Tests of Sympathetic System Evaluation

Slides:

Advertisements

Similar presentations

and Statistics, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, 1-8. doi: /ajams-4-1-1

Advertisements

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

before and after rehabilitation

Table 1. Empirical MSE to estimate the CP distribution parameter λ

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Perception of discriminatory organizational relationships

Test (Haemodialysis patients) Controls (health care workers)

Overall acceptability

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Research, 2015, Vol. 3, No. 6, doi: /education

Table 1. Sample Size No Category Sample Size (F) Percentage (%) 1

SON Nurse Practitioner Blackboard Community

Table 3. Descriptive Statistics – All Banks

Table 3. Student’s Mathematical Critical Thinking Ability Description

Management Philosophy

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 8. Drawing result before game

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Table 1. Descriptive data of movement form scores

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Levels of youth Involvement in Community Development Programs

in the last evaluation of the software

Table 2. Student's t–test (Tensile Strength)

Table 6. Control sample industry distribution

Table 1. The radial spheroidal functions

Year range Rainfall (mm) ∆s in rainfall Temp (°C) ∆s in temp RH (mm)

Table 1. Student’s attitude towards technology (%)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Significant (2- tailed)

Rating of Water Quality

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. Showing mean and SD along with t- critical ratio

Number of categories that are mentioned (0% < categories < 5%)

Table 1. Characteristics (age, height, and weight) of the participants

Table 1. Benefits of data visualization tools

Table 7. Status of CF in Nepal as of 2009

Entrapment Efficiency (%) ± S.D.

Simulation Frequency(Hz)

Number of questionnaires sent out

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 1. Descriptive Statistics

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 2. SUMMARIZED OBSERVATIONS FROM MODEL ANALYSIS

Table 4. Surface roughness (outer faces)

Cumulative Percentage

Cumulative Percentage

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. Correlation of PC, MC, RC & IC at the Supervisory level

chemistry that are involved in peer group

institution N Mean S.D SEM df t P

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Category Quantity Secondary school 3 Student participant

No. of runs Xo X1 X2 X3 X4 Y1 Y2 Y3 Y4 Y5 Si2

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 4. Value creation (Y2)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Table 3. Surface roughness (inner faces)

Table 2. Pre and Post Test Scores for the Plaid Condition(N=16)

Compressive Strength difference at 1 week (MPa)

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Average Execution Time in seconds

The distribution of systolic blood pressure (SBP) in male (blue) and female (red) athletes with mean values (SD) presented for each sex (panel A). The.

Figure 2. Changes in each parameter

Evaluating questionnaires

© The Author(s) Published by Science and Education Publishing.

Gender N Mean S.D Df t-cal P

Education, 2016, Vol. 4, No. 1, doi: /wjce-4-1-4

Presentation transcript:

Tests of Sympathetic System Evaluation Table 2. Sympathetic System Evaluation: Mean ± sd of HGT and CPT Group Phases Tests of Sympathetic System Evaluation N Hand Grip Test Cold Pressor Test SBP DBP Mean ± sd A Basal 120.3 6.5 76.3 4.6 20 During manoeuvre 137.2 3.2 94.9 2.2 136.5 4.1 94.8 2.6 Rise (difference of Basal and During Manoeuvre) 16.90 7.1 18.60 4.2 16.25 4.4 18.55 3.7 B 126.1 5.3 80.2 2.7 142.2 5.5 98.3 145.5 6.0 97.0 3.0 16.10 3.4 18.10 4.10 19.35 15.80 2.9 C 106.8 68.7 115.2 6.2 71.9 6.3 113.2 70.8 5.6 8.45 3.1 3.20 2.70 6.45 2,8 2.10 1.7 Mittal Sanjeev K.umar et al. A Study Showing Influence of Autonomic Nervous Activity and Meditation on Intra-Ocular Pressure. Neuro-Ophthalmology & Visual Neuroscience, 2014, Vol. 1, No. 1, 1-7. doi:10.12691/novn-1-1-1 © The Author(s) 2014. Published by Science and Education Publishing.