SANE Magnet Review ● Repaired polarized target magnet was successfully energized and put in persistent mode on 12/18/08 after the review, following the.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Brio 2000 / Brio 2000-M E-Learning Service Manual Rev. 0.0.
Advertisements

38GXC(Q)/40GXC(Q) Service Training Sizes 18 and 24K.
Power Supply System John Joseph LBNL Spectrometer Solenoid Test Plan Review Feb 17 th 2012.
Focus Coil Update Roy Preece / Tom Bradshaw / Mike Courthold STFC – RAL VC 17 th Jan 2013.
Polarized Target “Issues” Magnet Microwaves Target Ammonia.
G2P Target installation and Beyond. Schedule Pivot before.
SPECTRAP - GSI progress report and status overview.
23 October 2005MICE Meeting at RAL1 MICE Tracker Magnets, 4 K Coolers, and Magnet Coupling during a Quench Michael A. Green Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory.
Zoran Andjelkovic Johannes Gutenberg – Mainz University GSI Darmstadt Laser Spectroscopy of Highly Charged Ions and Exotic Radioactive Nuclei (Helmholtz.
1 Superconducting Magnets for the MICE Channel Michael A. Green Oxford University Physics Department Oxford OX1-3RH, UK.
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication & Testing Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE CM24 at RAL June 1, 2009.
Product Introduction.
Test plan for the MICE SS cryostat and magnet Tapio Niinikoski LBNL Spectrometer Solenoid Workshop May 10, 2011.
UVA Polarized Target In Hall A Pictures and Cost Paul Brindza Dec 17, 2009.
Electrical Integration CM38 Steve Griffiths & Ian Mullacrane.
Spectrometer Solenoid Test Plan Workshop: Spectrometer Solenoid Overview Steve Virostek - LBNL February 17, 2012.
HD target.
Status of installed target Preparation of “demonstrator” target Chris Booth Sheffield 25 th January 2008.
Superconducting IR Magnets CHEN, Fusan May 11, 2007.
Spectrometer Solenoids MICO 197 Steve Virostek LBNL August 15, 2012.
Spectrometer Solenoid: Plans to Fix Magnet 2 Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab Spectrometer Solenoid Review November 18, 2009.
Spectrometer Solenoid Fabrication & Testing Update Steve Virostek Lawrence Berkeley National Lab MICE CM25 at RAL November 6, 2009.
The Operation of the Tevatron Vacuum system Authors David Augustine Alex Chen Scott McCormick 1.
Target Commissioning Target installed in ISIS “Demonstrator” target in R78 Initial commissioning plans Chris Booth Sheffield 11 th February 2008.
1 Mice Collaboration Meeting CM33 Glasgow University 25 th – 29 th June 2012 STFC Daresbury Laboratory Electrical Infrastructure Report Authors : Ian Mullacrane.
Cryogenic Summary - K. C. Wu Testing D2L102 in MAGCOOLJune, 02 Difference between D2L102 and D2L101 Operating Summary Cooldown to 100 K and 6 K Test Condition.
Date 2007/Sept./12-14 EDR kick-off-meeting Global Design Effort 1 Cryomodule Interface definition N. Ohuchi.
Haixin Huang AGS Cold Snake: Status and Plans.
Practical experience with the AD Stochastic Cooling Murphy’s Law R. Louwerse.
Ruben Carcagno, Sandor Feher, George Velev (team leader) MQXFS1 status meeting Summary of the MQXFS1 Investigation.
XVII SuperB Workshop and Kick Off Meeting - La Biodola (Isola d'Elba) Italy May 28 th June 2 nd 2011 P.Fabbricatore Sezione di Genova Reuse of Babar sc.
RF Commissioning D. Jacquet and M. Gruwé. November 8 th 2007D. Jacquet and M. Gruwé2 RF systems in a few words (I) A transverse dampers system ACCELERATING.
Status of Vertical Test Stand at RRCAT P Shrivastava, P Mohania,D.Baxy, Vikas Rajput S C Joshi, S Raghavendra,S K Suhane RRCAT, Indore November 26, 2012.
2015 Operations Stay Treat CHL2 4K Cold Box Modifications SC1 2K Cold Box CC4 Failure Helium and LN2 Losses Contamination Operations Stay Treat.
LQS01a Test Results LARP Collaboration Meeting 14 Fermilab - April 26-28, 2010 Guram Chlachidze.
CLAS12 Longitudinally Polarized Target R&D Update CLAS Collaboration, October 20, 2015 Chris Keith.
Superconducting Cryogen Free Splittable Quadrupole for Linear Accelerators Progress Report V. Kashikhin for the FNAL Superconducting Magnet Team (presented.
MICE CC TEST, IN PROGRESS M. Tartaglia For the FNAL/LBNL Test Team 9/27/13.
Initial Tests of the JLab Frozen Spin Target Chris Keith Target Group Jefferson Lab September 13, 2007 Brookhaven National Lab.
Jim Kerby Fermilab With many thanks to Vladimir Kashikhin, the FNAL, KEK, and Toshiba teams. SCRF BTR Split Quadrupole ILC ML & SCRF Baseline Technical.
SRF Operating Experience at JLab
Electrical Configuration and System Protection
MICE Absorber and Focus Coil Magnet – Test Results
S. Feher MICE Magnet Readiness Review RAL, June 28th, 2016
Cryotarget Training Common Target Training for Halls A & C for the 12 GeV Era A trained TO must be on shift whenever the target is liquified Tgt Ops as.
Scintillator testing in Prague (update from Aussois)
Cryogenic behavior of the cryogenic system
Operation of CSC DCS Ryan Carroll Carnegie Mellon 29-Sept-2009.
Jorge Sánchez-Quesada BE-RF-FB
ELENA installation and commissioning status
HFM Test Station Main Cryostat
MICE Operations Scenario Run 1
Roger Wendell for the OD group
Test plan of ESS HB elliptical cavity
RF operation of REX-ISOLDE
Summary Friday h38: Ramp down and pre-cycle.
Run period of summer 2012 Zoltán Fodor
TEST PLANS for HL LHC IT STRING
Bubble Chamber – Beam Requirements
Tracker Software Status
Flotection: Building Main Shutoff System
Digital Chart Recorder Operation
Undulator Vacuum System
An Optimal Procedure for RF Conditionning at the FREIA Laboratory
Cryogenics – The Basics
Cryomodule Assembly Plan
Model Output Current Battery Life BATPSU VDC 2A 1.2Ah BATPSU VDC 2.3Ah
Undulator Vacuum System
Cryogenic behavior of the magnet
Isotope Readiness Review Run Plans
Presentation transcript:

SANE Magnet Review ● Repaired polarized target magnet was successfully energized and put in persistent mode on 12/18/08 after the review, following the procedure described in the review report ● On 12/19/08 the refrigerator was cooled down and CH2 was loaded in the insert

SANE Magnet Review ● Thermal NMR signals from CH2 were observed on 12/19/08 at about 7:00 PM. – The frequency on 12/19 after ~24 h of field on was MHz, B( ) = T – The current at time of persistent mode switch was A – Current was adjusted to A to center the frequency at 213 MHz – the NMR frequency MHz corresponds to T

Magnet Review Implementation ● Modified operating procedures for energizing and de-energizing maget are posted on the SANE wiki under –

Magnet Review Implementation ● Modified operating procedures for energizing and de-energizing maget are posted on the SANE wiki under –

Magnet Review Implementation ● Modified operating procedures for energizing and de-energizing maget are posted on the SANE wiki under –

Magnet Review Implementation ● Only 4 expert operators are allowed to modify or ramp the magnet current. These are: Don Crabb, Donald Day, James Maxwell, and Jonathan Mulholland – Names listed on procedure ● The ramp rates are limited as follows: – 0 to 60 A 1.2 A/min – 60 to 72 A 0.6 A/min – 72 to 78.9 A 0.3 A/min Programmed on PS firmware & LabView ● When in persistent mode the power supply is to remain on at the last setting -- operated in this mode in Dec until quench; will continue in the future; step 19 of ramp up procedure ● The helium level in the magnet is to be continually monitored. – saved in EPICS logger, displayed on target screen (PDP) – extensive target data logged by LabView converted to ASCII files for charting

