68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 1 Impact of Time Lapse Processing on 4D Simultaneous Inversion The Marlim Field Case Study C. Reiser * 1, E.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Signal Estimation Technology Inc. Maher S. Maklad Optimal Resolution of Noisy Seismic Data Resolve++
Advertisements

3-D Seismic Waveform Analysis for Reservoir Characterization
Time-lapse Seismic and AVO Modeling, White Rose, Newfoundland
3-D Fault Visualization with Fracture Swarms
2012 SEG/SPE/AAPG Summer Research Workshop
AASPI Attribute-Assisted Seismic Processing and Interpretation
Seismic Reservoir Characterization of the Morrow A Sandstone Thomas L. Davis & Robert D. Benson CSM Scott Wehner, Chaparral Energy, and Michael D. Raines.
74 th EAGE Conference & Exhibition incorporating SPE EUROPEC 2012 Automated seismic-to-well ties? Roberto H. Herrera and Mirko van der Baan University.
SAMPLE IMAGE Shale Gas Development: Integrated Approach Hemant Kumar Dixit Mumbai, India 18 January-2013.
Total Variation Imaging followed by spectral decomposition using continuous wavelet transform Partha Routh 1 and Satish Sinha 2, 1 Boise State University,
Youli Quan & Jerry M. Harris
Classification: Internal Status: Draft Using the EnKF for combined state and parameter estimation Geir Evensen.
HEAVY-OIL SEISMIC MONITORING at PIKES PEAK, SK I.A. Watson*, L.R. Lines and K.F. Brittle November 20, 2001.
Elastic Inversion Using Partial Stack Seismic Data: Case Histories in China.
Workflow for Finding Bypassed Reserves in Mature Assets  Real Time Integration of Simulation, Seismic Interpretation, and Geophysics  Best Answers Possible.
Geology 5660/6660 Applied Geophysics 24 Feb 2014 © A.R. Lowry 2014 For Wed 26 Feb: Burger (§8.4) Last Time: Industry Seismic Interpretation Well.
Weighted Stacking of 3-D Converted-wave Data for Birefringent Media Richard Bale.
Attribute- Assisted Seismic Processing and Interpretation 3D CONSTRAINED LEAST-SQUARES KIRCHHOFF PRESTACK TIME MIGRATION Alejandro.
Seismic Reflection Data Processing and Interpretation A Workshop in Cairo 28 Oct. – 9 Nov Cairo University, Egypt Dr. Sherif Mohamed Hanafy Lecturer.
King Field AVO Sensitivity to Reservoir Thickness and Amplitude Scaling Gregory A. Partyka and Philip J. Whitaker BP.
Impact of MD on AVO Inversion
The following discussions contain certain “forward-looking statements” as defined by the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 including, without.
Fractures play a major role in many tight reservoirs such as shale, carbonate, and low permeability sand by providing fluid flow conduits, for this reason.
1 RPSEA Project – Facies probabilities from seismic data in Mamm Creek Field Reinaldo J Michelena Kevin Godbey Patricia E Rodrigues Mike Uland April 6,
SAMPLE IMAGE December 10th 2007 Software Product Management Massy 1 TIKIM “Kirchhoff pre-stack time migration” Overview (Jean-Claude LANCELOT) Meeting.
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS. EARTH MODEL NORMAL-INCIDENCE REFLECTION AND TRANSMISSION COEFFICIENTS WHERE:  1 = DENSITY OF LAYER 1 V 1 = VELOCITY OF LAYER.
Uncertainty in AVO: How can we measure it? Dan Hampson, Brian Russell
Sandy Chen*, L.R.Lines, J. Embleton, P.F. Daley, and L.F.Mayo
Pitfalls in seismic processing : The origin of acquisition footprint Sumit Verma, Marcus P. Cahoj, Bryce Hutchinson, Tengfei Lin, Fangyu Li, and Kurt J.
Computing Attributers on Depth-Migrated Data Name : Tengfei Lin Major : Geophysics Advisor : Kurt J. Marfurt AASPI,The University of Oklahoma 1.
Reconditioning Seismic Data to Improve Carbonate Stratigraphic Interpretation and Reservoir Characterization, Fullerton Field, West Texas by Hongliu Zeng.
Wave-Equation Waveform Inversion for Crosswell Data M. Zhou and Yue Wang Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah.
Dario Grana and Tapan Mukerji Sequential approach to Bayesian linear inverse problems in reservoir modeling using Gaussian mixture models SCRF Annual Meeting,
Earth models for early exploration stages PETROLEUM ENGINEERING ÂNGELA PEREIRA Introduction Frontier basins and unexplored.
SEISMIC ATTRIBUTES FOR RESERVOIR CHARACTERIZATION
Site effect characterization of the Ulaanbaatar basin
Seismic monitoring of a unique CO2 injection site at Sleipner
Amit Suman and Tapan Mukerji 25th SCRF Annual Meeting May 9 – 11, 2012
Advance Seismic Interpretation Project
Amit Suman and Tapan Mukerji
Discrimination between pressure and fluid saturation using direct non-linear inversion method: an application to time-lapse seismic data Haiyan Zhang,
R. G. Pratt1, L. Sirgue2, B. Hornby2, J. Wolfe3
Combining statistical rock physics and sedimentology to reduce uncertainty in seismic reservoir characterization Per Åge Avseth Norsk Hydro Research Centre.
Two New Applications of Time Reversal Mirrors: Seismic Radio and Seismic Radar Sherif M. Hanafy September 2010.
Peipei Li, Tapan Mukerji
Modeling of free-surface multiples - 2
Creating a Conference Poster
Establishing Patterns Correlation from Time Lapse Seismic
Dario Grana, Tapan Mukerji
by A. Belaidi, D. A. Bonter, C. Slightam, and R. C. Trice
Introduction to Shear Wave Splitting
POTSI Gaboring Advances
Seismic attribute applications:
Elements of 3D Seismology: Introduction to Interpretation
Upscaling of 4D Seismic Data
Development of crosshole GPR data full-waveform inversion and a real data test at the Boise Hydrogeophysics Research Site Good morning and thank you for.
The Relationship between Uncertainty and Quality in Seismic Data
Jaehoon Lee, Tapan Mukerji, Michael Tompkins
Integration of reservoir simulation with time-lapse seismic modeling
Integration of reservoir simulation with time-lapse seismic modeling
Rainbow B time-lapse results
High Resolution Velocity Analysis for Resource Plays
Upscaling Petrophysical Properties to the Seismic Scale
bc POTSI Gaboring Advances
Impedance estimation from PP and PS seismic data: Ross Lake
EXPLORATION GEOPHYSICS
Pressure derivative plot from 205/21a-6 DST data.
Extract from the Intersect full-field simulation model exhibiting a pressure drawdown snapshot over a particular reservoir depth in relation to the horizontal.
Evgeny Tolstukhin*, Reidar Midtun, Pål Navestad, ConocoPhillips Norway
Wave Equation Dispersion Inversion of Guided P-Waves (WDG)
Presentation transcript:

