#AIDS2016 Dolutegravir (DTG) plus Rilpivirine (RPV) in Suppressed Heavily Pretreated HIV-Infected Patients A. Díaz, J.L. Casado, F.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Persisting long term benefit of genotypic guided treatment in HIV infected patients failing HAART and Importance of Protease Inhibitor plasma levels. Viradapt.
Advertisements

1 Treatment Failure HAIVN Harvard Medical School AIDS Initiative in Vietnam.
Switch to ATV/r + RAL  HARNESS Study. ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + TDF/FTC N = 37 N = 72 ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + RAL 400 mg bid  Design Randomisation 2: 1 Open-label.
Global HIV Resistance: The Implications of Transmission
Switch to TDF/FTC/RPV  SPIRIT Study. SPIRIT study: Switch PI/r + 2 NRTI to TDF/FTC/RPV TDF/FTC/RPV STR 24 weeks 48 weeks Primary Endpoint Secondary Endpoint.
Switch to ATV/r + 3TC  SALT Study. ATV/r 300/100 mg qd + 2 NRTI (investigator-selected) N = 143 ATV/r 300/100 mg + 3TC 300 mg qd  Design Randomisation*
TO EVALUATE EARLY ANTIVIRAL RESPONSE AND SAFETY OF A DUAL BOOSTED PROTEASE INHIBITORS REGIMEN INCLUDING LOPINAVIR/r (LPV) PLUS AMPRENAVIR (AMP) OR FORTOVASE.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy  MONOI  MONET  PROTEA  DRV600.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r  EFV vs LPV/r vs EFV + LPV/r –A5142 –Mexican Study  NVP vs ATV/r –ARTEN  EFV vs ATV/r –A5202.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy  Pilot LPV/r  M  LPV/r Mono  KalMo  OK  OK04  KALESOLO  MOST  HIV-NAT 077.
INTRODUCTION A previous cohort study from our unit suggested a benefit for the use of efavirenz compared to nevirapine in a group of patients initiating.
Switch PI/R to ETR  Etraswitch. Etraswitch Study: Switch PI/r to ETR Continuation of current PI/R + 2 NRTI N = 21 N = 22 ETR 400 mg QD* + 2 NRTI  Design.
Clinical development programme for Second-Line treatment Anton Pozniak World AIDS Conference, July 2014.
Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) in treatment-naïve subjects
Switch to RAL-containing regimen  Canadian Study  CHEER  Montreal Study  EASIER  SWITCHMRK  SPIRAL  Switch ER.
Superior Outcome for Tenofovir DF (TDF), Emtricitabine (FTC) and Efavirenz (EFV) Compared to Fixed Dose Zidovudine/Lamivudine (CBV) and EFV in Antiretroviral.
Weekly Alendronate Safe and Effective at Increasing Bone Mineral Density in HIV-Infected Persons on Antiretroviral Therapy Slideset on: McComsey GA, Kendall.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI  ENCORE  EFV vs RPV –ECHO-THRIVE –STAR  EFV vs ETR –SENSE.
FLAMINGO Efficacy and safety of dolutegravir (DTG) in treatment-naïve subjects SE/HIV/0023/14c January 2014.
ACTG 5142: First-line Antiretroviral Therapy With Efavirenz Plus NRTIs Has Greater Antiretroviral Activity Than Lopinavir/Ritonavir Plus NRTIs Slideset.
First-Line Treatment of HIV Infection With Either NNRTI- or PI-Based Regimens Effective for Long-term Disease Control Slideset on: MacArthur RD, Novak.
KLEAN Study: Fosamprenavir/Ritonavir Associated With Similar Efficacy and Safety as Lopinavir/Ritonavir SGC in Treatment- Naive Patients Slideset on: Eron.
Tipranavir/Ritonavir Superior to Comparator PI/Ritonavir at Week 48 in Multiclass-Experienced Patients Slideset on: Hicks CB, Cahn P, Cooper DA, et al.
Adefovir Suppresses HBV DNA Levels in Lamivudine-Resistant HIV/HBV Patients Slideset on: Benhamou Y, Thibault V, Vig P, et al. Safety and efficacy of adefovir.
Switch to PI/r monotherapy
Rilpivirine-TDF-FTC versus Efavirenz-TDF-FTC STaR Trial
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
Dolutegravir plus Rilpivirine as Maintenance Dual Therapy SWORD-1 and SWORD- 2: Design
Switch to PI/r + 3TC vs PI/r monotherapy
undetectable (undetectable-6.25)
Virological and immunological efficacy of regimen including MVC
ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + 3TC ATLAS-M Study.
Etravirine in Treatment Experienced DUET-2 (TMC125-C216)
Switch to RPV-TDF-FTC from Ritonavir-boosted PI Regimen SPIRIT STUDY
Etravirine versus Protease Inhibitor in ARV-Experienced TMC 125-C227
Switch to Etravirine from Efavirenz due to CNS Toxicity SSAT-029 STUDY
Sofosbuvir-Velpatasvir in HIV-HCV Coinfected Patients ASTRAL-5
Once Daily Etravirine versus Efavirenz in Treatment-Naive SENSE Trial
Dolutegravir versus Raltegravir in Treatment Experienced SAILING Study
Etravirine in Treatment Experienced DUET-1 (TMC125-C206)
Atazanavir + ritonavir vs. Lopinavir-ritonavir CASTLE Study
Darunavir/r versus Other PIs in Treatment Experienced POWER 1 and 2
ARV-trial.com Switch to MVC MARCH Study 1.
Switch to DTG + 3TC ASPIRE Study.
St Stephen’s Centre, Chelsea & Westminster Hospital, United Kingdom
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Long-Term Clinical and Immunologic Outcomes Are Similar in HIV-Infected Persons Randomized to NNRTI versus PI versus NNRTI+PI-based Antiretroviral Regimens.
Switch to E/C/F/TAF + DRV
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Impact of Baseline NNRTI Mutations on the Virologic Response to TMC125 in the Phase III Clinical Trials DUET-1 and DUET-2 J Vingerhoets, A Buelens, M.
Switch to DRV/r monotherapy
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Comparison of NNRTI vs PI/r
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
Switch to RAL-containing regimen
ARV-trial.com Switch to DRV/r + RPV PROBE Study 1.
Comparison of INSTI vs INSTI
ARV-trial.com Switch to TDF/FTC/EFV AI Study 1.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
Switch to ATV/r monotherapy
A prospective, randomized, Phase III trial of NRTI-, PI-, and NNRTI-sparing regimens for initial treatment of HIV-1 infection – ACTG 5142 Riddler S.A.,
Switch to LPV/r monotherapy
ARV-trial.com Switch to ATV/r + RAL HARNESS Study 1.
ARV-trial.com Switch to FTC + ddI + EFV ALIZE 1.
Comparison of NNRTI vs NNRTI
INTRODUCTION OBJECTIVES METHODS RESULTS DISCUSSION
Presentation transcript:

#AIDS2016 Dolutegravir (DTG) plus Rilpivirine (RPV) in Suppressed Heavily Pretreated HIV-Infected Patients A. Díaz, J.L. Casado, F. Dronda, C. Gómez-Ayerbe, M.J. Vivancos, S. Bañón, C. Quereda, S. Serrano, A. Moreno, E. Navas, M.Á. Rodríguez, M.J. Pérez-Elías, S. Moreno. Hospital Universitario Ramón y Cajal, Madrid (Spain) Background: It is frequent that patients with multiple virological failures are suppressed with complex, toxic regimens. Optimization of these regimens would be desirable. DTG+RPV is a NRTI-, PI-sparing regimen that is currently being evaluated in early switching. We aimed to explore the role of DTG 50 mg plus RPV 25 mg, both once daily, in fully suppressed patients with a history of repeated treatment failures. Methods: Ongoing cohort study, based in daily clinical practice. Patients with multiple ART failures and with long-standing viral suppression are offered treatment with DTG+RPV according to the physician’s criteria. Patients are not treated with DTG+RPV if resistance to integrase inhibitors (INI) or RPV was shown. All the patients had visits recorded at 4, 12, 24, and 48 weeks after switching. The main outcome variable was persistence of undetectable HIV RNA 48 weeks after switching.

#AIDS2016 Variable Age, median53.4 years GenderWomen 34% AIDS34% Prior IDU/HCV+68%/70% Nadir CD4+ T cell count, median 179 cells/mm 3 Baseline CD4+ T cell count, median 592 cells/mm 3 VariableResults Time on ART, median19.4 years Time HIV RNA<506.7 years Number of pills Reasons for prescribing DTG + RPV DDI: 38% Toxicity: 33% Simplification: 25% NRTINNRTIPIINI Treated 2, n (%)38 (100)34 (90)37 (97)24 (62) Failure 3, n (%)38 (100)26 (68)27 (71)3 (8) Resistance mutations 4, n (%)25 (65)14 (37)12 (32)NA Number of mutations, median NA Most significant major resistance mutations M184V (59%), M41L (50%), L210W (36%), T215Y (36%), K65R (9%) K103N (43%), G190A/S (28%), H221Y (14%), A98G (7%) V179D (7%) M46I/L (50%), V82AT (42%), I54V (33%), L33F (33%), L90M (25%), I84V (16%), I50V (8%). NA 2 CCR5 inhibitors, 10%, T20 10%. Median, 3.6 drug families per patient (55%) patients failed to 3 or more drug families 4 17 (45%) patients had major resistance mutations to 2 or more drug families Characteristics of the Study Population (n=38) Previous treatment and resistance mutations 1 Regimens at the time of switching included NRTI + NNRTI + PI (85%) NRTI + NNRTI + PI + INI (53%)

#AIDS2016 Efficacy Three patients discontinued the new regimen due to gastrointestinal toxicity, DDI with omeprazole, and physician’s decision, one case each. There have been no virological failures: HIV-RNA remained below 35 copies/mL in 100% (38/38) at week 4 and 100% (35/35) at week 48. CD4 count remained stable after switching: median 708 cells/mm 3 at week 48 (95%CI , P=0.99). Safety CONCLUSIONS Switching to a simple, dual regimen of DTG plus RPV in heavily pretreated, multiply failed, suppressed HIV- infected patients, appears to be safe and efficacious. All P values < 0.05 P < 0.05 P < 0.001