Version 0.6 Draft – For Review Huabing Zhao

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Tableau Software Australia
Advertisements

 An essential supporting structure of any thing  A Software Framework  Has layered structure ▪ What kind of functions and how they interrelate  Has.
EJB Enterprise Java Beans JAVA Enterprise Edition
Version 0.3 Draft – For Review Avinash S.  Project Name: SDN-O Drivers  Project Repository name:  Project Description  Provide the network service.
OPEN-O Use Case Design Residential Scenario. Consumer Story  Kaylin is a residential broadband subscriber of CMCC.  Her boy is 8 years old, and begins.
Version 1.0 Olga Havel  Project Name: SDN-O  Project Repository name: sdno  Project Description  Provide the network connectivity.
Version 0.7 Draft – For Review Olga Havel.  Project Name: SDN-O  Project Repository name:  Project Description  Provide the network service orchestration.
OPEN-O Modelling Project Proposal Version 1.2 Draft – For Review Chengli
Version 0.9 Huabing Zhao
OPEN-O Approach 1, 2, 3 and 1.5 Discussion in Beijing.
Open-O NFV-O Project Proposal Version 2.0 Draft – For Review Lingli Deng
Open-O GS-O Project Proposal
SDN-O LCM for Mercury Release Key Points and Overview
Open-O SFC.Mgr Proposal
ONAP Management Requirements
Version 0.1 Draft – For Review Murali Mohan Murthy
OPEN-O VNF Supplier APIs & SDK Project Proposal
Microservice Powered Orchestration
Open-O SDN-O Driver Project Proposal
Orchestration and Controller Architecture Alignment Vimal Begwani AT&T
Daisy4nfv: An Installer Based upon Open Source Project – Daisy & Kolla
Rationalizing ONAP Architecture for R2 and Beyond Vimal Begwani – AT&T
Microservice Bus Tutorial Huabing Zhao
ONAP Project Proposal Training
Open-O Client Project Proposal
OPEN-O CLIENT Planning Mercury Release
Orchestration and Controller Alignment for ONAP Release 1
Open-O Client Project Proposal
OPEN-O Project Proposal Training
Tina Tsou, Bryan Sullivan,
Open-O Project Proposal Template
Aligning Orchestration and Controller Per Merger Agreement Vimal Begwani – AT&T Jamil Chawki – Orange Alla Goldner -- Amdocs.
OPEN-O GS-O Planning Mercury Release
OPEN-O Sun Release Lab Deployment & Assembly
MSB Integration Guide.
Interface to External Controllers and SD-WAN Use Case
OPEN-O Multiple VIM Driver Project Use Cases
Sabri Kızanlık Ural Emekçi
ONAP Interface to External Controllers
ARC: Definitions and requirements for SO/APP-C/VF-C discussion Chris Donley Date , 2017.
OPEN-O Modeling Directions (DRAFT 0)
Open Source distributed document DB for an enterprise
Open-O CLI One Command to command whole Open-O v1.0
ARC 5: Deployment Options Chris Donley
The GEMBus Architecture and Core Components
Project Proposals: ODL-SDNi App
ONAP Run-time Catalog Project
A prototypical tool to discover architecture changes based on multiple monitoring data sources for a distributed system Patrick Schäfer, , Munich.
CHAPTER 3 Architectures for Distributed Systems
Open-O Client Project Proposal
Open-O GUI Project Proposal
Centralize Image Management for ONAP
ONAP – Centralised Parser Distribution Atul Purohit - Vodafone
OPEN-O Nanjing Workshop
Advanced Integration and Deployment Techniques
VF-C R2 Feature Planning & Implementation Yan Yang
Agenda Where we are (Amsterdam Architecture)
Microsoft Build /8/2018 5:15 AM © 2016 Microsoft Corporation. All rights reserved. MICROSOFT MAKES NO WARRANTIES, EXPRESS, IMPLIED OR STATUTORY,
Casablanca Platform Enhancements to Support 5G Use Case Architecture Review 5G Use Case Team June 26, 2018.
Documenting ONAP components (functional)
Multi-VIM/Cloud High Level Architecture
An Introduction to Computer Networking
Management and Orchestration in Complex and Dynamic Environment
Agile App Development with Azure API Management
ONAP Service Capability Management
ESB Modernization Prepared by: OIT As of May 23, 2016.
5G Use Case Configuration & PNF SW Upgrade using NETCONF ONAP DDF, Jan 9, 2019 Ericsson.
GNFC Architecture and Interfaces
ONAP Optimization Framework (OOF) POC for Physical CellID (PCI) Optimization July 30, 2018.
ONAP Architecture Principle Review
Presentation transcript:

Version 0.6 Draft – For Review Huabing Zhao

 Project Name: Common Service  Repository name: commonservice  Project Description Provide the common services for all the other OPEN-O components , including Microservice bus, HA, Driver Manager, Log, Authentication and Protocol Stack.  Project Participants:  China Mobile, Huawei, ZTE  Open for others who are interested

In Scope SDN Driver VNFM Drivers VIM Drivers ACCESS/WAN SDN Controller Drivers NFV SDN Controller Drivers Driver Mgr. Orchestrator Service Model Designer Portal TOOLs Foreman … Ansible GS-O Service Decomposer Service Lifecycle Mgr. Service Formation Abstract NBI SDN-O SDN Res. Mgr. Abstract NBI Abstract SBI NFV-O NFV Res. Mgr. NFV Monitor NS Lifecycle Mgr. Abstract NBI Abstract SBI VPN SDN Lifecycle Mgr. Traffic Optimize VAS Mgr. … SDN Monitor O-Common Lifecycle Mgr. Framework Template Mgr. Model Driven Framework Policy Driven Framework Common Res. Mgr … Compass Common Service Auth. Log Workflow … Catalog Micro-Service Bus Protocol Stack HA EMS/NMS Driver Parser NFV Driver Driver Mgr. Model Designer

 Sub-project1  Microservice Bus  High Availability  Log  Sub-project2  Driver Manager  Protocol Stack  Authentication

 Integration Test Strategy  External and internal interfaces are to be agreed first  Service Registration/Unregistration Interface between Microservice bus and managed services  Interface between HA and managed services  Interface between HA and Microservice bus  Interface between Authentication and Portal  Interface between Dirver Mgr. and Microservice bus  Interface between Dirver Mgr. and drivers  Each sub-team for individual modules are responsible for unit testing separately  The modules in Common Service are independent of each other  Integration into OPEN-O Test Strategy  Common Service will be the offset 0 project and should be available earlier for integration test with depended projects in each release  Have a representative to join the testing project and make sure the testing of Common Service integrated into OPEN-O will be delivered based on OPEN-O Test Strategy defined by the OPEN-O Test Team

 Simplify the communication between services  Within the OPEN-O, there are a lot of service instances, e.g., Catalog, Res Mgr., LCM Mgr., Drivers. These instances are distributed on multiple hosts. That make the communicate between service instances complex because the consumers need to know the addresses of all the service providers. Besides, some services may have multiple instances, which make the consumer harder to locate the service provider. Microservice bus provide a service registration/ discovery and routing mechanism to simply the communications between services. The consumer only need to talk with microservice bus without any address information of individual service providers.  There are three kinds of communications to be supported:  Point to Point  Broadcast  Publish/Subscribe

 Features in release 1  Service Registration – API, file, UI  Service Discovery  Service Call Routing  API Call Logging  Asynchronous Message Routing-Cometd  Features in future releases  Service Registration – proxy  Asynchronous Message Routing-Others

 1 Service Registration/Unregistration  2 Query service instance by service name  3 Consumer call service via API Gateway  4 API Gateway route service call to provider  5 Proxy gets service information from service container environment parameters  6 HA update service status into service registry

Support multiple service registration approaches with minimum invasion to the existing service implementation.  Registered via config file when deploying  Server provider registers itself when starting  Service proxy registers for the service provider  Administrator registers the service provider via UI

Provide HA Capability for OPEN-O Components As an E2E service orchestration platform, OPEN-O is intended to be one of the core business systems for carriers, which means that the systems should have no single point of failure, and should automatically scale out when facing increasing workload. HA component monitors the healthy of all the services of OPEN-O, for example, Res Mgr., LCM Mgr., Drivers, etc., and provides the self-healing and scaling capabilities.