Magnet Review Implementation ● The EMF across the magnet terminals is to be monitored – installed a DVM that reads the coil voltage across taps a-k of “D” connector. – DVM displays the voltage locally and is readout by LabView via RS-232 for display on target screen, and logged in EPICS. ● readout of all taps too complicated to implement on time ● The CoO will be modified so that the magnet need only be off during work on the lower platform. It is to remain on during other access work. -- – Modified COO reviewed by D. Skopik. Shift personnel are acknowledging reading it with signatures and . ACC staff have been informed and are aware of new procedure

Target Status ● Magnet operated until quenched at 11:00 PM on 12/19/08 ● Target developed a leak, which prevented further operation – Leak required target warm up, but was not detected when target was disassembled – Cold cathode gauge reading chamber vacuum was off at that time, due to earlier rack power trip (gauge requires local reset): ● no record of chamber vacuum during period before and sometime after quench. Gradual, unsuspected vacuum deterioration might have contributed to quench. – Damaged 4 K shield was found and rebuilt – Two failed rotary pumps and a damaged needle valve on the refrigerator have been replaced

Target Status (II) ● Quench – Target insert encoder calibration was in progress at that time – Beam was being horizontally centered on the target, both rasters were on, envelope was 21 mm in diameter, current was 93 nA (ibcm1) – BPM data at time of quench and survey on 1/9/09 of refrigerator “nose” which holds insert indicate that ● insert is 1.6 mm left of coil center, coil center is 2.6 mm left of beam ● when beam was steered right the raster envelope was more than 1 mm away from the coil package at the moment the quench was already in progress (timed from magnet flow data) ● combination of distance from coils, very short time in the vicinity of coils (< 1 s at  1.1 mm) and very low current density (0.3 nA/mm²) of rastered beam makes it unlikely beam may have caused quench – Future insert and beam centering will be done with reduced (  10 mm) raster diameter. – SEM crate trip at time of quench may indicate power transient.

Target Status (III) ● Target has been cooled and it may be ready for magnet powering today ● All Dec review measures have been implemented

Magnet and Beam Data ● Magnet flow [slpm] (red; FI91115), beam current [nA] (green; ibcm1), and beam position [mm] (blue; IPM3H00B.XRAW) vs EPICS time (add 1 h for clock time) on 12/19/08.

Magnet and Beam Data ● Beam position [mm] (IPM3H00A and IPM3H00B), Beam current [nA] (ibcm1) and Magnet flow [slpm] (FI91115) vs EPICS time (add 1 h for clock time) on 12/19/08.

Magnet and Beam Data ● Magnet flow [slpm] (red; FI91115), beam current [nA] (green; ibcm1), beam position [mm] (blue; IPM3H00B.XRAW), LHe level (purple; LL91111) and BPM (cyan; IPM3H00A.XRAW) vs EPICS time (add 1 h for clock time) on 12/19/08

Magnet and Beam Data ● Magnet flow [slpm] (red; FI91115), beam current [nA] (green; ibcm1), beam position [mm] (blue; IPM3H00B.XRAW), LHe level (purple; LL91111) and BPM (cyan; IPM3H00A.XRAW) vs EPICS time (add 1 h for clock time) on 12/19/08

SANE Magnet Review ● Thermal NMR signals from CH2 were observed on 12/19/08 at about 7:00 PM. – The frequency on 12/19 after ~24 h of field on was MHz, B( ) = T – The current at time of persistent mode switch was A, B(I) = T – Current was adjusted to A to center the frequency at 213 MHz – the NMR frequency MHz corresponds to T

Only 4 expert operators are allowed to modify or ramp the magnet current. These are: Don Crabb, Donald Day, James Maxwell, and Jonathan Mulholland. The ramp rates are limited as follows: 0 to 60 A 1.2 A/min 60 to 72 A 0.6 A/min 72 to 28.9 A 0.3 A/min When in persistent mode the power supply is to remain on at the last setting. The helium level in the magnet is to be continually monitored. The EMF across the magnet terminals is to be monitored. The CoO will be modified so that the magnet need only be off during work on the lower platform. It is to remain on during other access work.

Magnet Review Implementation ● Modified operating procedures for energizing and de-energizing maget are posted on the SANE wiki under –

Magnet Review Implementation ● Modified operating procedures for energizing and de-energizing maget are posted on the SANE wiki under –

Magnet Review Implementation ● Modified operating procedures for energizing and de-energizing maget are posted on the SANE wiki under –