THE PIONEERING EU TRADEMARK AND DESIGN PRACTICE Seminar on Intellectual Property Rights Budapest September 6, 2005 Jean-Jo Evrard NautaDutilh (Brussels)

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
UNITARY PATENT Challenges for the EPO - Advantages for the users Georg Artelsmair6 September 2012.
Advertisements

Sted og dato (Indsæt --> Diasnummer) Dias 1 Navn på enhed (Indsæt --> Diasnummer) EU Commercial Law 2011 III. A. Protecting IPR (patents, trademarks and.
Counterfeit and Pirated Goods 6 th April Relevant Acquis Icelandic Legislation International Conventions Customs Intervention Preconditions Time.
EU secondary law Regulation 593/2008 on the law applicable to contractual obligations (Rome I) Regulation No 864/2007 on the law applicable to non- contractual.
Strengthening the Protection and Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in Ukraine Activity October 2014.
© OECD A joint initiative of the OECD and the European Union, principally financed by the EU European Court of Justice Prof. Dr. Martin Trybus Birmingham.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States
The Court of Justice European Law in the Making. Terminology Jurisdiction Jurisdiction Venue Venue Standing Standing Chambers Chambers Plenary Session.
EU: Bilateral Agreements of Member States. Formerly concluded international agreements of Member States with third countries Article 351 TFEU The rights.
The Unitary Patent One single patent covering 25 EU members October 2013 Rodolphe Bauer, Frédéric Dedek, Gareth Jenkins, Cristina Margarido Patent Examiners,
Introduction to EU Law Cont.d. ECJ – TFI (Arts ) “The Court of Justice and the Court of First Instance, each within its jurisdiction, shall ensure.
Practical Information about Community Trade Marks and Community Designs Imogen Fowler, Alicante.
Handling IP Disputes in a Global Economy Huw Evans Norton Rose Fulbright LLP.
Open Competition Intellectual Property Specialists (AST 3/ AD6) OHIM, Alicante – Spain Open for application: October 31st 2013 Apply before : December.
IPR-INSIGHTS CONSULTING AND RESEARCH 1116 BUDAPEST, KONDORFA U. 10. TEL.: (+36-1) FAX: (+36-1)
Baker & McKenzie Presented by Gabriela Vendlova 3 December 2002 Intellectual Property Rights: Importance of Trademark Protection in the Digital World.
Small claims procedure Regulation (EC) No 861/2007of European Parlament and of the Council of 11 July establishing a European Small Claims Procedure (OJ.
Vaxholm – Laval Case European Court of Justice (ECJ) (Case No C-341/05, Judgement 18 December 2007)
EUROPEAN COMMISSION - DG Internal Market 1 "Reviewing the Review: The European Commission's Third Review of the Product Liability Directive"
European civil procedure law Judicial cooperation in civil matters.
Cyprus, April 2011 Direct effect of EU (VAT) Directives.
Seminar on EC case-law Bedanna Bapuly Brno, 2007 October 15th.
TRADE MARKS: LATEST EU CASE LAW ON ENFORCEMENT By Annick Mottet Haugaard Attorney at law, 2nd Vice President ECTA International Baltic Conference on Intellectual.
Court of Justice of the European Union
1 Trademark Definition by the EC Court of Justice Trademark Definition by the EC Court of Justice.
WARSAW May 2006 Seminar on Enforcement of Property Variety Rights.
Agreement on Patent Litigation. Jan Willems Still going strong.
Trademarks in Latvia Agency TRIA ROBIT 5 Vilandes Street, Riga LV-1010, Riga, Latvia P. O. Box 22, LV Tel.:
WUESTHOFF & WUESTHOFF 1/xx New Forms of Trademarks Smells, Shapes and Sounds Registration and Enforcement Experiences within the European Union Dr. jur.
The primacy and effectiveness of EU law Chiara Favilli Rome 7-8 April 2014.
1 CEIPI Conference Towards a European Patent Court 17 April 2010.
The Directive on Enforcement and The Customs Regulation Warsaw May 2006 Martin Ekvad Community Plant Variety Office Head of Legal Affairs.
European Law in the Case- law of the Constitutional Court of Latvia Kristine Kruma.
The Community Trade Mark (CTM) System. The Legal Framework Council Regulation (EC) No 40/94 of 20 December 1993 on the Community trade mark Council Regulation.
1 TOPIC III - PATENT INVALIDATION PROCEDURES EU-CHINA WORKSHOP ON THE CHINESE PATENT LAW HARBIN, SEPTEMBER 2008 Dr. Gillian Davies.
1 Seminar on the Internal Market Acquis for the Eastern Partnership Countries Nevena Mateeva Unit D2 - Industrial Property Rights, Internal Market & Services.
International Intellectual Property Prof. Manheim Spring, 2007 Trademark - Madrid Copyright © 2007.
Compatibility of ICS in CETA with EU law Presentation by: Laurens Ankersmit GUE CETA conference 31/5/2016.
M O N T E N E G R O Negotiating Team for the Accession of Montenegro to the European Union Working Group for Chapter 28 – Consumer and Health Protection.
Procedural Safeguards in Criminal Proceedings in the European Union in Practice Estella Baker Professor of European Criminal Law & Justice
Effective implementation: from Principles to Realities
Seminar on EU Service Directive Budapest, 3 May 2007 Thibaut Partsch
Competition Law and its Application: European Union
Harrie Temmink Industrial Property Unit European Commission
Support of the foreign language profile of law tuition at the Faculty of Law in Olomouc CZ.1.07/2.2.00/
The OHIM Sabina Rusconi, institutional affairs and external relations department, OHIM Roving Seminar on the Conmunity Trade Mark System in China,
NAGY, Csongor István EU law Class 3 NAGY, Csongor István
The Office for Harmonization in the Internal Market
International Trademark Treaties and Strategies Pamela C. Gavin, Esq
Filip Křepelka, Masarykova univerzita
SPCs and the unitary patent package
European Union Law Week 6.
Multinational collaboration in the Authorisation of VMPs: the EU approach VICH Outreach Forum Tokyo, Nov 2017 Noel Joseph European Commission.
The Mutual Recognition Regulation
EC Accession to the Madrid Protocol
European actions.
Dr. Wiebke Dettmers, LL.M. (Univ. Helsinki)
Chapter four – International Criminal Law:General Introduction
National remedies and national actions
Fundamental rights.
JUDGMENT OF THE COURT 15 February 2017 CASE C-499/15: W, X and V
EUROPEAN PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW
Business Law: An Introduction Summary Notes 1
Case 195/08 PPU Rinau.
Audiovisual Sector Social Dialogue Committee
Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights in the Community Benoît Lory European Commission, DG Internal Market and Services Enforcement of Intellectual.
Fundamental rights.
Position of the Board of Appeal in the legal protection system for Community plant variety rights Gert Würtenberger.
PRESENTATION OF MONTENEGRO
Decade of the EU law in Latvia
Presentation transcript:

