A-F Report Card Law, Reporting Phases, and Indicator Descriptors.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
PA School Performance Profile 1 WHITEHALL-COPLAY SCHOOL DISTRICT.
Advertisements

Rules and Legislation Regarding A-F Report Cards June 2013 Jennifer Stegman, Program Manager CTB.
State of Texas Assessments of Academic Readiness.
Ohio’s Options for a High School Diploma Jennifer Felker, Associate Superintendent Division of Learning and School Choice November 7, 2014.
STAAR EOC Elizabeth Lalor Senior Director of Academic Support
Senate Bill 1908 Beginning in the school year, 50% of the school’s grade will be based on the existing FCAT- related factors and the remaining.
Burton Secondary EOC/STAAR Data INDEX 1 STUDENT ACHIEVEMENT STARR SATISFACTORY PERFORMANCE All Students=3-8 grades spring administration.
ESEA Flexibility: College & Career Readiness Maryland Accountability Program Presentation 7 of 8.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2001, 2002, 2003, 2004, 2005, and 2006.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade in 2004, 2005, 2006, 2007, and 2008.
MEGA 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY. MEGA Conference 2015 ACCOUNTABILITY MODEL INFORMATION SUBJECT TO CHANGE The Metamorphosis of Accountability in Alabama.
STATE ACCOUNTABILITY OVERVIEW Back To School| August 19-22, 2013 Dean Munn Education Specialist Region 15 ESC.
School Performance Profile and PVAAS.  Federal accountability and PA law dictate that school effectiveness must be measured looking at multiple.
Standardized Testing Report PSAT (10-11)  SAT (11-12) PLAN (10)  ACT (11-12) AP (11-12) EXPLORE (8) Science Assessment (7) ACT Aspire (7-8)
Understanding the SPP September 26, > Purpose The PA School Performance Profile is designed to:  Provide a building.
PA School Performance Profile June /3/13. Your Role: Communicate the purpose and design of the proposed PA School Performance Profile (SPP) Create.
ACCOUNTABILITY UPDATE Accountability Services.
The elements of the proposed accountability model are subject to change.
Changes to the School Grading. Student Assessment FCAT 2.0 in Reading and Mathematics Next Generation Sunshine State Standards (NGSSS) with new cut scores.
CTE and the A-F Report Card Tommi Leach and Kelly Arrington, ODCTE.
Fall Regional Curriculum and Instruction Meeting September 2015.
Iowa School Report Card (Attendance Center Rankings) December 3, 2015.
Assigns one of three ratings:  Met Standard – indicates campus/district met the targets in all required indexes. All campuses must meet Index 1 or 2.
PA School Performance Profile 1 Tamaqua Area Middle School.
March 2013 Presenter: Nancy Webster Director of Instructional Measurement and Accountability.
College- & Career- Readiness: Key Talking Points DR. PHILIP CLEVELAND, JOSH LANEY, RENE’ DAY.
Kentucky’s New Assessment and Accountability System What to Expect for the First Release of Data.
Public School Accountability System. Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall performance Uses multiple indicators for broad picture of overall.
South Carolina Succeeds
Boyertown Area School District Data Summary
Overview Plan Input Outcome and Objective Measures Summary of Changes Board Feedback Finalization Next Steps.
March 2013 Training Session The content of this PowerPoint is contingent upon approval of the Alabama PLAN 2020 ESEA Flexibility Request by the USDOE.
Accountability and School Grades FY 16 Charter Schools Principal’s Meeting March 17, 2016 Everglades Preparatory Academy.
Accountability Overview Presented by Jennifer Stafford Office of Assessment and Accountability Division of Support & Research KDE:OAA:DSR:pp: 12/11/2015.
School Accountability and Grades Division of Teaching and Learning January 20, 2016.
2016 Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Operationalizing the General Assembly’s School Performance Grades (Senate Bill 795, Excellent Public Schools Act) October 2012 Superintendents’ Feedback.
Legislative Requirement 2013 House File 215. Category Cut Scores Based on a Normal Distribution across Measures.
Accountability Committee December 14, CTE Report Card Discussion.
1 Graduation Rates: Students Who Started 9 th Grade In 2003, 2004, 2005, 2006, and 2007.
Accountability and School Grades FY 17 Charter Schools Principal’s Meeting August 24, 2016 Pew Center.
2017 Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Communication Webinar:
Pathways to Graduation
Approved Graduation Diploma and Endorsement Requirements Effective for Incoming 9th Graders Diploma and Endorsement Options Approved September.
Legislative Requirement 2013
WorkKeys February 19 – 21, 2013 Online
OAEP Conference – Prepared for Success Component Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability May 8, 2017.
NHCS READY Report October 2016.
Overview Page Report Card Updates Marianne Mottley – Director Office of Accountability.
Graduation Requirements Effective
TESTING, RESEARCH & ACCOUNTABILITY
House Bill 22 Overview ESC PEIMS Coordinator Summer Training | August 1, 2017 Texas Education Agency | Academics | Performance Reporting.
FY 11 School Grade Calculation
New Statewide Accountability System
New Accountability System: District and Site Report Cards
Accountability 2020 Updates January 2015
CTE Data and Accountability Overview
The LEA Accountability Model
ESSA Update “Graduation Rate & Career and College Readiness”
Introduction For the graduating class of 2022 and any graduating class thereafter. Students in New Mexico must meet both coursework and competency requirements.
Ohio’s Options for a High School Diploma
Ohio’s Options for a High School Diploma
Birmingham City Schools Report Card Indicators
A-F Accountability and Special Education
Fall Regional Curriculum and Instruction Meeting
Spencer County Public Schools
OVERVIEW OF THE 2019 STATE ACCOUNTABILITY SYSTEM
Secondary Data Presentation
English Learner Accountability Component
Presentation transcript:

