joint Technical Secretariat Lead Partner Seminar 16 October 2009, Šiauliai.
Regional Dimension of the 7th Framework Programme Regions of Knowledge 2008 Calls Camelia DOGARU (DG RTD- B.4)
Application Form Part 1, Sections 4-9 How to Apply Seminar 16 th September 2010 – Copenhagen Kirsti Mijnhijmer.
NPP concepts and communications Kirsti Mijnhijmer 21 August 2008 – Copenhagen, Denmark European Union European Regional Development Fund.
APPLICATION FORM OF ROBINWOOD SUBPROJECT SECOND STEP 1. The short listed Local Beneficiaries work together to create international partnerships and prepare.
RTD-B.4 - Regions of Knowledge and Research Potential Regional Dimension of the 7th Framework Programme Regions of Knowledge Objectives and Activities.
Commissioning Self Analysis and Planning Exercise activity sheets.
Workshop II Monitoring and Evaluation INTERACT ENPI Annual Conference December 2009 | Rome.
Strategic Priorities of the NWE INTERREG IVB Programme Harry Knottley, UK representative in the International Working Party Lille, 5th March 2007.
Project Communication Kirsti Mijnhijmer & Christopher Parker 23 February 2010 – Copenhagen, Denmark European Union European Regional Development Fund.
1 Key elements of a good project ECVET contact seminar October 2010 Brussels LEONARDO DA VINCI.
Result Orientation in Interreg CENTRAL EUROPE Annual Meeting, Luxemburg, 15 September 2015 Monika Schönerklee-Grasser, Joint Secretariat.
Project preparation workshop “Bringing a transnational project to life” Project idea “Challenges and chances from Climate Change for regional and local.
Developing Transnational Project Indicators. The purpose of indicators > Indicators are useful tools that allow programme and project managers to monitor:
ESPON 2013 Programme Info Day on Calls and Partner Café Call for Proposals on Targeted Analysis A Decade of Territorial Evidence.
Guidelines for LDS preparation for Croatian LAG’s Estonian Leader Union Kadri Tillemann and Kristiina Timmo 28 th of September, Zagreb.
EUROPEAN REGIONAL DEVELOPMENT FUND Stakeholder Workshop Brussels – 5 February 2014 INTERREG EUROPE Nicolas Singer | Senior Project Officer INTERREG IVC.
Action 12:Internal Monitoring BMW Regional Assembly.
"The challenge for Territorial Cohesion 2014 – 2020: delivering results for EU citizens" Veronica Gaffey Acting Director EUROPEAN COMMISSION, DG for Regional.
Interreg IIIB Trans-national cooperation: Budget comparison : 440 million EURO 420 m EURO (Interreg IIC prog.) + 20 m EURO (Pilot Actions)
URBACT IMPLEMENTATION NETWORKS. URBACT in a nutshell  European Territorial Cooperation programme (ETC) co- financed by ERDF  All 28 Member States as.
Transnational Working & Reporting Procedures. LP Seminar January 2013 Transnational Cooperation & Reporting Procedures I) Transnational cooperation: Definition.
Exploitation means to use and benefit from something. For Erasmus+ this means maximising the potential of the funded activities, so that the results are.
Project Development seminar Katerina Staneva Kring February 2010 | Prague.
Karelia ENPI CBC September the 6th 2011 St. Petersburg Document EG Chairs and ITAs 12/4.4/Info 1.
Project: EaP countries cooperation for promoting quality assurance in higher education Maria Stratan European Institute for Political Studies of Moldova.
Assessments ASSESSMENTS. Assessments The Rationale and Purpose for Assessments.
INFORMATION & PUBLICITY REQUIREMENTS Rachel Burn, Joint Secretariat September 29th, Akureyri, Iceland.
WP8 Project management Milan Gocić University of Niš
Dissemination and communication – wp5
Annex III to BS/SC/PDF/A(2003)1
PARTNER ACTIVITY REPORTING
Financing possibilities for implementation of the European Union Strategy for the Baltic Sea Region: different solutions INTERACT Point Turku 14.
Introduction - Final activity reporting
Communicate your project
PROJECT MONITORING What project promoters cannot ignore about INTERREG IVB NWE project monitoring.
PROJECT MANUAL Galina Georgieva Project Officer
INFORMATION & PUBLICITY REQUIREMENTS
Thematic platform 1 Competitiveness & Attractivness
PROJECT ACTIVITY REPORTING
Application Form Sections 4-9 Christopher Parker & Kirsti Mijnhijmer 28 January 2009 – Copenhagen, Denmark European Union European Regional Development.
Project Proposal Template
“CareerGuide for Schools”
Our new quality framework and methodology:
Responses were received from:
PROJECT ACTIVITY REPORTING
Application Form – Part C
FP7 SCIENTIFIC NEGOTIATIONS
The Learning Networks under the ESF
Opening seminar of the project
Helene Skikos DG Education and Culture
WP2 Communication WP and tasks presentation
PROJECT ACTIVITY REPORTING
Project Communication Niclas Forsling 21st and 22nd of September 2009 – Höfn, Iceland European Union European Regional Development Fund.
Capitalisation and Dissemination activities
Complex Challenges, Innovative Cities
NDPHS Work Plan for 2012 NDPHS 8th Partnership Annual Conference
Project intervention logic
DG Justice and Consumers
Project intervention logic
XVII PA7 Steering Group Meeting
Presentation transcript:

Transnational Working & Reporting Procedures What project promoters cannot ignore about INTERREG IVB NWE project monitoring

LP Seminar April 2012 Transnational Cooperation & Reporting Procedures I) Transnational cooperation: Definition D.D.D.I.D Principle Examples II) Monitoring: Reporting Procedures Progress Reports Indicators Practical Tips

LP Seminar April 2012 Transnational Cooperation – Definition A transnational issue is a challenge which goes beyond national borders, for which, by its very nature, a satisfactory solution cannot be found at national, regional or local level without co-operation with partners in other countries. More about transnational cooperation: Guidance Notes: no.7

LP Seminar April 2012 Transnational Cooperation – Principles D.D.D.I.D. Principle: Design, Develop, Decide, Implement & Disseminate Together = joint process of the project

LP Seminar April 2012 Transnational Cooperation – Rationale Basics: reason to cooperate key point for all planned activities described in project application form ensured during all project activities evident and clearly reported results in strengthened economic competitiveness of NWE

LP Seminar April 2012 Transnational Cooperation – Added Value Develop / implement efficient and innovative solutions for common problems that you have been experiencing for ages Achieve greater impact by combined effort (better performance as it would be by separate actions) Establish common standard / identity / product Raised each partner’s profile / improve skills and expertise

LP Seminar April 2012 Transnational Cooperation – Before you start implementing Ensure clear common vision and understanding of purpose and clear focus of all planned activities make sure before implementation of action plan starts take your time to ensure this clear roles and added value of each partner -> each partner has own contribution -> brings something special & different no passive partner (even if the financial contribution is minor)

LP Seminar April 2012 Transnational Cooperation – Working Transnationally All outputs should as much as possible be jointly produced and include common products or strategies, useable and transferable over NWE HOW…?  Regular partner meetings: whole consortium and in smaller groups  Action groups or thematic groups related to key specific actions/investments  Reviews of investments by all partners  Communication – widely disseminated results by collective, not separate, communications activities BE A CREATIVE MANAGER!!

LP Seminar April 2012 Transnational Cooperation – Working Transnationally (Examples) MANAGEMENT AND REPORTING Organise a rotating system for the chairing of meetings / hosting events etc. (LP + 1 partner in charge) ACTIONS/INVESTMENTS Twinning approach: each investment is discussed beforehand by at least two partners (meeting for several days to give relevant input by one partner to another). Specific International Steering Committee for each investment: representing different levels of governance and key stakeholders => decision on investments at cross-border level (railway bottlenecks) => new level of governance and new negotiation platform!

LP Seminar April 2012 Transnational Cooperation – Working Transnationally (Examples) COMMUNICATION Joint public campaigns in parallel in each of the partner cities to promote the project – linked with e.g. a competition (awards) Web sites: focus on the joint work and main achievements! Present not only maps and concrete figures but also joint work  DISSEMINATION AND KNOWLEDGE TRANSFER Thematic workshops including experts external to project consortium could be more efficient than big and expensive conferences

Transnationality to sum up Own piece of cake to the party? Unique ingredients by each partner and baked together? What about taste? IT HAS TO TASTE GOOD!

LP Seminar April 2012 Monitoring – definition An important task/tool that needs to be carried out/used throughout the lifetime of your project: regular analysis of the progress made by your project highlights areas for improvement in the implementation of your action plan enables delivery of high quality results This is a way to communicate about your project with the JTS!

LP Seminar April 2012 Progress Report – general issues One common report for the whole partnership In line with the Application Form (Action Plan) Twice a year (April/October) Length and level of detail (long/short version of the report) Assessment of the Progress Report through a JTS Monitoring Report Delays in delivery of the report

LP Seminar April 2012 Short Progress Report – October I.General Information (general project data, details on reporting period, summary description of the project in English) II.Progress of the project – last 6 months (e.g. main achievements, added value of working transnationally, problems encountered) III.Monitoring of QUALITATIVE indicators (e.g. strength of cooperation between partners, innovativeness, capitalisation on previous projects) IV.Date and signature of the Lead Partner

LP Seminar April 2012 Long Progress Report – April I.General Information II.Overall cumulative progress of the project III.Progress of the project – last 12 months (including reporting on WPs and investments, submission of supporting annexes) IV.Monitoring of QUANTITATIVE indicators (indicators specified in the Application Form) V.Planned activities for the next 12 months VI.Date and signature of the Lead Partner

LP Seminar April 2012 Indicators Indicator – the measurement of an effect to be obtained. 2 Progress Reports – 2 sets of indicators Qualitative (in October PR) Qualitative (in October PR) Quantitative (in April PR) Quantitative (in April PR) general Priority specific results outputs RESULTS (immediate effects) RESULTS (immediate effects) IMPACTS (long-term effects) OUTPUTS (direct outcome) INPUT ERDF general

LP Seminar April 2012 Indicators – tips Quantitative indicators Small errors can lead to big inaccuracies! Fill in only the priority specific indicators that are relevant to your project Qualitative indicators LPs are highly encouraged to discuss them with their partners to obtain the views of the whole partnership More information: see Guidance Notes (Note 14).

LP Seminar April 2012 Progress Report – templates Progress Report – short version ProgressReportShort.xls Progress Report – long version ProgressReportLong.xls More information on Reporting Procedure: see Guidance Notes (Note 18).

LP Seminar April 2012 Progress Report – tips Give an accurate picture of the project’s progress through concise and relevant information Avoid reporting on activities that have not yet taken place Report on the implementation of the project as a whole, rather than on the partners’ individual activities (use annexes!) Report on achievements (outputs) and on the added-value of transnational cooperation Avoid listing a number of unrelated activities not clearly linked to the Action Plan Draft together (it is not a compilation!) Provide the JTS with material to disseminate

LP Seminar April 2012 Questions?