Management Advisory Group, Inc. Executive Summary City of Fairfax Compensation and Classification Study July 1, 2016.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Town Hall Presentation January 9-10, 2002 Curtis Powell Vice President for Human Resources The Division of Human Resources and William M. Mercer, Incorporated.
Advertisements

Hubbard County, Minn. Classification and Compensation Study Update GREG MANGOLD| AUGUST 5, 2014.
International Personnel Management Association Making 360 Degree Evaluations Work October 17, 2000 Jim Fox Charles Klein.
Slide Number: Faculty Range Salary Schedule Recommendation March 20, 2012 ALAMO COLLEGES UMGHR HARNESSING THE POWER OF HUMAN CAPITAL.
1. Compensation Objectives In the Compensation Training, we will discuss the details on ANR’s Compensation strategies and how it relates to new hires,
Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Meeting
Values and At Our Best tools to guide us Collaboration – We work together Integrity – We build confidence and trust in all interactions.
Fox, Lawson & Associates Compensation Study Summary Findings
For Professional Staff Bloomington, East, Indianapolis, Kokomo, Northwest, South Bend, Southeast Compensation Program (CSI)
Update on Job Reclassification System Redesign Project Civil Service Senate Patti Dion, Employee Relations Director Sheila Reger, OHR Consulting Team Manager.
Competitive Market Compensation Review July 2009 Project Overview.
© 2007 Hay Acquisition Company I, Inc. All Rights Reserved. State Employee Compensation Oversight Commission Compensation Plan Design October 15, 2007.
SECCP Salaried Employees Compensation and Classification Program June, 2005.
Staff Meeting Compensation Plan Adopted during the November 11, 2010 Board of Supervisor’s Meeting.
Erin Packwood 2005 Competitive Compensation Review Electric Reliability Council of Texas (ERCOT) January 17, 2006.
© 2007 Hay Group. All rights reserved. Review of Unclassified Pay Plan February 1, 2007 State of New Hampshire.
Staff Compensation Program – Phase 2 Internal Equity Adjustments October 2005.
Non-Academic Staff Compensation Program Employee Presentation 2013.
2005 Supervisory and Professional Salary Survey Final Report September 14, 2005.
1 ACC FY07 Classification and Compensation Study.
Classification & Compensation Study Outside firm (BCC) was hired to perform: Classification Study Internal Equity Pay equity compliance Study.
Compensation Project Faculty & Staff Compensation Programs Board of Regents Finance Committee Meeting Project Overview
© 2015 Texas Association of School Boards, Inc. All rights reserved. January 29, 2015 Presented by: Ann R. Patton Managing Compensation Consultant Compensation.
-09/06/13, - Page 1 The Ohio State University - Classification and Compensation Talking Points - CONFIDENTIAL – for internal use only -  Compensation.
Agenda Review Major Changes from January 8 Presentation of Draft Preliminary Results Review Final Recommendations Other Progress to Date  
TOTAL REWARDS ANNUAL ACTION ITEM #2. 2 AGENDA  Purpose of the Presentation  Our Approach  Total Rewards Philosophy Review  Compensation- Current State/Future.
Recommendations Recommendation 1: Regrade the ten classifications found to be 20 percent or more below market midpoint to be in alignment with the market.
MAG Management Advisory Group, Inc.
McGraw-Hill © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Budgets and Administration Chapter 18.
Compensation Study Preliminary Results Overview Presented by: CBIZ Human Capital Services October 26, 2015.
State Administration Staffing a report by the Office of Program Evaluation & Government Accountability FINAL REPORT May 2008 FISCAL OPPORTUNIT Y STUDY.
Classification and compensation Analysis Pilot Project MU Staff Job Title and Salary Study Implementation Update.
McGraw-Hill © 2005 The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All rights reserved Management: Making it Work Chapter 18.
Agenda Study Process Outreach Summary Salary Quartile Analysis
11-1 McGraw-Hill/IrwinCopyright © 2009 by The McGraw-Hill Companies, Inc. All Rights Reserved. fundamentals of Human Resource Management 4 th edition by.
Compensation Study Preliminary Results Presented by: CBIZ Human Capital Services January 11, 2016.
Human Resources Department Bridget Paris, Compensation Specialist Work Session July 7, 2011.
Building Effective Compensation and Classification Systems to Attract and Retain Talented Employees 5050 Quorum Drive, Suite 625, Dallas, Texas
Job Analysis Questionnaire (JAQ) Orientation Session Comprehensive Classification Study City of Hampton, VA Management Advisory Group International, Inc.
Discussion on Compensation. Goal To assist in securing and retaining a staff of necessary quality to achieve the goals and objectives of the organization.
Town of Carolina Beach Executive Summary for the Town Council Classification and Pay Study March 2015.
City of Galveston Classification & Compensation Study Discussion Preliminary Findings and Recommendations.
New Mexico Highlands University
Compensation and Classification Study for Alachua County BOCC, Sheriff, Property Appraiser, and Supervisor of Elections Offices, FL 1 March 2016 Results.
Sawyer County, WI Classification/Compensation Study Employee Briefings January 14,15 and 16, 2014 Carlson Dettmann Consulting, LLC.
Approve a Market Adjustment to the City of Southlake Employee Compensation Program Item 9B.
Compensation and Classification Study for Midwestern State University April 29, 2015 Presentation of Results.
Classification & compensation Study
Wage and Salary Management
Job Evaluation & Base Wage Systems
Compensation Structure and Merit Process
About the Study 1 Summary 2 Market Study Results 3 Recommendations 4.
Project Objectives and Scope Project Work Plan
Iredell County Classification and Compensation Study August 15 –
FOP’s INVOLVEMENT In the development of the pay plan for UDC
Compensation: Creating an Equitable and Market-driven Pay System
Associate Changes Policy: Manager Training
Compensation Program Update
Fox, Lawson & Associates Compensation Study Summary Findings
Job Evaluation Salary Administration Program
Job Analysis Questionnaire (JAQ) Orientation Session
Career Banding Program for North Carolina State Government Employees
University Budget Office (UBO)
Classification & COMPENSATION Study
A Compensation Analysis For Human Resources Professionals
Appalachia Regional Library, North Carolina Board of Directors
Agenda • Introductions • Project Objectives • Project Steps
Teacher Compensation Review
Classification & compensation Study
LUHR Compensation Program.
Presentation transcript:

