IPv6 Node Information Queries Update Bob Hinden Vienna IETF.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Internet Protocol Version 6 (IPv6) What the caterpillar calls the end of the world, nature calls a butterfly. - Anonymous.
Advertisements

IAB/IESG Recommendations on IPv6 Address Allocation Bob Hinden at RIPE Sept Brian Carpenter at ARIN Oct Alain Durand at APNIC Oct
1 DNSOPS / Vienna IETF / July 2003 / Bob Hinden IPv6 DNS Discovery, and why it is important Bob Hinden.
IAB/IESG Recommendations on IPv6 Address Allocation Bob Hinden at RIPE Sept Brian Carpenter at ARIN Oct Alain Durand at APNIC Oct
資 管 Lee Lesson 13 IPv6 and Name Resolution. 資 管 Lee Lesson Objectives IPv6 name-to-address and address-to-name resolution IPv6 name resolution support.
Updates to LDP for IPv6 draft-ietf-mpls-ldp-ipv6-02 Vishwas Manral Rajiv Papneja Carlos Pignataro Rajiv Asati IETF 80 - Prague, Czech.
IPv6 WORKING GROUP (IPNGWG) March 2001 Minneapolis IETF Bob Hinden / Nokia Steve Deering / Cisco Systems Co-Chairs.
IPv6 Document Status and Action Plan Margaret Wasserman IETF56 San Francisco March 2003.
DNS based IP NetLocation Service China Telecom Guangzhou Institute
0 NAT/Firewall NSLP IETF 62th – March 2005 draft-ietf-nsis-nslp-natfw-05.txt Martin Stiemerling, Hannes Tschofenig, Cedric Aoun.
Local IPv6 Networking March 2000 Adelaide IETF Bob Hinden / Nokia.
IETF – ECRIT Emergency Context Resolution using Internet Technologies ESW 5 – Vienna October 2008 Marc Linsner.
IPv6 WORKING GROUP December 2001 Salt Lake City IETF Bob Hinden / Nokia Steve Deering / Cisco Systems Co-Chairs.
March 15, 2005 IETF #62 Minneapolis1 EAP Discovery draft-adrangi-eap-network-discovery-10.txt Farid Adrangi ( )
IPv6 WORKING GROUP July 2002 Yokohama IETF Bob Hinden / Nokia Steve Deering / Cisco Systems Margaret Wasserman / Wind River Co-Chairs.
AAA and Mobile IPv6 Franck Le AAA WG - IETF55. Why Diameter support for Mobile IPv6? Mobile IPv6 is a routing protocol and does not deal with issues related.
IPv6 WORKING GROUP March 2002 Minneapolis IETF Bob Hinden / Nokia Steve Deering / Cisco Systems Co-Chairs.
Disman – IETF 56 Alarm MIB Sharon Chisholm Dan Romascanu
1 Miscellaneous Capabilities for IP Network Infrastructure IETF 64 Vancouver, BC, Canada November 2005.
IPv6 Host to Router Load Sharing December 2001 Salt Lake City IETF Bob Hinden / Nokia.
1 Virtual Router Redundancy Protocol (VRRP) San Francisco IETF VRRP Working Group March 2003 San Francisco IETF Mukesh Gupta / Nokia Chair.
Node Information Queries July 2002 Yokohama IETF Bob Hinden / Nokia.
Multiple Interfaces (MIF) WG IETF 79, Beijing, China Margaret Wasserman Hui Deng
Guidance for Running Multiple IPv6 Prefixes (draft-liu-v6ops-running-multiple-prefixes-02) Bing Liu, Sheng Jiang (Speaker), Yang Bo IETF91
IPv6 Working Group IETF58 Minneapolis November 2003 Bob Hinden & Brian Haberman Chairs.
IPv6 Site-Local Discussion Bob Hinden & Margaret Wasserman IETF 56 San Francisco March 2003.
IPv6 WORKING GROUP (IPv6 a.k.a. IPNGWG) August 2001 London IETF Bob Hinden / Nokia Steve Deering / Cisco Systems Co-Chairs.
Status of L3 PPVPN Working Group Documents March 2005 – Minneapolis IETF Ross Callon Ron Bonica Rick Wilder.
CONEX BoF. Welcome to CONEX! Chairs: –Leslie Daigle –Philip Eardley Scribe Note well.
OSPF WG – IETF 67 OSPF WG Document Status or “You can bring a Horse to Water …” Rohit Dube/Consultant Acee Lindem/Cisco Systems.
WSON Summary Young Lee Document Relationships Information Gen-constraints Encode WSON Encode Signal Compatibility OSPF Gen-constraints.
IPv6 WORKING GROUP (IPNGWG) December 2000 San Diego IETF Bob Hinden / Nokia Steve Deering / Cisco Systems Co-Chairs.
IETF Report – July th IETF Meeting Vienna, Austria Aaron Falk, Joyce Reynolds Bob Braden.
Click to edit Master title style Click to add subtitle © 2008 Wichorus Inc. All rights reserved. CONFIDENTIAL - DO NOT DISTRIBUTE rfc3775bis Issues November.
IETF-53-IPv6 WG- Cellular host draft 1 Minimum IPv6 Functionality for a Cellular Host Jari Arkko Peter Hedman Gerben Kuijpers Hesham Soliman John Loughney.
Advisory Council Shepherds: David Farmer & Chris Grundemann Global Policy for post exhaustion IPv4 allocation mechanisms by the IANA.
MODERN BoF Managing, Ordering, Distributing, Exposing, and Registering telephone Numbers IETF 92.
IPv6 Transition/Co-existence Security Considerations draft-ietf-v6ops-security-overview-04.txt Elwyn Davies Suresh Krishnan Pekka Savola IETF-66, Montreal,
DHCP Privacy Considerations Tomek Mrugalski IETF90, Toronto IETF-90 DHC WG1.
1 Update on Candidate Address Selection for Interactive Connectivity Establishment (ICE) draft-keranen-mmusic-ice-address-selection-00 A. Keränen, J. Arkko.
IPv6 Working Group IETF55 Atlanta November URL for Thermometer
1 Link Scoped IPv6 Multicast Addresses Jung-Soo Park, Myung-Ki Shin ETRI 54th IETF – Yokohama, Japan draft-ietf-ipv6-link-scoped-mcast-01.txt.
CLUE WG IETF-85 Mary Barnes (WG co-chair) Paul Kyzivat (WG co-chair)
IPng WORKING GROUP November 1999 Washington DC IETF Bob Hinden / Nokia Steve Deering / Cisco Systems Co-Chairs.
Netconf Notifications Sharon Chisholm Hector Trevino IETF 67 November 2006.
Internet Protocol Version 6 Specifications
Multiple Care-of Address Registration
RTP SDES Header Extension
Gunter Van de Velde Kiran Kumar Chitimaneni Warren Kumari
Note Well Any submission to the IETF intended by the Contributor for publication as all or part of an IETF Internet-Draft or RFC and any statement made.
Carlos Pignataro Bruno Stevant Jean-Francois Tremblay Bill Storer
IETF57 Vienna July 2003 Bob Hinden & Margaret Wasserman Chairs
IETF 96 (MPLS WG) Abhishek Deshmukh Kireeti Kompella (presenting)
CPS 512 midterm exam #1, 10/5/17 Your name please: NetID:_______ Sign for your honor:____________________________.
CAPWAP Working Group IETF 66 Montreal
draft-ietf-geopriv-lbyr-requirements-02 status update
CONEX BoF.
IETF Working Group CSCI 344 Spring 2016 Report <Your name>
IETF 103 pim wg meeting.
IPv6 Unique Local Addresses Update on IETF Activity
GeneRic Autonomic Signaling Protocol draft-ietf-anima-grasp-08
IETF 101 London MBONED.
News from APNIC ARIN XXII 16 October 2008.
Policy SIG Thursday 26 February Manila, Philippines
IETF 103 Bangkok, Thailand - November 2018
Jeffrey Haas Reshad Rahman
TCP Maintenance and Minor Extensions (TCPM) Working Group
IETF 103 pim wg meeting.
IETF Montreal BFD YANG Data Model
draft-ietf-teas-rsvp-te-scaling-rec-08
Presentation transcript:

