Doc.: IEEE /0583r0 Submission May 2005 Simon Black et al, NokiaSlide 1 STA receiver performance indication Notice: This document has been prepared.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Doc.: IEEE /0256r0 Submission February 2007 A. Centonza, D. StephensonSlide 1 Limitations on the Use of EBR Notice: This document has been prepared.
Advertisements

Doc.: IEEE /0930r0 Submission July 2006 Nancy Cam-Winget, Cisco Slide 1 Editor Updates since Jacksonville Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /0094r0 Submission November 2009 Steve Shellhammer, QualcommSlide 1 Comments on PAR Notice: This document has been prepared.
Doc.: IEEE /2797r00 Submission Oct 2007 Jiyoung et al. Path Selection and Path Switch Mechanism Notice: This document has been prepared to assist.
Doc.: IEEE /0644r2 Submission May 2006 Päivi Ruuska, NokiaSlide 1 Measurement Pilot Transmission Information as optional information in Probe.
Doc.: IEEE /0072r0 Submission January 2009 Slide 1 Proxy ARP Issue for Direct Link Setup Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE.
Doc.: IEEE /0408r0 Submission May 2005 John Klein, SymbolSlide 1 TPC Comments Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It.
Doc.: IEEE /86r2 Submission March, 2010 Gabor BajkoSlide 1 Location Proxy Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is.
Beacon Measurement on Pilot Frames
Submission on comments to +HTC frames
Triggered QoS Measurements
[ Interim Meetings 2006] Date: Authors: July 2005
IEEE White Space Radio Contribution Title
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Waveform Generator Source Code
[ Considering of Intra-cell multiple CBP response]
March 2014 Election Results
Attendance and Documentation for the March 2007 Plenary
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Motion to accept Draft p 2.0
Protected SSIDs Date: Authors: March 2005 March 2005
[place presentation subject title text here]
Descriptive Language Usage in TGv
(Presentation name) For (Name of group) (Presenter’s name,title)
On Coexistence Mechanisms
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
Best Path Selection Mechanism
On Coexistence Mechanisms
Reflector Tutorial Date: Authors: July 2006 Month Year
CID#102 - Channel Allocation for P2P
TGv Redline D0.07 Insert and Deletion
TGv Redline D0.06 Insert and Deletion
Experimental DTV Sensor
DLS Link Timeout Date: Eunkyo Kim
Protection Assurance Method
TGu-changes-from-d0-01-to-d0-02
LB73 Noise and Location Categories
Extended Channel Switch Announcements
IEEE White Space Radio Intended timeline
TGy draft 2.0 with changebars from draft 1.0
TGv Redline D0.10 Insert and Deletion
TPC Comments Date: Authors: January 2005
Solution for 40MHz in 2.4 GHz band
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Redline of draft P802.11w D2.2 Date: Authors:
Simulation Results for Adaptive Rate Control
Off-channel selection
TGu-changes-from-d0-02-to-d0-03
[ Policies and Procedure Summary]
Co-located Interference diagnostics
Path Selection and Path Switch Mechanism
Draft P802.11s D1.03 WordConversion
Path Selection and Path Switch Mechanism
Questions to the Contention-based Protocol (CBP) Study Group
Power Saving for DLS July 2006 Date: Authors: Month Year
TGu-changes-from-d0-04-to-d0-05
Location Capability Negotiation
Method for geting Link RCPI
Transition Nowhere Date: Authors: Sept 2005 Sept 2005
TGu-changes-from-d0-03-to-d0-04
TGu Motions Date: Authors: May 2006 May 2006
Non-AP STA Location Capability
Triggered QoS Measurements
Simulation Results for Adaptive Rate Control
Extended Channel Switch Announcements
WAPI Position Paper Sept 2005 Sept 2005 IEEE WG
Proposal for Diagnostic Alerts
Greenfield protection mechanism
TGu Timeline Date: Authors: July 2005 July 2005
Presentation transcript:

doc.: IEEE /0583r0 Submission May 2005 Simon Black et al, NokiaSlide 1 STA receiver performance indication Notice: This document has been prepared to assist IEEE It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein. Release: The contributor grants a free, irrevocable license to the IEEE to incorporate material contained in this contribution, and any modifications thereof, in the creation of an IEEE Standards publication; to copyright in the IEEE’s name any IEEE Standards publication even though it may include portions of this contribution; and at the IEEE’s sole discretion to permit others to reproduce in whole or in part the resulting IEEE Standards publication. The contributor also acknowledges and accepts that this contribution may be made public by IEEE Patent Policy and Procedures: The contributor is familiar with the IEEE 802 Patent Policy and Procedures, including the statement "IEEE standards may include the known use of patent(s), including patent applications, provided the IEEE receives assurance from the patent holder or applicant with respect to patents essential for compliance with both mandatory and optional portions of the standard." Early disclosure to the Working Group of patent information that might be relevant to the standard is essential to reduce the possibility for delays in the development process and increase the likelihood that the draft publication will be approved for publication. Please notify the Chair as early as possible, in written or electronic form, if patented technology (or technology under patent application) might be incorporated into a draft standard being developed within the IEEE Working Group. If you have questions, contact the IEEE Patent Committee Administrator at. Date: 2005-XX-XX Authors:

doc.: IEEE /0583r0 Submission May 2005 Simon Black et al, NokiaSlide 2 Abstract This presentation introduces the mechanism to carry STAs receiver performance information to other STA.