A-F Report Card Law, Reporting Phases, and Indicator Descriptors

ACT No requires the State Superintendent of Education to develop a school grading system reflective of school and district performance. This law requires the state to use state-authorized assessments and other key performance indicators that give a total profile of the school or school system, or both, a school’s grade, at a minimum shall be based on a combination of student achievement scores, achievement gap, college and career readiness, learning gains, and other indicators as determined by the State Superintendent of Education to impact learning and success.

A-F

Report Card Phases Schools without a Grade 12 Phase I December 2016 Student Achievement Local Indicators Learning Gains Phase II December 2017 Student Achievement Local Indicators Learning Gains Alabama Plan 2020 Program Reviews Achievement Gap Attendance (Bonus)

Report Card Phases Schools with a Grade 12 Phase I December 2016 Student Achievement Local Indicators Graduation Rate Phase II December 2017 Student Achievement Local Indicators Graduation Rate College and Career Ready Learning Gains Alabama Plan 2020 Program Reviews Attendance (Bonus)

Student Achievement Determined based on the percentage of proficient students in the areas of reading and math utilizing assessments in tested grades. 50% of points will be calculated from Reading 50% of points will be calculated from Math The chart below shows the weights that will be applied to calculate the indicator points earned. Achievement LevelWeight Level I0 points Level II0.5 points Level III1.0 point Level IV1.25 points

Learning Gains Determined based on individual students who demonstrate improvement in reading and math from one year to the next using multiple years of data. Growth Categories for Learning Gains: Low, Average, and High 50% of points will be calculated from Reading 50% of points will be calculated from Math The chart below shows the weights that will be applied to calculate the indicator points earned. Growth CategoryWeight Low0 points Average1.0 point High1.5 points

Local Indicator Percentage of Points Local Indicators Determined based on one indicator tied to student outcomes. The chart below shows how the indicator percentage of points can be earned. 25% - Baseline Identified 25% - Measurable Objective +50% - Met Goal 100% - Local Indicator

Graduation Rate Determined based on percentage of high school students who graduate within four or five years of first entering ninth grade. The chart below shows the percentage of points earned for each cohort. CohortWeight 4 – Year80% 5 – Year20%

College and Career Ready Determined based on the percentage of graduating seniors who meet at least one of the college- and career-ready indicators: Benchmark on any ACT Subtest (Math – 22, English - 18, Reading - 22, Science – 23) Qualifying Score on AP or IB Exam Military Enlistment Approved Transcript College or Postsecondary Credit while in high school Silver Level or Higher on the ACT WorkKeys Approved Industry Credentials

Alabama PLAN 2020 Program Reviews Determined based on a review of programs not measured by standardized tests. Achievement Gap Determined based on the progress made using the bottom 25% of student data in reading and math. Attendance (Bonus) Determined based on the 9 th month average daily attendance report for the entire school year.

A-F Data Sources for Phase I Indicators School Type Student Achievement Learning Gains Graduation Rate Local Indicators Schools without a Grade 12 ACT Aspire (Grades 3-8) Alabama Alternate Assessment ACT Aspire (Grades 4-8) N/A Measurable goal aligned to PLAN 2020 and tied to student outcomes Schools with a Grade 12 ACT Aspire 10 Alabama Alternate Assessment N/A 4-Year Cohort 5-Year Cohort Measurable goal aligned to PLAN 2020 and tied to student outcomes

Accountability Information Subject to Change

District Level Access Available to: Superintendents Accountability Coordinators School Performance Coordinators A-F Report Card Coordinators Coming in Phase II: School Level Accessibility

Report Cards

Data Governance While reporting data to schools, data governance rules apply. It is imperative to refrain from sending P2A student level data via due to the existence of Personally Identifiable Information (PII). Use a secure method of transfer.

Angela Martin, Accountability Coordinator Paul Bonner, Education Administrator Willie Horn Jr., Education Specialist