Management Advisory Group, Inc. Executive Summary City of Fairfax Compensation and Classification Study July 1, 2016

© Management Advisory Group, Inc

Scope of Work  Conducted employee orientation sessions;  Administered and reviewed Job Analysis Questionnaires;  Conducted department head/employee interviews;  Conducted job analysis of all City classifications;  Gathered salary and compensation data from competitor organizations;  Developed a revised classification structure and plan;  Provided a revised compensation and pay plan; and,  Recommended changes to support an internally equitable compensation system. 3

© Management Advisory Group, Inc Peer and Competitors included in the Market Survey  Arlington County  City of Alexandria  City of Falls Church  City of Manassas  Fairfax County  Prince William County  Town of Herndon  Town of Vienna 4 Overall the City was competitive in the market. Individual job placement adjustments were made to more closely align with market when appropriate.

© Management Advisory Group, Inc Recommendations  City of Fairfax proposed average range width:  Fire and Police is 60% with 58% at the top of the structure. This is consistent with market findings.  Unified (general employees) pay plan is also set to a 60% range width, also consistent overall with market findings.  MAG realigned some jobs internally to be competitive with market values and to reflect internal organizational values.  Results:  Establishes a competitive position overall and for all positions.  Makes the entry levels competitive.  Brings the ranges in line with the market. 5

© Management Advisory Group, Inc  The benchmarked positions included in the survey (50) were used as reference points for the overall competitive posture of the City and represented major job families.  The recommended structure reflects a competitive salary structure with a proposed implementation on July 1,  The structure is moved forward to anticipate market changes during this fiscal year. Market Competitiveness Survey Results 6

© Management Advisory Group, Inc Implementation Summary  Both the Fire and Police and the Unified (general employees) pay plans are recommended as “open range” plans, i.e., not steps within the ranges.  Using set criteria for implementation, the Classification Manager software program generates an internally equitable placement recommendation for each individual salary.  Formula for placement of current employees:  Target salary for employees is based on length of service in the current position, calculated down to the total number of days to July 1,

© Management Advisory Group, Inc Equity Adjustment Report – Unified Pay Plan  Proposed equity adjustments are simply a formula to migrate employees from the current pay structure to the proposed structure.  No equity adjustment is intended as a “pay raise”. Equity adjustments are made to bring an individual to the range minimum.  Each individual employee’s current salary is then compared with a target salary based on uniform progression within the plan.  Of the 384 employees covered in this study, 28 employees are below the proposed market minimums.  72 employees are recommended for an in-range equity adjustment.  All other salaries are above the equity adjustment target salary. 8

© Management Advisory Group, Inc Equity Adjustment Report –Estimated Costs for an Implementation Date of July 1, Total of 154 Proposed Classes Covering 384 employees Adjustment to Minimum (28)$ 47,862 Employee equity adjustments based on promotion date. (72) $105,832 Total Estimated Equity Adjustments:$152,694* Number of people with adjustments of any kind.80 Change in Total Payroll for included positions *Salary only – excludes the cost of merit increases for employees who are currently at the maximum of their range..58%

© Management Advisory Group, Inc Recommendations  MAG has provided a “best practices” set of personnel policies for the City’s consideration which include broad suggestions regarding:  Reclassification  Promotion  Lateral Transfer  Demotion  Temporary Assignment  Hiring.  The suggested policies are meant to be a starting point. 10

© Management Advisory Group, Inc Transition Plan Next steps include the following:  Adopt the new compensation plan structure and ranges.  Review, adjust and adopt personnel polices to guide key aspects of compensation.  Implement new structure and equity adjustments. 11