Ultra-Low Current Beams in UMER to Model Space Charge Effects of High-Energy Proton and Ion Machines Santiago Bernal on behalf of UMER group, IREAP, University.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
ISIS Accelerator Division
Advertisements

THE SMALL ISOCHRONOUS RING PROJECT AT MICHIGAN STATE UNIVERSITY J. Alberto Rodriguez.
1 BROOKHAVEN SCIENCE ASSOCIATES NSLS-II ASAC-2007, April. 23, 2007 Injection System with a Booster in Separate Tunnel T. Shaftan for the NSLS-II team.
Elias Métral, COULOMB’05, Senigallia (AN), Italy, September 12-16, /29 OBSERVATION OF OCTUPOLE DRIVEN RESONANCE PHENOMENA WITH SPACE CHARGE AT THE.
CESR-c Status CESR Layout - Pretzel, Wigglers, solenoid compensation Performance to date Design parameters Our understanding of shortfall Plans for remediation.
Thomas Roser Snowmass 2001 June 30 - July 21, MW AGS proton driver (M.J. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas,
 An h=4 (30 MHz) RF system will be used for electron operation. For protons, this would correspond to h=56, and the 1 kV maximum gap voltage would only.
Thomas Roser RHIC Open Planning Meeting December 3-4, 2003 RHIC II machine plans Electron cooling at RHIC Luminosity upgrade parameters.
FEL Beam Dynami cs FEL Beam Dynamics T. Limberg FEL driver linac operation with very short electron bunches.
High Current Electron Source for Cooling Jefferson Lab Internal MEIC Accelerator Design Review January 17, 2014 Riad Suleiman.
Proton Driver: Status and Plans C.R. Prior ASTeC Intense Beams Group, Rutherford Appleton Laboratory.
EDM2001 Workshop May 14-15, 2001 AGS Intensity Upgrade (J.M. Brennan, I. Marneris, T. Roser, A.G. Ruggiero, D. Trbojevic, N. Tsoupas, S.Y. Zhang) Proton.
05/05/2004Cyrille Thomas DIAMOND Storage Ring Optical and X-ray Diagnostics.
Advanced Accelerator Design/Development Proton Accelerator Research and Development at RAL Shinji Machida ASTeC/STFC/RAL 24 March 2011.
October 4-5, Electron Lens Beam Physics Overview Yun Luo for RHIC e-lens team October 4-5, 2010 Electron Lens.
November 14, 2004First ILC Workshop1 CESR-c Wiggler Dynamics D.Rubin -Objectives -Specifications -Modeling and simulation -Machine measurements/ analysis.
FLASH II. The results from FLASH II tests Sven Ackermann FEL seminar Hamburg, April 23 th, 2013.
Beam Dynamics and FEL Simulations for FLASH Igor Zagorodnov and Martin Dohlus Beam Dynamics Meeting, DESY.
Beam-Beam and e-Cloud in RHIC Oct. 6, 2015 Haixin Huang, Xiaofeng Gu, Yun Luo.
FFAG Studies at RAL G H Rees. FFAG Designs at RAL Hz, 4 MW, 3-10 GeV, Proton Driver (NFFAGI) Hz,1 MW, GeV, ISIS Upgrade (NFFAG) 3.
Accelerator Science and Technology Centre Extended ALICE Injector J.W. McKenzie, B.D. Muratori, Y.M. Saveliev STFC Daresbury Laboratory,
Proton Source & Site Layout Keith Gollwitzer Accelerator Division Fermi National Accelerator Laboratory Muon Accelerator Program Review Fermilab, August.
LDRD: Magnetized Source JLEIC Meeting November 20, 2015 Riad Suleiman and Matt Poelker.
The SPS as a Damping Ring Test Facility for CLIC March 6 th, 2013 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU CERN CLIC Collaboration Working meeting.
Imperial College London 1 6. Injection into and ejection from circular machines PREACCELERATOR ACCUMULATORRING PARTICLESOURCE INJECTION 1 EJECTION INJECTION.
Linear Resonances with Intense Space Charge at the University of Maryland Electron Ring (UMER) Chao Wu, Eyad Abed, Santiago Bernal, Brian Beaudoin,
Beam Halo Monitoring using Optical Diagnostics Hao Zhang University of Maryland/University of Liverpool/Cockcroft Institute.
Parameter [units]Tune-up beam"low" chargehigh currenthigh charge Kin. injection energy [MeV]2.0 – Maximum beam energy [MeV]16 –
The Introduction to CSNS Accelerators Oct. 5, 2010 Sheng Wang AP group, Accelerator Centre,IHEP, CAS.
Development of High Current Bunched Magnetized Electron DC Photogun MEIC Collaboration Meeting Fall 2015 October 5 – 7, 2015 Riad Suleiman and Matt Poelker.
Emittance reduction by a SC wiggler in the ATF-DR September 16 th, 2009 Yannis PAPAPHILIPPOU and Rogelio TOMAS ATF2 weekly meeting.
Progress of Bunched Beam Electron Cooling Demo L.J.Mao (IMP), H.Zhang (Jlab) On behalf of colleagues from Jlab, BINP and IMP.
Pushing the space charge limit in the CERN LHC injectors H. Bartosik for the CERN space charge team with contributions from S. Gilardoni, A. Huschauer,
Will Stem Resonant Excitation of Envelope Modes as an Emittance Diagnostic in High-Intensity Circular Accelerators.
Neutrino Factory by Zunbeltz, Davide, Margarita, Wolfgang IDS proposal.
Nonlinear Dynamics with Space-Charge in a Small Electron Recirculator Santiago Bernal on behalf of UMER group, IREAP, University of Maryland, College Park,
FFAG Studies at BNL Alessandro G. Ruggiero Brookhaven National Laboratory FFAG’06 - KURRI, Osaka, Japan - November 6-10, 2006.
Beam Manufacture in PS2 M. Benedikt, S. Hancock. LHC Beams in the PS by 2015 Typeh injε l inj [evs] h ejN bunch ej RF ej [MHz] ε l ej [evs] τ ej [ns]
S.M. Polozov & Ko., NRNU MEPhI
Status of the MAX IV Short Pulse Facility
HIAF Electron Cooling System &
Beam-beam effects in eRHIC and MeRHIC
Large Booster and Collider Ring
Status of the beta-beam study
UMER nonlinear optics: experiment, simulations, development of octupole magnet and nonlinear insert Kiersten Ruisard Heidi Baumgartner, David Matthew,
Adriana Rossi, Sergey Sadovich
Luminosity Optimization for FCC-ee: recent results
Conveners: L.Serafini,F. Villa
Jeffrey Eldred, Sasha Valishev
Experimental Overview
Beam-beam R&D for eRHIC Linac-Ring Option
CASA Collider Design Review Retreat Other Electron-Ion Colliders: eRHIC, ENC & LHeC Yuhong Zhang February 24, 2010.
FFAG Accelerator Proton Driver for Neutrino Factory
CEPC Injector Damping Ring
Advanced Research Electron Accelerator Laboratory
Generation of Higher Brightness Beams for LHC
Status of CTC activities for the Damping rings
A very brief introduction to beam manipulation
Cooling Time Measurements
Kicker and RF systems for Damping Rings
Kicker specifications for Damping Rings
MEIC New Baseline: Part 9
Multi-Ion Injector Linac Design – Progress Summary
JLEIC Main Parameters with Strong Electron Cooling
MEIC New Baseline: Part 7
Fanglei Lin JLEIC R&D Meeting, August 4, 2016
MEIC Alternative Design Part III
He Zhang, David Douglas, Yuhong Zhang MEIC R&D Meeting, 09/04/2014
Plans for future electron cooling needs PS BD/AC
JLEIC Ion Beam Formation options for 200 GeV
Presentation transcript:

Ultra-Low Current Beams in UMER to Model Space Charge Effects of High-Energy Proton and Ion Machines Santiago Bernal on behalf of UMER group, IREAP, University of Maryland, College Park, MD IREAP AAC16, National Harbor, MD, August 3rd, 2016 Work Supported by the U.S. Department of Energy

OUTLINE MOTIVATION SCALING OF INCOHERENT SPACE CHARGE TUNE SHIFT: –UMER, Large Proton and Ion Rings –Single-Turn Injection vs. Accumulation PRODUCING ULTRA-LOW CURRENT BEAMS IN UMER: –DC Electron Gun –Photoemission –Apertures + Solenoid Focusing, Pulsed Inj. Dipole SUMMARY

MOTIVATION Research in UMER has pioneered several areas in the physics of space-charge (SC) dominated beams: beam tomography and halo, beam stability, matching and betatron resonances, debunching and longitudinal confinement, soliton trains, etc. Initial motivation (e.g. intense beams for HIF drivers) has been expanded recently to include non-linear dynamics (IOTA-inspired lattices), but SC effects must be reduced significantly. See talk by Kiersten Ruisard in WG7 today. Furthermore, SC effects are increasingly important for new and upgraded large storage and accumulator proton and ion rings (e.g. SNS, SIS-18,100), but some of these are user facilities with limited time for beam physics experiments.

UMER, PROTON AND HEAVY-ION RINGS UMER SNS Acc. Ring SIS-18

SCALING OF INCOHERENT SPACE-CHARGE TUNE SHIFT. “BEAM INTENSITY”  SC INTENSITY SPACE-CHARGE INTENSITY: For small tune shift, insensitive to bare tunes  x,y. Typically,  x,y = 3 – 6. “Intensity” loosely defined as with “space-charge limited” meaning In UMER, typically,We intend to operate UMER in For small SC,  independent of . beam perveance or SC parameter

BEAM DEBUNCHING IN UMER GREATLY REDUCED AT LOW CURRENT Beam Current, I b “Sound” Speed C S (m/s) Approx. No.Turns to Debunch Approx. No.Turns with Long. Focusing 60 μA μA3  , mA8  mA mA2  FLUID MODEL: WITHOUT LONGITUDINAL CONTAINMENT, COASTING BEAMS IN UMER DEBUNCH AFTER A NUMBER OF TURNS

MACHINECIRC.KINETIC ENERGY Peak Curr. RMS ε x,y (norm.) TUNE  x  y βK, and/or ppp  ,   UMER e m 10 keV, 6 mA 1.3 μm × × , 2.4 UMER e - 10 keV, 40  A 5 μm6.0× × , UMER e - 10 keV, 60  A 0.13 μm9.0× × HIF Driver Xe m10 GeV, 1 kA 35.7 μm × , 2.0 ALS (LBNL) e m1.2 GeV, 400 mA 3.5 nm × , 0.00 SNS p Acc. Ring (ORNL) 248 m1.0 GeV, 52 A 120 μm × × , 0.15 SIS-18 U 28+ (FAIR-GSI) 216 m200 MeV/u, 15.1 mA (inj.) 150,50 μm 4.17, × , 0.45 ELECTRON, PROTON & ION RINGS Missing: beam transv. aspect ratio, bunch structure, injection type, and energy spread.

PRODUCING ULTRA-LOW CURRENT BEAMS IN UMER METHODBEAM CURRENT, PULSE IND. CURRENT / EMITT. CONTROL? EXPERIMENT? DC Electron Gun + Low Grid Bias + PD + timing 10 –100  A, 100 ns No. 40  A, Photoemission (355 nm, dispenser K) 10  A – 20mA, 5ns Yes. 1.6mA, min. power Apertures + Solenoid 60  A – 1mA, 100 ns Limited. Design in progress IDEALLY: INDEPENDENT CONTROL OF CURRENT AND INTRINSIC TRANSVERSE EMITTANCE

PRODUCING ULTRA-LOW CURRENT IN UMER: DC E-GUN APERTURE PLATE UMER Electron Gun PD QR70 Q5 Q6 QR1 YQ 10 cm QR71 Red: DC Blue: Quasi-DC PD: Pulsed UMER Injection Section

DC ELECTRON GUN: RESULTS FOR 40  A BEAM DC E-Gun V Grid Bias Ultra-low Current Beam at RC3 10 mm , QR11 = −1.75A Fast fluorescent screen diagnostics + Pimax fast camera

PRODUCING ULTRA-LOW CURRENT IN UMER: PHOTOEMISSION Minilite-II Nd:Yag, Q-Switched Laser: 355 nm, 4 mJ, 5 ns, 20 Hz P pk = 0.8 MW, P av = 80 mW First photoemission-only multi- turn beam (1.6mA) in UMER. Pulse stretcher based on fiber optics delay lines designed, but using the right laser may be simpler, safer and more cost-effective. PROFILE OF ATTENUATED LASER AT 4 MM (RAD.) CATHODE

Solenoid E-Gun IC1 AP1 Window Actuator iQ1 iQ2 Bergoz Transf. Z=0 10 cm PRODUCING ULTRA-LOW CURRENT IN UMER: APERTURES + SOLENOID FOCUSING AP2 6 mA Beam Sol Curr. = 5.5ASol Curr. = 0.0A 10 mm

SUMMARY The original regime of strong transverse space-charge (SC) intensities in UMER is being extended to include the regime of small (perturbation) SC in large proton and ion circular machines. The new regime requires operation at “ultra-low” beam currents, around 60  A. This regime is also appropriate for the non-linear dynamics studies already underway in IOTA-inspired lattices. The beams also eliminate the need for longitudinal focusing to prevent debunching. Three methods to achieve low beam currents are discussed: DC E-gun, photoemission, and a combination of apertures and solenoid focusing. Issues related to beam detection S/N and control are pending.