IPv6 Node Information Queries Update Bob Hinden Vienna IETF

Bob Hinden / VRRP Working GroupVienna IETF NEW DRAFT Goals for Draft –Resolve the issues raised by the IESG, and –Maintain comparability with current shipping code. Shipping in the KAME and USAGI distributions. Found to be very useful for deploying IPv6 service and debugging operational problems.

Bob Hinden / VRRP Working GroupVienna IETF CHANGES Moved applicability statement to start of document and update introduction. Removed Qtypes query capabilities Limit returned TTL in node name to zero and removed text describing non-zero TTLs. Remove text about A6 records Change to have all new Qtypes require IETF approval Updated security considerations

Bob Hinden / VRRP Working GroupVienna IETF LAST CALL ISSUES (1) Handling of RFC 3041 (privacy enhanced) addresses –Should Not reveal RFC3041 addresses to general Node Address query –Should Not reveal global name to Node Name query made to RFC3041 address –May respond with temporary name to Node Name query made to RFC3041 address

Bob Hinden / VRRP Working GroupVienna IETF LAST CALL ISSUES (2) Limit to responses to link-local queries –Not as default. Administrator “may want to filter” at administrative boundary. Remove IPv4 address query (Qtype=4) –Yes/No?

Bob Hinden / VRRP Working GroupVienna IETF EDITORIAL Qtype 3 A bit handling is a little bit complicated. how about moving the description to the top? (right after the first paragraph of 6.3) without understanding A bit, readers cannot understand theinterpretation of other bits. on page 3, text for NI query code 1 refers to "Supported Qtypes” which is no longer there (Qtype=1). suggestion: remove text starting from "as in....".

Bob Hinden / VRRP Working GroupVienna IETF NEXT STEPS New draft to resolve issues Resubmit to IESG for Proposed Standard?