THE PIONEERING EU TRADEMARK AND DESIGN PRACTICE Seminar on Intellectual Property Rights Budapest September 6, 2005 Jean-Jo Evrard NautaDutilh (Brussels)

1.KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF TRADEMARK AND DESIGN LAW IN THE EU Trademark and design are the only areas of law that are truly European. 1.1.Harmonisation of national laws on substantive points, including enforcement; 1.2.Creation of a Community trademark and design; 1.3.Centralisation litigation relating to CTM.

1.1.Harmonisation of national laws  First Council Directive of 21 December 1988 to approximate the laws of the Member States relating to trademarks  Directive 98/71/EC of 13 October 1998 on the legal protection of designs

Harmonisation on substantive points : - Signs of which a trademark/design may consist - Conditions of validity of a trademark/design - Scope of the trademark/design protection.

All Member States have transposed the directives into national law. If the wording of a national law differs from that of the directive, the national court is obliged to interpret its domestic law in light of the wording and purpose of the directive (consistent case law of the European Court of Justice).

If the scope of a particular provision is unclear, the national court may submit a request for a preliminary ruling to the European Court of Justice. If the national court is a supreme court, it is bound to request for a preliminary ruling. In other words, the ECJ is the “European supreme court”.

Future harmonisation Directive 2004/48/EC of 29 April 2004 "on the enforcement of intellectual property rights" This directive should be transposed by the Member States on April 30, 2006, at the latest.

Regulation Council Regulation n° 1383/2003 of 22 July 2003 concerning customs action against goods suspected of infringing certain intellectual property rights and the measures to be taken against goods found to have infringed such rights (O.J., 2.8/2003)

1.KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF TRADEMARK AND DESIGN LAW IN THE EU Trademark and design are the only areas of law that are truly European. 1.1.Harmonisation of national laws on substantive points, including enforcement; 1.2.Creation of a Community trademark and design; 1.3.Centralisation litigation relating to CTM.

1.2.Creation of a Community trademark/design  Council Regulation n° 40/94 on Community trademark  Council regulation n° 6/2002 on Community designs

The OHIM, based in Alicante, is in charge of : - the registration of the Community trademarks/designs, - the opposition procedures (only applicable to trademarks), - actions to revoke or to declare invalid Community trademarks.

The fundamental provisions of the Community trademark and design regulation are the same as those targeted by the harmonisation directives. Thus, there is an identity between the national laws and the Community system with regard to : - signs of which a trademark/design may consist, - conditions of validity of a trademark/design, - and their scope of protection.

1.KEY CHARACTERISTICS OF TRADEMARK AND DESIGN LAW IN THE EU Trademark and design are the only areas of law that are truly European. 1.1.Harmonisation of national laws on substantive points, including enforcement; 1.2.Creation of a Community trademark and design; 1.3.Centralisation litigation relating to CTM.

1.3.Centralisation of litigation relating to CTM At the Community level : The OHIM has jurisdiction in the following areas : - assessment of the absolute grounds of invalidity during the registration procedure, - assessment of the relative grounds of invalidity (only for trademarks), - actions to declare invalid or revoke a Community trademark.

(only for trademarks) Examiner Opposition Division Invalidity Division Boards of Appeal (Alicante) CFI (Luxemburg) ECJ (Luxemburg)

At the national level : Obligation, for the Member States, to designate a limited number of national courts with jurisdiction over Community trademark/design litigation: - Community trademark/design courts, and a - Community trademark/design court of appeal. Generally, one court per country.

The CTM courts have exclusive jurisdiction for all infringement actions based on a CTM or a CTD. In some cases, injunctions granted by a CTM court have effect in the whole EU. They can also submit a request for a preliminary ruling to the ECJ.

CTM National laws Courts of first instance Court of Appeal National CTMcourts OHMI Supreme Courts CFI ECJ

2.EFFECTS ON THE PRACTICE OF LAW - Necessity to know both Community and national case law

The practitioner must be familiar with: - The case law of the ECJ which is actually the only “Supreme Court” as far as trademarks/designs are concerned and which gives a ruling on two counts :  Answer to a preliminary question asked by a national Court,  Supreme Court in the framework of litigation before the OHIM - The case law of the OHIM and the CFI.

- The case law of the other Member States. This case law has the same weight as national case law since national laws have been harmonised.

How to be informed of the recent developments of EU trademark law : 4 websites are recommended :  ECJ and CFI  OHIM  ECTA (European Community Trademark Association)  Jeremy Phillips.