doc.: IEEE /0583r0 Submission May 2005 Simon Black et al, NokiaSlide 3 STA receiver performance information - background Minimum sensitivity levels are already specified – – – –Typically implementations are better Currently STAs does not have a mechanism to exchange receiver performance information – k-measurement-frame-normative-text introduces measurement frame where Transceiver Noise Floor is carried –However, this is only AP => STA.

doc.: IEEE /0583r0 Submission May 2005 Simon Black et al, NokiaSlide 4 STA receiver performance information A mechanism that enables STA to indicate receiver performance could be useful. –Can indicate minimum required signal level in reception –Can indicate better performance than mandated by the specification –Can be used to finetune APs rate adaptation algorithms –Can indicate ‘interference slots’

doc.: IEEE /0583r0 Submission May 2005 Simon Black et al, NokiaSlide 5 Sudden changes in STA receiver performance In multiradio devices it is possible that activity of other radio causes degradation in STA WLAN receiver performance –For example, GSM/GPRS TX may increase the noise floor by dB –WLAN - BT may collide –Other radios may cause similar effects Typically these are not continuous degradations and typically they have certain characteristics –For example, GSM/GPRS TX has certain slot structure and degraded performance is experienced periodically.

doc.: IEEE /0583r0 Submission May 2005 Simon Black et al, NokiaSlide 6 GSM interference mechanism: WLAN front-end GSM front-end GSM wideband noise desensitizes 2.4GHz ISM band GSM transmission 3 rd harmonic in 5GHz ISM band TRX switch causes harmonics that can’t be filtered out Wideband noise passes transmitter front-end without specific filters

doc.: IEEE /0583r0 Submission May 2005 Simon Black et al, NokiaSlide 7 Example: GSM/GPRS TX and WLAN GSM TX WLAN band interference GPRS TX 2 UL slots 0,577 ms 4,038 ms 1,154 ms 3,461 ms WLAN band interference

doc.: IEEE /0583r0 Submission May 2005 Simon Black et al, NokiaSlide 8 Example: WLAN - BT Simultaneous WLAN and BT usage is causing big problems is not solving the problem –Can control STA side but cannot control AP side, i.e., cannot control WLAN DL transmissions => collisions occurs. BT HV3 SCO TX RX 2 x 625 us 2500 us

doc.: IEEE /0583r0 Submission May 2005 Simon Black et al, NokiaSlide 9 Proposal: Enhanced Link Measurement Report Define new element: STA Performance Indicator Information element The Transceiver Noise Floor field is a signed integer and is 1 octet in length. It shall indicate the noise floor of the receiver used by the STA transmitting the frame in which it appears in units of dBm. The transceiver noise floor is referenced to the connector of the currently in-use receiving antenna The Interference Characteristic field enables the STA to indicate periods of degraded receiver performance due to local interference. The inclusion of this field shall be optional. Details: See next slide.

doc.: IEEE /0583r0 Submission May 2005 Simon Black et al, NokiaSlide 10 Interference Characteristic field The Receive Interference bit-field shall be set to 1 to report degradation in WLAN receiver performance The Transmit Interference bit-field shall be set to 1 to report that the WLAN radio is causing interference to other radio systems at the reporting STA The Periodic Interference bit-field shall be set to 1 to indicate that reported Receive Interference is periodic in nature with known timing The Interference Noise Floor shall indicate the degraded receiver noise floor during the reported interference in units of dBm. The Interference Interval field indicates the interval between two successive periods of interference in microseconds. The Interference Burst Length field indicates the duration of each period of interference in microseconds. The Interference Start Time field contains the lower 4 bytes of the TSF timer at the start of the next interference burst.

doc.: IEEE /0583r0 Submission May 2005 Simon Black et al, NokiaSlide 11 Usage of STA receiver performance information AP can request the information or non-AP STA can autonomously send report if its performance is degraded. If Interference Characteristic fields are not present then it can be used directly for e.g. rate adaptation purposes If Interference Characteristic fields are present then AP can: –Keep the rate same (even if there are lost frames) and try to avoid ‘Interference’ slots –Use more robust rate. However, this is not preferred as it will make the situation in many cases even worse. If interference does not exist anymore, STA can update its performance information by sending frame with no Interference Characteristics fields

doc.: IEEE /0583r0 Submission May 2005 Simon Black et al, NokiaSlide 12 Conclusion STA receiver performance information provides valuable information for the AP –STA can indicate that its performance is degraded STA can specify interference characteristic AP can try to avoid ‘interference’ slots –STA can indicate that its performance is better that mandated by the specifications Direct input for APs rate adaptation logic