This resource sponsored by Intel Education Copyright © 2016 K-12 Blueprint. *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
1 Common Core State Standards What they are! & How they came to be! Implications for New Jersey New Jersey State Board of Education May 4, 2011 Dorothy.
Advertisements

STATE STANDARDIZED ASSESSMENTS. 1969The National Assessment for Educational Progress (NAEP) administered for the first time, Florida participated in the.
Measuring the Common Core Standards Models for engaging postsecondary in student readiness for college and careers.
On The Road to College and Career Readiness Hamilton County ESC Instructional Services Center Christina Sherman, Consultant.
PREPARING STUDENTS FOR SUCCESS: NEW TESTS. NEW RESULTS.
What is the PARCC? PHILLIP CRISOSTOMO, PRINCIPAL ADRIAN CORA-WATERS, ASSISTANT PRINCIPAL & SCHOOL TEST COORDINATOR SHAWN MARSHALL, TESTING ADMINISTRATOR.
AzMERIT Arizona’s Statewide Achievement Assessment for English Language Arts and Mathematics November 20, 2014.
1 Presentation to USED Review Panel August 10, 2010 North Carolina Race to the Top Proposal R e d a c t e d.
Implementing Common Core State Standards in Greenville County School District Preparing Students for Success in the 21 st Century.
Making preparations in Ohio: Common Core and Ohio’s Revised Academic Content Standards New System of Assessments.
What This Means for Us Carol L. Jenkins Senior Director for Testing June 24, 2011 Carol L. Jenkins Senior Director for Testing June 24, 2011 Evaluation.
8 1Source: Development of the Next Generation Science Standards Stephen Pruitt, Ph.D., Vice President, Content and Policy Research; Science.
 Common Core State Standards (CCSS) Adopted in summer 2010  Next Milestone: How to Assess?
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction Presentation to California Teachers Association State Council.
CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION Tom Torlakson, State Superintendent of Public Instruction 2014 Assessment and Accountability Information Meeting Smarter.
CCSS-M IN MICHIGAN. Michigan K-12 Standards CCSS-M with Michigan “Welcome”
ELA Common Core State Standards Job Alike #8 Assessment.
Online Assessment Update Region 6 February 24, 2012.
POLS Conference January 17, 2013 Valley Lutheran High School Common Core State Standards: Assessing Our Progress.
Consortia of States Assessment Systems Instructional Leaders Roundtable November 18, 2010.
Ohio’s Assessment Future The Common Core & Its Impact on Student Assessment Evidence by Jim Lloyd Source doc: The Common Core and the Future of Student.
November 7,  Provisos are in annual Appropriations Bills  Proviso 1A.60 included in bill  Very prescriptive.
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) 1 California Department of Education, September 2015.
CCSS Assessments Presenter: Dr. Cindy Thomas. Session Objectives: Who developed the new CCSS assessment? What types of questions are on the math assessment?
Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools Common Core & Essential Standards Parent and Community Overview Winston-Salem/Forsyth County Schools.
Presentation by Robert L. King, CPE President SHEEO Annual Meeting, Boulder, CO July 13, 2011.
Gary W. Phillips American Institutes for Research United States Department of Education Public Hearings December 1, 2009, Denver, Colorado.
Next Generation Assessments Stakeholder Meeting June 26, 2014.
Summary of Assessments By the Big Island Team: (Sherry, Alan, John, Bess) CCSS SBAC PARCC AP CCSSO.
1 COMMON CORE STATE STANDARDS Assessments based on the Common Core State Standards Vince Dean, Ph.D. Office of Educational Assessment & Accountability.
What do families need to know? (Plainfield Central Middle School) ( )
California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress (CAASPP) 1 California Department of Education, September 2015.
SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium Technology Update State Superintendent’s Education Data Advisory Committee April 7,
29 States $176,000,000 for development Includes formative, interim & summative Governed and controlled by states Co-chairs, Judy Park, Utah; Tony Alpert,
“ Public education is open to all children - no matter their ability, heritage, or economic background. It is the promise of our future ” Denise Juneau,
Smarter Balanced Assessments Parent Information. Smarter Balanced Assessment 0 Aligned with Nevada Academic Content Standards, which were developed from.
Common Core State Standards What you need to know Cambrian School District.
The Iowa Journey toward CBE Sandra Dop, PhD, Consultant for 21 st Century Skills Iowa ASCD Conference June 27, 2013 IOWA Department of Education.
A PRESENTATION BY DR. PAUL SEVILLANO, ASSISTANT SUPERINTENDENT EDUCATION AND CYNTHIA VASQUEZ PETITT, ASSESSMENT AND EVALUATION ANALYST PRESENTED TO THE.
Technology Policy and School Staff and Faculty
Advanced Placement & PARCC Results
Overview of SB 191 Ensuring Quality Instruction through Educator Effectiveness Colorado Department of Education Updated: June 2012.
Evaluating Educationally Significant Outcomes: The Need to Balance Academic Achievement with Social-Emotional Learning Dr. Tiffany Berry Research Associate.
2016 Back-to-School Update Next-generation MCAS and updating our learning standards District Name Date, 2016.
Partnership for the Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers
Supporting a College- and Career-Ready America
Common Core State Standards
Smarter Balanced Assessment Results
State of New Jersey Department of Education
An Introduction to the “Big Picture”
Aspen Institute-Education Resource Strategies
A System of Assessments for College and Career Readiness For the Anaheim Union High School District Prepared and presented by Dr. Paul Sevillano, Assistant.
Common Core Update May 15, 2013.
PARCC Assessments Overview
Summative: Formative resources: Interim Assessments:
Shasta County Curriculum Leads November 14, 2014 Mary Tribbey Senior Assessment Fellow Interim Assessments Welcome and thank you for your interest.
Connecting OSAS Math Results to Instruction and Program Evaluation
Assessments aligned to Common Core State Standards
Smarter Balanced Assessments
The PARCC Vision PARCC states have committed to building a K-12 assessment system that:
Common Core State Standards May 2011
The Partnership for Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers
Dr. Timothy Vansickle, QAI
The Assessment Consortia An Overview of the Designs of PARCC
Presentation transcript:

This resource sponsored by Intel Education Copyright © 2016 K-12 Blueprint. *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others Four Pathways to Implementing Online Assessment in the U.S.

Background Copyright © 2016 K-12 Blueprint. *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others American Recovery and Reinvestment Act provided $350 million in assessment funding In February 2010, six state consortia existed, with most states involved in more than one Ultimately, two consortia competed for the bulk of the funding, the SMARTER Balanced Assessment Consortium and the Partnership for the Assessment of Readiness for College and Careers (PARCC) Both planned to administer computer-based tests, but only SMARTER Balanced group would use “computer adaptive” technology

SETDA Case Studies Copyright © 2016 K-12 Blueprint. *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others ●In the school year approximately 40 states used new online student assessments from PARCC and Smarter Balanced ●The State Educational Technology Directors Association (SETDA) sought to prepare states for the rollout of online assessments ●SETDA provided case studies that chronicle the experience four states have had implementing online assessments – Delaware, Idaho, North Carolina and Virginia

Delaware Copyright © 2016 K-12 Blueprint. *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others Began testing online in 2010 State faced a contract expiration with Delaware Student Testing Program (DSTP) DSTP was paper-and-pencil based, returned summative data annually, typically several months after students completed exams A taskforce of teachers, administrators, lawmakers, business leaders and Department of Education personnel identified two priorities: immediate scoring, and the ability to track data over time The Assessment Task Force’s priorities led to the recommendation for a shift to online assessment

North Carolina Copyright © 2016 K-12 Blueprint. *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others Launched statewide online summative assessments in 2012 One of the first states to provide no cost scalable Internet access to all public schools statewide Saw benefits of new online assessments Universal design Increased accessibility One-item per test page Large font Virtual highlighter, calculator Computer reads test aloud – student controlled accommodation Technology-enhanced/interactive items

Idaho Copyright © 2016 K-12 Blueprint. *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others Launched statewide online summative assessments in 2003 Move to full online assessment followed the recommendation of a ten-member committee made up of business leaders and educators The committee held meetings across the state to hear what constituents wanted from statewide assessments Faced communication challenges during rollout of the initial online system; communication from various departments were not always aligned

Virginia Copyright © 2016 K-12 Blueprint. *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others Launched statewide online summative assessments in 2005 The 2000 Standards of Learning (SOL) Technology Initiative laid the foundation for online testing in the state Interest in online testing spread quickly after early adopters observed students’ preference to test online during the fall of 2001

School Year Copyright © 2016 K-12 Blueprint. *Other names and brands may be claimed as the property of others Approximately 40 states used new online student assessments from PARCC and Smarter Balanced New tests based on the deeper, more rigorous Common Core State Standards Substantially different from previous test Contain computer-based items, require significant writing, include simulations, and test higher-order thinking skills in new ways Implementation requires both a substantial infrastructure and a human capacity effort involving careful planning and ample communication Source: