innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 1 Global Reputation 14 November 2014 LPU Retreat Hotel Bangi-Putrajaya Bandar Baru Bangi
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 2 Issues of Concerns in Global Reputation 2 The Roman wit Publilius Syrus famously wrote: “A good reputation is more valuable than money.” But in today’s academy, reputation is the currency: research has shown that institutional standing is the top consideration for academics when moving jobs, is vital for the formation of international collaborations, and is essential in persuading philanthropists to give and industrial partners to invest. Phil Baty – Times Higher Education Editor
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 3 Rankings: a measure of Global Reputation? ● Rankings, ratings and accreditation of academic institutions are new forces in national and global higher education ● These recognitions (esp rankings) are criticized but, nonetheless, taken seriously by potential (international) students, individuals, public, universities, scholarship sponsors and governments. ● Show no signs of disappearing…Rankings are here to stay ● Global Rankings and prominence are aligned with the strategic directions of the new Higher Education Blueprint. “Rankings do have influence on student decisions, particularly when it comes to international students selecting where they will study”. – Prof Simon Margison, Melbourne University
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 4 Issues of Concerns ● Ranking is the ‘SCORER’ – cumulative effects of all university strategic agenda which include outputs from academic, research, quality graduates, university- industry relations, internationalisation, customer services, sustainable campus, financial sustainability etc.
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 5 Issues of Concerns ● Knowledge gap between universities in developed and developing countries is still wide and widening ● Without strong fundamentals, sufficient resources and out-of- ordinary outputs, it is very difficult for UTM to complete with other institutions with bigger resources, longer history and stronger supports etc ● UTM is not ranked #1 in Malaysia in Engineering and Technology (#3). ● Research outputs especially number of publications and citations are still relatively low.
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 6 UTM in TOP 50?
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 7 UTM Positions in QS- Rankings 7 “ Rankings have many faults and do not adequately describe universities and cannot show whether one institution is better than another ….but I am very happy when Cambridge is rated as the top university in the world” Prof Alison Richard Former Vice Chancellor University of Cambridge, UK
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 8 Existing KAI ( ): Global Reputation Sasaran 2014 Sasaran 2015 S5: Reputable International Ranking S5.1 QS World University Ranking 350Top 300 S5.2 QS World University Ranking (in Engineering & Technology) Top 200Top 150 S5.3 QS-ASIAN University Ranking Top 60Top 50 Pencapaian Pencapaian (naik 61 tangga) 134 (naik 122 tangga) To be released in Feb 2015
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 9 Top 10 - Ranking of Universities in OIC Countries (based on QS-WUR 2014) WURUniversitiesCountries 1151Universiti MalayaMalaysia 2225King Fahd University of Petroleum & Minerals Saudi Arabia 3249King Saud UniversitySaudi Arabia 4259Universiti Kebangsaan MalaysiaMalaysia 5294Universiti Teknologi MalaysiaMalaysia 6305Alfarabi Kazakh National UniversityKazakhstan 7309Universiti Sains MalaysiaMalaysia 8310University of IndonesiaIndonesia 9324L.N. Gumilyov Eurasian National UniversityKazakhstan 10334King Abdul Aziz UniversitySaudi Arabia 9
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 10 COUNTRIESUTM POSITION COUNTRIESUTM POSITION COUNTRIESUTM POSITION AUSTRALIA 14 JAPAN 14 UNITED KINGDOM 37 CANADA 15 SOUTH KOREA 9 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA 60 GERMANY 22 Comparing UTM with Universities in Other Countries
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 11 Faculty Rankings – Comparison with other Malaysian Research Universities ARTS & HUMANITIES Did not qualify LIFE SCIENCES & MEDICINE NATURAL SCIENCES Did not qualify 356 RANKING POSITION - WORLD (ASIA) 2014 Faculty Category UMUSMUKMUPMUTM ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY 83 (27)122 (39)186 (55)161 (51)134 (44) Score SOCIAL SCIENCES & MGMT 123 (22)161 (25)196 (32)232 (40)283 (53)
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 12 QS Engineering and Technology RankScoreUniversity University of British Columbia UCL (University College London) Indian Institute of Technology Bombay (IITB) The University of Queensland Monash University University of California, San Diego (UCSD) 5781University of Waterloo Politecnico di Torino McGill University Universitat Politècnica de Catalunya Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM)
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 13 QS Engineering and Technology RankScoreUniversity The Hong Kong Polytechnic University Peking University Rheinisch-Westfälische Technische Hochschule Aachen University of Hong Kong The University of Sydney The University of Manchester Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IITD) Pohang University of Science And Technology (POSTECH) Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (KIT) 4982Australian National University 4982The Chinese University of Hong Kong
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 14 What about TOP 100?
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 15 QS Engineering and Technology RankScoreUniversity Technion - Israel Institute of Technology University of California, Santa Barbara (UCSB) University of Birmingham University of Barcelona Universiti Teknologi Malaysia (UTM) Hanya 2.2 markah yang membezakan UTM sekarang (134) dengan kedudukan 100!
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global UTM in QS-World University Rankings (WUR) 2014 YearRank 40% Academic Reputation 10% Employers Review 20% Faculty student Ratio 20% Citation Per staff 5% Int Faculty 5% Int Student 100% Overall score
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 17 Year ( Rank) Art and Humanities Engineering and Technology Life Science and Medicine Natural Sciences Social Sciences and Management 2014 (294) Did not qualify 134 Did not qualify (355)* Did not qualify 256* Did not qualify 363* 2012 (358) (401) UTM in QS WUR by Faculty 2014 SUBJECTACADEMICEMPLOYERCITATIONSH-IndexSCORE RANKING POSITION (ASIA) ENGINEERING & TECHNOLOGY 40%30%15% 100% 134 (44) * New criteria introduced SOCIAL SCIENCES & MGMT 50%30%10% 100% 283 (53) ARTS & HUMANITIES Did not qualify LIFE SCIENCES & MEDICINE NATURAL SCIENCES
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 18 Indicators and Contributors IndicatorsQS Academic ReputationAll Employers ReviewAll Faculty:Student RatioWUR Citation Per StaffSubject, Faculty H-IndexSubject, Faculty Papers per StaffAsia International StudentsWUR, Asia International StaffWUR, Asia University Income- Innovation Income- Contributors Reputation Networking, Alumni Basic Parameters Research Academic Academic & Research Financial Sustainability Research THE All - All (ISI) - All
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 19 Benchmarking of Performances More talented international Academic & Research staff (Lecturers, Post-docs, RO, Visiting Professors) Our strength. Current number of international students need to be sustained/improved. Still poor. Good progress, but urgent need to enhance the progression rate by encouraging more staff to publish (because higher number of staff will decrease the ratio). More international collaboration required. More full-time researchers and Academic Fellows are needed to enhance teaching quality. Poor. Relationship between UTM and industry/multinationals need to be improved/strategised urgently. Enhance the roles of alumni. Good progress. Continuing international engagements and partnerships are required esp discipline- based. Stronger communication of UTM brands globally.
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 20 Research Outputs: UTM vs MRU
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 21 Research Outs: UTM vs Top 50
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 22 Citation: Highly Cited Researchers Top researchers in the world earned the distinction by writing the greatest numbers of reports officially designated by Essential Science Indicators ℠ as Highly Cited Papers—ranking among the top 1% most cited for their subject field and year of publication, earning them the mark of exceptional impact.
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 23 3 Highly Cited Researchers in Malaysia Data Prof Saidur Rahman UM Prof Dr Abdul Latif Ahmad USM Prof Ishak Hashim UKM Results found: Sum of the Times Cited Sum of Times Cited without self-citations Citing Articles Citing Articles without self-citations Average Citations per Item h-index Highly Cited Paper according to categories Source: RMC Prof Ahmad Fauzi Prof Mohamed Mahmoud Nasef Prof Hamdani Saidi (4685)
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 24
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 25
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 26 NTU has one of 17 “Hottest Researchers of Today” in the World’s Most Influential Scientific Minds 2014 (Thomson Reuters, 2014).World’s Most Influential Scientific Minds patent applications 300+papers with total citation of over 13,000 and H-index of 58. One of 3215 "Highly Cited Researchers 2014" andHighly Cited Researchers 2014" Listed as one of 17 “Hottest Researchers of Today” in the World’s Most Influential Scientific Minds 2014 (Thomson Reuters, 2014).World’s Most Influential Scientific Minds 2014 Prof. Dr. Hua Zhang (Phd 1998)
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 27 SCOPUS Publications Jan-July 2014
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 28 RU cumulative performance in SCOPUS according to Subject Area Classifications LEADER
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 29 UTM performance in Engineering The biggest contributor for UTM is Physical Sciences UTM excelled in Engineering which are a subject area classification under Physical Sciences.
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 30 UTM performance in Engineering LEADER UTM is currently the leader in Engineering (no of papers 2014) We need to improve quality (citations)
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 31 Total RU Citations in SCOPUS (2014)
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 32 4 – Niche subject area No a strong niche subject area at UTM Source: Higher Education in Asia: Expanding Out, Expanding Up - The rise of graduate education and university research. UNESCO Institute of Statistics. 2014
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 33 QS - Subject Rankings Subject Rankings (in the World) Chemical Civil & Structural Electrical & Electronics Mechanical, Aeronautical & Manufacturing Computer Science & Information System Environmental Sciences Target to become GLOBAL TOP-50 by 2020 is achievable! Yakin BOLEH!
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 34 UTM Subject Rankings ( ) Subject Rankings (in the World) ChemicalTop 100Top 50 Civil & StructuralTop 150Top 100 Top 50 Electrical & ElectronicsTop 150 Top 100 Top 50 Mechanical, Aeronautical & Manufacturing Top 150 Top 100Top 50 Computer Science & Information System Top 150 Top 100 Top 50 Environmental SciencesTop 200 Top 150Top 100Top 50 MathematicsTop 400Top 350Top 300Top 250Top 100 ChemistryTop 400Top 350Top 300Top 250Top 100 PhysicsTop 400Top 350Top 300Top 250Top 100 Material SciencesTop 400Top 350Top 300Top 250Top 100 BiologyTop 400Top 350Top 300Top 250Top 100 EducationTop 400Top 350Top 300Top 250Top 100
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 35 Strategic Objectives and Strategic Direction
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 36 SASARAN OBJEKTIF (SO) 1. Mempastikan bidang tujahan terpilih berada dalam kedudukan 50 terbaik di dunia. (Ensuring selected niche areas to be ranked top 50 in the world)
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 37 KAI (UTM)) 1. Mempastikan bidang tujahan terpilih berada dalam kedudukan 50 terbaik di dunia 1.1Kedudukan dunia ranking QS dalam bidang Kejuruteraan & Teknologi 1.2Bilangan bidang tujahan yang berada dalam 50 teratas QS-Subject Ranking 1.3Bilangan bidang tujahan yang berada dalam 100 teratas QS-Subject Ranking
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 38 Main Initiatives 1. Menjadikan UTM sebagai hub bidang tujahan strategik. (Making UTM as a hub for strategic niche areas) 2. Menjadikan UTM sebagai pusat rujukan dan kepimpinan dalam bidang Sains & Teknologi kepada negara membangun dan ASEAN. (Establishing UTM as referral centre and leadership in Science and Technology for developing countries and ASEAN) 3.Memperkasa jenama UTM di peringkat global. (Strengthen UTM brand at global level)
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 39 Action Plans #1/3 1. Menjadikan UTM sebagai hub bidang tujahan strategik – Bilangan gabungan dalam bidang tujahan mengikut tema terpilih – Bilangan pusat kecemerlangan antarabangsa secara kerjasama
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 40 Action Plans #2/3 2.Menjadikan UTM sebagai pusat rujukan dan kepimpinan dalam bidang Sains & Teknologi kepada negara membangun dan ASEAN. – Bilangan penerbitan secara bersama dengan universiti lain – Bilangan post-doctoral, pelajar penyelidikan dan penyelidik yang terlibat dalam inbound mobility – Bilangan kampus antarabangsa/pusat pembelajaran di luar negara
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 41 Action Plans #3/3 3.Memperkasa jenama UTM di peringkat global. – Bilangan persidangan antarabangsa anjuran UTM (kertaskerja diterbitkan dalam jurnal berindex Scopus) – Bilangan jurnal UTM yang berindex Scopus – Bilangan jurnal UTM yang berindex ISI – Bilangan Star dalam QS-Star Rating – Bilangan talent terbilang direkrut dan dikekalkan sebagai staf UTM – Bilangan diaspora Malaysia yang dilantik sebagai profesor pelawat
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 42 Prog/Project/Init iative KAI StatementKAI Target Ensuring selected niche areas to be ranked top 50 in the world QS-ranking position in Engineering & Technology in the world Number of niche area in the top 50 under QS- Subject Ranking Number of niche area in the top 100 under QS-Subject Ranking (Chemical) 3 (Civil, Mechanical, Electrical) 80 2 (Chemical, Civil) 4 (Electrical,Me chanical, Environment, Computer Science) 70 3 (Chemical, Civil, Mechanical) 4 (Electrical, Mathematic s, Environment, Computer Science) 50 5 (Chemical, Civil,Mechanical, Electrical, Computer Science) 8 (Mathematic, Environment, Chemistry, Physics, Education, Modern Languages, Biology, Material Science) Cadangan KAI #1 (UTM)
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 43 Prog/Project/Init iative KAI StatementKAI Target Making UTM as a hub for strategic niche areas No. of Partnerships in niche-based thematic programs No of joint-international CoE Cadangan Initiatif # 1/3 (PTJ)
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 44 Prog/Project/InitiativeKAI StatementKAI Target Establishing UTM as referral centre and leadership in Science and Technology for developing countries and ASEAN No of postdoctoral, visiting research/academic professors % of joint-publications between UTM and other universities No of UTM offshore learning centre/international campus Cadangan Inisiatif #2/3 (PTJ)
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 45 Prog/Project/Initi ative KAI StatementKAI Target Establishing UTM brand globally No of international conferences hosted by UTM (articles published in Scopus-indexed journals) No of UTM journals indexed in Scopus No of UTM journals indexed in ISI Number of stars in QS-Star Rating Cadangan Inisiatif #3/3 (PTJ)
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 46 Cadangan Inisiatif #3/3 (PTJ) Prog/Project/Ini tiative KAI StatementOperational Definition (OD) KAI Target Establishing UTM brand globally Number of top talents* recruited and retained as UTM staff Number of Malaysian Diaspora appointed as visiting professors Top talents (*research stars and world leaders in their field: H-Index>30) Malaysians talents or experts in the field working in universities oversea
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 47 Impact/Outcome?
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 48 ● UTM to be Top 50 in QS-World University Rankings based on Subject (Engineering and Technology) by 2020
innovative ● entrepreneurial ● global 49 Terima kasih Prof Dr Nordin Yahaya Prof Dr Noordin Mohd Yusof Prof Dr Ahmad Fauzi Ismail Prof Dr Marsin Sanagi Prof Dr Johari Halim Shah Osman Hajjah Najmah Shamsuddin En Muhamad Afandi Hamzah Hj. Zainul Rashid Abu Bakar