68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 1 Impact of Time Lapse Processing on 4D Simultaneous Inversion The Marlim Field Case Study C. Reiser * 1, E. A. Thedy 2, P. S. Johann 2, A. Castoro 1 and P. Lee 3 1 CGG UK, 2 Petrobras, 3 CGG Brazil

68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 2Overview 1. 1.Introduction 2. 2.Objective of this study 3. 3.Seismic Processing 4. 4.Seismic Preconditioning D Simultaneous Inversion 6. 6.Results 7. 7.Conclusions

68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 3 Geological Settings Discovered in 1985 About 150 development wells Pressure maintained by water injections Sand rich turbidite system of Tertiary age Average thickness 60m Average porosity around 30% Oil density API EW Abreu et al. (1998) Bruhn et al. (1998) MARLIM

68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 4 Geological Settings Discovered in 1985 About 150 development wells Pressure maintained by water injections Sand rich turbidite system of Tertiary age Average thickness 60m Average porosity around 30% Oil density API EW Abreu et al. (1998) Bruhn et al. (1998) MARLIM

68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 5 Time Lapse Seismic: Two surveys acquired using different geometries Pre-development in 1986 Monitor in sqkm for the test area 7.5 sec Record Length Acquisition Sample Interval 4ms (1986) and 1ms (1997) 1986: 25m by 75 m bin size 1997: 25m by 25m bin size RMS amplitude over a 200ms window around 800ms

68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 6Overview 1. 1.Introduction 2. 2.Objective of this study 3. 3.Seismic Processing 4. 4.Seismic Preconditioning D Simultaneous Inversion 6. 6.Results 7. 7.Conclusions

68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 7Objectives  Main objectives Better understanding of the reservoir in terms of: Fluid distribution mapping Discrimination between production and injection effect.  Key issues to address: Not optimum 4D acquisition Attenuate different acquisition footprints Reduce seismic differences unrelated to production  Methodology Develop the 3D Simultaneous Elastic Inversion scheme An estimate of reliable elastic attributes

68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 8Overview 1. 1.Introduction 2. 2.Objective of this study 3. 3.Seismic Processing 4. 4.Seismic Preconditioning D Simultaneous Inversion 6. 6.Results 7. 7.Conclusions