 Access Layer Access layer HA is implemented by load balancer and microservice bus cluster  Load balancer(DNS Server/LVS etc.) –not in HA module scope, OPEN-O can use existing load balancer solution  Microservice bus cluster– in scope  Service Layer Service layer HA is implemented by HA module and microservice bus  load balancing for Stateless services  Master-slave for stateful services  DB Layer DB layer HA is implemented by the DB used by individual services or business logic of individual services- not in HA module scope

 Features in release 1  Microservice Bus Cluster  Load balancing for stateless service  Service healthy monitoring  Features in future releases  Master-slave support for stateful service  Service degradation(Work with Microservice Bus API Gateway)  Automatically scale out the service with increasing workload  Service self-healing

 1 Service healthy monitoring  KPI collecting  Heartbeat testing  Periodically call a dedicated heartbeat interface  Tell from the result of normal service invoking  2 Service scaling & self-healing  Create/Start service  3 Update service status into service registry

In ServiceOverloaded Failed Start Terminate KPI Abnormal Detected KPI Return to Normal Heartbeat Failed  HA changes the status of overloaded service into registry, So API Gateway will not route more incoming requests to it until its KPI return to normal  HA automatically create new service instances based on scaling policy(for example: 80% current instances are in overloaded status)  Failed Services will be isolated and terminated by HA

 There are a lots of services in OPEN-O, and each service may have multiple instances when deployed. As a result, logs are distributed in different servers, which make it’s difficult to looking and finding problem in logs. Log service is targeted to solve this problem by the below methods Aggregate logs into a central storage Parse& Enrich GUI Search & Visualizing tool  Support Audit log(Security, System, Operation, etc.) and Trace log

 Features in release 1  Define a log format standard across all services  Individual service save log in local file  Features in future releases  Centralized log collecting  Log parse & enrich  GUI for log searching & analytic

 1 Log collecting interface  File  Syslog  Stdin

Driver manager works with microservice bus, routes the service call from higher layers to the appropriate driver Drivers register to driver manager and the driver manager then register service for drivers to microservice bus Microservice bus plugin asks driver manager for the destination driver based on the routing rule of driver manager and then route the API call to the specific driver

 1 Drivers register to driver manager  2 Driver manager register service to service registry of microservice bus

RESTCONF Protocol Stack : A REST like protocol running over HTTP for accessing data defined in YANG using datastores defined in NETCONF. RESTCONF is an IETF draft that describes how to map a YANG specification to a RESTful interface. RESTCONF Protocol Stack provide standard API of RESTCONF

Provide an integration Authentication for OPEN-O  Authentication service : As it is one of the common services, can effectively guarantee the user access to system resources. We will not support the concept of tenant in the first release, which will be discussed in the future.

 User Management  Login and Logout  Session Management  RBAC Access Management

REST API Gateway AUTH

 OPENAPI   Specification/blob/OpenAPI.next/versions/3.0.md Specification/blob/OpenAPI.next/versions/3.0.md  Documents  Microservice Bus: Tutorial  TBA

 Contact person   Developers committed to the project  TBA  Initial Committers       

 Current release plan  This is the Release 1 project  Minimum viable product  Provide integration framework for OPEN-O services  Log format standard  Simple user/name authentication  Driver mgr.  Stretch goals  Microservices bus self HA  Service Healthy Monitoring  Milestones <TBD – align with other projects)  Identified gaps  Describe your longer-term roadmap  Microservice self-healing & scaling  Centralized logging  RBAC Access Control

 Link to seed code (if applicable)  Vendor Neutral  All proprietary trademarks, logos, product names, etc. have been removed.  Meets Board policy (including IPR)  Align on OPEN-O license policy

 Project name:  Jira project name: Common Service  Jira project prefix: commonservice  Repo name:commonservice  Lifecycle state: Proposal  Primary contact:  Project lead:  Mailing list tag:  Committers:       