NHT Conference 2013 Reality verses perception……. Medway Council.

Slides:



Advertisements
Similar presentations
Urban Transport Benchmarking Year Two Urban Transport Benchmarking Initiative DEMAND MANAGEMENT Working Group Directorate-General for Energy and Transport.
Advertisements

Satisfaction and Quality of Highway Travel for NYS Residents.
City of Salem Transportation Department Public Opinion Survey Summary Report August 2007 Presented By Tim Hibbitts, Principal Davis, Hibbitts & Midghall,
2 Presentation Overview Study Objectives Survey Design Trip Purpose and Trip Chaining Overview – Satisfaction with Roadways and Transportation in Communities.
Pulsar Advertising Southeastern Institute of Research 1 VDOT Omnibus Study Wave I: December 2004 Pulsar Advertising G January 6, 2005 Southeastern Institute.
Highways and Engineering Savings and Efficiencies Review November 2010.
RESEARCH AND TRAINING SPECIALISTS, INC Concord, North Carolina 2008 CITIZEN SATISFACTION SURVEY Paul C. Friday, Ph.D. President
Rail and the West Midlands Economy EMTA Conference Birmingham, 11/11/11 Peter Sargant Head of Rail Development, Centro.
Big Listening 2010 A summary of surveys 13, 14 and 15.
Huntingdonshire District Council Place Survey 2008 Presentation by Sofia Vartsaki mruk research ltd 9 Northburgh Street London EC1V 0AH Tel :
Kirsty Wells, Scotland Manager, HouseMark Angela Currie, Director, SHBVN.
2008 Missoula Long-Range Transportation Plan Survey May 20, 2008.
Key Findings from the 2008/9 Place Survey. Purpose of the Place Survey  Captures local people’s views, experiences and perceptions about the local area.
Mark King Head of Service StreetCare Update Autumn 2015.
Place Survey 2008/09 Brent Results. What makes an area a good place to live? - Top 5.
Powered by Earswick Village Residents Questionnaire Key Findings October 2015.
Agenda Methodology Major Findings –Perceptions of Congestion –Ease of Travel –Transportation Planning Issues –Interest in Using Public Transportation.
Highways Investment Strategy May Background 1,100 km of roads One of the lowest spends in the country Consecutive years of severe weather Significant.
Moving Ahead The American Public Speaks on Roadways and Transportation in Communities Federal Highway Administration Industry Briefing March 20, 2001.
2004 City Budget Allocation Survey January Since 1997, tracking of City of Vancouver residents’ attitudes on: Main local issues of concern Perceptions.
Putting the NHTS data to work locally NHT Network autumn conference, 10 October 2011 Ben Marshall.
Conducting the survey Ben Marshall, Ipsos MORI February 2009.
The National Highways & Transport Public Satisfaction Survey nhtsurvey.org South West Highways Service Improvement Group The National Highways and Transport.
Working together effectively Ag obair go héifeachtach le chéile Working together effectively Ag obair go héifeachtach le chéile Update Road Management.
NHTS 2012 Customer satisfaction, KBIs & PFIs: the aggregate
1 Ownership.Trust and respect. Inclusion and support. Sustainability. Innovation. Inspiration and passion. Paul Tysoe Asset Management Engineer Northamptonshire.
NHT Survey 2013 Explanation of Indicators. Survey Questions BIs (Benchmark Indicator) KBIs ( Key Benchmark Indicator) Theme e.g. Accessibility e.g. KBI.
Version 1 | Internal Use Only© Ipsos MORI 1 Version 1| Internal Use Only NHS SOUTH EAST STAFFS AND SEISDON PENINSULAR CCG Latest survey results.
Place Survey Workshop 5 th August 2008 Phil Challoner Communications Manager Paul Wright Head of Communities & Regulatory Services Chris Wright Principal.
Garrett Emmerson Chief Operating Officer: London Streets Managing London’s Road Network.
Version 1 | Public (DELETE CLASSIFICATION) Version 1 | Internal Use Only Version 1 | Confidential Version 1 | Strictly Confidential© Ipsos MORI NHTS 2014.
Survey Report Event Survey Report ●Survey Participants469 ●Survey Participation58% ●Total Survey Responses6757 ●Active Attendees814 ●Attendee Networking16744.
1 City of Virginia Beach 2007 Citizens’ Survey Objective: To learn how residents feel about their community and the services provided by the City of Virginia.
Law Society of Scotland Survey of members 2016
Chris Kennedy, Martin Sachs, Mark Stephenson
2017 Community Survey City of Mountain Brook, Alabama
Highlights of the 2007 NRMCA Industry Data Survey
Why do we need a compensation survey
Place Standard How Good is Our Place?
Alexander Needs Assessment
This will help you understand the limitations of the data and the uses to which it can be put (and the confidence with which you can put it to those.
A ‘Value for Money’ monitor that takes account of Customer Satisfaction, Quality and Investment (also know as ‘3 legged stool’) .... helping.
City of Huber Heights Public Opinion Survey
NHS GLOUCESTERSHIRE CCG
Celebrating 10 year of the NHT Network
Rural and Small Community
City of Washougal 2016 Community Survey Findings
Transit Leadership Academy (MTTA)
Quality and purpose: quality in quantitative methods
Lecture 5: Techniques for data collection
Wider NHT Network News Simon Pinkney – m2i.
DirectionFinder® Survey
Law Society of Scotland Survey of members 2016
Place Standard How Good is Our Place?
Law Society of Scotland Survey of members 2017
Law Society of Scotland Survey of members 2016
SPEC Barometer Results
Better mobility for older people
Islington Residents’ Survey 2018 March 2018
NHT Network Update Sharon Andrews 11th September 2018.
Maps, maps, maps.
2010 DirectionFinder® Survey City of Blue Springs, Missouri
Telemedicine in Peru and Nicaragua: an empirical analysis
UNODC-UNECE Manual on Victimization Surveys: Content
‘How satisfied are road users?’
YouGov polling on public priorities for Council spending
Spatial Methodology Introduction Outline of draft Chapter Highlights
Trevor Collett LGTAG Past President & Kier Asset Data Manager
Cllr Martin Tett Leader Buckinghamshire County Council Chair LGA Environment, Economy, Housing and Transport Board Chair England’s Economic Heartland.
Dealing with nonresponse
Presentation transcript:

NHT Conference 2013 Reality verses perception……

Medway Council

Medway Network 840 km of highway network comprising: 110 km of A Roads (including Medway Tunnel) 37 km of B Roads 97 km of C Roads 596 km of Unclassified Roads Predominantly urban network Three distinct geographical areas: - Urban - Chatham, Gillingham and Rochester - Urban - Strood - Rural – Grain Peninsula

National Highways and Transport Survey started in 2008 as a cost-effective way to capture customer opinion It is a perception survey verses factual data………. Includes some maps (to ward level) to allow spatial analysis and allows for breakdown by customer base Helps us understand change – analysis over time Provides a great deal of information for local reporting and also allows for benchmarking ( ) How helpful are the findings and how can we use them in Medway? What is and why NHT

Benchmarking across the SE7 area One of 40+ unitary authorities participating Medway participated in – 2011, 2012 and 2013 Recipient list drawn up by Ipsos MORI based on random sample of Medway addresses 4,500 questionnaires sent to households in Medway summer 2012 with 734 responses, a return rate of 16.31% Why NHT in Medway

Highway spend £ per head of population

Year168 Condition 2008/095% 2009/104% 2010/115% 2011/126% 2012/135% Year169 Condition 2008/0911% 2009/1011% 2010/1112% 2011/1213% 2012/1312% National Indicator NI168 Principal Roads/169 Non Principal Roads

HP26 Satisfaction with roads HP 27 pavements 400 telephone calls to a random sample across Medway, whilst ensuring demographic and protected characteristics are covered Local Tracker

YearHP26 Roads 2011/12 Q146% 2011/12 Q247% 2011/12 Q356% 2011/12 Q450% 2012/13 Q144% 2012/13 Q252% 2012/13 Q349% 2012/13 Q443% 2013/14 Q138% Year HP27 Pavements 2011/12 Q /12 Q270% 2011/12 Q371% 2011/12 Q472% 2012/13 Q169% 2012/13 Q269% 2012/13 Q368% 2012/13 Q466% 2013/14 Q169% Local Tracker

NHT data Year% Satisfied Unitary Authorities (40) Rank All Authorities (75) Rank How satisfied or dissatisfied were the public in transport and highway services? Similar to the Tracker indicator

What do people in Medway think are the priorities? Most important Most in need of improvement Condition of Roads (21%) Condition of Roads (25%) Pavements & Footpaths (19%) Pavements & Footpaths (18%) Safety on Roads (17%) Traffic and Congestion levels(16%)

Satisfaction with Highway maintenance 49% Local satisfaction with road maintenance 48% Close to national average across the theme

Scope to improve against the best performer: condition of road surfaces, speed and quality of repairs and potholes

Fall in satisfaction - obstructions on pavements Significant increase in satisfaction (+11.09%) with cold weather gritting

Satisfaction with cold weather gritting, by ward

In Conclusion, the top 5 areas that people found to be the most important and the most in need of improvement: Condition of roads Pavements and Footpaths Safety on the roads Tackling Congestion Local Bus Services NHT data consistent with locally gathered satisfaction information - suggesting the survey results are a useful gauge of satisfaction General satisfaction with transport and highway services puts us 31 out of 75 authorities (18 out 40 unitary authorities)

Perception verses reality condition data. Why when we have a highway condition survey of around 6% needing maintenance, do we have a satisfaction result of highway condition of less than 50% What more can we do More questions about detail, if an answer is poor, why do they think its poor etc etc

NHT Conference 2013 Phil Moore (TAG President) Head of highways and parking services