68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 9 Reservoir oriented workflow Time alignment Enhancement of the S/N ratio and the resolution Enhancement of the S/N ratio and the resolution Quantitative and qualitative reservoir properties Acquisition footprint removal Acquisition footprint removal Seismic, wavelets and initial model Multiple attenuation STRATIGRAPHIC INVERSION PROCESS PRECONDITIONING SEQUENCE (Adapted to specific needs) Random noise Random noise attenuation Vp Density Vs RhoLambda

68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 10 Seismic Processing Two 4D processing sequences used for the inversion Few items: Independent – un-parallel seismic processingIndependent – un-parallel seismic processing 1986: DMO stack and Post-Stack migration 1997: Pre Stack migration Different Velocity fields Parallel seismic processingParallel seismic processing Bin regularisation to the 1997 survey (12.5 by 25 m) Same velocity field for both vintage. Parallel PSTM migration Post stack pre-conditioning

68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 11 Seismic Processing – Independent Full Stack Base 86 Full Stack Monitor 97

68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 12 Seismic Processing – Parallel Full Stack Base 86 Full Stack Monitor 97

68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 13 Seismic Processing – Time lapse impact Base Monitor Angle Stacks Differences ParallelIndependent

68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 14 Seismic Processing Base Monitor repeatability analysis Parallel Independent PRECONDITIONING LowHigh NO PRECONDITIONING

68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 15Overview 1. 1.Introduction 2. 2.Objective of this study 3. 3.Seismic Processing 4. 4.Seismic Data Preconditioning D Simultaneous Inversion 6. 6.Results 7. 7.Conclusions

68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 16 Reservoir oriented workflow Monitor Data pre-conditioning Invariant reference Base Geostatistical Filtering 3D Simultaneous Inversion Geostatistical Filtering Initial Model Building Inversion of Invariant reference Inversion of Base Mapping and Interpretation With flow model Inversion of Monitor

68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 17 Application of the Geostatistical decomposition 1986 Data, 32 ° stackCOMMON PART 1997 Data, 32 ° stack Data 1997 Data Common Part Hz Signal / Noise

68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 18Overview 1. 1.Introduction 2. 2.Objective of this study 3. 3.Seismic Processing 4. 4.Seismic Preconditioning D Simultaneous Inversion 6. 6.Results 7. 7.Conclusions

68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 19 Simultaneous Elastic Inversion in a Stratigraphic Framework <  ? Difference Simulated Annealing Model Perturbation V p, V s,  and  t Initial Model Final Model tt 100ms ~2ms 100ms Initial Layered Model Synthetic Angle Stacks Structural Framework Real Angle Stacks

68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 20Overview 1. 1.Introduction 2. 2.Objective of this study 3. 3.Seismic Processing 4. 4.Seismic Preconditioning D Simultaneous Inversion 6. 6.Results 7. 7.Conclusions

68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 21 Reservoir characteristics – well logs information

68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 22 Reservoir characteristics – well logs information Vp (m/s) Vs (m/s) GR (API)

68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 23 Initial Model Data for Initial Model: 17 wells 17 wells 6 with real shear velocity 6 with real shear velocity 6 horizons 6 horizons Model in Vp, Vs and Density Model in Vp, Vs and Density

68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 24 Inversion Results and Well Data Random Line, Sequence 2 - Base IP Random Line, Sequence 2 - Monitor IP

68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 25 Inversion Results: Comparisons Independent processing Parallel Processing Internal faults - Flow barrier ? Orange = Increase of Ip between base and Monitor

68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 26 Inversion Results: Comparisons Independent processing Parallel Processing

68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 27Overview 1. 1.Introduction 2. 2.Objective of this study 3. 3.Seismic Processing 4. 4.Seismic Preconditioning D Simultaneous Inversion 6. 6.Results 7. 7.Conclusions

68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 28Conclusions Data pre-conditioning was helpful in ensuring a reliable input for inversion Geostatistical decomposition attenuated acquisition footprints Reprocessing with parallel sequences improves repeatability and the resolution of the 4D effect though often not practical (technically / economically) true 4D acquisition should reduce some of the 4D noise Simultaneous Elastic Inversion Better comparison with the flow model (saturation variation) with the P impedance differences Some 4D differences unrelated to production history have been observed The 4D differences from the parallel processing appear to be more realistic and their distribution more consistent with the known geology

68th EAGE Conference and Exhibition, Vienna 29Acknowledgements The authors would like to thank Petrobras for granting permission to publish these results. A Thanks to CGG London and CGG do Brazil